Data Release Information Sheet

Similar documents
Ethiopia - Rural Socioeconomic Survey

Benin Indicator Survey Data Set

The Solomon Islands 2015 Enterprise Surveys Data Set

2018 Resources for HealthIT Vendors

Ethiopia - Socioeconomic Survey

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO AUDIT SERVICES. Outpatient Pharmacy Billing Project #11-018(A) December 2010

The Egypt 2016 Enterprise Surveys Data Set

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS AUDIT AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES

Four Things the Healthcare Manager Needs to Know About Financial Management Systems


3. Which is not an inventory account manufacturing companies have: a) Raw Materials b) Manufacturing Overhead c) Work in Process d) Finished Goods

SAMPLE. Diplomate Practice Assessment Plan (DPAP)

Internal Auditor s Report. The County Council and County Executive of Wicomico County, Maryland:

The Trinidad and Tobago 2010 Enterprise Surveys Data Set

Application for Employment

Who Can Be A Commissioner?

Department of Wildlife Resources North Summit Fire District. Utah Department of Transportation US Department of Agriculture

2018 Resources for Health Care Delivery Organizations

Final Audit Follow-Up As of May 31, 2015

Shelter Helper. Team. Problem Statement and Solution. Stakeholders & Research Goal

Belize 2010 Enterprise Surveys Data Set

The Bahamas 2010 Enterprise Surveys Data Set

WEDI 2015 Health Information Exchange Value and ROI Survey

Contact: Version: 2.0 Date: March 2018

Administrative Services Manager

The School District of Lee County Division of Operations

Terms of Reference for i2i Credit Pilot Study in Zimbabwe. June 2017

electronic Vaccine Intelligence Network (evin)

Audit Follow-Up. Audit of Selected Departments Performing Accounts Receivable Functions (Report #1204 issued February 15, 2012)

11.1 TRACKING COMMODITY FINANCIAL FLOWS

CAQH CORE Phase I Measures of Success. May 2009

University Health Center STRATEGIC PLAN. June 15, 2017

Executive Compensation Framework Program Public Consultation Process

Meeting the Challenges of Converting a Large Establishment Survey from Paper to Electronic Administration

CalWORKs/Child Welfare Partnership Project. Sample Plan Any County, California. Policy Foundation

SECTION II EMPLOYMENT POLICIES

SI Benchmarking Data Elements

How Standardized Data Improved Finance-Revenue Cycle Communication at Ascension Health (E06) Bridging the Gap

Form CMS Transmittal 15 Changes. Compu-Max Version December 11, 2018

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Example Project Valuation Model User Guide

Service Marketing: A practical approach Prof. Dr. Biplab Datta Vinod Gupta School of Management Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur

The County Council and County Executive of Wicomico County, Maryland:

Generating Value from Investments in Business Analytics. Rajeev Sharma, Tim Coltman, Abhijith Anand, University of Wollongong

National HMIS Support: India Experience. Prof. Sundeep Sahay

Office of Multnomah County Auditor

a. Pinellas County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended September 30,2013.

Energy consumption surveys and end uses estimation in the U.S. EIA

Improving Your Revenue Cycle Health: Why Continual Check-ups Are More Crucial than Ever

ONTARIO CENTRE FOR MUNICIPAL BEST PRACTICES SW WD 05 Best Practice Identification Methodology Report

The EVM site selection process and User Guide for the EVM Site Selection Tool

Tonga (Tongatapu) Enterprise Surveys Data Set

How ThedaCare Increased Staff Engagement by 11%

Audit of Producer Cars. Audit and Evaluation Services Final Report Canadian Grain Commission

Examiners Report/ Principal Examiner Feedback. Summer PL Business, Admin and Finance (BA301, BA302, BA305, BA306, BA307 & BA310) Paper 1A

IMV 2006 CT Market Summary Report Featuring results from 2,565 hospital and non-hospital CT imaging sites in the United States

Learning about Clinical Trials

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING MANUAL FOR FIELD STAFF

Broader Public Sector - Executive Compensation Program

Medicare Boot Camp Rural Health Clinic Version

Medicare Boot Camp Rural Health Clinic Version

Medicare Boot Camp Rural Health Clinic Version

TestStream for Epic Hyperspace

ACAP. Austin Competency Analysis Profile. Workforce Department Chair. Conducted January 27, 2016

Seattle Public Schools Office of Internal Audit. Internal Audit Report Construction Management Practices

2007 Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

FINAL REPORT 1. Performance Analysis Project Final Report for Fantastic Sam's salon. Sue Burleson. Franklin University IDPT630-U1WW

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Survey Radio for Resilience Project. DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS: Wednesday 9 July 2014

PART 1: REVENUE INTEGRITY PROGRAM DESIGN, PROCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION CAROLINE RADER ZNANIEC OWNER/FOUNDER LUNA HEALTHCARE ADVISORS

University of Toledo Finance and Audit Committee

ANCHOR ISO9001:2008 RPR-006 MARINE SERVICES REQUIRED PROCEDURE PREVENTATIVE ACTION

Executive Summary Provides the background, scope and objectives, and overall summary and highlights of the engagement

On growing your own future leaders: Succession planning practices of hospices

PRSP and HNP (Health, Nutrition and Population) Resources for PRSP Teams and Appraisal Teams

Creating a Winning Application for the MAP Awards (GS1) Karen Godfrey, CPA, FHFMA Vice President, Revenue Management Baptist Health South Florida

I. Survey Methodology

STRIKING A BALANCE ADMINISTRATIVE COST-SHARING IN SCHOOL HEALTH CENTERS. Thursday, June 15, 2006

THE LONG ISLAND CENTER FOR NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION

State of South Carolina. Classification and Compensation System Study Project Report

Bangladesh - CGAP Smallholder Household Survey 2016, Building the Evidence Base on The Agricultural and Financial Lives of Smallholder Households

Category 2 Involving Your Stakeholders in the Strategic Planning Process & Aligning Strategic Goals

HEALTHCARE RECRUITING LEXICON

Standard Report on Methods and Quality. for Earnings and Labour Costs

Ethiopia - Socioeconomic Survey , Wave 3

Audit Follow Up. Citywide Disbursements (Report #0410, Issued April 15, 2004) As of September 30, Summary

King County Library System 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, WA February 15, 2011 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR

CITY OF JOHNSTON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ANNUAL AUDIT SERVICES

Internal Auditor s Report. The County Council and County Executive of Wicomico County, Maryland:

Treatment of Influential Values in the Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll

a. In total, 29 companies replied to the two surveys. These companies employ approximately 4,000 full-time staff.

Audit of Weighing Services. Audit and Evaluation Services Final Report Canadian Grain Commission

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Internal Audit Annual Report for FY 2017

International Program for Development Evaluation Training (IPDET)

Measurement Systems to Support Quality and Safety. Chuck Derus, MD Vice President - Medical Management

AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: DECLARATION OF QUORUM: Clerk of the Board

BERKSHIRE HEALTH SYSTEMS

Ambulance Contract Billing Report October 12, 2016 KEY CONTROL FINDING RECOMMENDATION STATUS The City should:

Operational Costs of Canal Companies and Irrigation Districts in the Intermountain Region

EMPLOYEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR REPORTING AN INCIDENT

COMMUNITY INNOVATION SURVEY (CIS)

TECHLINK INFOWARE PVT. LTD. MUMBAI INDIA

Transcription:

Data Release Information Sheet Data summary Project name: Access, Bottlenecks, Costs, and Equity (ABCE) project in Gujarat. Date of release: 03/27/2018 Summary: This dataset is from the Access, Bottlenecks, Costs, and Equity (ABCE) project in Gujarat, jointly conducted by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). The dataset provides information at the facility-year level. Data include information on services offered, expenditure, revenue, personnel by category, and other variables related to facility operations. In total, a nationally representative sample of 103 facilities were surveyed. Data were collected through interviews of health providers, direct observation of facility areas, and assisted observation of facility resources. Relevant publications: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI). Assessing Facility Capacity, Costs of Care, and Patient Perspectives: Gujarat. Seattle, WA: IHME and New Delhi: PHFI, 2018. Acknowledgments Collaborating organizations: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar Gujarat state government and district officials Funding institution: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Suggested Citation: Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Public Health Foundation of India. Access, Bottlenecks, Costs, and Equity (ABCE) project in Gujarat, India: ABCE Health Facility Survey 2015-2016. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2018. File inventory File name Description Date Finalized IHME_ABCE_IND_GJ_2015_2016_FACILITY_DATA Public use survey dataset March 27, 2018 _Y2018M03D27.CSV CSV format IHME_ABCE_IND_GJ_2015_2016_FACILITY_DATA Public use survey dataset March 27, 2018 _Y2018M03D27.DTA DTA format IHME_ABCE_IND_GJ_2015_2016_FACILITY_CODE Codebook, with March 27, 2018 BOOK_Y2018M03D27.CSV descriptions of all variables included in the dataset IHME_ABCE_IND_GJ_2015_2016_FACILITY_QUES Health Facility March 27, 2018 TIONNAIRE_Y2018M03D27.PDF IHME_ABCE_IND_GJ_2015_2016_FACILITY_INFO _SHEET_Y2018M03D27.PDF Data structure Questionnaire Data release information sheet March 27, 2018 The data are structured in such a way that each row represents a facility-year (i.e., the variable year in each row corresponds with a given fiscal year). Methodological statement Data collection Data from health facilities in Gujarat were collected with the ABCE Facility Survey from August 2015 to October 2016 by research associates (RAs) hired by PHFI. All data were collected with Surveybe, which allows for survey adaptation and customization based on respondent answers. All collected data went through a thorough verification process between IHME, PHFI, and the ABCE field team. Following data collection, the data were methodically cleaned and re-verified, and securely stored in databases hosted at IHME and PHFI. All instruments used for the ABCE project in Gujarat are available through IHME s Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx): http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/india-gujarat-access-bottlenecks-costs-and-equityproject-2015-2016. Sampling/population To construct a nationally representative sample of health facilities in Gujarat, districts were selected using three strata to maximize heterogeneity: proportion of full immunization in children aged 12-23 months as an indicator of preventive health services; proportion of safe delivery (institutional delivery or

home delivery assisted by skilled person) as an indicator of acute health services; and proportion of urban population as an indicator of overall development. The districts were grouped as high and low for urbanization based on median value, and into three equal groups as high, medium and low for the safe delivery and full immunization indicators. Eight districts were selected randomly from each of the various combinations of indicators, and in addition the capital district was selected purposively. Eight districts were selected randomly from each of the various combinations of indicators, and in addition the capital district was selected purposively. Facilities were sampled from each selected district across the range of platforms identified in Gujarat. In India, sampled health facilities included district hospitals, sub-district hospitals, community health centres, primary health centres, and sub health centres. A total of 9 districts were selected through the county sampling frame, and 103 facilities from those districts participated through the facility sampling frame: One district hospital One sub-district hospital for each sampled district hospital Two community health centres for each sampled sub-district hospital Two primary health centres for each sampled community health centre One sub health centre for each sampled primary health centre Facility type Final sample District hospital 5 sub-district hospital 8 Community health centre 18 Primary health centre 36 Sub health centre 36 Total health facilities 103 Data processing and cleaning Data were processed and appended together. All feedback gathered through the collection and verification process was incorporated into the dataset. Clear data entry-errors and skip patterns were removed. Generally, facilities that answered N/A to questions were treated as zeros while facilities that answered don t know or refuse to answer were treated as missing data. Several variables were identified to clean more extensively (Annex 1). These variables were reviewed by comparing the difference between totals and subcomponents collected in the data as well as ratio outlier detection, among other methods. For a list of assumptions applied to these variables, please contact IHME. The other variables in this dataset have not been analyzed or examined in detail beyond removing skip patterns and apparent data-entry issues.

Inclusion of administrative data Public health facilities in Gujarat rarely provide information about expenditure toward medical supplies and pharmaceuticals. Instead, medical supplies and pharmaceuticals are often paid for through central sources, such as the national or state government. Pharmaceutical expenditures State ministry data from2010 to 2015 have been added to supplement the pharmaceutical expenditure reported by the facility, to capture expenditure exchanged above the facility level. Since vaccines were distributed from central agencies, the expenditure on vaccines was calculated based on the number of doses stored or administered. Imputation and constructed variables Missing values in the following variables have been filled in using the Amelia II package in R (Honaker et al. 2011) using lags and leads of two years. The model was run 50 times, and the final dataset includes the median values over these 50 runs. All variables were imputed at the same time. The model used to fill in missing values was chosen through out-of-sample validation to compare model fit with other viable models; ultimately, the model that minimized the root mean square error (RMSE) across all variables was chosen. This strategy was consistent across all ABCE countries and states. For each variable, there is a corresponding variable with the prefix i_, which indicates an imputed value. The complexity of imputation for such a large dataset prevented researchers from successfully imputing missing values for the over 1,500 variables in the ABCE dataset. As a result, we imputed all major outputs, expenditures, and personnel, but excluded many subcategories of outputs and expenditures. Known data-quality issues To date, the variables pertaining to inpatient visits, outpatient visits, births, immunization doses, personnel totals, and expenditure totals have received the most scrutiny and review by ABCE research team members. Outliers involving other variables have yet to be thoroughly examined in such detail. The ABCE Facility Survey structure varies slightly across countries and Indian states. Therefore, some variables used for the ABCE project in Gujarat may not be directly comparable to those used in other ABCE countries and Indian states. The expenditures reported with these data include any expenditure at the facility level as well estimates of expenditure through central government agencies. Expenditure data do not include the cost of donated pharmaceuticals or medical supplies and equipment. Facility outputs were collected using forms that facilities use to record patient volumes and services provided. This method of record keeping can introduce some inconsistencies between outputs. For instance, for a small number of facilities, the number of family planning visits was higher than the total

number of inpatients recorded. For certain outputs such as inpatient visits and expenditure subcomponents, the totals were more reliable then the subcomponents, so the subcomponents may not add up to the total. For other outputs, the subcomponents were more reliable than the total reported. Some facilities included in the sample had inadequate data for a subset of variables. There were instances where all five years of a certain output or expenditure category had to be imputed. These values are less reliable than the imputation results from facilities where at least one year of data has been reported. You can identify these cases if the variable has all_imp_ preceding its name and the variable you are interested in is 1. If a value has been imputed, note that the total will not be the sum of the subcomponents. Codebooks Variable names and labels can be found in the Excel file IHME_ABCE_IND_GJ_2015_2016_FACILITY_CODEBOOK_Y2018M03D27.CSV. Each codebook contains variable names pertaining to a given module of the survey. You will also find indicators of which variables have been imputed, supplemented with any additional information and variables generated by IHME. Any variable with fy in the name varies over the five-year panel of the data, whereas variables without fy in the name do not vary and were measured at only a single point in time. Public Use Dataset Notes This is a public use dataset. The data have been de-identified. Variables determined to contain identifiable private information, or potentially identifiable private information, for health facilities, health workers, and/or other individuals have been removed in accordance with IHME s microdata release protocol. The protocol s determination for variables that constitute identifiable private information is based primarily on HIPAA S De-identification Standard. Citations Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M. Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011: 1-47. Additional Information Terms and Conditions http://www.healthdata.org/about/terms-and-conditions

Contact information To request further information about the ABCE project in India or in other countries, please contact IHME: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation 2301 Fifth Ave., Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98121 USA Telephone: +1-206-897-2800 Fax: +1-206-897-2899 Email: data@healthdata.org www.healthdata.org These files may be updated periodically, so we appreciate hearing feedback or additional information about how these data are being used. Annex 1. Variables that have been cleaned, imputed, or both for the ABCE project in Gujarat Variable name Variable description Cleaned Imputed Expenditure te_fy_tot Total expenditure X atq_fy_1 Total administrative and training expenditure X X nm_fy_1 Total non-medical expenditure X X iu_fy_1 Total infrastructure expenditure X X mse_fy_1 Total medical supplies and equipment, X X pharmaceuticals, and vaccine expenditure ps1_fy_1 Total expenditure on personnel X X ps2_sal_fy_1 Total expenditure on salaries X Personnel pers_fte_fy_1 Total personnel X Doctors_fy Total # of doctors X X Nurses_fy Total # of nurses X X Paramed_fy Total # of other medical personnel X X Nonmed_fy Total # of non-medical personnel X X Outputs opc_fy # of outpatient visits X X ipc_fy # of inpatient visits X X Births_fy # of deliveries X X Opcv_fy # of immunization doses X X Inputs fac_beds # of beds X X