Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones Pittsburg County, Oklahoma

Similar documents
Sequatchie Valley Coal Mine Sequatchie County, Tennessee

Tecumseh AML Site 262 Warrick, Indiana

The complicated role of CO 2 in mine water treatment

A METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE ALKALINITY GENERATED BY ANOXIC LIMESTONE DRAINS

ACID MINE DRAINAGE TREATMENT VIA ALKALINE INJECTION TECHNOLOGY 1

I-99 Remediation Site Centre County, Pennsylvania

The complicated role of CO2 in mine water treatment

EVALUATION OF MINE DRAINAGE LIABILITY DURING PREAQUISITION SITE ASSESSMENTS¹

Zortman Landusky Swift Gulch Site Phillips County, Montana

Effective Passive Treatment of Coal Mine Drainage 1

Passive Treatment of Coal-mine Drainage by a Sulfate-reducing Bioreactor in the Illinois Coal Basin 1

Iron Mountain Mine Shasta County, California

Methodology for Estimating the Costs of Treatment of Mine Drainage

Keystone and Rising Star Mines Shasta County, California

Tar Creek Superfund Site Ottawa, Oklahoma

Innovative Method to Reduce Land Area and Cost in the Treatment of Acid mine Drainage by

Passive Aluminum Treatment Successes

ACID MINE DRAINAGE TREATMENT IN GREENS RUN BY AN ANOXIC LIMESTONE DRAIN

Low Maintenance Passive Treatment Systems for Mining Site Contaminants. Robert C. Thomas, Ph.D

Evaluation of the C&K Coal Pit 431 Passive Treatment System, Glasgow, Cambria County

Treatment of Acidic Coal Mine Drainage with Ver7cal Flow Ponds and Drainable Limestone Beds. Robert Hedin Hedin Environmental Pi2sburgh, Pennsylvania

ALKALINE FOUNDATION DRAINS AND ALKALINE AMENDMENTS FOR AMD CONTROL IN COAL REFUSE PILES 1

Sample Point ph Conductance Acidity Iron Manganese Aluminum Sulfates

Chapter V. SAPS Design Guidelines

Annapolis Lead Mine Site Iron County, Missouri

reclamation OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MINING AND RECLAMATION

Horse Heaven Mine Site Jefferson County, Oregon

Passive Treatment of Acidic Coal Mine Drainage: The Anna S Mine Passive Treatment Complex

Full scale pilot test of a novel technology to remediate alkaline coal mine water using high-surface media at Acomb Mine Water Treatment Scheme, UK

SIMCO/PEABODY WETLAND AN OVERVIEW

Big River Mine Tailings Site St. Francois County, Missouri

ROLE OF ACCELERATED OXIDATION FOR REMOVAL OF METALS FROM MINE DRAINAGE 1

Paul Eger Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Lands and Minerals September 2010

The Mahoning Valley Mushroom Farm North Lima, Ohio AMD Investigation

TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW IN SITU TREATMENT OF MINE POOLS AND PIT LAKES

Black Branch Acid Mine Drainage Remediation. ADEM Nonpoint Source Conference January 15,2015

Mine Reclamation Sustainable Remediation Cape Breton, Nova Scotia

Black Butte Mercury Mine Lane County, Oregon

Self-Sustainable Mine Water Treatment through Passive Iron Oxide Recovery

Susquehanna River Basin Commission Bear Run Watershed Renaissance Mine Drainage Restoration Project

Passive Treatment System for Arsenic, Manganese, & Iron. Presented by, Neal Gallagher, Golder Associates Inc.

Results from a Bench Scale Passive Treatment System Designed for Removing Sulfate at a Site on Vancouver Island, BC

SOUTH BRANCH SUBWATERSHED

RECOVERY OF MARKETABLE IRON OXIDE FROM MINE DRAINAGE 1

THE EFFECTS OF ANOXIC LIMESTONE DRAINS ON MINE WATER CHEMISTRY'

Steel Slag Leach Bed Longevity

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR HUBLER RUN

Design and Early Field Performance of AMD Treatment Systems Developed Under the Appalachian Clean Streams Initiative

A REVIEW OF PASSIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY JEFF SKOUSEN, CARL ZIPPER, ARTHUR ROSE, PAUL ZIEMKIEWICZ, ROBERT NAIRN, LOUIS MCDONALD AND ROBERT KLEINMANN

Sand Coulee Abandoned Mine Reclamation Acid Mine Drainage Source Control Evaluation David Donohue, HydroSolutions Inc Tom Henderson, Montana DEQ

Advanced Planning Tools for Optimization of AMD Treatment

EVOLUTION OF TRACE METAL REMOVAL PRODUCTS IN FIELD-SCALE VERTICAL FLOW BIOREACTORS

AIR JAMMER : CUTTING AMD COSTS AT WARWICK MINE ON A LIMITED BUDGET

Successive Alkalinity Producing Systems. Damariscotta West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium

Carbon Dioxide Pretreatment of AMD for Limestone Diversion Wells

Hedin Environmental Passive Mine Water Treatment Systems

PASSIVE TREATMENT OF ACID MINE DRAINAGE THE ENOS RECLAMATION PROJECT, INDIANA: PRELIMINARY RESULTS 1

A FIELD DEMONSTRATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE COAL WASTE DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY GEOCHEMICAL FINDINGS. Paul T. Behum. Liliana Lefticariu. Y.

DRAFT Slippery Rock Creek Priority Watershed Report 2004 Update

Provide overview of multi-stage constructed wetland groundwater treatment system design and operation

1556 by Georgius Agricola. In the United States 10,000 miles of streams and surface

TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW CONSTRUCTED TREATMENT WETLAND

SOME CONSIDERATIONS WHEN APPLYING LIMESTONE/ROCK PHOSPHATE MATERIALS ON TO ACID PYRITIC SPOILS

Is There AMD In This Stream?

Semi-Passive Bioreactors and RCTS Lime Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage

GEOCHEMICAL MODULE FOR AMDTreat

Passive Treatment in Pennsylvania Watersheds: Erico Bridge Restoration Area A Case Study 1. Slippery Rock Watershed Coalition 2

Precipitation, Flow and Loads at Active Mine Sites

RECOVERY OF MARKETABLE IRON OXIDE FROM MINE DRAINAGE 1. Robert S Hedin 2

Passive treatment of mine drainage: Options, challenges, and possible future developments

Operational and treatment performance of an unique Reducing and Alkalinity Producing System (RAPS) for acidic leachate remediation in Lancashire, UK.

April 28 th, Cambria County, Pennsylvania

Chemical treatment of acid mine drainage. Anna Gulkova, Water and Environmental Engineering, Aalto University

Lower Kittanning Coal Seam, Clarion University Campus

Remediation of the Irwin Discharge through Passive Treatment and Resource Recovery

WETLAND SIZING, DESIGN, AND TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS FOR COAL MINE DRAINAGE 1

An Alternative Alkaline Addition for Direct Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage

Mitigation of Environmental Impacts Resulting from Mine Pool Build up: A Case History

THE SUGAR CREEK COAL REFUSE PILE AND MINE DRAINAGE DISCHARGE RECLAMATION PROJECT

4. Present Activities and Roles

What is the purpose of the plan? Why did we choose Raccoon Creek? What pollutants does this TMDL address? Where do the pollutants come from?

MEPCO, Inc (Morgantown Energy Producing Company)

Is There AMD In This Stream?

APPENDIX D FIELD LOG OF OUTCROP DESCRIPTIONS

FeS 2. Fe O 2. Fe H 2. Produced by Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, 2018

METAL REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FROM ACID MINE DRAINAGE IN THE BIG FIVE CONSTRUCTED WETLAND 1

Modeling Approach - Flowchart for an In-situ Acid Mine Drainage Neutralization

Organization. Department of Natural Resources. Division of Reclamation Mining & Safety. Office of Active Mines. Office of Inactive Mines

ENGINEERED WETLAND TECHNOLOGY TO ADVANCE STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT. Sheldon Smith March 28, Photo Optional

Impact of Coal Mine Reclamation Using Coal Combustion By-products (CCBs) on Groundwater Quality: Two Case Studies

What is the purpose of the plan? Why did we choose Raccoon Creek? What pollutants does this TMDL address? Where do the pollutants come from?

ACID ROCK DRAINAGE (ARD)

Mining Impacts. Metal Recycling. Reading Today: Ch. 12 pp , also Ch. 16 pp Wed: Ch. 13

Metal Recycling. Mining Impacts. Recycling of other mineral resources. Hazardous Work

March 20, 2007 Catawissa Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Update Addressing the TMDL

Abandoned Mine Drainage in the Swatara Creek Basin, Southern Anthracite Coalfield, Pennsylvania, USA: 2. Performance of Treatment Systems

Western Maryland Resource Conservation and Development Council

Dunka Mine Minnesota

Optimizing the Design and Operation of Self-flushing Limestone Systems for Mine Drainage Treatment Final Report December 31, 2008

Natural Resource Extraction: Modern Remediation Techniques in Response to Acid Mine. Drainage. Matthew Horine. Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of

Transcription:

CASE STUDY Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones Pittsburg County, Oklahoma August 2010 Prepared by The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council Mining Waste Team

Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source. The suggested citation for this document is as follows: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2010. Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. Mining Waste Treatment Technology Selection Web. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Mining Waste Team. www.itrcweb.org. Acknowledgements The ITRC Mining Waste Team would like to acknowledge Dr. Robert W. Nairn from the University of Oklahoma, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, who completed the April 2008 Mine Waste Case Study Survey, from which the information in this case study is taken.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SITE INFORMATION...1 1.1 Contacts...1 1.2 Name, Location, and Description...1 2. REMEDIAL ACTION AND TECHNOLOGIES...2 3. PERFORMANCE...2 4. COSTS...4 5. REGULATORY CHALLENGES...4 6. STAKEHOLDER CHALLENGES...4 7. OTHER CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNED...4 8. REFERENCES...4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1. Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones, Hartshorne, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma...1 Figure 3-1. Rock Island #7 field site showing location in Oklahoma; schematic of passive treatment system with location of VALD showing general direction of flow; and generalized diagram of VALD...3 i

HARTSHORNE/WHITLOCK-JONES, PITTSBURG COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 1. SITE INFORMATION 1.1 Contacts Dr. Robert W. Nairn The University of Oklahoma School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science 202 West Boyd Street, Room 334 Norman, OK 73019 Telephone: 405-325-3354 E-mail: nairn@ou.edu 1.2 Name, Location, and Description The former Rock Island Coal Mining Co. Mine 7 is located immediately east of Hartshorne, OK and was one of a series of mines operated by the Rock Island Coal Mining Co. during the early part of the 20th century. The No. 7 mine was abandoned in the 1930 s and utilized three shaft entries and two parallel slope entries access the abandoned underground workings. An artesian acid mine drainage (AMD) discharge, ranging from the 19 to 76 L/min (5 to 20 GPM) of highly mineral-laden water discharges from a 55-m (180-ft) deep airshaft (Behum, Meier, and Bohnenstiehl 2004). See Figure 1-1. Figure 1-1. Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones, Hartshorne, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. (N 34º, 50.7' [34.8450], W 95º, 33.4' [-95.5562]. Source: Google Earth 2009)

ITRC Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma August 2010 2. REMEDIAL ACTION AND TECHNOLOGIES Prior to construction, the mine discharge was sampled periodically for several years and showed considerable fluctuation in both water quality and quantity. Measured discharge rates ranged from <1 to approximately 75 LPM. Metal and anion concentrations varied with each sampling event, although temperature, ph, and DO remained relatively consistent. The acidic nature of the discharge, coupled with median concentrations of iron (Fe) and Mn (Manganese) of 765 and 18mg/L, respectively, warranted a plan for treatment. An abandoned fan shaft (total depth approximately 56 m) from which the water discharged in an artesian manner was converted to the vertical anoxic limestone drain (VALD) and serves as the first process unit in the passive treatment system. The VALD was designed to perform similarly to a traditional horizontally-oriented ALD. The shaft was first filled with approximately 34 m of local dolomitic stone (to provide long-term stability) which was then covered by 22 m of high calcite limestone (to provide alkalinity generation capacity). An effluent header pipe directs water from the VALD to the remainder of the passive treatment system, consisting of an alternating series of three oxidation ponds and two vertical flow cells, before discharging to a polishing wetland cell and then into an existing pond. Because this study focuses solely on alkalinity generation in the VALD, performance of the remaining process units is not discussed (Labar, Nairn, and Canty 2008). 3. PERFORMANCE Due to the design of the VALD [Figure 3-1], sampling of the original mine discharge is currently impossible. The VALD effluent is considered the best approximation of the discharge water quality. Water quality and quantity data collected from the VALD effluent from January 2007 through June 2008 demonstrate that this mine discharge remains highly mineralized, containing elevated metals, base cations, SO 4 2, and Cl. Metal and anion concentrations and discharge rates were highly variable, remaining consistent with pre-construction data. However, temperature, ph, and DO remained relatively consistent over the sampling period. The maximum concentrations for all metals, all anions, alkalinity, and conductivity occurred in the first sampling event after the VALD first began to flow. Concentrations of metals and anions decreased for sampling events since then, with the majority of the minimum concentrations occurring in the last sampling event during the study. The purpose of the VALD is to generate alkalinity to sustain Fe oxidation in subsequent unit processes. In this regard, the VALD is performing effectively. [A] typical anoxic limestone drain can be expected to add up to 150 300 mg/l as CaCO 3 of alkalinity. Alkalinity concentrations in the VALD effluent averaged 470 ± 49 mg/l (mean ± standard deviation) as CaCO 3 during the period of study. The cause of these unusually high alkalinity concentrations is likely due to several factors, including the ionic strength of the mine water, elevated pco 2 (~10-0.3 entering the VALD), and retention time (25 to 53 hours) of the water in the VALD. As a result of alkalinity generation as well as decreases in metals concentrations, the net acidity of the discharge decreased from a preconstruction value of 1288 mg/l as CaCO 3 to 614 ± 498 mg/l as CaCO 3. 2

ITRC Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma August 2010 Figure 3-1. Rock Island #7 field site showing location in Oklahoma; schematic of passive treatment system with location of VALD (base drawing courtesy Burns and McDonnell 2004) showing general direction of flow (OP = oxidation pond, VF = vertical flow cell, PW = polishing wetland); and generalized diagram of VALD. (After Behum, Meier, Bohnenstiehl 2004. Note: Not to scale.) Although the Rock Island #7 passive treatment system was designed primarily for the removal of Fe from the mine discharge, it has been very effective at removing other metals as well. The system, on average, has exhibited Fe removal and alkalinity generation rates that compare well to those found in the literature. However, these rates fluctuate widely due to the highly variable water quality and quantity entering the system. In order to understand the system more fully, more information must be gathered on the retention time of the water in the system and the unit processes themselves. This will aid greatly in resolving the issue of location-event sample matching. Also, a thorough evaluation of the biotic processes occurring in both the oxidation ponds and vertical flow cells is necessary to gain a better understanding of how the system treats this unique mine discharge. Gathering a wider array of data on this system will help in further determining the efficacy of treatment. Despite these gaps in data, it is evident that the treatment system is discharging water with much higher quality that the original mine discharge (Labar and Nairn 2009). 3

ITRC Hartshorne/Whitlock-Jones, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma August 2010 4. COSTS No information was included with this survey. 5. REGULATORY CHALLENGES No regulatory issues were encountered. 6. STAKEHOLDER CHALLENGES There were no significant public or stakeholder issues associated with the project. 7. OTHER CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNED Learning to work with private landowners was critical, and there was a need to demonstrate how remedial technologies would benefit them. 8. REFERENCES Behum, P. T., L. Meier, and K. Bohnenstiehl. 2004. Application of LIDAR Imagery in AML Reclamation: Case Example Design of an AMD Passive Treatment System at the Rock Island No. 7 Airshaft, Oklahoma, in Proceedings, Advanced Integration of Geospatial Technologies in Mining and Reclamation, Atlanta, December 7 9. Labar, J. A., and R. W. Nairn. 2009. Evaluation of First 1.5 Years of Operation of a Passive Treatment System in SE Oklahoma, pp. 693 708 in Proceedings, Joint Conference of American Society of Mining and Reclamation 26 th Annual Conference and 11 th Billings Land Reclamation Symposium, Billings, Montana. Labar, J. A., R. W. Nairn, and G. A. Canty. 2008. Generation of 400 500 mg/l Alkalinity in a Vertical Anoxic Limestone Drain, in New Opportunities to Apply Our Science, Proceedings, 25 th National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Richmond, Virginia, June 14 19. 4