The Stage 2 Disinfection By-Products Rule

Similar documents
Part XXIII Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts

MONITORING PLAN FOR THE DISINFECTANTS/DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS RULES

[INSERT STATE] Rural Water Association Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule Initial Distribution System Evaluation Compliance Checklist

[INSERT STATE] Rural Water Association Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule Initial Distribution System Evaluation Compliance Checklist

The Wait is Over Tier 3 and 4 Operational Evaluation Level Reporting

Disinfection Byproducts Rules and Regulations Update Presented by: Turner Morrison II D/DBP Rule Manager Public Water Supply Section.

Example Plan Small PWS

Instructions. Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (DBPR) Monitoring Plan Template 6/4/03

Reporting Monitoring Data

CHLORITE, BROMATE, AND CHLORINE DIOXIDE MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT

New Rules for Disinfection Byproducts Is your system compliant? Presentation Topics. Achieving Compliant Water Means Balancing the Ultimate Goals

UTILIZING AN ON-LINE TTHM ANALYZER TO AID IN COMPLIANCE WITH DBP REGULATIONS

Annex A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES

THM Analysis From Compliance to Optimization

Revised Total Coliform Rule. Monica Busam August 10, 2016

SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT REGULATORY UPDATE 2003

Stage 1 Disinfectants and

May 15, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Docket ID No. EPA HQ OA Dear Docket:

Future Drinking Water Regulations

EPA Disinfection Profiling and

SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT REGULATORY UPDATE 2004

Routine Monitoring. Revised Total Coliform Rule. RTCR Baseline Monitoring. Routine Samples & NCWS with Varying Population

Free Chlorine Distribution System Influent Hold Study Protocol (April 2019)

The template begins on the next page.

Disinfection and Disinfection Byproducts (DBP)

Achieving Stage 2 Compliance by Online Monitoring In Surface Water

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION

Balancing Microbial Control and Stage 2 DBP Rule Compliance (at Ocean City, Maryland)

SUMMARY OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA DRINKING WATER STANDARDS-9/2011

SESSION 10. Operational Savings through Online THM Monitoring

Disinfection Byproducts in the Drinking Water What Does it Mean and What is Being Done

THIS POLICY DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW

Small Water System Compliance Monitoring, Compliance Determination & Waivers

Localized Treatment for DBP s using Spray Aeration and Online Monitoring

Microbiological Sample Types

Town of Lake Clarke Shores

THMs and HAAs in Drinking Water: Considering the Factors and Meeting the Requirements

THM Monitoring in Consecutive Drinking Water Systems

Partnership for Safe Water Distribution System Optimization Program. Barbara Martin, AWWA

Completing an EPA Stage 2 DBPR Operational Evaluation made EASY!

Subj: U.S. DRINKING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR U.S. NAVY INSTALLATIONS OVERSEAS

POLICY ANALYSIS OF THE STAGE 2 DRINKING WATER DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS RULE IN THE STATE OF OREGON KARI JEAN DUNCAN A THESIS

EPA Federal Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) Public Water System Training Workshop

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

NJWA Presents DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS: TREATMENT OPTIONS & CHALLENGES. Stage 2 D/DBPR. Trihalomethanes DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS.

2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Town of Franklin Water System Number:

2011 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report For University of South Florida PWS ID#

2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Town of Edenton Water System Number

LT1ESWTR Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking

2016 Water Quality Report For the City of Ocala, Florida (PWS-ID # )

To request a paper copy call (270)

FROM RAW WATER INTAKE TO DISTRIBUTION NETWORK: THE JOURNEY OF DBP CONTROL

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant Upgrades Status Update

Annual. Reporting Year Presented By City of Plantation PWS ID#: FL

Buckskin Estates 2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report PWS #

LA PLATA ARCHULETA WATER DISTRICT 2018 Drinking Water Quality Report For Calendar Year 2017

WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT

Aeration Strategies for TTHM Control

Town of Lake Clarke Shores

The Revised Total Coliform Rule. A Guide for Small Public Water Systems

SANITARY SURVEY GUIDANCE MANUAL FOR GROUND WATER SYSTEMS

The Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) Kelly Moran EPA Region 3 Drinking Water

TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANES (TTHM) MITIGATION FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PILOT TESTING ABSTRACT KEYWORDS

Inorganic chemical monitoring requirements.

Treatment techniques for control of disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors.

Disinfection By-Products

City of Auburndale 2018 Annual Drinking Water Report

PIKE WATER INCORPORATED CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT 2016 DATA. We have a current, unconditioned license to operate our water system

Ohio EPA Update. Northeast Section AWWA Spring Meeting. Anne Karney Environmental Specialist 3 Northeast District Office

Revised Public Notification Handbook. 2nd Revision of Document: EPA 816-R , March 2010

2017 Malmstrom AFB Consumer Confidence Report

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Partnership for Safe Water: Distribution System Optimization Program. Adam Feffer San Jose Water Company November 8, 2017

How to Develop a Monitoring Plan for a Public Water System. Prepared by Water Supply Division

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Pasco County Utilities - Pasco County Regional Water System PWS ID No

UCMR 4. What will be its challenges and costs?

TTHM Reduction Corrective Action Update 1 st Progress Meeting October 18, Robert Horvat, P.E x1501

Revised Total Coliform Rule Monitoring and Assessments

The City of Winter Springs 2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. PWS ID No

Revised Total Coliform Rule Monitoring and Assessments

North Carolina Area-Wide Optimization Program 2016 Annual Report

NSF DEVESELU 2015 DRINKING WATER CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT

Online Methodology for Determining THM Formation Potential & Predicted Network TTHM Levels

Surfside Homeowners Association

US AIR FORCE ACADEMY 2018 Drinking Water Quality Report For Calendar Year 2017

Policy and Planning to Address Impacts of Forest Fires to Source Water Quality. Troy Hayes, P.E. Water Services Deputy Director (Water Quality)

CASCADING BENEFITS: OPTIMIZING DISINFECTION FOR CHEMICAL SAVINGS, CONTROL NITRIFICATION AND DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS.

Enhanced Coagulation and Enhanced Precipitative Softening Guidance Manual

City of Bonner Springs

ACHIEVING STAGE 2 DBPR COMPLIANCE THROUGH SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION AND EFFICIENT USE OF POST-FILTRATION GAC: A 5 YEAR CASE STUDY

Arsenic Rule Compliance. Purpose. Learning Objectives. Arsenic is a primary drinking water contaminant, regulated by USEPA.

Hannibal Chloramine Replacement Evaluation

PWS ID# N 1st Street Altus AFB, OK June 2017

WEST VIEW PWS ID# ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

Welcome! Regulations Basics Session #6 Disinfection Byproducts Rule WELCOME!

Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule UCMR4. Focus On Change 2018

Introduction and Water Resources Source Water Assessment Additional Health Information Microbial contaminants Inorganic contaminants

Enterprise Consecutive Water System 2015

City of Winter Springs 2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. PWS ID No

Transcription:

The Stage 2 Disinfection By-Products Rule DoD/EPA State Conference Compliance Track Atlanta, GA June 21, 2007 Amy Newbold Environmental Engineer Drinking Water Section EPA Region 4

Review: What are Disinfection By- Products? Precursor in Water Natural Organic Matter (NOM) Bromide Added Disinfectant + Chlorine Chloramines Chlorine Dioxide Ozone = Total DBP Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Chlorite Bromate

Health Risks of DBPs Public Notification DBPs, including trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs), have been shown to cause cancer in laboratory animals. DBPs have been shown to affect the liver and the nervous system, and cause reproductive or developmental effects in laboratory animals. Exposure to certain DBPs may produce similar effects in people. EPA has set standards to limit exposure to THMs, HAAs, and other DBPs

Stage 1 Disinfection By-Products Rule Published December 1998 Applies to all CWS and NTNCWS that treat their water with a chemical disinfectant for either primary or residual treatment TTHM MCL = 0.080 mg/l HAA5 MCL = 0.060 mg/l Monitoring depends on number of plants Multiple wells drawing from same aquifer may be considered one treatment t plant Sample at Max Residence Time (MRT) and Average Residence Time (ART) if taking more than 1 sample per r plant Compliance based on Running Annual Average of quarterly results

Stage 2 Disinfection By-Products Rule - NEW Published January 4, 2006 Applies to CWS & NTNCWS that add and/or deliver water that is treated with a primary or residual disinfectant other than UV. Consecutives Systems Required to Monitor under Stage 2. MCLs are the same Compliance based on Locational Running Annual Average instead of Running Annual Average. Monitoring based on population served instead of number of plants Has 2 Parts 1. 2006-2010 2010 - Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) 2. 2012 and beyond - Compliance Monitoring Operational Evaluation Levels (2012 and beyond)

New Definitions Wholesale System - is a public water system (PWS) that treats source water as necessary to produce finished water and then delivers some or all of that finished water to another PWS. Delivery may be through a direct connection or through the distribution system of one or more consecutive systems. Consecutive System - is a PWS that receives some or all of its finished water from one or more wholesale systems. Delivery may be through a direct connection or through the distribution system m of one or more consecutive systems. Combined Distribution System (CDS) - is the interconnected distribution system consisting of the distribution systems of wholesale systems and of the consecutive systems that receive finished water.

More New Definitions... Dual Sample Set - is a set of two samples collected at the same time and same location, with one sample analyzed for TTHM and the other sample analyzed for HAA5. Dual sample sets are collected ed for the purposes of conducting an IDSE (part1) and determining compliance with the TTHM and HAA5 MCLs (part 2). Locational Running Annual Average - is the average of sample analytical results for samples taken at a particular monitoring location during the previous 4 calendar quarters.

RAA vs. LRAA Calculation Stage 1 RAA (4 samples per plant example) (Samp1 + Samp2 + Samp3 + Samp4)/4 = Quarterly Average (Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4)/4 = RAA Stage 2 IDSE and Compliance Monitoring (Site1 Q1 + Site1 Q2 + Site1 Q3 + Site1 Q4)/4 = LRAA for Site 1 (Site2 Q1 + Site2 Q2 + Site2 Q3 + Site2 Q4)/4 = LRAA for Site 2 (Site3 Q1 + Site3 Q2 + Site3 Q3 + Site3 Q4)/4 = LRAA for Site 3 (Site4 Q1 + Site4 Q2 + Site4 Q3 + Site4 Q4)/4 = LRAA for Site 4

Part 1 of the Stage 2 Rule - The Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) 2006-2010

Initial Distribution System Evaluation Applies to NTNCWS that serve > 10,000 and all CWS Purpose is to Identify best locations to monitor TTHMs and HAA5s. One-time Study 1 year of increased monitoring Use results from IDSE and Stage 1 data (part 1), to select compliance monitoring locations for the Stage 2 DBPR (part 2).

Stage 2 DBPR IDSE Options IDSE Options 1 2 3 4 VSS Waiver 40/30 Certification System Specific Study Standard Monitoring (Most Common Option)

VSS Waivers Criteria Serve fewer than 500 people Have taken TTHM and HAA5 samples Waivers effective immediately No application necessary Systems must meet all criteria Primacy agency may deny waiver and require Standard Monitoring or o System Specific Study VSS Waiver is only a waiver from additional IDSE activities. No IDSE Report Continue compliance with Stage 1 DBPR until Stage 2 DBPR compliance begins & Revise Stage 1 DBPR monitoring plan for Stage e 2 DBPR

40/30 Eligibility Criteria Systems must have taken all required Stage 1 DBPR samples: Within specified 2-year 2 year eligibility period based on system size No individual sample can have exceeded: 0.040 mg/l for TTHM (40 μg/l) 0.030 mg/l for HAA5 (30 μg/l) No TTHM or HAA5 monitoring violations within specified time period Continue compliance with Stage 1 DBPR until Stage 2 DBPR compliance begins & Revise Stage 1 DBPR monitoring plan for Stage 2 DBPR Sch. Population Eligibility Period Beginning No Earlier Than*: Submit 40/30 Certification By: 1 >100,000 Oct. 1, 2006 2 50,000-99,999 January 2004 Apr. 1, 2007 3 10,000-49,999 January 2005 Oct. 1, 2007 4 <10,000 Apr. 1, 2008

System Specific Studies (HQ) 2 Types of SSS: Hydraulic Model Specific requirements laid out in IDSE Guidance Manual Chapter 6 Submit SSS plan HQ will review all hydraulic models in Region 4 If approved, conduct monitoring based on System Specific Study Plan P Existing Monitoring Results Samples must be collected no earlier than 5 years prior to the study s plan submission date. Submit SSS plan HQ will review most existing monitoring SSS unless State requested ed otherwise If Approved, continue to monitor according to Stage 1 until Stage e 2 Compliance period begins.

Most Common IDSE Submission Standard Monitoring Plan Standard Monitoring: One year of increased distribution system monitoring to find locations with high TTHMs an HAA5s. Stage 1 Monitoring Will Continue During IDSE Results from IDSE Standard Monitoring should not be used to determine compliance with Stage 1 MUST continue to monitor Stage 1 sites according to Stage 1 monitoring plan.

Standard Monitoring IDSE Steps 2 1 Select Standard Monitoring Locations Prepare and Submit Standard Monitoring Plan EPA or the state approves the Standard Monitoring Plan 3 Conduct Standard Monitoring If you haven t 4 Select Stage 2 DBPR compliance monitoring locations heard from EPA or State within 12 months of submitting SMP 5 Prepare and Submit IDSE report

How to Prepare a Standard Monitoring Plan (SMP) Use Form 6 of the IDSE Guidance Manual (Chapter 7) http://www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/stage2 Submit by mail or email to EPA Email to: stage2mdbp@epa.gov Mail to: Stage 2 DBPR US EPA IPMC PO Box 98 Dayton, OH 45401-0098 0098 Or Use the IDSE Tool on website: http://www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/tools/tools-idse.html idse.html Submit Distribution Schematic Showing: Locations of Sources Entry Points Storage Facilities Standard Monitoring Locations Stage 1 Monitoring Locations

Standard Monitoring Requirements Ground Water Monitoring Requirements Based PWS population (dual sample sets) For Groundwater systems or systems that purchase GW Population Frequency Total Near EP ART High TTHM High HAA5 < 500 1/year (2) 2 1 (3) - 1-500-9,999 2 - - 1 1 10,000 99,999 6 1 1 2 2 4 (every 90 days) 100,000-499,999 8 1 1 3 3 > 500,000 12 2 2 4 4

Standard Monitoring Requirements Surface Water (CFR 141.601) For Surface and GWUDI systems and systems that purchase surface or GWUDI Population Frequency Total Near EP ART High TTHM High HAA5 <500 1/year (2) 2 1 (3) - 1-500-3,300 2 - - 1 1 3,301-9,999 4 (every 90 days) 4-1 2 1 10,000-49,999 8 1 2 3 2 50,000-249,999 16 3 4 5 4 250,000-999,999 6 (every 60 days) 24 4 6 8 6 1,000,000-4,999,999 32 6 8 10 8 > 5,000,000 40 8 10 12 10

Good Site Selection Characteristics (Use Chapter 7 of Guidance Manual): Entry Points Disinfected Entry Points (excluding pure UV) Average Residence Time Sites Flow weighted or population weighted Tracer Study Disinfectant Residual Avg High TTHM Sites High Water Temp Increased Water Age Near Dead Ends (before last group of customers) Hydraulically downstream of storage tanks High HAA5 Sites High Water Temp Low Residuals Lower Water Age (if biodegradation is occurring) Increased Water Age (if no biodegradation)

Biodegradation Check Three Questions: Are the highest HAA5 values typically in the summer months? Are the highest HAA5 values at MRT? Do highest HAA5 values generally occur at same time of year as TTHMs? If Yes to all 3 unlikely that biodegradation is taking place If No to Any HAA compounds may be degrading due to biological activity.

What s s Your Schedule? IDSE Schedule determined by the population served a PWS or by the largest population served by a PWS in your CDS. Schedule Sys Serving (or connected to a sys serving): Submit 40/30, SMP, or SSS By: Complete Standard Monitoring or SSS By: Submit IDSE Report By: 1 > 100,000 10/1/2006 9/30/2008 1/1/2009 2 50,000 99,999 4/1/2007 3/31/2009 7/1/2009 3 4 10,000 49,999 10/1/2007 9/30/2009 1/1/2010 < 10,000 4/1/2008 3/31/2010 7/1/2010

Review of Standard Monitoring Plan State or EPA(FL only) will review & and approve or ask system to modify their SMP. If the State or EPA(FL only) does not approve or contact the system to modify the SMP within 12 months from the date it was due, the system can consider the plan approved Conduct Standard Monitoring in accordance with the plan.

Next Steps after IDSE Plan Submittal Once SMP is Approved, Conduct 12 months of monitoring based on Standard Monitoring Plan Determine Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring Locations Use protocol in IDSE Guidance Manual (Chapter 7) From IDSE Results and Stage 1 Results during Standard Monitoring Prepare and submit IDSE Report Stage 2 Monitoring Plan Deadline depends on schedule (3 months from deadline for completion of IDSE monitoring) Begin Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring (start date based on system type and size)

Stage 2 Routine Compliance Monitoring

Determining Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring Sites (Worsheet 7.2)

Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring Site Selection Protocol (Exhibit 7.7)

How to Prepare a IDSE Report Use Form 7 of the IDSE Guidance Manual (Chapter 7) http://www.epa.gov/safewater/disinfection/stage2 Submit by mail or email to EPA Email to: stage2mdbp@epa.gov Mail to: Stage 2 DBPR US EPA IPMC PO Box 98 Dayton, OH 45401-0098 0098 Submit Updated Distribution Schematic Showing: Locations of Sources Entry Points Storage Facilities Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring Locations

System Recordkeeping Must keep a copy of their Standard Monitoring plan and IDSE report for 10 years after date of submittal and make available for review by the public CCR must include the range of sample results from the IDSE monitoring in same calendar year as sampling occurred

Complete Schedule

Part 2 of the Stage 2 Rule - Compliance Monitoring 2012 and Beyond

Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring (2012 and Beyond) MCL Compliance will be calculated based on LRAA Operational Evaluation Levels predicts whether you will have an MCL violation in the next monitoring period. 141.626(a)

Operational Evaluation Levels (2012 and Beyond) Reg Language: 141.626(a) You have exceeded the OEL at any monitoring location where the sum s of the 2 previous quarters TTHM results plus twice the current quarter s TTHM result, divided by 4 to determine an average, exceeds 0.080 mg/l, or where the sum of the 2 previous quarters HAA5 results plus twice the current quarter s s HAA5 result, divided by 4 to determine an average exceeds 0.060 mg/l. Example (for TTHMs): current quarter = Q2 (Q4 +Q1) + 2*(Q2) 4 (0.070 + 0.060) + 2*(0.100) = 0.0825 mg/l 4 OEL = 0.0825 0.080 mg/l OEL EXCEEDED!

If OEL Is Exceeded... Must conduct an Operational Evaluation and submit a written report of the evaluation to the State no later than 90 days after being notified of the analytical result that causes you to exceed the OEL. Examination of System Treatment and Distribution Operational Practices including: Excess Storage Capacity Distribution System Flushing Changes in Sources or Source Water Quality Treatment Changes or Problems that may contribute to TTHM and HAA5 Formation

Summary of Stage 2 Requirements Determine IDSE Option (VSS, 40/30, SSS, or SMP) Submit IDSE (40/30 Cert, SSS, or SMP) Once Approved VSS continue monitoring Stage 1(if applicable) 40/30 continue monitoring Stage 1(if applicable) SSS (model) conduct monitoring (continue Stage 1) SMP conduct monitoring (continue Stage 1) After monitoring is complete, select new monitoring locations (out of IDSE and Stage 1 sites) Put together Stage 2 Monitoring Plan (IDSE Report) Stage 2 Compliance Monitoring & OELs

Contact Info: Amy Newbold EPA Region 4 Drinking Water Section (404) 562-9482 Newbold.Amy@epa.gov or Region4Stage2@epa.gov