Biofiltration and Downspout Filter Media Evaluation for BMP Decision-Making at the Port of Vancouver, WA

Similar documents
Biofiltration for Stormwater Treatment Port of Vancouver, WA. Sheila Sahu, Senior Project Manager, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Portland, Oregon

Floating Plants & Boxes of Dirt The Future of Stormwater Treatment

Treatment Selection, Design, and Performance for Two Heavy Industrial Facilities

Zooming in on Particle Size: Understanding Metals in Industrial Stormwater

CENTRALIZED BMPS TYPICALLY PUBLICLY OWNED & MAINTAINED BMPS, TREATING A LARGE (>20 ACRES) URBAN DRAINAGE WITH MULTIPLE LAND

Observed infiltration and clogging characteristics for tested media.

Stormwater Programs and Permit Compliance at Washington Ports

Port of Tacoma Stormwater Management Program. Jason Jordan Director of Environmental and Planning Programs

December 2009 (Revised May, 2010, September 2011)

Best Management Practices for Stormwater Quality Treatment in Urban Settings. Lower Mississippi River WMO September 2017

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Certifying the Performance of Manufactured Stormwater Treatment Devices: A Review of the TAPE Process and Testing Centers

SmartDrain TM for Enhanced Biofiltration Controls

Conservation Design Approach for New Development

A Forterra Company Kraken Filter

Topics. Water Quality Treatment in Permeable Paving. Treatment Mechanisms. Initial and Long-term Performance

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LID PLAN)

3.7 Guidance for Large Bioretention/Biofiltration BMP Facilities

4.4.5 Grassed Swale (also known as Enhanced Swale or Biofiltration Swale)

4/21/2015. Statewide LID Training Program INSTRUCTORS. Curtis Hinman. Dylan Ahearn PhD

Attachment 1. Manufactured Treatment Device (MTD) Registration

Biochar for Stormwater Treatment:

INSTRUCTORS. Curtis Hinman. Dylan Ahearn PhD 4/21/2015

Wet Detention Ponds, MCTTs, and other Options for Critical Area Stormwater Control. Robert Pitt University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

TABLE B.3 - STORMWATER BMP POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES

Chapter 5 Hydraulic Structures

Stormwater Treatment Measure Sizing and Design Considerations SMCWPPP C.3 Workshop June 21, 2017

CONTAINER TERMINAL STORMWATER TREATMENT ON A SUPERFUND SITE Stephen Bentsen, Floyd Snider, Seattle

Development of a rapid bio-filtration media using local materials

Maine Stormwater Conference Portland Marriott at Sable Oaks South Portland, Maine November 21, 2013

Stormwater Management Regulation & Implementation Overview

Stormwater Management at San Diego International Airport

Advanced Stormwater Biofiltration. MWS Linear

Design Example Residential Subdivision

Dr. Britt Faucette, PhD, CPESC, LEED AP Ecosystem Scientist. Designing with Nature: Compost Blankets & Filter Socks for Erosion & Sediment Control

Need to Verify Model TSS Reduction Estimates

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

Georgia DOT s Fresh Approach to Improving Water Quality on Roadway Projects. The New Drainage Manual October 10, 2014

SUMMARY REPORT. Brik Zivkovich, M.S., EIT Graduate Engineering Intern, Master Planning Program

Utilizing Sorbtive Media to Enhance Green Infrastructure Practices. Robert A. Gallucci, PE Imbrium Systems, Inc.

George Hild Hild & Associates, Inc. River Falls, WI

Comprehensive Stormwater Solutions

EAGLE DRAINAGE DESIGN STANDARDS

Infiltration Trench Factsheet

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

Permeable Pavement Hydrologic Modeling

Concurrent Session B: LID Design Specifications (Chapter 4 in Draft Manual)

Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University

MODEL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT

Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

Permeable Pavement. Pavements constructed with these units create joints that are filled with permeable

Permeable Pavement for Stormwater Management Porous Pavement

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

Choosing BMPs and Monitoring Them. James Houle and Tim Puls, UNH Stormwater Center

What To Do When the Rain Comes Down Meeting the Requirements of Washington States New Industrial General Stormwater Permit

APPENDIX I WATER QUALITY FACTORS FOR FEE CREDIT CALCULATIONS

Lockwood Folly Watershed Bacteria TMDL & LID

Pinellas County Stormwater Management Manual Training Workshop SMALL COMMERCIAL AREA CASE STUDY

Stormwater Runoff Water Quality Characteristics From Highways in Lake Tahoe, California

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

Table 1: Water Quality Event (WQE) Design Intensities. i 1 (t c 5 min) (in/hr) a b. tc c

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

Chapter 12 - Emerging Technologies

Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards d Workshop

Opti-Tool: A BMP Optimization Tool for Stormwater Management in EPA Region 1

with assistance from New Zealand Water and Wastes Association presents Managing Stormwater and Road Run-off Tools, Techniques and Devices

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary

PERKFILTER. Design Guide

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

NORTH GRIFFIN REGIONAL DETENTION POND - WETLANDS FILTRATION FOR NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL AND ABATEMENT

APPENDIX I. Water Quality Technical Memorandum

OHIO S NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OHC Justin Reinhart, PE Division of Surface Water

APPENDIX C. STORMWATER STRUCTURAL BMP DESCRIPTIONS

Complying with the Edwards Aquifer Rules Technical Guidance on Best Management Practices

CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS: An Overview of the Technology

Stormwater Manufactured Treatment Devices (MTDs)

Comparing Treatment and Siting Criteria for Stormwater BMPs near Drinking Water Supply Areas

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

10/16/2013. The Big Picture of LID and Green Infrastructure. Learning Objectives

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

Appendix F: Modeled Benefits for New Wet Weather Structural BMPs

CHAPTER 7: guidance. categories: Pollutant Removal. Jordan Lake watershed) Cisterns. Bioretention Areas. Green Roofs. Dry. Proprietary Devices

State-of-the-Practice Porous Asphalt Pavements. Kent R. Hansen, P.E. Director of Engineering National Asphalt Pavement Association

Challenges and Practical Solutions to Managing Municipal Stormwater Systems. Stories from the end of the pipe

3.2 INFILTRATION TRENCH

Appendix A. Compliance Calculator Guidance

Dual Media Filtration System for Reducing Pollutants in Storm Water Runoff

Pollutant Load Modeling for PDX

ENGINEERED WETLAND TECHNOLOGY TO ADVANCE STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT. Sheldon Smith March 28, Photo Optional

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS. Filterra Bioretention System Solutions Guide

Land Development and Soil Characteristics Affects on Runoff

UNH STORMWATER CENTER EFFECTIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Lamprey River Symposium January 16, 2009

Designing with Nature: LID & Stormwater Quality Treatment with Compost BMPs

Passive Phosphorus Removal Systems

Stormwater line will be ABOVE ground corrugated pipe (No need to bury) running down to basin on NW 99 th St. It is simple and approved.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE

TMDL and Stormwater Regulations & Policy: Recent Developments and their Implications for MS4 Permit Holders

Transcription:

Biofiltration and Downspout Filter Media Evaluation for BMP Decision-Making at the Port of Vancouver, WA StormCon August 30 th, 2017 Sheila Sahu, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Portland, OR Matt Graves, Port of Vancouver Vancouver, WA

Presentation Outline Introduction to Treatment Systems Stormwater Challenges, Goals, and Limitations Design and Performance (Overview) Infiltration Testing and Sampling Results (In-Depth): Terminal 2 (T2) System Grattix Box Summary of Findings Annual Maintenance Recommendations

Two Successful Treatment Systems at the Port T2 System Large Biofiltration System Installed 2009 Grattix Box Biofiltration in a Tote First installed 2008 Name derived from (Matt) Graves/ (Mary) Mattix combo

Stormwater Pollutant Challenges Sources everywhere (both municipal & industrial issues): TSS dirt, tires, worn pavement O&G motor oil & hydraulic fluids Metals zinc, copper, lead from galvanized materials, paint, dirt, roofs, fences, tires, shipping containers, etc. Pollutants fall from the sky through atmospheric deposition BMPs only help so much

Our Goals = WA ISGP Permit Benchmarks Quarterly Stormwater Sampling - Benchmarks Turbidity: 25 NTU ph: 5.0-9.0 Oil Sheen: none visible Petroleum Hydrocarbons: 10 mg/l Total Copper: 14 µg/l Total Zinc: 117 µg/l Port discharge routed to Columbia River

Limitations of Conventional Methods E.g., ponds, vaults, swales, engineered wetlands Proprietary systems can be expensive Large footprint= $$ Most focus on particle settling, residence time Ineffective for dissolved metals & colloids

Why Natural Systems? Capital cost, O&M, sustainability More removal processes They work Mike Siegel / The Seattle Times

T2 System Large Biofiltration System 23,650 square feet (0.54 ac) Treats 60 ac impervious Peak inflow rate= 18.2 cfs (~5-yr, 24-hr storm event, 2.8 ) Design includes: Sedimentation basin Underdrains Collector line CBs (1-ft max. ponding) Sampling port Collector Line CBs Sampling Port Underdrain (typical) Sedimentation Basin

T2 System 2009-2013 Performance Port achieved consistent attainment (8 consecutive quarterly sampling events meeting ISGP benchmarks) 4 years after install Allows for 3-year sampling suspension; will resume sampling in 2017 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)

T2 System 2016 Performance Evaluation Samples collected in each profile depth (red, pink, blue dots): 0-4 surface deposition 8-14 middle of soil mix 23-36 bottom of soil mix Infiltration Testing (blue dots; Ecology Pilot Infiltration Test)

T2 System 2016 Performance Evaluation Invasive Plants Cirsium arvense (Canada thistle) Surface Deposition Equisetum arvense (Field horsetail)

Grattix Box Biofiltration in a Tote One box treats max. 5,000 sq. ft. http://www.portvanusa.com/assets/grattix-how-to-flyer.pdf

Grattix Box 2008 Pilot Study Performance Downspout Influent Downspout Effluent Total Zn (μg/l) Total Zn (μg/l) Benchmark 117 μg/l 11/20/08 295 21.3 11/25/08 947 14.7 12/12/08 278 ND (<5) 12/29/08 213 ND (<20)

Grattix Box 2016 Performance Evaluation Samples collected in each profile depth (3 boxes): 0-4 surface deposition 6-10 middle of soil mix 10-16 bottom of soil mix/sand Infiltration Testing (single-ring infiltrometer) 2009 2012 2016

T2 System and Grattix Box Results Infiltration Testing Laboratory analyses for: RCRA 8 metals plus Copper and Zinc Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) Organic Content (OC) Sieve and Hydrometer (Particle Size)

Infiltration Testing Results BMPs had high infiltration rates compared with recommended (2-12 in/hr) Higher T2 System rates likely due to larger testing area, no ring restriction >Gravel surface samples = high constant head rate >Sand bottom samples = high falling head

Media Sampling Results (Metals) Number of Samples Range (mg/kg) Median (mg/kg) Metal Copper Top 9 26.5-83.7 58.5 Middle 9 12.7-33.5 15.5 Bottom 3 5.82-7.34 6.63 Lead Top 9 15.7-45.5 21.2 Middle 9 8.69-18.3 10.7 Bottom 3 5.36-7.09 5.55 Zinc Top 9 277-556 346 Middle 9 153-283 202 Bottom 3 50.2-72.6 67.2 T2 System Sample T2 System ProUCL Box Plot Grattix Boxes

Media Sampling Results (CEC & OC) Soil mix is 40% compost, 60% sand by volume Highest Metals Capture (top samples >CEC & OC)

Particle Size Distribution Uniformity Coefficient (Uc) = (D60) / (D10) Uc= 4 or less recommended BUT higher Uc = higher metals capture Conclusion: Widely graded with fines is more effective than narrowly graded Assumption: Origination of fines is not runoff Highest Metals Capture

Summary of Findings T2 System and Grattix Boxes are successfully treating stormwater metals Primary processes are sedimentation, filtration, and adsorption 2016 sampling shows Grattix Boxes <benchmarks and T2 System slightly >Cu benchmark; maintenance can restore performance Filter media: has high but effective infiltration rates can be max. 16-20 inches deep; top 4-inch layer with >OC is key is predicted have a 30-year lifespan prior to breakthrough (defined as effluent= 10% influent concentrations) based on top sample OC is under Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory levels, but high total Cu levels may fail WA state book designation and be characterized as dangerous waste without bioassay results

Annual Maintenance Recommendations Daucus carota (Queen Anne s lace) Remove surface sediments and revegetate Till in compost to top 4 inches Clean catch basins Clean basin, pipes & downspouts Remove invasive plants/replace with plants with deeper root structure

Questions? mgraves@portvanusa.com sheilasahu@kennedyjenks.com