House Bill 3575 Legislative Oversight Committee Eligibility System Update. February 19, 2008

Similar documents
Integrated Eligibility and TIERS Implementation Subcommittee Report

ELIGIBILITY SUPPORT SERVICES DRAFT RFP NO SEND COMMENTS TO:

In April 2004, Executive Order RP 33 instructed the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to

RIDER 31: CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES STAFFING FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR 2015

Kansas Eligibility Enforcement System (KEES) Joint Committee on Information Technology. Glen Yancey KEES Project Director May 3, 2017

CPS Transformation Overview

Youth Service Elements:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACCOUNTABILITY. SFY STRATEGIC PLAN Oklahoma Department of Human Services

Response to IRR #4 Questions and Clarifications

ONTARIO POWER GENERATION KEY ACTIONS UPDATE 2013 AUDITOR GENERAL S REPORT ON HUMAN RESOURCES

State of Ohio Integrated Eligibility System. Category: Cross-Boundary Collaboration

2017 Contact Center Overflow Vendor Request for Proposals Responses to RFP Questions

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BUILDING 2 SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

Human Resources BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 8,664,661 Capital $0 FTEs 29.25

Committee on Information Technology

NC FAST Update JOINT LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. September 9, 2014

Wage Floor Discussion. City Council Briefing September 2, 2015

Project Progress Report #3

NHS Improvement Agency Usage Board Diagnostic Tool

Administrative Services About Administrative Services

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 3133 Estudillo Street P.O. Box 2759 Martinez, CA Phone: (925) FAX (925)

TECHNOLOGY UPDATE & STRATEGIC OPERATIONAL PROJECTS FOR CY2016 Prepared for: Connect for Health Colorado Finance and Operations Committee February

Briefing on Provisions and Applications Of the Minimum Wage Ordinance

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Project Update: Tufts Support Services (TSS)

OZAUKEE COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 2009 ANNUAL REPORT

2017 Ways and Means Human Services Joint Subcommittee Presentation. Shared Services

Certified Recruitment Specialist. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

Fiscal Years Strategic Plan. VOLUME I: Agency Strategic Plan and Redundancies & Impediments

Contingency Plan for Community-Based Care Stage I

Government Management Committee. Deputy City Manager, Cluster A Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

OU Workforce Management Requirements For Affordable Care Act Compliance

The Ohio State University June 8, 2018 Board of Trustees

EXL 2016 Performance Report. Stacie Loucks, Executive Director May 2, 2016

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES EXPANDED SUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Monitoring and Oversight Standards and Guidelines

Adult Protective Services

IPMA-Canada Certification Program

CHILD WELFARE DIGITAL SERVICES (CWDS) UPDATE

GSIL s Recruitment & Retention News for Attendant Care Workers (ACW)

Sanitation Services Bulk and Brush Program - Update. Quality of Life & Environment Committee November 14, 2016

Wastewater Audit Follow-up

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES KNOTT COMMITTEE ROOM 116 OCTOBER 24, 2018

Enabling Efficiency in Stores to Improve the Customer Experience. Presented by Andrei Cotunoaei

Adult Protective Services

Office of the City Auditor. Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency

Customer Information System Implementation

Southeast Minnesota Human Services Redesign

Aligning Process Redesign and Change Management with Project Management (System Implementation Projects)

HR/Payroll Modernization Overview. January 2015

Child Welfare Services New System Project Quarterly Legislative Briefing. March 29, 2017

APPLICATION INFORMATION: 1. All five sections of the application must be completed.

Nomination Form Please complete entire form. All nominations must be postmarked no later than May 18, 2003.

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Montana DPPHS Enterprise Architecture. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services Deloitte Consulting LLP

Five Steps to HR Optimization: Transforming from Transactional Back Office HR Operations to Strategic Mission Support

Senate Bill 1, Rider 9 85th Legislature, Regular Session Human Resources Management Plan

Project Progress Report

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

EPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES. RHODE ISLAND HEALTH COVERAGE PROJECT Melba Depena Affigne, Director Department of Human Services September 22, 2015

Ground Transportation Management Services

Kentucky Enterprise User Provisioning System (KEUPS)

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Certified HR Auditor. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit Page 1 of 11

Service Business Plan

100 th Air Refueling Wing. NSPS to GS Conversion Town Hall Briefing

Child Welfare Services New System Project Quarterly Stakeholder Briefing. April 11, 2017

Staff Position Management Guidelines

GREATER RHODE ISLAND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD

AUDIT UNDP HAITI GRANTS FROM THE GLOBAL FUND TO FIGHT AIDS, TUBERCULOSIS AND MALARIA. Report No Issue Date: 15 April 2014

Facilities Key Performance Indicators

COVERED CALIFORNIA PROGRAM REPORTS January 23, 2014

CHILD WELFARE DIGITAL SERVICES UPDATE

The Brave New World of Measurement and Stability Periods

2018 OPERATING BUDGET BRIEFING NOTE Costs Incurred for Engineering Services

Innovative Labor Procurement:

Human Resources IV-79

Leading KPIs of Positive Financial Performance. Presented by: Hugh Shaw, Ventera Corporation Bill Riviere, Unanet

Foster Care Redesign. Implementation Plan April 2015

Human Resources Management. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

Collections & Customer Service Flex Agent Proposal

WIB MEMBER. Revised 08/11

The Certified HR Administrator. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS TEXOMA POLICIES & PROCEDURES CHAPTER 6 - MONITORING

THE COUNTY SHOULD DOUSE FIREFIGHTER OVERTIME PAY

ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: April 29, 2002 NO: R082 REGULAR. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 18, 2002

Child Protective Services Progress Report June 2, 2009

Human Resources RECOMMENDED BUDGET & STAFFING SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 8,511,700 Capital $0 FTEs 25.25

Human Resources IV-97

Data Usage, Lean Thinking and Process Improvement

Entergy People Health Committee Overview and Strategy. February 2017

ONTARIO-MICHIGAN BORDER TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP Planning/Need and Feasibility Study. 1. Work Accomplished This Period (4 Weeks)

Pay or Play Penalty Special Rules for Temporary Staffing Firms

TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION. June 6, 2014

Request for Resume (RFR) MHBE IT IDIQ Master Contract All Master Contract Provisions Apply. Section 1 General Information

NASPE Eugene H. Rooney, Jr. Award Nomination Category: Innovative State Human Resource Management Program

Transcription:

House Bill 3575 Legislative Oversight Committee Eligibility System Update February 19, 2008

Scope of the Eligibility System Texas has an integrated system designed to determine eligibility for services including: Medicaid including Women s Health Program and Foster Care and Adoption Managed Care Food Stamps Children s Health Insurance Program Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Long-term care for the elderly and people with disabilities -2-

Recent Developments in the Eligibility System Beginning in 1997: 75th Texas Legislature passes legislation directing changes to begin integrating eligibility determination and streamlining service delivery processes for multiple health, human services, and workforce programs. June 1999: 76 th Texas Legislature authorizes and funds the development of information technology and automated data processing system titled the Texas Integrated Eligibility Redesign System (TIERS) to replace multiple outdated client eligibility determination systems including the 25 year old SAVERR system. June 2003: H.B. 2292 directs HHSC to establish call centers if cost effective; Legislation also directs HHSC to outsource call centers unless not cost effective. The directive to change business processes requires a substantial redesign of TIERS, which was already in pilot in Travis and Hays counties. Eligibility Services appropriation for the 2004-2005 biennium reduced by $42.5M all funds and 901 FTEs. August 2004 May 2005: HHSC conducts competitive procurement activities for call center operations, CHIP processing and eligibility determination, maintenance of the TIERS computer system, enrollment broker services, and moving some eligibility processing work currently performed by state eligibility workers to the private sector while ensuring eligibility determination is conducted by skilled state staff. -3-

Recent Developments in the Eligibility System June September 2005: Eligibility Services appropriations for FY 2006-2007 reduced by $140 M all funds and 3,980 FTEs. A reduction 3,151 FTEs was designated for FY 2007. Eligibility services staff are notified of future business model changes and the planned reduction in force; only 2,600 could be offered a job in the new eligibility system. Legislature authorizes several new programs: Women s Health Waiver, Managed Care for Foster and Adopted Children; Integrated Care Management, CHIP Perinate Program. HHSC anticipates the statewide rollout of TIERS and retirement of SAVERR will occur before implementation of the new programs. Decision is made to re-program TIERS to accommodate the new programs. November December 2005: Children s Health Insurance Program, Enrollment Broker, and TIERS contracts are transferred to the Texas Access Alliance (TAA). January March 2006: The integrated eligibility and enrollment services (IE) pilot begins in Travis and Hays counties and expands client access to eligibility services through offices, 2-1-1 (phone), internet, fax, and mail channels. -4-

Recent Developments in the Eligibility System April May 2006: HHSC delays further IE implementation pending technology and operational performance improvements. Following 30-day review HHSC suspends the IE pilot and state reassumes critical functions. HHSC seeks and receives approval from state leadership to transfer general revenue funds to increase the authorized FTE level and to not implement reduction in force or close local eligibility offices. November 2006: Williamson County cases successfully convert from SAVERR into TIERS. January February 2007: Action to stabilize state staff taken that converted 900 temporary staff to regular status positions; upgraded supervisor staff; and paid 2 nd phase of retention bonus program to eligible state staff. New programs implemented in TIERS including the Women s Health Initiative and CHIP Perinatal. Foster Care cases converted into TIERS. -5-

Recent Developments in the Eligibility System March 2007: HHSC and TAA agree to wind down contract after failing to agree on costs and service levels for a re-balanced model. April May 2007: To avoid an interruption of services to HHSC clients and applicants, HHSC and MAXIMUS execute agreements on an emergency basis to replace services that were previously the responsibility of TAA, for: Enrollment Broker services, Eligibility Support services, and CHIP automated systems and to operate CHIP. June July 2007: To avoid an interruption or disruption in technology and automated data processing services for Eligibility Services: HHSC amends Deloitte contract to provide resources and support for enhancements and maintenance of TIERS. TIERS development, maintenance and operations transitions from TAA to HHSC. -6-

Current Environment Two eligibility systems are currently operating. Statewide System ( legacy ): Front-line client interaction either face-to-face or by telephone in locations across the state. Supported by SAVERR and local office LAN and mainframe technology. Is largely paper-based and ties a client to a local office. Clients are assigned to specific offices and caseworkers. New Eligibility System: Implemented in Travis, Hays, and Williamson counties. Clients have multiple access channels including telephone, internet, mail, fax and network of local eligibility offices. Supported by TIERS and internet accessible technology. -7-

Challenges of Operating Two Systems Maintaining two systems that support the eligibility process places operational stresses on clients and staff: System changes are required in both systems. Training must be developed and delivered to support both systems. Scheduling TIERS clients in offices outside the TIERS pilot area requires staff to be proficient in both systems. The population in TIERS is growing, and TIERS cases are diffused throughout the state. Difficulty in hiring programmers skilled in the antiquated computer language, COBOL, needed to sustain SAVERR. Local offices are impacted by frequent hardware failures due to the age of the equipment supporting SAVERR; during FY 2007, SAVERR was not available to eligibility staff for more than 2,600 hours cumulatively. -8-

TIERS -9-

TIERS TIERS: Tests a client s eligibility for all programs. Shares client information across benefit programs avoiding duplicate data entry. Records are electronically imaged and stored, giving ready access to client information from anywhere in the state. Eligibility staff have access to real time case information. TIERS web-based tools and electronic records allows workload to be more evenly distributed across the state. Helps to reduce fraud: Identifies multiple applications for the same client. Prevents multiple benefits being issued for same client for same programs. Rules engine drives benefit determination: TIERS requires more rigorous data collection to ensure consistent application of rules. Ensures client receives all benefits he or she is eligible for. -10-

State Auditor s Office Report The State Auditor s Office concluded in an October 2007 report that TIERS correctly determines if someone qualifies for benefits and correctly calculates benefits. HHSC s Management Response notes: HHSC had identified several issues and made improvements in early 2005 to improve efficiency and increase the integrity of the information in the database. TIERS is a scalable system, which allows HHSC to add capacity as it is needed by purchasing additional servers and related hardware. HHSC has conducted a thorough assessment of hardware needs and developed a capacity plan. HHSC increased storage requirements to increase accountability and performance. The design is more rigorous and provides a complete look at a household, to support an integrated approach to eligibility. TIERS collects twice the data elements of SAVERR, which results in a stricter adherence to state and federal policy requirements. -11-

State Auditor s Office Report HHSC s Management Response (continued): There are more than 1,000 screens available in TIERS, but only those screens that are applicable to the case being processed are presented to the caseworker. A worker goes through 80-100 screens in a typical case and a complex case might require up to 250 screens. Manual data corrections are rare and the agency is working to reduce the need for such changes even further. There are 4.5 million transactions processed each month in TIERS, so this represents a fraction of the transactions per month. In some instances a manual process is appropriate and necessary. For example, if a caseworker mistakenly enters the wrong data from the application, a senior worker may enter the correction for that case, allowing the case to be completed during the applicant s visit. For both SAVERR and TIERS, cases are pended by caseworkers who are waiting for more information to be submitted by the applicant. -12-

Next Steps for TIERS The continued development and deployment of TIERS will be carried out over an extended time period. Involves the conversion of approximately 8 million records. Must ensure that 7,000 staff are trained to use the new system. Region 7 (Central Texas) conversion will occur in segments each approximately the size of Williamson County rollout. Federal funding agencies CMS and FNS invited to participate in readiness testing and to be on-site in local offices for go live. Readiness criteria include whether sufficient levels of TIERS trained staff are located in rollout areas so that timeliness performance is not reduced. -13-

Other Support Systems HHSC partners with the Department of Information Resources (DIR) for management of the voice, fax and data management services that support HHSC s eligibility offices and call centers access to TIERS and supporting systems. DIR assumed responsibility of providing access to the call centers and to the TIERS application from Accenture in July 2007. HHSC is working with DIR staff to address issues that resulted from: the transition from the former vendor and the increasing demand for telecommunication services. DIR has implemented an improvement plan that includes several performance enhancements, which will ensure clients access to the call centers and other critical resources. -14-

Staffing and Workload -15-

Average Annual Filled Eligibility Determination Positions Average Annual Filled Eligibility Determination Positions FY1995 through FY2008 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 11,933 11,710 12,487 FY 1998 FY 1999 10,404 10,378 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 9,142 9,606 9,668 FY 2003 8,446 FY 2004 7,573 FY 2005 6,703 FY 2006 FY 2007 5,975 6,382 Budgeted FY 2008 7,136-16-

Average Number of Recipients per Staff Person Number of Medicaid, Food Stamp and TANF Recipients Per Eligibility Determination Filled Position 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1995 437 1996 436 1997 402 1998 389 1999 351 2000 367 2001 374 2002 442 2003 561 2004 691 2005 814 2006 946 2007 849 Budgeted 2008 782-17-

Workforce Stabilization Efforts Since January 2007, converted 2,000 temporary jobs to regular employment status. Eligibility determination (full-time) positions are posted statewide, with positions available in all 11 regional areas. All positions are regular full-time positions. Hiring qualified candidates for advisors, clerks, supervisors and other vacant positions. Conducting outreach to retirees and previous eligibility staff. HHSC has hired 800 new eligibility staff since the beginning of FY 2008. During this same period, a total of 676 staff left employment with the agency. Implementing process improvements that reduce overtime and divert work from local offices to specialized teams and centralized units. Continuing to assure state staff that no reduction in force or office closures will occur as we modernize the eligibility system. -18-

Turnover by Region Region Lubbock Abilene/Midland Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex Tyler Beaumont Houston Austin San Antonio El Paso Rio Grande Valley Total FY 2006 Turnover Rate -19-32.3% 31.4% 37.1% 40.9% 34.2% 27.5% 43.2% 27.9% 15.3% 21.5% 31.1% FY 2007 Turnover Rate 21.1% 22.2% 24.9% 24.1% 28.6% 28.6% 23.7% 18.3% 10.4% 14.8% 22.3%

Example: TIERS Children s Medicaid To reduce local office workload, most of TIERS Children s Medicaid eligibility is performed in centralized units: In January 2007, most of the staff were housed in Austin (108 staff). In the last six months in FY 2007 we lost 70 employees a turnover rate of 64.8%. With the new appropriation we have substantially increased staff from 108 to 169. New hires were placed outside of the Austin Region. TIERS enabled us to redistribute TIERS Children's Medicaid workload to other labor markets in state work previously done in Austin is exported to Midland, Athens, and San Antonio. -20-

Decline in Eligibility Staff Tenure Percent of Eligibility Determination Workers for each September Count 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2% 7% 19% 12% Eligibilit y Det erm inat ion Workers, Years of Service September Counts by Percent: 2004-2007 September Counts by Percent 2004 2005 2006 2007 2% 2% 3% 11% 16% 11% 5% 5% -21-24% 22% 19% 18% 47% 46% 40% 40% 13% 14% 12% 11% <1 year 1-2 years 3-4 years 5-9 years 10-19 years 20+ years Years of Service

Improving Staffing Levels Actions Taken to Reduce Job Vacancy Rate: Hire ahead effort to reduce job vacancies. Regional hiring coordinators have been assigned to expedite the hiring of new staff. Considering strategies to improve staff compensation (currently entry level workers are paid an average salary of $2,177 per month). -22-

Timeliness -23-

100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Statewide Food Stamp Application Timeliness Statewide Percentage of Food Stamp Applications Completed within 30 Days -24- Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Month %

Timeliness Problems Due to high employee attrition and reduced staff tenure, timeliness is down for both SAVERR and TIERS. Timeliness for cases processed in TIERS is lower than cases processed in SAVERR: TIERS data collection is more extensive. Cases in TIERS have been increasing rapidly while the staff trained in TIERS has not kept pace. Staff are less proficient in TIERS than in SAVERR. DFW, Houston, and Austin account for large numbers of TIERS cases. -25-

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Statewide Food Stamp Application Timeliness Percentage of Food Stamp applications completed within 30 days Statewide SAVERR Statewide TIERS -26- Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Month %

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Statewide Medicaid Application Timeliness Percentage of Medicaid applications completed within 45 days Statewide SAVERR Statewide TIERS -27- Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Month %

-28- Factors Contributing to Timeliness Issues Growth in TIERS cases The number of TIERS cases as a percentage of all cases statewide has more than doubled in the past year: 5.2 percent in January 2007 11.6 percent in January 2008 In January 2007, when the Women s Health Program was launched, 69 percent of TIERS cases were in the pilot area. One year later, 29 percent of TIERS cases were in the pilot area. During this timeframe the total number of cases in TIERS increased by 130 percent. In 2005, HHSC anticipated Women s Health Waiver and Foster Care - Adoption Managed Care Program statewide rollouts would occur after statewide SAVERR conversion to TIERS. Further investment in SAVERR was not prudent. The same client cannot be in both computer systems, making the option of using both computer systems for the new programs infeasible. Women s Health Waiver is a provider-driven program; this has led to higher than anticipated application rates and the acceleration of SAVERR case conversions to TIERS. SAVERR cannot support the design of the Women s Health Waiver program with its electronic submittal of client applications by providers.

Diffusion of TIERS Cases Statewide diffusion of TIERS cases Due to Women s Health Waiver and Foster Care-Adoption Managed Care programs and the geographic relocation patterns of our clients, TIERS cases are no longer centrally located in the three pilot counties, they are diffused throughout the state. This means we must have eligibility staff statewide trained in both systems - SAVERR and TIERS; this effort is exacerbated by high turnover and vacancy rates. Some staff are currently managing their workload in two automation systems. Having to use both systems reduces staff proficiency and leads to diminished speed and accuracy. -29-

Growth in Number of TIERS Cases TIERS Active Cases by Household 450,000 400,000 350,000 Total Cases Within TIERS Pilot Area Outside TIERS Pilot Area 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 A case refers to a single program type. A person or household may have multiple cases if they qualify for more than one program, such as a family that receives both Food Stamps and Medicaid. Therefore, the number of cases does not represent an unduplicated number of clients. -30-

Additional Factors Contributing to Timeliness Issues In December 2007 the TIERS application exhibited slow system performance. Cause: The increase in both the number of cases and the number of eligibility staff utilizing TIERS. Corrective Action: An additional server was added in mid-december to address the immediate need. Additional modifications were made to further enhance performance in early January. TIERS programming enhancements were implemented in early February. Long-Term Planning: The capacity plan for TIERS was completed at the end of January 2008, to anticipate hardware needs based on the increasing caseload and the number of users. -31-

Actions Taken to Improve Timeliness -- TIERS Training The new FY 2008-2009 appropriation allows us to increase eligibility staff and the trainers needed. Since July 2007, over 1,400 eligibility staff have completed the TIERS training. Goal is to train 2,000 staff in TIERS within the next six months. This number will be approximately half new staff, half current staff. With increasing growth of TIERS cases, new workers will be trained in TIERS based on caseload needs. -32-

Actions to Improve Timeliness Reduce local office workload: Created several centralized units to relieve staff in local offices. Strengthening efforts to improve timeliness and quality: Stronger productivity monitoring to ensure performance expectations are met. Designating specialized staff at the front-line level to focus on service improvement initiatives. Greater focus on policy support, targeted case reviews, and quality assurance monitoring. Improve client access: Upgrading local office phone systems in 26 sites to improve client access; these offices combined have more than 1,400 eligibility staff. Stabilize workforce and increase staffing levels Federal regulatory waivers: In discussion with FNS on regulatory waivers that would reduce workload and quickly lower number of untimely cases. -33-

FNS Waiver Extend Certification Periods Current policy Households certified under federal streamlined reporting rules have a 6 month certification period. Adults exempt from work requirements. No changes expected in next 6 months. Only have to report change in residence or income. Households with all members over age 65, and receiving SSI are certified for 36 months. Households with elderly and disabled members and stable income are certified for 12 months. Other households are certified 1-6 months. Federal regulations allow a 12 month certification period for streamlined reporting households, but require an interim report at 6 months. -34-

FNS Waiver Extend Certification Periods Proposed Policy Extend the certification period for streamlined reporting households to 12 months. Waive the requirement to have an interview or submit an interim report at 6 months. Benefits Streamlined reporting households are 67 percent of the total food stamp caseload, and 75-85 percent of monthly recertifications due in the local office. Reducing this workload temporarily will provide relief while staff are being hired, trained, and gain proficiency. -35-

Procurement -36-

Procurement Strategy HHSC s procurement strategy is being designed to keep complex decision-making in the hands of experienced state employees, while allowing qualified contractors to perform functions that support eligibility determination and improve business processes. HHSC will: Re-define the roles and functions of state staff and vendor staff. Enter into contracts with qualified contractors to support state roles and responsibilities in implementing an enhanced eligibility system. -37-

Procurement Strategy Eligibility Support Services (includes CHIP processing and call centers) Issue request for information May 2007 Issue draft request for proposals October 2007 Issue final request for proposals To be determined Tentative Contract award 180 days after the RFP is released External review of contract 90 days after tentative award Document Processing Center Issue request for information May 2007 Issue draft request for proposals October 2007 Issue final request for proposals To be determined Tentative Contract award 180 days after the RFP is released External review of contract 90 days after tentative award Enrollment broker services Issue request for information May 2007 Issue final request for proposals December 2008 Contract award December 2009 TIERS maintenance and support Transition CHIP to TIERS April 2008 Issue final request for proposals November 2008 Contract award November 2009 External review of contract December 2009-February 2010-38-

Division of Responsibilities - BEFORE -39-

Division of Responsibilities - AFTER -40-

Bottom Line Texas eligibility workforce and program performance were eroded as a result of a large impending RIF. Timeliness problems are greatest in those regions with high staff turnover and vacancy rates; staff recruitment and retention in the Austin, DFW and Houston regions, which have robust job markets, is a critical problem. SAVERR does not allow for the redistribution of excessive workloads to geographic areas where we can more successfully hire and retain staff. Job complexity for staff across the state who must now work in two computer systems exacerbates employee attrition and thus case timeliness rates. Critical decisions regarding the implementation of new legislatively mandated programs had to be made at a point in time when HHSC anticipated near future rollout of TIERS statewide. Women s Health Waiver and Foster Care and Adoption Managed Care programs, along with client re-location patterns, will continue to accelerate the conversion of cases from SAVERR to TIERS. -41-

Conclusion H.B. 3575 provides an opportunity to continue to enhance the eligibility system to be more fully functional to the needs of Texans. Existing eligibility system must be modernized. Continuation of the current system is not feasible. Staff and resource intensive. Cannot respond to caseload growth without substantial increases in appropriations. The state s goals remain: Increase access to services. Implement efficient and simplified business processes. Reduce fraud. Comply with federal law. Lessons learned are being applied to the design of the new system and HHSC remains committed to creating a system that improves access to services for consumers and efficiently and effectively utilizes the available resources. -42-