A Methodological Note on a Stochastic Frontier Model for the Analysis of the Effects of Quality of Irrigation Water on Crop Yields

Similar documents
ESTIMATION OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY ON WHEAT FARMS IN NORTHERN INDIA A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Dr. S. K. Goyal

MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF POTATO PRODUCTION IN TWO SELECTED AREAS OF BANGLADESH: A TRANSLOG STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS

Estimating Technical Efficiency of IRRI Rice Production in the Northern Parts of Bangladesh

Livestock Production Systems and Technical Inefficiency of Feedlot Cattle Farms in Thailand *

The Impact of Rural Financial Services on the Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in the Upper North of Thailand 1

DOES LABOUR MARKET FLEXIBILITY INCREASE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF LABOUR USE? EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING

Analysis of Technical Efficiency and Varietal Differences in. Pistachio Production in Iran Using a Meta-Frontier Analysis 1

Journal of Asian Scientific Research

ABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION

Technical efficiency and productivity of maize producers in eastern Ethiopia: a study of farmers within and outside the Sasakawa-Global 2000 project

Igbekele A. Ajibefun INTRODUCTION

Performance of participatory and non-participatory farmers of integrated crop management project at Pirganj upazila under Thakurgaon district

CROP-SPECIFIC PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF BANGLADESH RICE CROPS AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF ARTISANAL FISHERIES IN THE SOUTHERN SECTOR OF GHANA

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN IRISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY, Ali Uğur IIIS and Department of Economics Trinity College Dublin

Catch, Efficiency and the Management of the Australian Northern Prawn Fishery

Efficiency in Sugarcane Production Under Tank Irrigation Systems in Tamil Nadu, India

Technical Efficiency in Food Crop Production in Oyo State, Nigeria

The productive efficiency of organic farming The case of grape growing in Catalonia B. Guesmi, T. Serra, Z. Kallas & J.M. Gil

Pattern of investment allocation to chemical inputs and technical efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis of farm households in Laguna, Philippines

Technical Efficiency of Temple Owned Lands in Tamil Nadu, India

Analysis of Allocative Efficiency in Northern Pakistan: Estimation, Causes, and Policy Implications

Technical Efficiency of Thai Manufacturing SMEs: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis

Estimation of Technical Efficiency of Wheat Farms A Case Study in Kurdistan Province, Iran

FARM-SIZE-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS FOR RICE GROWERS IN BANGLADESH. K. M. M. Rahman 1 M. I. Mia 2 M. A.

The Impact of Building Energy Codes on the Energy Efficiency of Residential Space Heating in European countries A Stochastic Frontier Approach

Analysis of the technical efficiency of rice farms in Ijesha Land of Osun State, Nigeria

Department of Econometrics University of New England Armidale NSW 2351 Australia

Technical Efficiency of rice producers in Mwea Irrigation Scheme

Technical Efficiency of the Manufacturing Industry in. Turkey:

IMPACT OF FARM-SPECIFIC FACTORS ON THE TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY OF PRODUCING RICE IN BANGALDESH

SELF-DUAL STOCHASTIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS AND DECOMPOSITION OF OUTPUT GROWTH: THE CASE OF OLIVE-GROWING FARMS IN GREECE

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF CITRUS FARMS IN BRAZIL Authors: Marcelo José Carrer, Hildo Meirelles de Souza Filho & Fabiana Ribeiro Rossi.

Cost efficiency of Malaysian oil and fat industry: An empirical evidence. Abstract

THE EFFICIENCY OF INPUT USAGE OF ORGANIC PADDY FARMING IN INDONESIA

PROFIT EFFICIENCY IN RICE PRODUCTION IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH

Water Use and Agricultural Production

Productivity of Maize Farmers in Surulere Local Government Area of Oyo State

Available online at ScienceDirect. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 5 ( 2015 ) 89 95

Chapter 5: An Econometric Analysis of Agricultural Production, Focusing on the

Sensitivity of Technical Efficiency Estimates to Estimation Methods: An Empirical Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Approaches

Increasing production efficiency of ginger for poverty alleviation in Kaduna state, Nigeria: A stochastic frontier approach

EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF RICE-WHEAT SYSTEM IN PUNJAB, PAKISTAN

Productivity and Efficiency of Farmers Growing Four Popular Wheat Varieties in Punjab, Pakistan

Research Note AN ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF RICE FARMERS IN PAKISTANI PUNJAB. Munir Ahmad Muhammad Rafiq Asgar Ali ABSTRACT

Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University, Ithaca, New York USA

Efficiency and Technological Progress in the Chinese Agriculture: the Role of Foreign Direct Investment. Quan Li and Thomas I.

DO FARMERS CHOOSE TO BE INEFFICIENT? EVIDENCE FROM BICOL, PHILIPPINES

Technical Efficiency of Rice Farms under Irrigated Conditions in Central Gujarat

Technology choice and efficiency on Australian dairy farms*

The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, October, 2001, pp

ESTIMATION OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IT S DETERMINANTS IN THE HYBRID MAIZE PRODUCTION IN DISTRICT CHINIOT: A COBB- DOUGLAS MODEL APPROACH

OHAJIANYA D.O, P.C. OBASI AND J.S. OREBIYI

Technical Change and Productive Inefficiency Change in Norwegian Salmon Farming: The Influence of Regional Agglomeration Externalities

MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY IN THE PRODUCTION OF RICE IN BANGLADESH - A TRANSLOG STOCHASTIC COST FRONTIER ANALYSIS

Technical Efficiency and Determinants of Maize Production by Smallholder Farmers in the Moneragala District of Sri Lanka

AN INTRODUCTION TO EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS

Measuring Technical Efficiency of Wheat Farms in Punjab, Pakistan: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis Approach

Journal of Asian Scientific Research PROFIT EFFICIENCY AMONG PADDY FARMERS: A COBB-DOUGLAS STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION ANALYSIS

A Stochastic Frontier Approach for Measuring Technical Efficiencies of Date Farms in Southern Tunisia

An Investigation of the Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Broadacre Farmers a

FACE Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Universidad de Diseño de Páginas: Diana M. Vargas

Can Small-scale Tomato Farmers Flourish in Benue State, Nigeria?

Technical Efficiency, Technological Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises in the Early 1990s

Impact of EU accession on farms technical efficiency in Hungary

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SORGHUM PRODUCTION IN HONG LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA OF ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA. Abba Mohammed Wakili, Researcher

Economies of Scale and Cost Efficiency in Small Scale Maize Production: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria

Farm Technical Efficiency and Extension

The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services on Farm Household Efficiency in Ethiopia

A.S.M. Anwarul Huq and Fatimah Mohamed Arshad Institute of Agricultural and Food Policy Studies, University Putra Malaysia,

A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS OF BAMBARA GROUNDNUT PRODUCTION IN WESTERN KENYA

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF DAIRY CATTLE FARMS IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY BY STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS ABSTRACT

Stochastic Frontier Analysis of the Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Maize Farmers in Central Province, Zambia

An Analysis of Allocative Efficiency of Wheat Growers in Northern Pakistan

ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF GINGER (Zingiber officinale Rose.) CULTIVATION IN SOME SELECTED LOCATIONS OF BANGLADESH. Abstract

Analyzing the technical performance of Swedish farms - Involved in horse related activities

Parametric Estimation of Technical and Scale efficiencies in Italian Citrus farming. Fabio A. Madau 1

Impacts of Climate Change and Extreme Weather on U.S. Agricultural Productivity

Technical Efficiency Analysis of Maize Production: Evidence from Ghana

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN DISTRICT DERA ISMAIL KHAN

FUW Trends in Science & Technology Journal April, 2016 Vol. 1 No. 1 e-issn: ; p-issn: pp

Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

Lahore University of Management Sciences. Econ 414 Applied Microeconomics Spring 2018

Technical Efficiency and Costs of Production among Small holder Rubber Farmers in Edo State, Nigeria

Dairy Farm Cost Efficiency

A Comparative Analysis of Productivity Growth, Catch-Up and Convergence in Transition Economies

Technical Efficiency in Wheat Seed Production: A Case Study from Tarai Region of Nepal

Production Efficiency of Broiler Farming in Thailand: A Stochastic Frontier Approach

Profitability and technical efficiency of Boro rice (BRRI dhan29) cultivation in Dinajpur and Bogra of Bangladesh

Resource-use Efficiency of Paddy Cultivation in Peechi Command Area of Thrissur District of Kerala: An Economic Analysis

RAAE. Raymond K. DZIWORNU 1*, Daniel B. SARPONG 2 ABSTRACT

Gender Comparison in Production and Productivity of Cocoa Farmers in Ile Oluji Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria

Technical Efficiency Analysis of Small-Scale Cassava Farming in Lao PDR

ESTIMATION OF FARM LEVEL TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND ITS DETERMINANTS AMONG MALE AND FEMALE SWEET POTATO FARMERS IN IMO STATE, NIGERIA 1

Technical Efficiency, Determinants and Risks of Watermelon Production in Bangladesh

Cost Efficiency Evaluation and Performance Assessment of Urban Water Supply Utilities In The State of Madhya Pradesh, India

USING CROSS-SECTION DATA TO ADJUST TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY INDEXES ESTIMATED WITH PANEL DATA

Firm Efficiency in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from Vietnam

IMPACT OF DIRECT INCOME PAYMENTS ON PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY OF KOREAN RICE FARMS *

University of Wollongong Economics Working Paper Series 2010

Transcription:

The Pakistan Development Review 37 : 3 (Autumn 1998) pp. 293 298 Note A Methodological Note on a Stochastic Frontier Model for the Analysis of the Effects of Quality of Irrigation Water on Crop Yields GEORGE E. BATTESE A stochastic frontier model is proposed for analysis of crop yields, which considers the effects of differing quality of irrigation water, in addition to different inputs and factors associated with technical inefficiency of production. The parameters of the production frontier involved are assumed to be a function of other variables, which measure the quality of the irrigation water. 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years in Pakistan, there has been concern about the quality of the irrigation water used by farmers on their crops. Frequently, canal and tubewell water are mixed, or used in sequence, in the irrigation of various crops in the Punjab, because the quality of the tubewell water has been of poor quality and has lead to reduced crop yields and salinity of the soils. Research by soil scientists has led to the measurement and classification of soils, according to their chemical and structural characteristics. However, no empirical research work has been done on the analysis of farm-level data on the effects of poor-quality irrigation water on crop yields. This paper outlines a possible model for analysis of crop yields, which considers the effects of inputs and farmer characteristics, together with the effects of the quality of irrigation water used. The approach involves a stochastic frontier production function model, in which the technical inefficiency effects are assumed to be a function of various observable variables. In addition, the parameters of the stochastic frontier function are assumed to be a function of variables, which are associated with the quality of the irrigation water used in the cropping season. George E. Battese works at the Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, School of Economic Studies, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia. Author s Note: This paper arises from the author s three-month assignment at the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan (UAF), as part of a twinning agreement between the University of New England and the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

294 George E. Battese 2. SAMPLING AND DATA In order to investigate the effects of varying quality of irrigation water on crop yields, it is necessary to obtain an appropriate sample of farms from a given population. Unless random sampling methods are used in obtaining the sample of farms, the analysis of the data obtained may be of no benefit in making inference to the whole population of farms of interest. In order to obtain a sample of some design (simple random, stratified, cluster, etc.) some information on the population must be available or obtained, so that the appropriate sample of farms can be selected. For example, if a stratified random sample is to be obtained, where several villages in a district comprise the strata, then lists of all farmers in each village must be obtained before the sampling can proceed. If unequal probability sampling is used in the selection of the sample farms, then these probabilities of selection should be used in the analysis of the sample data. Such analyses are not often taken into account in empirical analysis of input and output data in agricultural economics [see Fuller (1975)]. The analysis suggested below assumes that the sample farms obtained are selected by simple random sampling and so the weights applied to all observations are the same. In order to be able to conduct a response function analysis, yields of crops on the sample farms must be collected, together with the relevant input data for each crop to be considered. In order to account for the possible effect of varying quality of irrigation water used by the farmers, quantitative measures for the quality of the water must also be obtained, involving laboratory analysis of samples of water. Further, data on variables, which are likely to influence the level of the technical inefficiency of production, are required, given that stochastic frontier production functions are to be estimated, rather than the traditional crop response functions. These data requirements imply that the survey procedures must be carefully designed, and carried out, for the project to result in appropriate data for a satisfactory empirical analysis to be conducted. Battese (1998) comments on these procedures. 3. ECONOMETRIC MODEL The model, which is proposed for the analysis of farm-level data, involves a stochastic frontier production function, in which the parameters of the production function are specified to be a function of the variables associated with the quality of the irrigation water. The quality of the irrigation water is not to be considered as an input variable, like land, labour, fertiliser, etc. However, the quality of the water applied in the cropping season may affect the responsiveness of a crop to the different factors of production involved. The model is presented in terms of a Cobb- Douglas production function. If data from a large number of sample farmers are available, then the parameters of a more flexible functional form, such as a translog

A Methodological Note on a Stochastic Frontier Model 295 production function, may be estimated with reasonable levels of precision. For purposes of exposition, the model is presented in terms of output of wheat, involving the three input variables, land, fertiliser and irrigation, as follows: log (Y i ) = β 0i + β 1i X 1i + β 2i X 2i + β 3i X 3i +V i U i (1) where log denotes the natural logarithm (base, e); the subscript, i, denotes the ith farmer in the sample, i = 1,2,..., n, and n is the number of farmers selected in the random sample; Y i denotes the total yield of wheat for the ith farmer; X 1i denotes the logarithm of the land area under wheat; X 2i denotes the logarithm of the quantity of fertiliser applied; 1 X 3i denotes the logarithm of the quantity of irrigation water applied; 2 β ki K = 0, 1,2,3, are unknown parameters for the production function for the ith farmer (to be defined below in terms of other variables); V i s are random errors associated with measurement errors in the yields of wheat reported, or the combined effects of input variables not included in the production function, where the V i s are assumed to be independent and identically distributed N (0, σ v 2 )-random variables; U i s are non-negative random variables, associated with the technical inefficiency of production of the farmers in the population, assumed to be independently distributed, such that the technical inefficiency effect for the ith farmer, U i, is obtained by truncation (at zero) of the normal distribution with mean, µ i, and variance, σ 2, such that µ i = δ 0 + δ 1 Z 1i + δ 2 Z 2i + δ 3 Z 3i + δ 4 Z 4i (2) where Z 1i, Z 2i, Z 3i and Z 4i are values of explanatory variables for the technical inefficiency effects for the ith farmer, say, his age and education, logarithm of the total land operated by the farmer, 3 and the proportion of the tubewell water used in the irrigations over the past season(s). 1 The quantity of fertiliser could be in terms of a particular fertiliser, such as urea, or in terms of NPK. If some farmers did not apply fertiliser, then a dummy variable should be included in the model to permit the intercepts to be different for farmers with positive and zero fertiliser, see Battese (1997). 2 The quantity of irrigation water applied can be approximated by the number of irrigations times the area under the crop, given that the volume of water applied is effectively constant for each occasion of irrigating. If this is not the case then a different measure of the irrigation water would be needed. 3 When the inputs (or a variable closely corresponding to them, as suggested here) are also involved as explanatory variables for the inefficiency effects, the stochastic frontier model is called a non-neutral model, as proposed by Huang and Liu (1994) and further considered by Battese and Broca (1997). These models have important bearing upon the estimation of the elasticity of the mean output with respect to an input variable, which is also an explanatory variable for the inefficiency effects.

296 George E. Battese The above stochastic frontier model is a development of the original model, proposed by Aigner, Lovell and Schmidt (1977) and Meeusen and van den Broeck (1977). The inefficiency effects are modelled in terms of other variables, as suggested by Battese and Coelli (1995) in the context of panel data on sample firms. The model can be estimated using the computer programme, FRONTIER 4.1, written by Tim Coelli from the University of New England. 4 The final component of the model, for considering for the effects of differing quality of irrigation water, is defined as follows: β ki = β k + β k1 Q 1i + β k2 Q 2i, k = 0, 1, 2, 3, (3) where Q 1i and Q 2i are the values of variables, which measures the quality of the irrigation water applied by the ith farmer. These measures may be a function of the levels of electrical conductivity (EC), sodium absorption ratio (SAR), or residual sodium carbonate (RSC), which are important measures by which soil and water quality are classified by soil scientists, e.g., see Ghafoor, Qadir and Qureshi (1991). Alternatively, the model in Equation (3) may include second-order terms involving one or more of these variables. 5 The specification of the parameters of the frontier model, in terms of the quality of the irrigation water, implies that the frontier model to be estimated is obtained by substitution of Equation (3) into Equation (1), which yields the model log (Y i ) = β 0 + β 01 Q 1i + β 02 Q 2i + β 1 X 1i + β 2 X 2i + β 3 X 3i + β 11 X 1i Q 1i + β 12 X 1i Q 2i + β 21 X 2i Q 1i + β 22 X 2i Q 2i + β 31 X 3i Q 1i + β 32 X 3i Q 2i + V i U i. (4) Thus the stochastic frontier production function includes the quality variables for irrigation water as intercept shifters in the function, together with their interactions with the input variables, as additional explanatory variables in the production function. An implication of this model is that the elasticities of output with respect to the different inputs are a linear function of the quality variables for irrigation water. In the empirical application of this model, there would be interest to see if the elasticities are independent of the quality of the irrigation water applied to the crop. This would involve testing if the coefficients of the interaction variables are simultaneously zero (i.e., β k1 = β k2 = 0, k = 1,2,3). Testing the null hypothesis, that the quality variables for irrigation water have no effects on the level of yields and the elasticities of output, would involve estimating the traditional Cobb-Douglas 4 FRONTIER 4.1 can be downloaded from the Internet by accessing the address for the Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) at the University of New England. http://www.une.edu. au/econometrics/cepa.htm. 5 Such a model has more parameters to estimate and so the efficiency of estimation would be reduced.

A Methodological Note on a Stochastic Frontier Model 297 frontier production function. These tests can be easily performed using a generalised likelihood-ratio test 6 and the FRONTIER 4.1 programme to estimate the appropriate models involved under the null and alternative hypotheses. 4. CONCLUSION The investigation of the effect of quality of irrigation water on crop production is a subject of considerable importance for the agricultural and economic development of Pakistan. It would require that considerable resources be expended on carefully designing and conducting a sufficiently large random sample of farmers. However, it is a research project that should be given some priority by government departments, in conjunction with researchers in relevant departments of the agricultural universities, which have the appropriate expertise in the areas required. REFERENCES Aigner, D. C., A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt (1977) Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Models. Journal of Econometrics 6: 21 37. Battese, G. E. (1997) A Note on the Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Functions When Some Explanatory Variables Have Zero Values. Journal of Agricultural Economics 48: 250 252. Battese, G. E. (1998) A Stochastic Frontier Model for the Analysis of the Effects of Quality of Irrigation Water on Crop Yields. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Armidale. (CEPA Working Papers, No. 9/98.) Battese, G. E., and S. S. Broca (1997) Functional Forms of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions and Models for Technical Inefficiency Effects: A Comparative Study for Wheat Farmers in Pakistan. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8: 395 414. Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli (1995) A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data. Empirical Economics 20: 325 332. Coelli, T. J., and G. E. Battese (1996) Identification of Factors which Influence the Technical Inefficiency of Indian Farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural 6 The generalised likelihood-ratio statistic is calculated as λ = 2 log[l(h 0 )/L(H 1 )], where L(H 1 ) and L(H 0 ) are the values of the likelihood functions for the original model and that for which the specifications of the null hypothesis, H 0, are imposed before estimation. This test statistic asymptotically has Chi-square or mixed Chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference between the numbers of parameters estimated in the two models. Coelli and Battese (1996) pointed out that, for the test for absence of the inefficiency effects in the stochastic frontier model, λ has a mixed Chi-square distribution and the appropriate critical values for the test are obtained from Table 1 of Kodde and Palm (1986). For this test, the value of λ is directly calculated by the FRONTIER programme.

298 George E. Battese Economics 40: 103 128. Fuller, W. A. (1975) Regression Analysis for Sample Survey. Sankya: The Indian Journal of Statistics 57: 117 132. Ghafoor, A., M. Qadir, and R. H. Qureshi (1991) Using Brackish Water on Normal and Salt-affected Soils in Pakistan: A Review. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 28: 273 288. Huang, C. J., and J-T. Liu (1994) Estimation of a Non-neutral Stochastic Frontier Production Function. Journal of Productivity Analysis 5: 171 180. Kodde, D. A., and F. C. Palm (1986) Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions. Econometrica 54: 1243 1248. Meeusen, W., and J. van den Broeck (1977) Efficiency Estimation from Cobb- Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error. International Economic Review 18: 435 444.