Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District

Similar documents
Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project

Dear Interested Party,

File Code: 1950 Date: September 13, 2017

Idaho Panhandle National Forests

Dear Interested Party:

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

The Project Area. Coeur d'alene River Ranger District. Idaho Panhandle National Forest. P. O. Box 159 Smelterville, ID 83868

Caring for the Land and Serving People

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments

National Forests in North Carolina Croatan National Forest Croatan Ranger District

Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

Preacher Dewey 1 Decision Notice

Oak Flats Restoration Project Scoping Notice May 5, 2010

3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES

Agency Organization Organization Address Information. Name United States Department of Agriculture

Reading Project Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest April 3, 2013

Antler Salvage - Post-fire Logging Review of Science

DECISION NOTICE, FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, and FINDING OF NON-SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT for the

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

Idaho Panhandle National Forests

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

File Code: 1950 Date: March 22, 2011

Walla Walla Ranger District

Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned

Appendix E Post-Sale Activities

Dear Interested Party,

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Water and Soil Resource Management Considerations

Siuslaw National Forest. Central Coast Ranger District - Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area

Appendix A (Project Specifications) Patton Mill Fuel Break Project

Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program

DECISION MEMO PROJECT NAME: CLARK CREEK BLOWDOWN USDA FOREST SERVICE IDAHO PANHANDLE NATIONAL FOREST BONNERS FERRY RANGER DISTRICT

Poker Chip Project. Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Almanor Ranger District Lassen National Forest

CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE & NEED

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

Chapter 1: Purpose and Need for Action and Proposed Action

Treatment/Project Area: Blanco Basin

Sheppard Creek Post-Fire Project

Emergency Stabilization, Rehabilitation, and Restoration

Kurtis Robins District Ranger US Forest Service 138 S Main

Hyde Park Hyde Park Wildland Urban Interface Project. Scoping Information February 2017

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Post-Fire BAER Assessment Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER)

FSM 2000 NATIONAL FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ZERO CODE 2080 NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT

Monument Fire Recovery Project Record of Decision and Non-Significant Amendment #57

Purpose and Need - 1 Chapter 1 Purpose and Need

Twins Project Scoping Report

File Code: 1950 Date: November 17, 2015

Elk Post-fire Restoration Reforestation Project USDA Forest Service Boise National Forest Mountain Home Ranger District Elmore County, Idaho

DECISION RECORD for the Rattlesnake Negotiated Timber Sale (Reference:

Dear Interested Party:

Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program How did we get here? Brief account of Selway Middle Fork CFLR project

United States Department of Agriculture. Hellroaring Project. Environmental Assessment. Idaho Panhandle National Forests.

Alternatives, including the Proposed Action

DECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA

Idaho Panhandle National Forests

Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region

Sequoia National Forest, California; Summit Fuels Reduction and Forest Health. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

March 2, Ponderosa Drive Moscow, Idaho 83843

Riparian Forest Ecology & Management. Derek Churchill, Nov 8, 2014

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

United States Department of Agriculture. Lowell WUI Project. Decision Memo

3.14 VISUAL RESOURCE (SCENERY)

Meacham Creek Restoration Project

Appendix C. Consistency With Eastside Screens. Salvage Recovery Project

Decision Memo Young Stand Density Management and Conifer Pruning

Fire Management CONTENTS. The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...4

preliminary Decision Memo Wickiup Acres Hazardous Fuels Reduction

Tenmile and Priest Pass Restoration Project Scoping Notice

April 2, Lloyd McGee, President Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition 565 West 5 th Colville, Washington 99114

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

Cascades Resource Area Soil Rehabilitation

Warren Wagon Road Improvement Project McCall Ranger District, Payette National Forest Project Description

Center Horse Landscape Restoration Project Summary Selected Action (Draft Record of Decision (DROD))

1792/5400 (OR-120) Umpqua River Sawyer Rapids EA OR Purdy Creek DM OR120-TS Dear Citizen:

Glass Angel Restoration Project

Kreist Creek. Environmental Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Upper Charley Subwatershed Ecosystem Restoration Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Information Packet for Comment: Chequamegon Red Pine Thinning Project

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

WILLAMETTE NATIONAL FOREST Middle Fork Ranger District

Juncrock Timber Sale Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Soils

WO AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/21/2008 DURATION: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed.

Halfway Malin Project

Environmental Assessment

Riparian Vegetation Protections. Heritage Tree Protection

Forest Service Angora Recovery Efforts. Eli Ilano Deputy Forest Supervisor Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit USDA Forest Service November 3, 2007

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

Storrie and Rich Fire Area Watershed Improvement and Forest Road 26N67 Re-alignment Project

1. Protect against wildfires 2. Enhance wildlife habitat 3. Protect watersheds 4. Restore plant communities. Ford Ridge Project Area (pre-treatment)

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

Idaho Panhandle National Forests

Pacific Southwest Region

DECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008

Galiuro Exploration Drilling Project

MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District 831 Selway Road Kooskia, ID 83539 208 926-4258 TTY 208 926-7725 File Code: 1950 Date: Dec 30, 2011 Dear Interested Party, The Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement for the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project to analyze and disclose the effects of proposed forest management and watershed improvement activities within the Clear Creek Drainage located approximately five miles southeast of Kooskia, Idaho. I am inviting your comments on the proposal. Project Area Location The project area is comprised of the 43,731 acres of National Forest System lands within the Clear Creek Drainage. The project will take place on the Moose Creek Ranger District of the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest. The attached maps show the legal descriptions of proposed management activities. The Clear Creek Roadless Area is within the project area. A link to supplementary information about the project and additional maps may be found on the Nez Perce National Forest s website at: http://www.fs.usda.gov/land/nezperce/landmanagement - under the projects tab. Proposed Action The Moose Creek District proposes to implement restoration projects and use a combination of timber harvest, commercial thinning, pre-commercial thinning, prescribed fire and reforestation to achieve the desired range of age classes, size classes, vegetative species distributions, habitat complexity (diversity) and landscape pattern across the forested portions of the project area. Road decommissioning, culvert replacement and road improvements are also proposed to improve watershed health. Completion of the project will move the area toward a Desired Future Condition as defined in the Nez Perce National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (USDA-FS 1987, II-1& 2). Accomplishment of activities associated with these projects will improve or maintain ecosystem health and integrity; improve watershed and aquatic conditions, improve wildlife habitat, and provide resources to help support the economic structure of local communities. Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

The purpose of and need for this project was determined after comparing the Desired Future Condition and the existing condition of the Clear Creek project area. The Forest Plan provides the basis for Desired Future Condition (DFC), as well as direction for the management of the Clear Creek project area. The area s existing condition was determined using site-specific field examinations, as well as scientific findings and recommendations from the Selway and Middle Fork Clearwater Rivers Subbasin Assessment (USDA-FS 2001). This project includes management activities that address several of the actions that were recommended in that document. Purpose and Need for the Proposal The objective of the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project is to manage forest vegetation to restore natural disturbance patterns, improve long term resistance and resilience at the landscape level; reduce fuels; improve watershed conditions; improve elk habitat effectiveness improve habitat for early seral species, and maintain habitat structure, function, and diversity. Outputs (timber) from the proposed action would be used to offset treatment costs and support the economic structure of local communities and provide for regional and national needs. The following resource management opportunities were identified for the project area based on the existing condition of the area, applicable Forest Plan management direction, recommendations in the Selway and Middle Fork Clearwater Rivers Subbasin Assessment (USDA-FS 2001) and the needs, opportunities and issues identified by an interdisciplinary watershed assessment and NFMA analysis conducted in 2011. Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Improvement Purpose: Trend vegetation species composition, structure, and distributions toward desired conditions described in the Forest Plan. Need: The project area has a high proportion of grand fir/douglas fir habitat. These habitats tend to be more susceptible / vulnerable to insects and diseases and grand fir is unlikely to survive in wildfire. There is a need to trend the area towards a more diverse and resilient forest structure by creating a range of age classes, size classes, habitat complexity (diversity) and disturbance patterns that more closely emulate natural mixed severity disturbance. Shifting tree species composition by retaining and planting early seral species (i.e. ponderosa pine, western larch and western white pine) in managed areas would help trend the area toward or maintain desired habitat conditions and would make these habitats more resistant and resilient to change agents such as insect, disease, and fire. Historical logging practices and fire suppression have created a landscape that is more highly fragmented than what would be expected through natural disturbance. Ladder fuels have increased and there has been a shift to shade tolerant species. Habitat structure and patch sizes of young forests are simplified and smaller than what would have been created through natural disturbance. Edges of patches are straight and even. There is a need to increase diversity within

previously harvested areas to begin restoring long-term habitat quality for sensitive and old growth associated species. There is a shortage of young forest habitats on this landscape. Age classes are dominated by middle-aged and mature forest habitats. Forest management would increase high quality early seral wildlife habitats by retaining large trees and promoting establishment of tall shrubs and hardwood tree by using variable retention regeneration harvest. This would benefit wildlife species using early seral habitats such as: neotropical migratory birds, resident birds, small mammals, and big game species in the short term. Tree retention would help maintain habitat structure and complexity needed by old growth associated species in the long-term. Goods and Service Purpose: To utilize timber outputs produced through restoration activities to support the economic structure of local communities and provide for regional and national needs. (Forest Plan page II-1) Need: The need to provide a sustained yield of resource outputs is directed in the Forest Plan. Much of the area consists of grand fir dominated stands that have insect and disease infestations that are contributing to increased tree mortality, or are at risk from stand replacing events. Stands proposed for treatment are currently losing volume and value due to insects and disease. Harvest of the timber would provide materials to local industries. Fire Regime/Natural Disturbance Restoration and Fuel Reduction Purpose: Reduce ladder fuels created by shade-tolerant species and create more natural patch sizes by emulating mixed severity fire. (Forest Plan page II 2) Need: Effective fire suppression in this area began in the 1930 s. As a result, there has been vegetative shift to less fire resistant species, and an increase in ladder fuels that can contribute to the risk of high intensity and potentially resource damaging wildfire. Some portions of the project area have been identified as being up to five times outside of their normal fire return intervals. Past harvest patterns do not emulate natural disturbance patterns nor do they emulate natural habitat structure. There is a need to increase patch sizes to shift age and size class distributions to increase high quality early seral wildlife habitats. Landscape burning and timber harvest that mimics natural fire would help increase forest resilience, help reduce risk of wildfires, and help create high quality habitats that would benefit neotropical migratory birds, resident birds, small mammals, and big game species. Fire dependent wildlife species would benefit from landscape burning. Watershed Improvement Purpose: Reduce potential sediment inputs into the aquatic ecosystem from roads. Need: There are 283 miles of road within the project area, 200 of which are needed for current and future management. The remaining 83 miles of road have been cleared for decommissioning under the SF/WF Clear Creek Road Decommissioning EA (2011). The roads needed for management can contribute sediment to streams through road surface erosion and potential

culvert failures. Surface erosion occurs during spring snowmelt and rain events. Dirt coming off roads is diverted into ditchlines which are often directed into streams. Preliminary surveys show most roads in the area are drained by ditches. Culvert failures can result from undersized, damaged or rusting culverts which can plug with debris and then fail as water saturates the surrounding fill. Failures can contribute large pulses of sediment into streams. Surveys indicate at least 60 miles of road with culverts that are in need of replacement or cleaning. There is a minimum of 40 high or moderate priority culverts in need of replacement, and 12 in need of cleaning. There are an additional 40 low priority culverts in need of replacement and 15 in need of cleaning. The surveyed roads pose the highest risk to streams in the project area. The desired condition for roads is to have ditchlines that drain road surface water away from streams and onto forest the forest floor. All culverts at stream crossings are appropriately sized to allow for the passage of material within minimal risk of plugging. There is a need to drain roadside ditchline water away from streams by installing cross drain pipes near live stream crossings. The cross drain pipes collect ditchline water and direct it onto the forest floor. There is also a need to replace existing undersized, damaged, or rusting culverts on streams to minimize failure potential. Proposed Actions The actions proposed by the Forest Service to meet the purpose and need are briefly described below. Improve forest health, provide goods and services, reduce fuels and improve wildlife habitat Conduct variable retention regeneration harvest and post harvest burning activities on up to 2500 acres to create early sucessional plant communities and improve wildlife habitat while re-establishing long-lived early seral tree species. Variable retention harvest would include areas of full retention (clumps), irregular edges, and retention of snags and legacy trees to provide structure and a future source of woody debris. Openings will likely exceed 40 acres. Commercially thin approximately 7810 acres to reduce stand densities improve forest health and reduce the chance of crown fire. Apply improvement harvest (thin from below) to approximately 311 acres to remove encroachment and ladder fuels from ponderosa pine dominated stands. Construct a minimum temporary road system to carry out the proposed action. Roads would be decommissioned after use. Pre-commercially thin approximately 1865 acres to reduce stand densities improve forest health and reduce fuels.

Restore approximately 42 acres of bunchgrass communities through prescribed burning and revegetation with native grasses and forbs to improve wildlife habitat and reduce the spread of noxious weeds. Apply approximately 1400 acres of low and mixed severity prescribed fire within the Clear Creek Roadless area to restore natural fire regimes, reduce fuels, improve wildlife habitat and create mosaic forest conditions. Proposed activities are consistent with Idaho Roadless Rule. There is no timber cutting planned within the Clear Creek Roadless area. Reduce sediment production and address transportation needs Maintenance or improvement of 100-130 miles of system roads would occur on roads used to support the proposed actions. Maintenance or improvement may include culvert installation or replacement, ditch cleaning, and riprap placement for drainage improvement. It may also include gravel placement, road grading and dust abatement. Additional site specific maintenance or improvements would occur to improve watershed conditions on up to 20 miles of roads outside of proposed treatment areas. 2-5 miles of system roads no longer considered necessary for transportation needs will be removed from the system by decommissioning. Consistency with the Forest Plan Proposed management is located in and consistent with Nez Perce Forest Plan direction for the following management areas: MA 12 (timber) 7040 acres; MA 14 354 acres; MA 16 (big game) 5102 acres; MA 20 307 acres; MA 21 841 acres; Proposed Forest Plan Amendment - Soils A Forest Plan amendment to use the Region 1 soil standards is being proposed to implement vegetation treatment activities in some areas with past ground disturbance. Forest Plan Standard #2 (Forest Plan, p. II-22) Design Criteria Below is a preliminary list of design measures developed to protect resources in the project area. This list is not comprehensive and additional design criteria may be necessary to address resource issues brought forward during the scoping and analysis processes. 1. Maintain or improve water quality, watershed function, and fish habitat by using PACFISH riparian buffers and Best Management Practices 2. Maintain snag habitats by using Northern Region Snag Management Protocol, January 2009 3. Maintain or improve soils by using Regional Soils Guidelines

4. Fully retain and protect old growth habitats using Old-Growth Types of the Northern Region (Green et al. 1992 as amended). 5. Construction of a temporary road system would be necessary to implement the proposed actions. Temporary road locations would generally be located on gentle ridgetops, over existing templates, and in areas where excavation would be minimized. All temporary roads would be closed to the public and decommissioned following use. A site specific logging system layout design would be developed in order to use as many of the existing skid trails and landings as possible and to limit the amount of new detrimental soil disturbance. All used skid trails and landings exhibiting detrimental soil disturbance would be decompacted/decommissioned after use. There will be no permanent road construction. 6. No ground base logging on slopes over 35 percent, unless mitigating measures, such as operating on adequate compacted snow or only over short distances. 7. Avoid or protect known historic properties or sites (Forest Plan, page II-17, Cultural Resources Standard #4). Halt ground-disturbing activities if cultural resources are discovered in the project area until an Archaeologist can properly evaluate and document the resources in compliance with 36 CFR 800. 8. Prevent, remediate or control invasion of exotic species using a variety of methods including chemical treatments, equipment inspection, and seeding. All seeding would follow Regional guidelines. Public Participation The interdisciplinary team will develop alternatives and anticipates completion of the draft environmental impact statement in February 2013 with a final decision scheduled in November 2013. I recognize the many interests and concerns the public has regarding management on National Forest lands and this is why I am requesting your comments concerning the Clear Creek project proposal. To assure your written comments are fully considered during the analysis of this project, please submit your comments by Feb 15, 2012. Comments submitted after that date will be accepted, but our ability to respond effectively could be reduced. Comments may be submitted in writing, orally, or through electronic means. Those who respond to this invitation for comments will be notified when the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project is available for a forty-five day public comment period Please address written comments to: Lois Hill, Interdisciplinary Team Leader; Kamiah Ranger Station; 903 3 rd Street, Kamiah, ID 83536. Electronic comments may be submitted to comments-northern-nezperce-moose-creek@fs.fed.us. The subject line must contain the name of the project for which you are submiting comments (i.e. Clear Creek Project). Acceptable formats are MS Word, Word Perfect, or RTF. When commenting, please include the following: (1) your name, address, and (if possible) your telephone number, and organization represented, (if any); (2) title of the document on which you

are submitting comments (Clear Creek); (3) specific facts and related rationale concerning this project that you feel should be considered. Should you have questions or need further information, please contact Lois Hill, Interdisciplinary Team Leader, at the Kamiah Ranger Station (208-935-4258). Thank you for your interest in this project. Sincerely, /S/ RICK BRAZELL Rick Brazell Forest Supervisor