A Summary of Feeding Market Cows for the White Fat Cow Market

Similar documents
A Seven Year Summary of Feeding Cull Market Cows

Iowa 4-H Beef Carcass Summary

Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn

Factors Affecting Lot Low Choice and Above and Lot Premium Choice Acceptance Rate of Beef Calves in the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Program

Performance and Carcass Traits of Market Beef Cattle Supplemented Self-Fed Byproducts on Pasture: Final Report

Finishing Beef Cattle on Grass Supplemented with Self-fed By-Products

Comparing Iowa 4-H Beef Carcass Programs with the 2016 National Beef Quality Audit Carcasses

Beef Cattle Feeding in a Deep Bedded Hoop Barn: A Preliminary Study

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

Effect of Feed Delivery Management on Yearling Steer Performance

ECONOMICS OF FEEDING MARKET COWS USING DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 1

Making Beef Out of Dairy

EFFECTS OF LIMIT FEEDING ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS

FEEDLOT AND CARCASS DATA: MAKING CENTS AND MAKING DECISIONS

Effects of Internal Parasite Infection at Feedlot Arrival on Performance and Carcass Characteristics in Beef Steers

Key words: Beef feedlot, performance, natural supplement

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

Traits of Cattle That Hit the Quality Target Gary D. Fike Feedlot Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC

Strategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Economics of Adding Value to Cull Cows

The Use of Real-Time Ultrasound to Predict Live Feedlot Cattle Carcass Value

A Producer Survey of Feeding Corn Co-Products in Iowa

Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves

2003 Spring Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

The Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production

Marketing Cull Cows How & When?

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs: A Progress Report

A Refresher Course on Finishing Cattle in Tennessee. Genetics, Quality and Efficient Production for Marketing

FACTORS INFLUENCING PROFITABILITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS

The Use of Real-Time Ultrasound to Predict Live Feedlot Cattle Carcass Value

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

What Value Looks Like to a Feedyard. By Tom Brink

Pasture Supplementation of Distillers Dried Grains to Growing Heifers in Southern Iowa

Key Points. Introduction. Materials and Methods. Sides G, PhD * ; Swingle S, PhD ** January 2008

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Why Do They Discount My Heifers So Much? T.A. Thrift and J. Savell University of Florida

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Silage for beef cattle 2018 CONFERENCE. sponsored by: LALLEMAND ANIMAL NUTRITION

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

Breeding for Carcass Improvement

Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

Fatty Acid Profiles and Content of Pasture- and Feedlot-Finished Beef Steers Supplemented with 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Prior to Harvest

EFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS. Story in Brief

Corn Silage and Earlage Nutrient Analysis

Utah State University Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Ranch to Rail Summary Report

Decisions, Decisions, What do I do with my calf crop? R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D. University of Georgia Tifton Campus

Investigating New Marketing Options to Increase Beef Production in Ontario

PERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS. D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

co-products ethanol for cattle Distillers Grains for Beef Cows

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Improving the Value of Cull Cows by Feeding Prior to Slaughter 1

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Indiana Beef Evaluation and Economics Feeding Program

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Beef & sheep business management

A 13-Year Summary of the ISU Beef Cow Business Record

University of Florida Presentation. By: Jerry Bohn

Beef & sheep business management

Corn Silage for Beef Cattle

CATTLE MAY HAVE A DECENT, BUT VOLATILE YEAR

Sell or Keep to Upgrading Cull Cows Profit Projection

Backgrounding Cow-calf. Backgrounding for Profit. Backgrounding Cow-calf. Backgrounding Cow-calf VA Veterinary Conference 2/27/16

2010 UW Extension Cattle Feeder Clinic Proceedings 1

2012 Iowa Dairy Farm Survey

Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers

EFFECT OF SIRE BREED ON STEER PERFORMANCE, CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS, BOXED BEEF YIELDS AND MEAT TENDERNESS

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report. Performance Information

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

Extruded complete feed for finishing cattle

Iowa Beef Center. Animal Industry Report. Dan Loy Iowa State University, Patrick J. Gunn Iowa State University,

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Spotted Profits VS. Solid Profits Jessica Leetch AGEC 4960 March 1, 2010

A COMPARISON OF BARLEY DISTILLERS DRIED GRAIN, SUNFLOWER MEAL AND SOYBEAN OIL MEAL AS PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS IN BACKGROUNDING RATIONS

Impact of Drought on Northwest Iowa Beef Cow- Calf Operations

Organic Dairy Performance in 2015

FUNDAMENTALS. Feeder Calf Grading. Jason Duggin and Lawton Stewart, Beef Extension Specialists.

Cull Cow Marketing And Feeding Alternatives. Dillon M. Feuz - Utah State University and John P. Hewlett University of Wyoming

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Grassing Costs. in Manitoba

Retained Ownership Budget Templates User s Guide

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Cattle Comfort Reducing Heat and Cold Stress

Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Finishing Cull Cows. Robert Hand and Brenda Ralston. Take Home Message. Considerations For Feedlot Finishing Cows

Nutrition, facilities, and management of the Holstein steer. Steven Rust Michigan State University

Application of Carcass Ultrasound in Beef Production. T. Dean Pringle Animal and Dairy Science University of Georgia

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

Impacts of Crossbreeding on Profitability in Vertically Coordinated Beef Industry Marketing Systems

FINPACK. Livestock Budgets. Based on 2015 FINBIN Database Reports

September Implications of Postweaning Nutrition on Carcass Characteristics and Feed Costs. Calendar. Dan Drake, Livestock Farm Advisor

Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

Influence of Cow BCS and Late Gestation Supplementation: Effects on Cow and Calf Performance 1

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Transcription:

Animal Industry Report AS 650 ASL R1888 2004 A Summary of Feeding Market for the White Fat Cow Market Daryl R. Strohbehn W. Darrell Busby Dennis D. DeWitt Perry Beedle III Recommended Citation Strohbehn, Daryl R.; Busby, W. Darrell; DeWitt, Dennis D.; and Beedle, Perry III (2004) "A Summary of Feeding Market for the White Fat Cow Market," Animal Industry Report: AS 650, ASL R1888. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ans_air/vol650/iss1/47 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal Science Research Reports at Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Animal Industry Report by an authorized editor of Digital Repository. For more information, please contact digirep@iastate.edu.

A Summary of Feeding Market for the White Fat Cow Market A.S. Leaflet R1888 Daryl R. Strohbehn, Professor of Animal Science, W. Darrell Busby, Dennis D. DeWitt, Extension Livestock Specialists and Perry Beedle III, County Extension Education Director Summary and Implications Three groups of culled market cows were fed high concentrate rations at three locations in Iowa to demonstrate the possibilities of finishing for the White Fat Cow market. Final shrunk weights ranged from 1378 to 1609 pounds, while average daily gains ranged from 2.78 to 3.87 pounds daily on a 70 to 90 day program. Dry matter feed efficiency on a shrunk basis ranged from 9.98 to 12.03 pounds per pound of gain. From 74 to 89 percent of the cows qualified in the Premium White Fat grades. Net profit ranged from $52 to $89 per head, but it is important to realize that net profit is very dependent on buy sell margin and these demonstration feed outs were done in the time frame where very positive seasonality prices existed. Introduction Marketing cows and other nonproductive breeding stock from the cow herd accounts for 20% of the gross income in cow-calf operations. Achieving additional gross income from these marketings have the potential of improving the profit picture. In recent years fed cows that reach the market with the finish that is designated as white fat bring premiums over normal cows that are sold into the cutter, canner, utility or commercial grades. This demonstration project was devised to investigate the efficiency, marketing and potential profit of feeding normally culled breeding cows for the white fat market. Materials and Methods The Iowa Center, in conjunction with the Tri- County Steer Carcass Futurity, Iowa Lakes Community College, ISU Extension and a producer, Marckmann- Wallace, conducted three feeding demonstration in 2002-03 to examine whether high energy feeding programs would achieve white fat status in market cows. All cows in this demonstration project were consigned by local producers. Forty-eight cows were started on feed with a Tri-County cooperating feedlot, 27 cows were started at the Iowa Lakes Community College feedlot and 27 cows were fed at the Marckmann-Wallace feedlot. A great deal of variation existed at the beginning for weight and condition score (see table 1). A beginning market value was assigned to each individual cow by staff based on condition, estimated dressing percent and appeal to the live market. were delivered in early November and December and implanted upon feedlot arrival with Revalor H. Vaccinations included using a modified live program, this included the overeating toxoids. were started on feed slowly using lower energy rations at the start and worked up to typical finishing rations containing MGA and an ionophore after 30 days. Final rations contained 55 to 61 megacalories per hundred pounds of dry matter (see rations in table 2). Each of the three groups experienced problems with cows that either entered the test unsound or became that way during the feeding period, were unacceptable from a disposition standpoint or were open yearling heifers, thus not belonging in this project. It is imperative that producers be selective in the type of market cows fed for this type of market. Besides having the potential for muscle thickness and good depth of body, cows should be structurally sound, healthy and thrifty. The two southwestern Iowa groups were harvested in January and February while the remaining northwest Iowa group was harvested in March. American Foods Group in Green Bay, Wisconsin was the cooperating harvest facility. Data collected at the harvest facility was hot carcass weight, fat cover between the 12 th and 13 th rib, ribeye area, an estimate of percent kidney, heart and pelvic fat, calculated yield grade, and the plant house grade and price. Results and Discussion Weight gains as shown in table 3 varied depending on the energy level fed, however, average daily gain (ADG) exceeded the expectations of clientele involved in the demonstration. These demonstration beef cows had shrunk ADG from 2.78 to 3.87 lbs. As expected, feed efficiency was poor with the three groups of cows averaging 10.86 lbs of feed dry matter per pound of gain with a range of 9.98 to 12.03. However, this low feed efficiency should be expected due to large maintenance requirements and predominantly carcass fat gain. The Tri-County and Iowa Lakes Community College groups were ultrasounded for carcass traits shortly after arrival and averaged.20 and.16 for backfat, respectively. From a carcass perspective, the cows developed significant fat cover in a relative short feeding period (see table 4), going from.20 to over.60 in 70 to 90 days. Management of the marketing program is vital in order to keep cows from becoming overly fat, thus suffering financially from Yield Grade discounts.

Nearly 90 percent of the cows graded in the premium price categories. Depending on the group from 74% to 89% of the cows made it into the #1 or #2 Premium White Fat grades. These premium grades were achieved in 70 to 90 days. Due to the low feed efficiency, the feed cost per hundredweight ranged from $47.84 to $56.82. Additionally, non-feed cost was high in comparison to most other finishing cattle programs. This is due to many factors, including: increased transportation costs (fewer cattle per truck load) and higher yardage fees due to additional bunk space requirements on a per head basis. However, there are certain parts of the cattle marketing cycle when added returns are possible as seen in this demonstration. The average net profit for these three groups of cows averaged over $72 per head. But keep in mind these cows were fed from November to March and generally the price seasonality is favorable during that time frame and certainly was in this project. Acknowledgments The Iowa Quality Cull Cow Project was a joint effort between the Iowa Center, the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Coop and Iowa Lakes Community College. The three cull groups were fed at the Bentley East Feedlot of Macedonia, Iowa; the Delmar Marckmann Feedlot of Greenfield, Iowa; and the Iowa Lakes Community College Feedlot near Emmetsburg, Iowa. The authors wish to thank Neil Williamson, ILCC, Ron Irvin, retired ISU extension and Tri-County staff for data collection and processing and the staff at American Foods Group at Green Bay, WI for harvesting the cattle and providing financial support for transportation of the cows to their facility. Table 1. Beginning head counts, market values, weights and condition scores. NW Iowa Extension & Iowa Marckmann Wallace Tri-County No of Head 27 27 48 Market value $/cwt $36.40 $34.57 $36.19 Average Delivery Wt 1121 (range 724-1662) 1316 (range 1090-1605) 1254 (range 896-1630) Average Condition Score 4.2 (range 2-8) 4.6 (range 3.7-6) 5.2 (range 3-8)

Table 2. Rations fed to market cows at three locations. NW Iowa Extension & Iowa Ration 1 Ration 2 Ration 3 Ration 4 % As Fed Basis Hay 12.5 12.5 12.5 6.5 High Moisture Corn 25.0 36.0 49.0 63.0 Corn Silage 60.0 49.0 36.0 28.0 Soybean Meal 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Urea Supplement 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 NE gain Mcal/cwt, DM basis 51 54 57 61.5 % Crude Protein, DM basis 12 12 12 11.5 Marckmann Wallace Rations Ration 1 Ration 2 Ration 3 Ration 4 % Dry Matter Basis Corn: 85% dry matter @ $2.30/bu 0 % 0 % 7.7 % 47.4 % Earlage: 79.5% dry matter @ $65.53/ton 67.2 % 79.2 % 82.4 % 42.3 % Haylage: 60% dry matter @ $49.41/ton 29.4 % 18.3 % 6.0 % 6.2 % Supplement: 80% dry matter @ $259/ton 3.4 % 2.4 % 3.3 % 3.4 % Limestone: 92% dry matter @ $60/ton 0 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 0.7 % NE gain Mcal/cwt 48 52 56 61 % Concentrate, DM basis 56 % 65 % 76 % 84 % % Crude Protein, DM basis 11.6 % 10.7 % 10.4 % 10.4 % Tri-County Feedlot Rations Ration 1 Ration 2 Ration 3 Ration 4 % Dry Matter Basis Corn: 85% dry matter @ $2.30/bu 27.1 % 34.4 % 44.8 % 57.5 % Ground Hay: 80% dry matter @ $85/ton 41.4 % 33.1 % 22.4 % 12.0 % Corn Silage: 35% dry matter @ $25/ton 8.5 % 8.7 % 8.7 % 5.7 % Wet Corn Gluten: 60% dry matter @ 21.9 % 22.4 % 22.3 % 22.4 % $68.39/ton Supplement: 92% dry matter @ $295/ton 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % Limestone: 92% dry matter @ $100/ton 0 % 0.3 % 0.6 % 1.0 % NE gain Mcal/cwt 49 52 56 61 % Concentrate, DM basis 53 % 61 % 72 % 83 % % Crude Protein, DM basis 13.8 % 13.6 % 13.2 % 13.0 %

Table 3. Gain, efficiency and gain cost of market cows at three locations. NW Iowa Extension & Iowa Marckmann Wallace Tri-County Days on Feed 94 87 69 or 90 Feedlot Weight 1411 1669 1616 Feedlot Weight, Shrunk 1378 1609 1548 ADG, Shrunk 2.78 3.78 3.87 Feed Efficiency, Shrunk 12.03 9.98 10.57 Average NEg Mcal/cwt 54.6 58.0 59.3 Average Ration Dry Matter 58% 79% 69% Feed cost/cwt shrunk wt $56.82 $47.84 $56.62 Total cost/cwt shrunk wt $87.81 $73.20 $84.96 Table 4. Carcass data on market cows at three locations. NW Iowa Extension & Iowa Marckmann Wallace Tri-County Hot Carcass Wt 787.1 917 880 Dress % Feedlot Wt 55.6% 54.9% 54.3% Fat Cover, Inches.51.66.64 Ribeye area, sq.in. 12.3 12.6 12.9 %Kidney, heart & pelvic fat 1.78 1.8 2.0 Calculated Yield Grade 3.19 3.97 3.14 % Yield Grade 3 or less 92.6% 67% 57% % Yield Grade 4 7.4% 22% 25% % Yield Grade 5 0% 11% 18% House or USDA Quality Grades # 1 Premium White Fat 66.7% 89% 70% # 2 Premium White Fat 7.4% - 12% Boning Utility/Dark Cutter 7.4% 7% 2% Holstein Choice - - 2% Low Choice 11.1% 4% 2% Select + 3.7% - 2% Standard - - 2% Cutter/Canner 3.7% Unknown/Not Reported - - 8% Table 5. Feed and non-feed costs and profit in feeding programs. NW Iowa Extension & Iowa Marckmann Wallace Tri-County Carcass Price $/cwt $89.98 $85.59 $84.57 Live Price Shrunk wt $/cwt $51.41 $48.77 $48.39 Feed cost/cwt shrunk wt $56.82 $47.84 $56.62 Non-feed cost/cwt shrunk wt $30.99 $25.36 $28.34 Total cost/cwt shrunk wt $87.81 $73.20 $84.96 Profit $/head $74.06 $89.72 $52.71