Extended Detention Ponds

Similar documents
Best Management Practice Fact Sheet 14: Wet Ponds

Best Management Practice Fact Sheet 10: Dry Swale

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

Standard for Wet Ponds

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

MCM 5 - POST CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

Typical Local Erosion Control Requirements (Storm Water Management Authority, Inc.)

Virginia Stormwater Regulations Proposed Changes. Planning Commission May 5, 2009

CHAPTER 4 - EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA. Adopted March 29, 2010.

Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) Stormwater Plan Review Checklist

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

Scheduling Maintenance for Dry Ponds

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR STORMWATER-MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES FORT CARSON, COLORADO

ORDINANCE # 854. Stormwater Management / Operation and Maintenance Requirements

Items in this checklist identify the base requirements that are to be provided by the design professional.

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Streamlines V2, n2 (May 1997) A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators

6.5 Extended Detention Basin

TABLE B.3 - STORMWATER BMP POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES

Infiltration Basin Description Applicability

Root Zone. Shallow Ground Water

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

APPENDIX C. STORMWATER STRUCTURAL BMP DESCRIPTIONS

Best Management Practices (BMPs) are structural

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER

Chapter 3: Post Construction Water Quality Best Management Practices

Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW

Natural and Engineered Wetlands for Stormwater Management

Empowering Virginia's Well and Spring Users: The Virginia Household Water Quality Program

Intended users: City and County public works Young engineers Developers Public officials and other non-engineers

4.4.5 Grassed Swale (also known as Enhanced Swale or Biofiltration Swale)

Water Quality Ecosystem Services in the Urban Environment

Shirley E. Clark, Ph.D., P.E. October 5, /30/2012

THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER.

4.28 Underground Detention

Slide 1: Welcome to today s The Nitrogen Cycle presentation, where we ll be talking to you about the importance of nitrogen in our environment.

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Stormwater Management in Your Backyard: Stormwater 101

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.

Modeling the Urban Stormwater (and the rest of the watershed) Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Suggested Stormwater Management Practices For Individual House Lots

Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Wet Detention Ponds

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP CODE

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341. Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014

DUBUQUE COUNTY SMART PLAN Watershed Management

The Borough of Penbrook 150 South 28th Street Penbrook, PA NPDES MS4 Permit PAG DRAFT for Public Review: July 21, 2017

Post-Development Stormwater Runoff Performance Standards

Grass Channel STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY KEY CONSIDERATIONS

The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

Water Resources: Technical Update

Suitable Applications Where concentrated flow of surface runoff must be conveyed down a slope in order to prevent erosion.

Mike Mitchell U.S. EPA Region 4

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Primer introduction to watershed management Plan Process highlight the major steps of plan development Project types look at some examples of common

Meeting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Earth Dikes and Drainage Swales

What Does It All Mean? CWA? Sara Esposito, P.E. DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship

The Pond Management Protocol. Tom Schueler Chesapeake Stormwater Network

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission Wetland 639W Outlet Modifications Summary Feasibility Report

Scientific overview: Water quality functions of coastal buffers

Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment. September 1995

POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR EROSION CONTROL PROFESSIONALS

INTRODUCTION TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Site Design Checklist and LID Calculations Worksheet. Draft Revision December 2004

CHAPTER 9 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

Managing Drainage From Agricultural Lands with Denitrifying Bioreactors in the Mid-Atlantic

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS DRAFT

Infiltration Trench Factsheet

4.4.6 Underground Detention

Module 2: Basic Stormwater Principles

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

Project Priority List scoring worksheet - stormwater Guidance document

Chapter 2: Selecting Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Go Green, Save Money: Lowering Flood Insurance Rates in Virginia with Stormwater Management. Kristen Clark VCPC Alumna, Spring 2014

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Stormwater BMP Maintenance

UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist

Clean Water is Everyone s Business. A commercial & industrial property owner s guide to improving Lake Tahoe s clarity

Practices that capture and temporarily store the WQ v before allowing it to infiltrate into the soil.

Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual

APPENDIX I WATER QUALITY FACTORS FOR FEE CREDIT CALCULATIONS

Chapter CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION CONTROL

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP Chapter 290: WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article IV: Stormwater Management

Constructed Wetland Channel T-9

Construction Site Inspections

Transcription:

Publication 426-134 Best Management Practice Fact Sheet 15: Extended Detention Ponds David J. Sample, Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech Stefani Barlow, Undergraduate Student, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech This fact sheet is one of a 15-part series on urban stormwater management practices. Please refer to definitions in the glossary at the end of this fact sheet. Glossary terms are italicized on first mention in the text. For a comprehensive list, see Virginia Cooperative Extension (VCE) publication 426-119, Urban Stormwater: Terms and Definitions. What Is an Extended Detention Pond? Extended detention ponds (EDs) are dry detention ponds that provide 12 to 24 hours of runoff storage during peak runoff events (see figure 1). Releases from the ED ponds are controlled by an outlet structure. During a storm event, as the discharge restriction is reached, water backs up into the ED pond. The pool slows flow velocities and enables particulate pollutants to settle. Peak flows are also reduced. ED ponds have the lowest overall pollutant-removal rate of any stormwater treatment option, so they are often combined with other upstream, lowimpact development (LID) practices to better maximize pollutant-removal rates. Due to their placement at the exit point of the watershed, ED is often the last opportunity Figure 1. Extended detention pond during wet period (VA-DCR 2011). to treat stormwater before it is discharged to a stream. Because of its low treatment performance, an ED should be viewed as the treatment option of last resort. Where Can Extended Detention Ponds Be Used? Extended detention ponds are widely applicable and can be used in a range of locations with few exceptions. All regions and climates are capable of supporting an ED, though some adjustments may be needed for cold climates or areas with karst terrain. An adequate size is needed for the pond, so urban areas may pose some spacing issues. Steeper slopes are acceptable for EDs (up to 15 percent) provided the pond bank side slopes are relatively flat to reduce safety risks. Sandy soils or karst areas may pose a risk from infiltration to groundwater, and they require an impermeable liner that can be used to help the pond hold water and minimize seepage losses. How Do Extended Detention Ponds Work? EDs fill during storm events and reduce and retard peak stream flows by acting like a buffer or shock absorber for flows in the stream. Water is pooled and released at a controlled rate until the pond reaches capacity. Controlling stream flow also reduces the potential for downstream erosion (see figure 2). Produced by Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2013 Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, genetic information, marital, family, or veteran status, or any other basis protected by law. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg. VT/0813/BSE-82P

Figure 2. Typical extended detention pond profile. Source: Minnesota Stormwater Manual, 2011. While in the pond, water quality improves through natural processes, including biological uptake, microbial decomposition, and settling. After the specified detention time, detained water is released through the outlet structure that connects to a stormwater conveyance system that eventually discharges to the environment. Limitations May be difficult to provide sufficient hydraulic head to drain the pond in low-lying areas. Can be considered an aesthetic nuisance and decrease property values. May raise water temperatures because stored water is heated by the sun. Can provide a breeding area for mosquitoes, so some control measures may be necessary. Are not effective at removing soluble pollutants, such as nitrates and phosphorus. Treatment of settleable solids and nutrients attached to sediment is generally good. However, sediment may resuspend in the next storm event and be discharged, thus lowering performance. Maintenance Routine Maintenance (annual) Seed and sod to restore any bare patches. Inspect the ED regularly, e.g., are the inlet and outlet structures functioning and clear of debris? Repair as needed. Remove trash and debris from pond area (perform during dry periods). Nonroutine maintenance (as needed) Remove excess accumulated sediment when pond volume has been reduced by 25 percent. Control pest populations as needed. Performance Extended detention ponds have relatively low dissolved pollutant-removal capabilities, particularly with nutrients. A typical ED is expected to reduce total phosphorus (TP) by 15 percent and total nitrogen (TN) by 10 percent (VA-DCR 2011). In a more advanced design, the ED includes a shallow marsh at the bottom of the pond that enhances treatment. Advanced ED designs can improve this expected reduction of TP to 20 percent and of TN to 30 percent (VA-DCR 2011). Expected Cost EDs are one of the least expensive stormwater treatment practices when compared to other alternatives. An average preliminary estimate of the construction cost of an ED pond of 1 acre-foot is $41,000. Compared to wet ponds (VCE publication 426-133), EDs are more costeffective on a per-unit-area treated basis. Annual mainte- 2

nance cost is estimated to be 3 percent to 5 percent of the construction cost, or $1,800 to $3,500 (EPA 2006). The value of land is not included in this analysis. EDs are usually located on undevelopable land to minimize this cost. Additional Information The Virginia departments of Conservation and Recreation (VA-DCR) and Environmental Quality (VA- DEQ) are the two state agencies that address nonpoint source pollution. The VA-DCR oversees agricultural conservation; VA-DEQ regulates stormwater through the Virginia Stormwater Management Program. Additional information on best management practices can be found at the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse website at http://vwrrc.vt.edu/swc. The BMP Clearinghouse is jointly administered by the VA-DEQ and the Virginia Water Resources Research Center, which has an oversight committee called the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse Committee. Committee members represent various stakeholder groups involved with stormwater management. Online Resources Alameda Countywide (California) Clean Water Program www.eoainc.com/download/8_extended_ Detention_Basin_Technical_Guidance.pdf Chesapeake Bay Program http://archive.chesapeakebay. net/pubs/bmp/year_1_reports/dry%20extended%20 Detention%20Basins.pdf Eugene (Oregon) Stormwater Management Manual www.eugene-or.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/ PTARGS_0_0_12093_689_1795_43/http%3B/ ceppcontent.eugene1.net%3b7087/publishedcontent/ publish/pw/stormwater/docs/ch2m.pdf Georgia Stormwater Management Manual www.georgiastormwater.com/vol2/3-4-1.pdf Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Stormwater Catalog, Volume 4: Permanent Stormwater Controls, Dry Extended Detention Ponds (page 76) www.deq.idaho.gov/media/6223-stormwater.pdf New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection www.state.nj.us/dep/watershedmgt/docs/bmp_ DOCS/chapter5_basins.PDF U.S. Department of Agriculture ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/wsi/urbanbmps/water/ quality/dryextdetent.pdf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http:// cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/index. cfm?action=factsheet_results&view=specific&bmp=67 Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation www.dcr.virginia.gov/stormwater_management/documents/chapter_3-07.pdf Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse http://vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/ Companion Virginia Cooperative Extension Publications Daniels, W., G. Evanylo, L. Fox, K. Haering, S. Hodges, R. Maguire, D. Sample, et al. 2011. Urban Nutrient Management Handbook. Edited by M. Goatley. VCE Publication 430-350. Gilland, T., L. Fox, M. Andruczyk, and L. Swanson. 2009. Urban Water-Quality Management: What Is a Watershed? VCE Publication 426-041. Sample, D., et al. 2011-2012. Best Management Practices Fact Sheet Series 1-15. VCE Publications 426-120 through 426-134. Acknowledgements The authors would like to express appreciation for the review and comments provided by the following individuals: Thomas Bolles, environmental educator, Virginia Tech; Mike Andruczyk, lecturer, Virginia Tech; Robert Lane, Extension specialist, Virginia Tech; and Richard Jacobs, conservation specialist, and Greg Wichelns, district manager, Culpeper Soil and Water Conservation District. Knox County (Tennessee) Stormwater Management Manual www.knoxcounty.org/stormwater/pdfs/ vol2/4-3-3 Dry Extended Detention Ponds.pdf 3

References U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2006. Dry Detention Ponds. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Fact Sheet. http:// cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/ index.cfm?action=browse. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (VA-DCR). 2011. Virginia DCR Stormwater Design Specification No. 15: Extended Detention (ED) Pond, Version 1.9. http://vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/non- PBMPSpecsMarch11/DCR%20BMP%20Spec%20 No%2015_EXT%20DETENTION%20POND_ Final%20Draft_v1-9_03012011.pdf. Glossary of Terms Best management practice (BMP) Any treatment practice for urban lands that reduces pollution from stormwater. A BMP can be either a physical structure or a management practice. Agricultural lands use a similar, but different, set of BMPs to mitigate agricultural runoff. Biological uptake The process by which plants absorb nutrients for nourishment and growth. Detention time See residence time. Erosion A natural process by either physical processes, such as water or wind, or chemical means that moves soil or rock deposits. Excessive erosion is considered an environmental problem that is very difficult to reverse. Extended detention ponds A stormwater treatment practice that mitigates peak flow rates by retaining runoff for 12 to 24 hours before slowly releasing water back to the natural system. Hydraulic head The difference in elevation between two points of flowing water. Impermeable liner A material designed to retard seepage from ponds and wetlands. Impervious surfaces Hard surfaces that do not allow infiltration of rainfall into it, or not pervious. Infiltration The process by which water (surface water, rainfall, or runoff) enters the soil. Karst terrain Areas where the underlying bedrock is high in limestone composition, making the site subject to underground erosion that often results in sinkholes and unstable building conditions. Low-impact development (LID) Growth and development that attempts to maintain predevelopment hydrologic function at a site. Microbial decomposition The breakdown of compounds or organic matters into smaller ones with the aid of microorganisms. Nutrients The substances required for growth of all biological organisms. When considering water qualities, the nutrients of greatest concern in stormwater are nitrogen and phosphorus, because they are often limiting in downstream waters. Excessive amounts of these substances are pollution and can cause algal blooms and dead zones to occur in downstream waters. Outlet structure A structure that regulates water discharge from best management practices and serves as an exit point from the BMP. Also known as control structure. Particulate pollutants A mixture of small (2.5 to 10 micrometers) particles of acids, organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. Peak runoff The highest water flow off of a surface during a storm event. Peak stream flows The highest water flows within a stream during a storm event. Residence time The average time it takes water to travel through a treatment system, such as an extended detention pond. Residence time can also be called detention time. Resuspension When sediment that has settled becomes suspended in water after being disturbed. Sediment Soil, rock, or biological material particles formed by weathering, decomposition, and erosion. In water environments, sediment is transported across a watershed via streams. Seepage Water lost through the bottom of a lake or pond. 4

Settling The process by which particles that are heavier than water fall to the bottom under the influence of gravity. Stormwater Water that originates from impervious surfaces during rain events, often associated with urban areas and is also called runoff.. Stormwater conveyance system Means by which stormwater is transported in urban areas. Stormwater treatment practice A type of best management practice that is structural and reduces pollution in the water that runs through it. Watershed A unit of land that drains to a single pour point. Boundaries are determined by water flowing from higher elevations to the pour point. The pour point is the point of exit from the watershed, or where the water would flow out of the watershed if it were turned on end. Wet ponds Stormwater impoundments that have a permanent pool of water used to treat water pollution. 5