USDA-FSIS Recall Procedures

Similar documents
Meat and Poultry Recalls USDA, FSIS

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. RECAll OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2016 Biennial Conference for Food Protection

Industry Best Practices for Customer Complaints of Foreign Material in Meat and Poultry Products. August 2018

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2012 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

White Paper: Food Safety Enforcement and Inspection Actions and Terminology

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC RECALL OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

Starting on the Right Track

Lessons from USDA s Mandatory HACCP Rule for Meat and Poultry

Food Safety and Inspection Service:

F. Role of Supplier Approval and Verification Programs in a Food Safety System

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC RECALL OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

So, You Think You are Ready for a RECALL?

Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC T F

Important Contacts: Reporting the Recall

Important Contacts: Reporting the Recall

PRODUCT RECALL GUIDELINES FOR FIRMS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Establishment Name Date Establishment Address Establishment Number Establishment City, State, Zip Code. Date: Approved by:

Validation In Plant Findings

OneUSDA Do right and feed everyone

FSIS PERSPECTIVE ON PATHOGEN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Patricia S. Schwartz, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development FSIS, USDA

Product Recall & Withdrawal Policy. For Suppliers of United Natural Foods, Inc.

Keller and Heckman LLP Serving Business through Law and Science

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) & Imports of Food Products. August 9 th, 2016 Russell Statman, Registrar Corp

A Multi-Step Evaluation of the Economic Effects of USDA s 1996 HACCP Regulation on Meat and Poultry Plants

The Food Safety Modernization Act: What Exporters to the U.S. Need to Know. Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014

Poultry and Egg Regulations in Maryland. Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance

United States Department of Agriculture FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE STRATEGIC PLAN

FSMA compliance update

What a Preventive Controls Facility Looks Like. FSMA-HARPC vs. HACCP

Meat and Poultry Inspection Kansas Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Traceability Recordkeeping: A Public Health Vulnerability

Poultry and Egg Regulations in Maryland. Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance

EFFECTIVENESS CHECKS

USDA and MDA Food Safety Requirements for

FSMA. An Industry Perspective Patty Harvey MCAFDO February 24, 2016

Egg Products Inspection Verification

How Do Holds and Recalls Work with USDA Commodities?

Chairman, Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies

Achieving FSIS HACCP Validation Compliance. March 15 th and 17 th, 2016

HACCP? Yes/No/Maybe (delete where appropriate)

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson VP Regulatory Services IPPE, February 2019

1/15/2013. What is POULTRY?? * Before getting started... Rules, Regulations and Processing Options

Best Practices in Pathogen and Allergen Testing

HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION. John W. McCutcheon Associate Deputy Administrator, Field Operations Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA

9 CFR Parts 300, 441, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 537, 539, 540, 541, 544, 548, 550, 552, 555, 557, 559, 560, and 561

FSMA s Foreign Supplier Verification Program

Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food.

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

Reshaping FDA s Foods Program

Preventive Controls, Foreign Supplier Verification & Third Party Certification

Successfully Managing Product Recalls and Withdrawals

Strategic Plan FY FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE

Whether a Poultry Slaughter or

Table of Contents. How to Use This Service. Order of Chapters... iii. Contents of Appendices... How Tabs and Sections are Numbered...

Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)

Poultry Bill & Processing in Oregon

Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs.

Recall Plan Template Company Information

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

The Food Safety Modernization Act and Its Implications for USDA and Dual Jurisdiction Establishments

CDC STATISTICS FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA) (FSMA) RULEMAKING PROCESS AND HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS 02/12/13

SEMINAR-WORKSHOP ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRENGTHENING OF FOOD RECALL SYSTEM FOR APEC MEMBER ECONOMIES

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson January, 2018, IPPE

Food Safety in the Supply Chain Managing Risk in Global Trade

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Food Safety By Design Focus on FSMA Preven<ve Controls. Presented by: Dr. David Acheson

FDA s Revised Draft Guidance for Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready- To-Eat Foods

High Event Period (HEP) Kari Godbey & Chad Martin

Foreign Supplier Verification Programs: The Final Rule.

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FOOD SAFETY A RESOURCE GUIDE

FDA FSMA Timeline. July 29, 2009 House version passed. Nov. 30, 2010 Senate version passed. Dec. 19, 2010 Senate revised version passed

The following guidelines are intended to control contamination by. 4Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 and other pathogenic Shiga-toxin producing E.

Meet Diamond Pet Foods

Pathogen Reduction: a food safety priority

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service. Recordkeeping: A Public Health Vulnerability

Food Security Through Effective Food Safety Standards. IFMA Congress 2011 Methven. Kevin Swoffer

Starting your Alaska Food Business Successfully. Southeast Alaska Farm & Fish to School Conference Juneau, AK April 2-3, 2015

Food Safety Quality, Trust, and Integrity

Food Defense: Background and Global Importance

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MICROBIAL SAMPLING OF READY-TO-EAT (RTE) PRODUCTS

3M Food Safety and The Acheson Group present FSMA: How do I comply? Webinar series

Processing and Selling Value Added Food Products in Maryland

Lesson 10: Chapter 4 Module 1 Purchasing and Receiving Foods

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

RMOP REQUIRED METHODS OF OPERATION PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHMENTS EXPORTING BEEF TO CANADA: COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food: Draft Guidance for Industry 1

Consumer interest in food has been

The Federal Food Safety System: A Primer

Food Recall Train-the-Trainer

Testing for Salmonella in Raw Meat and Poultry Products Collected at Federally Inspected Establishments in the United States, 1998 through 2000

RE: PETITION FOR REGULATIONS TO ADDRESS PRODUCE SAFETY

FSMA How The Food Safety Plan, Auditing and the Role of PCQI

Food Safety Modernization Act

Table of Contents Page

The FDA Food Protection Plan and Others

Transcription:

USDA-FSIS Recall Procedures Midwest FDC Conference April 28, 2010 Lisa Volk Recall Management Staff

Recall A firm s voluntary removal of distributed meat, poultry, or egg products from commerce when there is reason to believe they are adulterated or misbranded under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) or the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA). Recall does not include a market withdrawal or a stock recovery.

Recall Classification Class I: Reasonable probability that consumption of product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death (Lm in RTE product, E. coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef) Class II: Remote probability of adverse health consequences from use of the product (ineligible imports, small amounts of allergens such as soy) Class III: Use of product will not cause adverse health consequences (undeclared, non-allergenic, GRAS ingredient such as added water)

15 Field Offices

Jurisdiction matters FSIS Pepperoni pizza Open-faced sandwiches Processed egg products Exotic species @ slaughter Beef broth FDA Cheese pizza Closed sandwiches Shell eggs Elk, bison, etc. in commerce Chicken broth* (*varies)

USDA/FSIS Inspection Daily inspection presence 5360 plants (~ 1800 dual jurisdiction) Carcass by carcass inspection HACCP plans mandated for all plants Problems identified - Plant or inspection personnel (lab tests) - Customer complaints - Illnesses/Epidemiologic investigations - Other governmental bodies

Problem categories Pathogens - E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef - Lm or Salmonella in RTE foods Undeclared allergens Extraneous materials/chemical contaminants/residues Operating w/o inspection presence

Ingredients Driven Recalls Melamine in pet foods - animals held pending test results - no meat recalls Salmonellosis Outbreaks - PCA Peanut recall implicated handful of FSIS products - Hundreds of illnesses; Nearly 4000 products recalled - Spice recalls (black and red pepper) -Initially linked to Salami-type products HVP - FDA and FSIS jointly developed policy - No illnesses, recalls on-going

FSIS Recalls CY 2009 By Class (Total 69)

FSIS Recalls CY 2009 by Problem Type

FSIS Recalls CY 2009 by Source

Depth of a Recall Wholesale Level Product has been distributed to a warehouse or distribution center, where it is NOT under the direct control of the producing company (level between the manufacturer and the retailer) Retail Level Product has been received by retailers for sale to household consumers HRI Level The product has been received by hotels, restaurants, and other institution customers Consumer Level The product has been sold directly to household consumers (mail order)

Public Notification Recall Release for Class I & II recalls, post to FSIS Web site and distribute to media wire and outlet services in area of product distribution Publish Retail List for Class I Recalls only includes retail consignees that have or have had recalled products in their possession Recall Notification Report (RNR) Class III recalls or Class I & II distributed only to the wholesale level follows the same format and pre-release procedures as the Recall Release but is not distributed to media wire and outlet services Subscribers receive email notification of all recalls

Press Release The Recall Release: Clearly describes product(s) being recalled, along with identifying marks; provides reason for the recall, and describes the risks involved in consuming the product Provides name and telephone number of the company contact for consumers and media to call with any questions Provides general information about the product s destination (depth of recall) When possible, without slowing the public notification, FSIS will post an electronic picture of the product label on the FSIS website

Public Notification FSIS prepares and submits a draft copy of the Recall Release or RNR to the recalling firm 30 minutes prior to its release. The firm will have 30 minutes to review the Recall Release to verify its technical accuracy (i.e. product description, company contact information, product distribution information, etc.) If the firm DOES NOT respond in 30 minutes of receiving the release, FSIS will proceed to issue the Recall Release Recall Release uses a standard format to provide the public with pertinent, descriptive product information, therefore comments and additions outside of this format are not typically included Release is sent to media outlets, public health officials, subscribers, posted on the FSIS website and Twitter.

Effectiveness Checks Effectiveness checks are conducted throughout the distribution chain Risk based and primarily dependant on the class of the recall and total number of consignees District Office coordinates and directs FSIS personnel to conduct effectiveness checks for domestic recalls When an importer conducts the recall, process details are different

RECORDS! RECORDS! RECORDS! Good recordkeeping is essential to the recall process. Accurate detailed records can: Narrow the scope of the recall Demonstrate the microbiological separation of implicated products Help isolate the source of problem Clearly identify products involved both for the recall committee during deliberations and to the retailer/consumer in the event of a recall Provide support for the firm s position of why a recall may not be warranted Ensure distribution and product information obtained easily, quickly, and accurately

What Can Simplify the Process Be prepared to submit information electronically, including copies of labels Be able to obtain product and distribution information quickly (even for large amounts of product) Be able to identify specific consignees vs. a generic customer list

Useful Links http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oppde/rdad/fsisdire ctives/8080.1rev5.pdf http://www.fsis.usda.gov/fsis_recalls/ http://www.fsis.usda.gov/fact_sheets/fsis_foo d_recalls/index.asp http://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls/default.htm

Questions