TABLE 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPACTION LEVELS FOR THREE SOILS IN THE WETTING AGENT EXPERIMENT

Similar documents
No-till Oklahoma. Soil Compaction. Jason Warren Oklahoma State University Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

Turf Irrigation Series No. 2. Drought Resistance and Efficient Irrigation for the Cool-Humid Region

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

Salinity Management Soil and Cropping Systems Strategies

4/17/2014. Using Compost to Improve Post-fire Water Quality. David Crohn University of California, Riverside. Acknowledgements

The Real Dirt on Managing Recycled Water

TURFGRASS RESEARCH FOR HIGH TRAFFICKED AREAS J.N Rogers, III, J.e. Sorochan, J.J. Henderson, and L.M. Lundberg Department of Crop and Soil Sciences

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

WETTING AGENT STUDIES

Salinity Management Soil and Cropping Systems Strategies

Loss of Nitrogen and Pesticides from Turf via Leaching and Runoff

Sensor Strategies in Cotton. Stacia L. Davis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Irrigation Engineering LSU AgCenter

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Turfgrass and Garden Fertilizer Application to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Advances in understanding and managing water repellent soils.

Biochar Soil Amendment Opportunities

SOD PRODUCTION AND TRANSPL.A~TING RESEARCH REPORT. Dr. James B. Beard Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University

AERWAY TURF AERATION TURF AERATION ADVANCED TINE SOLUTIONS FROM AERWAY

CONTINUING NITROGEN INJECTION RESEARCH P.E Rieke, D.E. Karcher, and J. Neer Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University

1. Introduction. 2. Material and Methods

Urban Soil Conservation and Management

FGD Gypsum: How It s Made and How to Apply It Ron Chamberlain Agronomist and Director of Gypsum Programs GYPSOIL/BENEFICIAL REUSE MANAGEMENT

The soil is a very. The soil can. The manure. Soil Characteristics. effective manure treatment system if manures are applied at the proper rate.

Research and Practical Insights into Using Gypsum

Soils and their Sustainable Management (2016) Trish Steinhilber extension.umd.edu/anmp

Kentucky grain farmers commonly use fall subsoiling as

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT Sustainable Turfgrass Management in Asia 2013 John Neylan Senior Agronomist Turfgrass Consultancy & Research

Herbicide Effects on Bermudagrass Turf

Dept. of Sol Science, UW-Madison/UW-Extension, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706/ November 2010 Issue #2 2010

Soil Health and Crop Productivity. Brian Wienhold USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE

Effect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation

Reused Water for Turf. Bernd Leinauer Professor & Extension Turfgrass Specialist New Mexico State University

Irrigation efficiency

2. Test physical and chemical treatments on the Fred Shaeffer ranch to determine their effect on water infiltration, tree growth, and fruit yield.

Nutrient Management Guidelines for Turfgrass Seeding and Sod Installation

SOIL AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS DURING DROUGHT PERIODS

1991 USGS begins National Water Quality Assessment Program

Analysing soil moisture

Further Evaluations of High Pressure Water Injection as a Turf Management Tool

Remediation of Brine Spills- What Goes Wrong Kerry Sublette

Irrigation Management for Trees and Vines

EAST KILBRIDE GOLF CLUB

Cistern is a three way blended soil surfactant, with one of its component a Humectant Compound. Humectants are designed to hold / retain moisture in

THE PORTION OF THE SOIL WATER THAT IS USABLE BY PLANTS. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIELD CAPACITY AND WILTING POINT.

Soil Compaction. By: Kelly Patches Soils 401 April 8, 2009

The Quality of Composts: Implications for Use. Jean Bonhotal Cornell Waste Management Institute

Irrigation Water Testing & Interpretation. Dennis Martin, PhD Professor & Turfgrass Extension/ Research Specialist

CALIFORNIA CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

REDUCING RUNOFF LOSSES OR IRRIGATION WATER BY IMPROVING CULTURAL PRACTICES. Sowmya Mitra, Magdy Fam, Armen Malazian, Eudell Vis and Ramesh Kumar

Survey of reclaimed water (wastewater) use in the Alabama turf industry

Rainwater harvesting and greywater recovery - Part 1 -

Site Damage from Timber Harvesting

The Ground Water Protection Council

Considerations for Improving Surface Irrigation Efficiency. Daniel Munk University of California Cooperative Extension

Poa annua Control with Methiozolin ( PoaCure ) Weed Conference Washington State Weed Association Wenatchee, WA November 5, 2015

Richard Wolkowski, Extension Soil Scientist Department of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

SOIL GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT MEASURES

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

SULFUR FERTILIZATION RESPONSE IN IOWA CORN AND SOYBEAN PRODUCTION. John E. Sawyer, Brian Lang, and Daniel W. Barker 1

NITROGEN APPLICATIONS

COMAND provides a natural, cost effective way of maintaining quality playing surfaces, while creating wear tolerant and attractive turfgrass

Water is fast becoming the new

Irrigation and Runoff Management. Water Quality for Irrigation. Soil Salinity and Sodicity

FINAL REPORT. Respond Formulation Effects on Localized Dry Spot Incidence and Putting Green Moisture

HOW WATER MOVES IN SOIL Beth Guertal Auburn University

Gypsum. John Sawyer. Professor Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Cornell Soil Health Assessment

IS SOIL COMPACTION FROM ANIMAL TRAFFIC A PROBLEM IN PASTURES DICK WOLKOWSKI EXTENSION SOIL SCIENTIST UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Funding Agencies: The Environmental Institute for Golf and Georgia Golf Environmental Foundation

How to Create an Irrigation Schedule. Bernd Leinauer Professor & Extension Turfgrass Specialist New Mexico State University

Typical 150 Acre Golf Course Uses About 200 Million Gallons per Year

Management to improve soil productivity and maximise lateral infiltration in permanent bed-furrow irrigation systems

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT IN ALFALFA Mir M. Seyedbagheri and James M. Torell. Since most alfalfa in southern Idaho is grown under irrigation, irrigation

Water Budget IV: Soil Water Processes P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Good Irrigation Water Management Practices. December 7, 2016

Soil Properties that influence detachment and runoff

TURF-TEC 6 and 12 INCH INFILTRATION RINGS INSTRUCTIONS (IN7-W & IN8-W)

Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete 1

LANDOWNER S SURVEY: WHAT S THE RISK TO YOUR WATER

Irrigation is an important component for the production

Forte Plus - A New Approach to Managing Water Repellency in Soils

Irrigation Scheduling Using Crop Water Use Data

Appendix C. Soil Compost Amendment

To order, call your Par West Territory Manager or We re online... parwest.com. H2O Maximizer. Soil Surfactant Polymer Resin Blend

Design Guideline for Gravity Systems in Soil Type 1. January 2009

Annual Progress Report May 2017

On-site Systems and Groundwater Washington State Department of Health February 6, 2014

EC Soybean Irrigation in Nebraska

Soybean Relative Yield as Affected by Cropping Sequences and Conservation Tillage

Nitrogen Rates and Forms for Maximum Quality and Growth of Penn A-4 Creeping Bentgrass

Tile Drainage: a solution to excess water? Stewart Brandt Northeast Agriculture Research Foundation Melfort, SK.

Wetting Agents QUALIBRA Deeper Thinking

Soil Water Relationship. Dr. M. R. Kabir

Helpful pointers on how to manage water in a drought

Sa d A. Shannak Final Report USGS

PRODUCT DATA SHEETS Pasteurised Forest Mulch 1.1 Pasteurised Forest Fines 8.1 Potting Mix 3.2 Composted Soil Conditioner 12.1 Organic Soil Blend 5.

TURFGRASS RESEARCH FOR HIGH TRAFFICKED AREAS J.N Rogers, III, J.e. Sorochan, J.J. Henderson, and L.M. Lundberg Department of Crop and Soil Sciences

Texture Definition: relative proportions of various sizes of individual soil particles USDA classifications Sand: mm Silt:

Agronomy 406 World Climates

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

Transcription:

THE INFLUENCE OF WETTING AGENTS AND GYPSUM ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES A. Martin Petrovic and P. E. Rieke Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University Introduction: For as long as turf has been utilized for recreational purposes, compaction has posed a major problem for turf managers. Numerous investigations have centered on alleviating compaction. This includes common maintenance practices such as periodic cultivation, as well as proper construction techniques and addition of physical and chemical soil amendments. Only a few studies have examined the effects of wetting agents and/or gypsum on compacted soils. Wetting agents are routinely applied in combination with pesticides for improved effectiveness or on hydrophobic soils to increase wettability. Gypsum applications on turf have been limited to problem salt areas and as a source of calcium and/or sulfur where ph alteration is not wanted. Wetting Agent Experiment Many questions have arisen as to the effects of wetting agents on water in non-hydrophobic soils. Naiden (2) observed that Aqua-Gro reduced the bulk density of a heavily trafficked fairway. Morgan et ale (1) noted an increased infiltration rate on an uncompacted sandy loam when treated with Soil Penetrant. However, many other studies have shown no beneficial responses attributed to wetting agents. This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of Hydro-Wet and Aqua- Gro on the structure of three soils. The wetting agents were applied at the rate of 0,25 ppm and 250 ppm, where 25 ppm is a "typical" rate applied to turf. Table 1 contains the compaction level applied percentages of sand, silt and clay and % moisture of field capacity (1/3 bar) for three soils. The compaction levels were selected after preliminary laboratory testing. TABLE 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPACTION LEVELS FOR THREE SOILS IN THE WETTING AGENT EXPERIMENT Soil Type Sand Silt Clay Compaction ------------ % ------------- -psi- Southgate clay loam 41.4 30.4 28.2 7 Hodunk sandy loam Morley sandy loam 73.0 57.6 18.6 27.4 8.4 15.0 66 66 1/3 bar Moisture by weight -%- 30.8 15.8 23.8 Saturated hydraulic conductivity (water flow through soil) and bulk density for the various treatments are shown in Table 2. It is obvious that all treatments and soils had very low hydraulic conductivities and high bulk densities 28

indicating extremely compacted conditions. There was no meaningful influence of wetting agents on the Southgate clay loam or the Morley sandy loam. However, in the case of the Hodunk sandy loam, Hydro-Wet at 250 ppm and Aqua-Gro at 25 ppm increased the hydraulic conductivity by 1 mm per hour (or 1 inch per day) although these data have not yet been analyzed statistically. This increased hydraulic conductivity from a practical standpoint may not be significant. Bulk density was not influenced by any of the treatments. TABLE 2. EFFECTS OF WETTING AGENT TREATMENTS ON SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND BULK DENSITY. Soil Wetting Rate Hydraulic Bul k Type Agent of Conduc- Density Application tivity ppm mmlhr glcc SCL* 0 0 0.18t 1.35 SCL Hydro-Wet 25 0.06 1.35 SCL Hydro-Wet 250 0.08 1.35 SCL Aqua-Gro 25 0.10 1.35 SCL Aqua-Gro 250 0.10 1.36 HSL 0 0 1.35 1.62 HSL Hydro-Wet 25 1.47 1.61 HSL Hydro-Wet 250 2.33 1.61 HSL Aqua-Gro 25 2.28 1.61 HSL Aqua-Gro 250 1.58 1.62 MSL 0 0 0.06 1.45 MSL Hydro-Wet 25 0.08 1.45 MSL Hydro-Wet 250 0.08 1.45 MSL Aqua-Gro 25 0.08 1.45 MSL Aqua-Gro 250 0.03 1.45 * SCL, HSL and MSL refer to Southgate clay loam, Hodunk sandy loam and Morley sandy loam, respectively. t Each number is an average 6 values Table 3 contains oxygen diffusion rates (ODR) and soil moisture content at time of ODR measurements. The ODRls for all treatments and soils were relatively low (the minimum critical ODR for root growth of moist turf species range from 5 to 20 g of O 2 X 10-8 cm -2 min- 1 ). The low ODR can be attributed to high soil moisture content. 29

TABLE 3. EFFECTS OF WETTING AGENT TREATMENTS ON OXYGEN DIFFUSION RATES (ODR) AND SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT. Days of Draining 2 4 2 4 Soi1 depth (cm) Soil Wetting Rate of Moisture, by Type Agent Application 2 4 2 4 Weight ppm -- g of O 2 x 10-8 cm-2 min-1 ---- % ----- SCL* 0 0 8.0t 8.2 8.9 8. 1 34.7 33.3 SCL Hydro-Wet 25 9.4 10.3 10.1 8.5 34.8 33.2 SCL Hydro-Wet 250 9.1 8.9 10.1 8.8 34.6 33.5 SCL Aqua-Gro 25 8.8 8.3 8.1 8.5 35.0 33.8 SCL Aqua-Gro 250 9.7 9.8 8.5 8.7 34.9 33.8 HSL 0 0 10.3 10.9 9.1 10.3 24.0 23.3 HSL Hydro-Wet 25 10.6 10.7 14.9 9.5 24.1 23.3 HSL Hydro-Wet 250 11.1 11.1 12.3 9.6 24.1 23.2 HSL Aqua-Gro 25 10.4 11.2 8.2 9.3 24.3 23.4 HSL Aqua-Gro 250 10.6 11.0 15.0 9.8 24.2 23.4 MSL 0 0 13.1 12.9 10.2 9.4 31.1 30.0 MSL Hydro-Wet 25 13.7 13.5 12.7 10.4 31.8 30.9 MSL Hydro-Wet 250 14.4 14.0 10.2 10.0 31.4 30.5 MSL Aqua-Gro 25 12.9 13.4 9.7 9.8 30.1 29.3 MSL Aqua-Gro 250 13.9 13.7 10.1 9.8 30.0 29.2 * SCL, HSL and MSL refer to Southgate clay loam, Hodunk sandy loam and Morley sandy loam, respectively. t Each number is an average of 30 readings. Hydro-Wet and Aqua-Gro appeared not to dramatically improve or adversely alter the soil structure. Further research is in progress examining lower compaction rates to determine if these wetting agents improve water movement in the soil and reduce susceptibility of the soil to compaction. Gypsum Field Studies Four field experiments were initiated in 1976 to investigate the effects of gypsum (calcium sulfate) on physical properties of fine textured soils. The field plot locations, rates of gypsum applied, application methods and treatment dates are shown in Table 4. On Dearborn Country Club, Bay County Golf Course and Oakland County grounds gypsum was surface applied to 5' x 7' plots of established turf. In the Southgate Golf Course study the treatments were applied to the soil surface, incorporated into the top four inches and seeded the following day with a blend of several Kentucky b1uegrasses. 30

TABLE 4. OUTLINE OF FOUR GYPSUM STUDIES ON FINE TEXTURED SOILS INITIATED IN THE SUMMER OF 1976. Site Location Rate of gypsum applied (ton/acre) Application method Treatment Date Dearborn C. C. (13th mens tee) 1, 2, 4,8, 16 surface Bay County G. C. (9th fairway) 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 surface Southgate Municipal G. C. 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 incorporated Oakland County Grounds 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 surface 7/07/76 7/14/76 9/23/76 7/09/76 Infiltration rates, turf quality ratings and % Poa annua from the Dearborn Country Club study is presented in Table 5. In general the infiltration rates were extremely slow with no treatment responses observable. Quality rates exhibited a slight improvement with higher gypsum rates. However, the lower % of Poa annua in the higher gypsum plots created an artificially improved quality rating. The traffic pattern existing on the experimental site causing a lower % Poa annua in higher gypsum plots. Further data must be collected before gypsum can be recommended for use to improve the structure of fine-textured soils. These studies will be continued to determine if gypsum applications contribute to improved structure of fine-textured soils in Michigan. 31

TABLE 5. INFILTRATION RATES, TURF QUALITY RATING AND % POA ANNUA FOR DEARBORN COUNTRY CLUB - GYPSUM Study, Fall 1976 Treatment Infiltration t Turf* Poa** # Material Rate Qua 1ity Rating Annua - inches/hr. - - % - 1 Check 0.05 2.7 82 2 Gypsum, 1 ton/acre 0.08 2.7 74 3 Gypsum, 2 ton/acre 0.02 2.7 65 4 Gypsum, 4 ton/acre 0.02 2.2 37 5 Gypsum, 8 ton/acre 0.08 2.2 67 6 Gypsum, 16 ton/acre 0.05 2.0 48 Average 0.05 2.4 62 t Average infiltration rate over a 3 hour period; each number is an average of 6 readings. * Turf quality rating; 1 = best to 9 = bare soil, each number is an average of 3 values. ** Each number is an average of 3 values. LITERATURE CITED 1. Morgan, W. C., Letey, J., Richards, S. J., and N. Valoras. 1966. Physical soil amendments, soil compaction, irrigation, and wetting agents ln turfgrass management. I. Effects on compactability, water infiltration rates, evapotranspiration, and number of irrigations. Agron. J. 58:525-528. 2. Naiden, P. G. 1971. The amelioration of soil compaction on golf fairways by application of gypsum, limestone and surfactants. Master Thesis, Univ. of Maine. Orono, Maine. 32