UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY WHEAT SCIENCE NEWS

Similar documents
KENTUCKY SOYBEAN PRODUCTION CONTEST. Summary of Awards and Cultural Practices

Kentucky Extension Soybean Production Contest

Kentucky Extension Soybean Production Contest Summary of Winners & Cultural Practices

2017 Kentucky Soybean Production Contest FORM A Agronomic Data Form*

SOYBEAN YIELD CONTEST

Evaluation of Awaken Fertilizer Additive to Wheat

Grain producers often express concern

Kentucky Extension. Soybean Production Contest. Summary of Winners & Cultural Practices

Kentucky Extension. Soybean Production Contest. Summary of Winners & Cultural Practices

HERBICIDE COMPARISONS ON BROADLEAF WEED CONTROL IN WHEAT James R. Martin and Dottie Call Department of Agronomy

2007 Kentucky Extension Corn Production Contest

Agronomy notes. Greg Schwab, Lloyd Murdock, Jim Herbek, Chad Lee, and David Van Sanford

2006 Kentucky Extension Corn Production Contest

In This Issue: Upcoming Events for 2016 UK Winter Wheat Meeting Small Grain Disease Management Workshop UK Wheat Field Day

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR ITALIAN RYEGRASS CONTROL IN WHEAT (UKREC )

Environmentally Sustainable Utilization of Nitrogen on Corn 2015

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL

Kentucky Extension Corn Production Contest Summary of Winners and Cultural Practices

Kentucky Extension Corn Production Contest Summary of Winners and Cultural Practices

2017 Field Crop Budgets. Updated 2/24/17

2018 Field Crop Budgets. Updated 11/8/2017

CORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMY UPDATES. Angela McClure December 2015

Organic Systems Trial. Advisory Group Meeting 2008

Fertilizer Management

Top Strip-Till Practices for Corn and Soybean

Winter Wheat Response to Applied Copper Fertilizer

SOYBEAN MAXIMUM YIELD RESEARCH

Carinata Fit into SE Cropping Systems

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

February, 2007, Volume 7, Issue 1. Available online at:

2005 New Kent Wheat Strip Trial L. C. Davis Sons, New Kent

Nutrient Management in Tile Drained Fields

2008 Kentucky Extension Corn Production Contest

Purdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol

Cover Crops Strategies After Short Season Crops

OKLAHOMA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2009

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

AGRONOMY NEWS. Grasslands for Tomorrow. Reminder All Agronomy News issues can be found at Ducks Unlimited s website:

CORN AND SOYBEAN UPDATES FOR Angela McClure Corn and Soybean Specialist

WHEAT RESEARCH UPDATE FROM UK SPECIALISTS

Agronomic Management Considerations for Fields Flooded in Ronnie Helms Stuttgart, Arkansas

Rates for No-Tillage Wheat Production in the Mid-Atlantic

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

On-Farm Comparison Results Mulliken

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2005

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profi t Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Crop Enterprises

NDSU Soybean Production Factors - Research and Recommendation Update

c) What optimality condition defines the profit maximizing amount of the input to use? (Be brief and to the point.)

Frederic L. Kolb Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois (217)

Soybean Seed Yield Tillage Yield Yield Yield /8/2016. Soybean Productivity on Raised Seedbeds

ARKANSAS WHEAT Jason Kelley - Wheat and Feed Grains Extension Agronomist September 13, 2017

Objectives: Background:

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

Advanced Crop Advisers Workshop, Feb , Fargo, ND

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

c) What optimality condition defines the profit maximizing amount of the input to use? (Be brief and to the point.)

2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

Methods The trial was designed as a randomized complete block.

2016 KANSAS SOYBEAN YIELD AND VALUE CONTESTS WHY A SOYBEAN YIELD OR VALUE CONTEST? To recognize outstanding Kansas soybean producers

Soil Science News & Views

ESN Controlled Release Fertilizer on Corn and Spring Wheat

Developed and Edited by

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

The Nutrient Value of Manure: What s it Really Worth? Brad Joern Department of Agronomy

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES

2017 Virginia Grain Sorghum Performance Tests

Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee

DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

SWROC Research on Organic Vegetable Production and Field Crops

FERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF

Wheat Program Update Yield and Protein Determination

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2008

THIS SHEET IS ONLY FOR ENTERING YOUR DATA. TO PRINT YOUR DATA USE ONE OF THE OTHER

Effects of Polymer Coated Urea on Corn Yield G.J. Schwab and L.W. Murdock University of Kentucky

Soybean and Corn Hybrid Variety Performance Under Organic and Conventional Systems

Enterprise Budget. Winter Wheat, Conventional Tillage and No-Till, Willamette Valley Region

2018 KANSAS SOYBEAN YIELD AND VALUE CONTESTS WHY A SOYBEAN YIELD OR VALUE CONTEST?

2016 Virginia Grain Sorghum Performance Tests

Institute of Ag Professionals

CORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMIC UPDATES. Angela McClure December 2014

October 2007, Volume 7, Issue 8. Available online at:

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Cereal Leaf Disease Management with Headline, Tilt and Folicur Fungicides in Spring Cereals

Differences Between High, Medium, and Low Profit Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Crop Enterprises

PENNSYLVANIA SOYBEAN YIELD CONTEST 2014 REPORT S P O N S O R E D B Y T H E PENNSYLVANIA SOYBEAN BOARD

Strip-till Research Results: Rotation, Automatic Guidance, and Fertilizer Placement. Tony J. Vyn & Graduate Students, Colleagues & Farmers

1 Northeast Ag Expo 2011 Small Grains On- Farm- Test Report White Hat Seed Farm; Perquimans County

December 2008, Volume 8, Issue 3 Available online at:

Economic Comparison of SDI and Center Pivots for Various Field Sizes

HIGH YIELD WHEAT! Peter Johnson Cereal Specialist,

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2007

Risk vs. Reward: Can We Resolve Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Questions in Soybean?

Do We Grow Another Bushel or Save a Buck?

FIELD CROPS NEWSLETTER

Maximizing Soybean Yields

SPRING FEED & MALT BARLEY & SPRING OATS VARIETY TRIAL DATA

Growing Season ET. This presentation posted at The Importance of Winter Wheat to Cropping Systems

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY WHEAT SCIENCE NEWS Research & Education Center, Princeton, KY 42445 Volume 10, Issue 3 Sept. 2006 Wheat in Kentucky -Team Work Makes a Difference- Wheat Science Group 2006 A 70 bu/ac. state average wheat yield in 2006 is the highest ever produced by the state of Kentucky. This is the 5 th highest in the U.S. and higher than almost all of the surrounding states. This is a dramatic increase over the 40 bu/ac state average in the mid 1980 s. This increase occurred in steps that corresponds to increased emphasis on education and applied research. The first step occurred as an agribusiness established a scouting and applied research program. With the new emphasis, the state average yields improved from the 40 s to the 50 s bu/ac. range. The next step occurred when the University of Kentucky concentrated and focused efforts on wheat with a group of 16 specialists with diverse expertise to form the Wheat Science Group. Soon afterward, the state average yields moved to the 60 s bu/ac range. The UK Specialists, consultants, and the Small Grain Grower s Association worked as a team on many research and educational efforts. So Kentucky now has excellent research and education programs on wheat with well informed and productive producers. Wheat yields have reached the 70 bu/ac range and Kentucky leads the nation in the percentage of acres planted to no-till wheat. Team work among the different groups has been the key to this effort. Kentucky s Wheat Enterprise Demonstrating Economic Potential Richard L. Trimble Extension Economist Kentucky s wheat enterprise has been earning management returns on a par with corn and soybeans over the past few years. However, 2006 could be the year that wheat, in the traditional combination with double crop soybeans, could really shine for Kentucky producers. Projections of 2006 return over variable costs by Craig Gibson, Kentucky Farm Business Management Specialist, indicate that wheat and double crop soybeans could expect a return over variable costs of $184.00 per acre. This was $66.00 per acre greater than the next best enterprise projected return. Kentucky wheat producers find themselves in this fortunate position as a result of two major factors. First, as a result of the efforts of the University of Kentucky Wheat Science Group, producers have been constantly increasing wheat yields. The state wide average wheat yield has increased from 53 bushels in 1996 to an average of 70 bushels per acre in 2006. Second, wheat prices are projected to be quite favorable for 2006. The result of combining these two factors has the potential for creating an uncommonly pleasant outcome for Kentucky wheat producers.

2006 Kentucky Extension Wheat Production Contest Summary of Award Winners 17 Entries (8 Tillage, 9 No-Tillage) 9 Varieties 10 Counties I. State Awards: AWARD DIV. TILLAGE PRODUCER COUNTY BRAND/ VARIETY YIELD (BU/AC) Champion I Conventional George Fox Todd Pioneer 25R49 108.36 Champion II No-Tillage Pat Clements Washington Cumberland 119.71 II. Area Awards AREA PRODUCER COUNTY BRAND/ VARIETY YIELD (BU/AC) DIV. 1. Purchase & Pennyrile Jeremy & Bruce Benson Hopkins Pioneer 25R37 110.51 II 2. Green River Knott Farms Daviess Pioneer 25R78 107.75 I 3. Mammoth Cave No Entry 4. Rest of State Bivens Farms LaRue Pioneer 25R78 109.21 II

III. Summary of Cultural Practices 1. Date Planted 2. Test Weight (lbs/bu) Oct. 1-9 1 51.0-53.5 1 (1) a Oct. 10-20 11 (4) b 55.0-58.0 10 (4) b Oct. 21-30 3 (3) 58.5-60.5 2 (1) Nov. 1-15 2 (1) a 60.5-62.0 1 62.1-64.0 1 (1) 3. Row Width (inches) 4. Seed Rate (lbs/ac) 7 4 (2) 90-114 1 7.5 10 (5) ab 115-125 1 8 1 (1) 126-135 2 (2) a Broadcast 2 136-145 1 (1) 2 146-155 5 (1) b 156+ 6 (4) 34 seeds/ft 2 1 5. Tillage Used 6. Insecticides Used No-Tillage 7 (5) a Cruiser fb Mustang 1 Disc x1, 2, or 3 8 (3) b DiSyston 1 Di-Syston fb Mustang 1 (1) Mustang 3 Mustang (fall & spring) 2 (2) a Warrior T 3 (1) Warrior (fall & spring) 3 (2) b 7. Herbicides Used 8. Fungicides Used Glyphosate 1 (1) Folicur 14 (4) b Harmony Extra XP 20 (8) ab Headline 4 2,4-D 4 (3) Quilt 1 (1) Sencor 2 Stratego 1 (1) Buctril 1 (1) Tilt 1 9. Fertilizer 10. Fertilizer P 2 O 5 (lbs/a) K 2 O (lbs/a) 0 3 0 3 (1) b 20-59 1 20-30 1 (1) 60-70 4 (4) a 40-59 1 75-99 6 (1) 60-70 100-120 1 (1) b 75-99 5 (3) a 100-120 4

III. Summary of Cultural Practices (Cont d) Nitrogen Applied N at Planting (Lbs/A) Nitrogen Applied Total N (Lbs/A) 0 2 60-79 1 (1) 15-20 2 (1) 80-99 3 (1) 21-25 2 (1) b 100-110 2 26-35 7 (4) a 111-120 1 36-60 1 121-130 6 (4) ab Broiler Litter (2 tons/ac) 1 (1) 131-140 4 (1) Split N in Spring Split N in Spring 1 st Split Date 1 st Split N (Lbs/A) Feb. 1-10 7 (3) b 30-39 1 (1) Feb. 13-28 6 (3) 40-50 12 (6) b Mar. 1-15 2 (1) a 51-90 3 (1) a 2 nd Split Date 2 nd Split N (Lbs/A) Mar. 10-20 10 (4) b 20-29 1 (1) Mar. 21-30 4 (3) 30-49 3 (1) a Apr. 1-25 2 (1) a 50-59 6 (3) 60-90 5 (3) b Single N in Spring Date Applied Single N in Spring Single N (Lbs/A) Mar. 1 90-99 1 *Number of entries Example 15 (3) a,b 15 = total number of entries (3) = number of entries above 105 bu/acre a = Top Yield, Division I, Conventional Tillage b = Top Yield, Division II, No-Tillage

IV. Agent Awards Top Yield: Rick Greenwell, Washington County, 119.71 bu/acre Top Three Average Yield: Curt Judy, Todd County, 106.13 bu/acre Most Entries: Clint Hardy, Daviess County, 6 entries V. Summary of Entries Grower, Farm Name County Brand Variety Yield (bu/a) Division I, Tillage George Fox Todd Pioneer 25R49 108.36 Knott Farms Daviess Pioneer 25R78 107.75 Traughbe Bros./George Fox Todd Pioneer 25R49 107.11 Greg Thomas McLean Vargo 104.76 Triple T Farms Daviess Pioneer 26R58 101.67 Scott Kuegel Daviess Pioneer 26R58 99.45 Knott Farms Daviess Pioneer 25R78 99.44 Clements Bros. Union Pioneer 25R54 98.44 Triple T Farms Daviess So. States SS 8302 94.95 Division II, No-Tillage Pat Clements Washington Cumberland 119.71 Jeremy & Bruce Benson Hopkins Pioneer 25R37 110.51 Bivens Farms LaRue Pioneer 25R78 109.21 Williams Farms Wayne So. States SS 8302 108.17 Burton Farms Wayne Pioneer 25R47 105.58 P & P Farms Todd Pioneer 25R37 102.93 Phillip McCoun Shelby Pioneer 25R54 86.96 PPJ Thompson Farms Daviess Pioneer 26R58 79.96 Contributing Agribusiness Appreciation is expressed to the following companies for their financial support which made it possible to provide proper recognition of the participants in this contest. General Sponsors Agri-Chem, Inc. Crow's Hybrid Corn Co. DuPont Crop Protection Pioneer Hi-Bred, USA Syngenta Crop Protection, United States No-Till Trophy Kentucky Small Grain Growers Association Traveling Trophy Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. and DuPont Crop Protection

For More Information, Contact: Dottie Call, Wheat Group Coordinator UK Research and Education Center P.O. Box 469, Princeton, KY 42445 Telephone: 270/365-7541 Ext. 234 E-mail: dcall@uky.edu Visit our Website: www.ca.uky.edu/ukrec/welcome2.htm Lloyd W. Murdock, Extension Soils Specialist Research and Education Center P.O. Box 469 Princeton, KY 42445-0469 Official Business