System Requirements (URS)

Similar documents
COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS

CUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR 21 CFR 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT. 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ. (Frequently Asked Questions)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union

Computer System Validation Perform a Gap Analysis of your CSV Processes

References Concept. Principle. EU Annex 11 US FDA , (g), (i), 11 Orlando Lopez 2/15/11. Old Annex 11.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union

EU Annex 11 US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines Orlando López 11-MAY-2011

EU Annex 11 US FDA , (g), (i), 11 Orlando López 09-APR

Computerised Systems. Alfred Hunt Inspector. Wholesale Distribution Information Day, 28 th September Date Insert on Master Slide.

EU GMP - Annex 11 Computerised systems Versione corrente Nuova versione per commenti (emessa 8 aprile 2008)

Validation of MES and Manufacturing Automation systems

Regulatory Overview Annex 11 and Part 11. Sion Wyn Conformity +[44] (0)

GAMP5 Validation for Dynamics 365

Summary of Significant Changes. Policy

Reduce paper-based errors

GAMP Guideline & Validation Documentation

White paper: Code of GMP Chapter 4 Documentation - PIC/S versus EU

COMPUTER SYSTEMS VALIDATION

Reduce the time & labor to process and archive documents. Reduce document cycle times. Create audit trails of document handling activities

Use of computerised equipment, software and systems in clinical research

Oracle Tech Cloud GxP Position Paper December, 2016

DATA INTEGRITY ASSURANCE AS KEY FACTOR FOR SURVIVING CORPORATE AUDITS AND REGULATORY INSECTIONS

Take Control of Your Workflow. Agilent Dissolution Workstation Software

PTC s Windchill Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) System Facilitates Part 11 / Annex 11 Compliance

Key changes in new BCSH Transfusion I.T. Guidelines. Debbie Asher EPA Network Transfusion Manager Member, BCSH Guideline Writing Group

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 21 December 2017 Review date: 21 December 2019

JAS Job Approval System. The way it works

10 "Must-Haves" for the Life Sciences Learning Management System

Guidance for Industry - Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Trials

Intland s Medical IEC & ISO Template

Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES) for SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.1

Agilent OpenLAB Enterprise Content Manager REALIZE THE FULL VALUE OF YOUR SCIENTIFIC DATA

Computerised Systems. Inspection Expectations. Paul Moody, Inspector. 18/10/2013 Slide 1. ISPE GAMP COP Ireland Meeting, Dublin, 17 th October 2013

INCREASING YOUR LABORATORY PRODUCTIVITY

to confirm that its document management- and archiving solution fulfils all applicable audit criteria for document management solutions

Application Note. Consistent Formulation Quality Preventing Errors in the Dispensing Room

SIMATIC IT. SIMATIC IT R&D SUITE V7.1 Compliance Response ERES. Introduction 1. The Requirements in Short 2

Computerised System Validation

Atlant s atwatch CAPA TM. Corrective and Preventive Action System (CAPA) Product & Services Bundle for

Ensure Data Integrity Compliance Enterprise-Wide

Apriso and FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Addressing the Paradigm Shift in Regulatory Inspections

TECTURA LIFE SCIENCES HIGHLIGHTS

STUDY CLOSURE AND ARCHIVING

E-CRB System specification

Agilent Dissolution Workstation Software PERFECTING WORKFLOW DYNAMICS

it s project management integrated. intuitive. intelligent

EU Annex 11 update. An ISPE interpretation

Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures for COMOS V10.0

The SaaS LMS and Total Cost of Ownership in FDA-Regulated Companies

TOPCALL SOLUTION FOR CONTENT CAPTURE & DELIVERY

IoT-BASED MATERIAL & ASSET TRACKING FOR AEROSPACE & COMPOSITES

EVM-11-G-001 Does the tool use ITIL 2011 Edition process terms and align to ITIL 2011 N/A. Edition workflows and process integrations?

General European OMCL Network (GEON) QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

The Role of the LMS in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

Clarity CDS since version 7.2 supportive tools for compliance with Title 21 CFR Part 11, EudraLex Chapter 4, Annex 11 and other similar legislation

to confirm that its document management- and archiving solution fulfils all applicable audit criteria for document management solutions

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Reflection paper on GCP compliance in relation to trial master files (paper and/or electronic) for management, audit and inspection of clinical trials

Invu Accounts Payable

SOP SF SOP for Controlled Document Management

Develop a Roadmap for the Implementation of a Global CSV Program. Eileen Cortes April 26, 2017

UNIFI 1.5 : Simplifying Qualification and Validation June 2012

All Data Welcome at inforouter

Paperless Manufacturing Solutions With MES PAS-X and OSIsoft's PI System For Bio Manufacturing

Traka Web. Innovative browser-based key and equipment control software. ASSA ABLOY, the global leader in door opening solutions

Principle Suite & File Stream

The future of. OpenLAB! Bernhard Etrich ChemStore Program Manager

CHANGE MANAGEMENT PLAN OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ENTERPRISE SYSTEM (MOSAIC PROJECT)

Records Management Plan

LIMS FOR TESTING LABORATORIES AN OVERVIEW OF FEATURES AND COMPLIANCE FOR TESTING LABORATORIES

Delivering high-integrity accounting with Xero

ISPE NORDIC COP CLEAN UTILITIES SEPTEMBER TUUSULA FINLAND. Timo Kuosmanen STERIS Finn-Aqua

Life Sciences Nuclear Medicine / PET Radiation Safety. PET LIMS Software.

Implement Effective Computer System Validation. Noelia Ortiz, MME, CSSGB, CQA

SQC. FreeWeigh.Net New dimensions in process control

SESSION 14. Documentation Requirements and Management for Validation. 30 March Frits Vogt

Be Remarkable. CONTRACT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE. Software Overview OVERVIEW. Additional Available Professional Services

ANCHOR ISO9001:2008 RPR-004 MARINE SERVICES REQUIRED PROCEDURE NON-CONFORMING PRODUCTS

Installation Qualification Equipment (Reference SOP: )

Controlling Specification Management. Throughout the Food & Beverage Product Lifecycle

DATASCOPE WMS. Warehouse Management System. Building your success. Version 4.0 DATASCOPE. Supply Chain Optimisation Software

Release & Deployment Management PinkVERIFY

Enterprise Contract Management RFI/RFP Checklist

IBM Rational RequisitePro

Appendix A - Service Provider RACI Model

Web TimeSheet Release Notes Version 8.10

GENERAL PLATFORM CRITERIA. General Platform Criterion Assessment Question

Beamex CMX Calibration Software and GAMP - Good Automated Manufacturing Practices

GUIDELINES ON THE PRINCIPLES OF GOOD DISTRIBUTION PRACTICE OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCES FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE

Laserfiche and SharePoint Integration. Your Potential, realized. Learn More Inside

Waypoint Global Suite Reports

Case Study: Validation Process Efficiency and Cost Reduction Improvements

FaciliWorks. Desktop CMMS Software. Making Maintenance Manageable

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE TEAM INSPECTIONS

ALCOA AND DATA INTEGRITY: PASTAND FUTURE

Electronic I-9 Documentation Guardian Electronic I-9 and E-Verify Compliance with 8 CFR 274a.2

This topic focuses on how to prepare a customer for support, and how to use the SAP support processes to solve your customer s problems.

Implementation Life-cycle SOP

Secure, Efficient Content and Submission Lifecycle Management. QUMAS R&D Solution TM

Transcription:

System s (URS) System Document Control System Document ID URS000XXX Version 1 DOCUMENT APPROVALS Reason For Signature Name Position Signature Date Prepared by Vic Johnson Project Manager Checked for accuracy and completeness by QA representative, FCP Checked for accuracy and completeness by Approved by Quentin Jones QA representative, FCP Director, Quality Assurance, FCP VERSION HISTORY VERSION REASON AUTHOR NUMBER 1.0 Initial Version Vic Johnson VERSION DATE

TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT APPROVALS...1 VERSION HISTORY...1 1 INTRODUCTION...3 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT...3 1.2 SCOPE...3 2 OVERVIEW...3 2.1 BACKGROUND...3 3 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS...4 3.1 shared requirements for electronic data systems...4 3.1.1 General use of system...4 3.1.2 System access...4 3.1.3 Audit Trails / Event Logs...4 3.1.4 Electronic Records...5 3.1.5 Electronic Signatures...5 3.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCUMENT CONTROL...5 3.2.1 Creating a controlled document...5 3.2.2 Reviewing a controlled document...6 3.2.3 Approving a controlled document...6 3.2.4 Archiving a controlled document...6 3.2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS...6 3.2.6 INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS...7 3.3 Constraints...7 3.3.1 LOGISTICAL CONSTRAINTS...7 3.3.2 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT...8 3.4 Implementation s...8 3.4.1 Conversion of existing documents to new system...8 3.4.2 Training...8 3.4.3 Ongoing system use and management...8 Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 2 of 8 6/15/2006

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The purpose of this document is to capture the major user and functional requirements of a document control system. All requirements are identified with a unique number in order to provide the ability to cross-reference requirements to testing in a traceability matrix, if required. The requirements have been organised in sections. The order of the sections and requirements within the sections do not indicate any priority within the system. 1.2 SCOPE The requirements will cover: General System use Regulatory s, such as Audit trails, Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures Document Control s Environmental s Interface s Implementation s 2 OVERVIEW 2.1 BACKGROUND First Class Pharmaceuticals is a pharmaceutical company involved in the manufacturing of Premier medicinal liquid products. FCP is in a state of rapid growth and is actively looking for a document management system as a means of creating and managing compliance documents, and some other types of documents used within the company. The purpose of the document control system will be to: Capture and control the documents that are produced during the development lifecycle of FCP s products Capture and control the documents used in production, such as raw material specifications, finished product specifications, batch records Act as a historical archive for the IP developed during specific phases of product development Monitor and record documents that are sent to partners for the purposes of technology transfer Act as a repository for all the company SOPs Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 3 of 8 6/15/2006

3 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1 SHARED REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS 3.1.1 General use of system 3.1.1.1 3.1.1.2 3.1.1.3 The system should be capable of operating on the current infrastructure without significant upgrades being required. The system must support the use and management of both hardcopy, hand signed original documents and electronic copies of documents. The system should support automatic escalation of overdue actions via FCP s email system. 3.1.2 System access 3.1.2.1 3.1.2.2 3.1.2.3 System access must be restricted to authorised users only and authority checks of users for access and use privileges must be in place. Authorised users must first be logged into the WAN/LAN before they are able to log into the application The network and server hardware must be physically secure 3.1.3 Audit Trails / Event Logs 3.1.3.1 The system must have audit trail functionality that identifies record changes, user ID, date and time, and reason for action/change. The record changes must not obscure preceding data or previously recorded information. 3.1.3.2 Users must not be allowed to disable the audit trail function. Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 4 of 8 6/15/2006

3.1.4 Electronic Records 3.1.4.1 3.1.4.2 3.1.4.3 3.1.4.4 The system must provide the ability to generate accurate and complete records in human readable and electronic form. The system must be able to quickly retrieve (4 hours) electronic records and audit trail records throughout the retention period. The system must ensure that the electronic signature cannot be excised, copied or otherwise transferred to falsify an electronic record by ordinary means. Records must be secured from unauthorised access. 3.1.5 Electronic Signatures 3.1.5.1 3.1.5.2 Electronic signatures must be linked to electronic records. If a user makes a change to an electronic record, the user must be prompted to re-authenticate. 3.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCUMENT CONTROL 3.2.1 Creating a controlled document 3.2.1.1 3.2.1.2 The system must allow any authorised user to create a document. There should be the ability to apply approved templates for each document type. Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 5 of 8 6/15/2006

3.2.2 Reviewing a controlled document 3.2.2.1 3.2.2.2 The system should notify a reviewer that there is a draft document for review. The system should allow for more than one reviewer of a draft document. 3.2.3 Approving a controlled document 3.2.3.1 3.2.3.2 There should be only one document approver. This will usually be QA. The system should automatically notify the approver that there is a document for approval. 3.2.4 Archiving a controlled document 3.2.4.1 The system should allow for the archiving of controlled documents when; The document is no longer required (obsolete) The document has been superseded by a new version. 3.2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Users of the Document Control system will be office and laboratory based staff located at West Melbourne. There are no major unique environmental requirements for this system. 3.2.5.1 The server should be installed in a secured (logical and physical) computer room. Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 6 of 8 6/15/2006

3.2.6 INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS 3.2.6.1 USER INTERFACE 3.2.6.1.1 Client PCs should access the system using a browser and standard Microsoft Office software. 3.2.6.2 SYSTEM INTERFACE There are not expected to be any interfaces to systems other than e-mail. 3.2.6.2.1 Notifications from the system should occur automatically, and therefore there will be a link to the FCP s email system. 3.2.6.3 EQUIPMENT INTERFACE There is no requirement to interface to any laboratory or manufacturing equipment / instrumentation. 3.2.6.3.1 The system must be able to support the use of network printers. 3.3 CONSTRAINTS 3.3.1 LOGISTICAL CONSTRAINTS 3.3.1.1 Users of the systems will be from within several departments at the West Melbourne site. Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 7 of 8 6/15/2006

3.3.2 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT 3.3.2.1 Prefer local support from within Australia. Level 1 FCP personnel Level 2 Local support from within Australia Level 3 - Supplier of Document Control system (if different) 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 3.4.1 Conversion of existing documents to new system 3.4.1.1 3.4.1.2 There should be the provision to automatically migrate existing documents to the new document management system. The mechanism should be documented as either a plan or a procedure. All documents of a particular type should be migrated, even if they are becoming due for review. 3.4.2 Training 3.4.2.1 All personnel involved in configuration, validation, protocol establishment, scheduling, test result entry and reporting will be trained for the required functionality and have their training records documented. 3.4.3 Ongoing system use and management The following procedures should be created. 3.4.3.1 3.4.3.2 Use of the system Change control of the system, covering hardware and software Systems s FCP Doc Control Doc No: URS000XXX Page 8 of 8 6/15/2006