SITE INVESTIGATION Validation and Interpretation of data

Similar documents
Typical set up for Plate Load test assembly

Subsurface Investigations PDCA Professor s Driven Pile Institute. Loren R. Anderson Utah State University June 25, 2015

Exploration, Sampling, and In Situ Soil Measurements. Dr. Omar Al-Hattamleh

Mariamman Kullam. Mariamman kullam TOILET BLOCK. 2m wide pathway

Conventional Field Testing Methods and Issues

Ch 6 Foundation Engineering

Site Investigation MUHAMMAD AZRIL HEZMI

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED OUTFALL LOCATION CITY OF MORGAN S POINT DRAINAGE HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REPORT NO

Go back to Basic Assessment of Soil Stiffness

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT. FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR PROPOSED 2 x 25 MVA 66/11kV G-1 SUB-STATION AT DWARKA, NEW DELHI.

CERTIFICATE FOR: CADD CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD

June i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Soil Mechanics Lab ECIV 3151 Final Exam 2016/2017

TG 10l SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WATER CORPORATION

Code No: RR Set No. 1

CERTIFICATE FOR: CADD CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD

SITE INVESTIGATION. Foundation Engineering

2.6 Methods of Soil Sampling

REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED 33/11 KV SUB STATION AT JAUN SAMANA, MARIPAT, GREATER NOIDA IN UTTAR PRADESH

UPDATED 04 OCT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Compressibility of Soil. Chapter 11

Consultant Specifications for Subsurface Investigation & Geotechnical Analysis and Design Recommendations

Module - CE 3132 Geotechnical Engineering Assignment Triaxial Test Marks 10% Learning Outcome

GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (1449-R2-NALANDA UNIVERSITY)

Site Location. Figure 1: Site Location Map US-24 and I-275 Interchange Ash Township, Monroe County, Michigan

RAO ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES Geotechnical Consultants, Land Surveyors, Piling Contractor & GPR Surveyors

SOIL MECHANICS CIVIL ENGINEERING VIRTUAL LABORATORY

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

A Case Study: Foundation Design in Liquefiable Site

Inclusion Effect on Heterogeneity of Excess Pore Water Pressure Distribution in Composite Clay


Area Ratio A % % = 16.88%

Lecture on Foundation Settlements-immediate settlement

A Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil & Soil investigation

CEX6230 GEOTECHNICS Dear Student:

EXHIBIT G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (DRAFT)

CONTRACT 5E-2 APPENDIX A - TEST HOLE LOGS DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. PORTAGE AVE WINSTON DR BOURKEVALE CAVELL PARKSIDE DR ASSINIBOINE AVE

Estimation of in-situ water content, void ratio, dry unit weight and porosity using CPT for saturated sands

Investigation of Foundation Failure of a Residential Building A Case Study

Introduction to CPT. Peter K. Robertson. Santiago, Chile. CPT in Geotechnical Practice. July, 2014

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT B-1942

Stress-Strain and Strength Characteristics of Sand-Silt Mixtures

New Development -Sonic Drilling with Sampling

4. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE DATA REPORT

Analysis of Four Load Tests on Augered Cast-in-Place Piles in the Texas Gulf Coast Soils Raghu Dass, PE, Woodward Vogt, PE, and Frank Ong, PE

WEEK 5 ACTIVITY. Lecture (2 hours)

COURSE ON COMPUTATIONAL GEOTECHNICS A Geotechnical Design Tool. Faculty of Civil Engineering UiTM, Malaysia

2012 Soil Mechanics I and Exercises Final Examination

TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Brooks/Cole Thomson LearningiM. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering. Braja M. Das. California State University, Sacramento

Effectiveness of Gel-Push Sampling Technique to Retrieve Undisturbed Sandy Specimens for Liquefaction Test

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CARSON FREEWAY CLEARVIEW DRIVE GRADE SEPARATION CARSON CITY EA DECEMBER

Pile foundations Introduction

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT US 93 WILDLIFE UNDERCROSSINGS North of Wells, Nevada E.A July 2009

PROJECT INFORMATION...

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 2 MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS CE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT 1

Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation Report

Capability Statement

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

Developing Subsurface Exploration & Testing Programs Considering Geophysics & In-Situ

Seismic Design & Retrofit of Bridges- Geotechnical Considerations

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT US 93 WILDLIFE OVERCROSSING At HD SUMMIT North of Wells, Nevada E.A December 2009

WASH STRUCTURE B-420 S EA

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

Geotechnical Investigation at Various Locations in Bangalore

Ground Improvement. Martin G. Taube, P.E., P.G. February 4, 2003

Beyond Engineering & Testing, LLC.

J.-H. YIN Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF PLASTIC AND NON-PLASTIC FINES IN SOIL

Comparison of the results of load test done on stone columns and rammed aggregate piers using numerical modeling

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GANDHINAGAR Department of Civil Engineering Soil Mechanics Laboratory

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture Shear Strength of Soil II (Das, Ch. 11)


GATE SOLVED PAPER - CE

Electrical Conductivity & Hydraulic Profiling. The Combining of Two Subsurface Investigation Methods (With More to Come)

FULLY AUTOMATIC TRIAXIAL TESTER (T-5001/A) ASTM D2850 D4767 D7181

WINDSOR PARK LIBRARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 1201 ARCHIBALD STREET WINNIPEG, MANITOBA

Geotechnical Engineering Report

APPENDIX A DRAINAGE STUDY PHASE 2 ALTERNATIVE IMPROVEMENTS CRYSTAL LAKE ALTERNATIVE 4C IMPROVEMENTS LAKEWOOD PIRATELAND SWASH HORRY COUNTY, SC

Unconfined compression strength Instrument Set Up

Page 4 Blythe Municipal Airport Project County of Riverside, California December 7, 2015 CTE Job No G

Foundation Engineering CE Introduction. Prof. H. Alawaji. Room No. 2A- 47/1, Tel

PARAMETRIC STUDY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION BEARING CAPACITY IN CLAYEY SOIL

Pavement materials: Soil

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Figure (12.1) Foundation Grouting

Compaction and Jet Grouting

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT US 95 WIDENING ANN ROAD

mtec REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FTFA Construct Bin Wall at HERD Eglin AFB, Florida

Terraprobe Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering Construction Materials Inspection & Testing

The effect of degree of saturation and consolidation pressure on monotonic behavior of reinforced earth seawalls

NODIA AND COMPANY. GATE SOLVED PAPER Civil Engineering Geotechnical Engineering. Copyright By NODIA & COMPANY

SETTLEMENTS DUE TO TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION

RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTAION OF DMG SPECIAL PUBLICATION 117 GUIDELINES FOR ANALYZING AND MITIGATING LIQUEFACTION IN CALIFORNIA

POWER-INSTALLED FOUNDATIONS, GUY-ANCHORS AND INSTALLING EQUIPMENT

4. FIELD VANE SHEAR TEST (VST) One of the objectives of this research is to correlate the high quality CRS

Transcription:

SITE INVESTIGATION Validation and Interpretation of data Dr. G.Venkatappa Rao The Impact 1

The Need To determine the type of foundation To assess bearing capacity/settlement Location of Ground water table,issues related to construction Identification of potential problems to adjacent structures Identify environmental issues 3 Soil a Unique engineering material Does not possess a linear or unique stress-strain relationship Behaviour depends on pressure, time and environment Essentially different at every location Cannot be seen in entirety like other building materials Sensitive to disturbance 4 2

Sampling for Laboratory Testing volume/scale limitations with sampling. The total volume of the samples is approximately 1/250,000th of the stressed ground. Steps in Geotechnical Investigation Reconnaissance Preliminary Investigation Detailed Investigation Planning - Numbers,Depths,Locations,Types Drilling/Boring Field Testing/Sampling Laboratory Testing Report Writing Report Validation/Choice of design parameters 6 3

Sampling Methods a guide to sampling methods. Why Soil Classification Disturbed soil samples Classification Coarse grained or granular soils Fine grained or cohesive soils Boulders Gravel Sand Silt Clay 8 4

Soil as an Engineering Material Soils can rapidly change its properties depending on its microstructure and the way this microstructure interacts with pore water and external loads. Landslide in a quick clay. Strength loss of a sensitive clay, or quick clay, which liquifies during remolding. Sampling Disturbance distortion of bedding by a tube sampler. smooth penetration with correct sampler jerky penetration with correct sampler smooth penetration with incorrect sampler. 10 of 54 5

16-10-2017 Quality Evaluation Strength Results No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 11 Quality Evaluation Stress strain curves 12 6

Quality evaluation -- e log p curves 13 Soil and Water Most geotechnical engineering problems are associated with water: water flow through voids and pores in the soil mass pore water pressures, effective stresses and consolidation seepage forces 7

Fig. 1 Alignment of boreholes 15 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) 14 Oct 2017 Site Investigation - Validation RAO G V 16 8

Procedures which may affect Measured N Values Inadequate cleaning of the borehole Not seating the sampler spoon on undisturbed material Driving of the sample spoon above the bottom of the casing Failure to maintain sufficient hydrostatic head in boring Attitude of operators Overdrive Sampler SPT is only partially made in original soil. Sludge may be trapped in the sampler and compressed as the sampler is driven, increasing the blow count. (This may also prevent sample recovery.) Incorrect "N" values obtained "N" values are increased in sands and reduced in cohesive soils The water table in the borehole must be at least equal to the piezometric level in the sand, otherwise the sand at the bottom of the borehole may be transformed into a loose state Blow counts for the same soil using the same rig can vary, depending on who is operating the rig, and perhaps the mood of operator and time of drilling Higher blow counts usually result from overdriven sampler Sampler plugged by gravel Higher blow counts result when gravel plugs sampler, resistance of loose sand could be highly overestimated. 17 Procedures which may affect Measured N Values Plugged casing Over-washing ahead of casing Drilling method Not using the standard inner drop Free fall of the drive weight is not attained Not using correct weight Weight does not strike the drive cap concentrically Not using a guide rod High "N" values may be recorded for loose sand when sampling below groundwater table. Hydrostatic pressure causes sand to rise and plug casing. Low blow count may result for dense sand since sand is loosened by overwashing. Drilling technique (e.g., cased holes vs. mud stabilized holes) may result in different "N" values for the same soil. Energy delivered per blow is not uniform. European countries have adopted an automatic trip hammer not currently in use in North America. Using more than 1/2 turns of rope around the drop and/or using wire cable will restrict the fall of the drive weight. Driller frequently supplies drive hammers with weights varying from the standard by as much as 4 Kg. Impact energy is reduced, increasing "N" values. Incorrect "N" value obtained. Not using a good tip on the If the tip is damaged and reduces the opening or increases sampling spoon 14 Oct 2017 the end area the "N" value can be increased. Site Investigation - Validation 18 9

Procedures which may affect Measured N Values Use of drill rods heavier than standard Not recording blow counts and penetration accurately Incorrect drilling procedures Using drill holes that are too large Inadequate supervision Improper logging of soils With heavier rods more energy is absorbed by the rods causing an increase in the blow count. Incorrect "N" values obtained. The SPT was originally developed from wash boring techniques. Drilling procedures which seriously disturb the soil will affect the "N" value, e.g. drilling with cable tool equipment. Holes greater than 10 cm in diameter are not recommended. Use of larger diameters may result in decrease in the blow count. Frequently a sampler will be impeded by gravel or cobbles causing a sudden increase in blow count; this is not recognized by an inexperienced observer. (Accurate recording of drilling, sampling and depth is always required.) Not describing the sample correctly Using too large a pump Too high a pump capacity will loosen the soil at the base of the hole causing a decrease in blow count. 19 (After US Navy 1985) Use of existing Correlations Grain size plasticity Plasticity -- consolidation behaviour Grain size permeability PI vs Strength N value vs Relative Density N value vs angle of friction 20 10

14 Oct 2017 Site Investigation - Validation RAO G V 21 Consistency of Saturated Cohesive Soils Consistency N 70 q u, kpa Remarks Very Soft 0 2 < 25 Extruded between fingers when squeezed Soft 3 5 25 50 Very easily deformed by NC Young Clay squeezing by light finger pressure Medium 6 9 50 100 Moulded by strong finger pressure Stiff 10 16 100 200 Hard to deform by hand squeezing Very Stiff 17 30 200 400 Very hard to deform by Increasin Aged / hand squeezing, g OCR Cemented indented by thumb nail Hard > 30 > 400 Nearly impossible to deform by hand 22 11

Empirical Values of Ø, D r and Unit Weight of Granular Soils Description Relative Density D r Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very Dense 0 0.15 0.35 0.65 0.85 SPT, N 70 Fine 1 2 3 6 7 15 16 30? Ø Medium 2 3 4 7 8 20 21 40 > 40 Coarse 3 6 5 9 10 25 26 45 > 45 Fine 26 28 28 30 30 34 33 38 Medium 27 28 30 32 32 36 36 42 < 50 Coarse 28-30 30-34 33 40 40 50 g14 wet Oct, kn/m 2017 3 11 Site 16 Investigation 14 18 - Validation 17 20 17 22 20 23 23 SPT Vs UCS -- Clays 24 12

16-10-2017 Strength correlations Granular Soils g 25 Consolidation Test Relationships g g 26 13

The Triaxial Test UU Unconsolidated-Undrained (i.e. undrained strength, c u and u ). CU Consolidated-Undrained. CD Consolidated-Drained (i.e. drained strength, c' and '). The Triaxial Test Analysis of the test results are based on the recorded magnitudes of the minimum principal stress, given by the confining pressure, and the maximum principal stress, taken as the sum of the confining stress and the axial load at failure. The effective stresses can then be computed at any point during the load history if the pore water pressure is measured. 14

16-10-2017 Triaxial Shear Parameters 29 Permeability Relations -- SAND 30 15

16-10-2017 Correlations of Consolidation Characteristics SILTS & CLAYS 31 Testing Permeability 16

Typical Issues In Delhi Filled up soil vs. Natural soil In Delhi Structure partly on rock & soil At IIT Delhi Library Building Solar passive houses Block VI SPT Vs Plate load test Depth of exploration vis-à-vis foundation depth 34 Additional Information Information for ground improvement Successful technologies Soil chemistry Soil water chemistry Liquefaction potential Backfill materials 35 17

Caveat Geotechnical investigation does not end with the Report Continues..as Construction begins.. At least throughout construction 36 THANK YOU 37 18