Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques

Similar documents
Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton and Peanut in Conventional and Sod-Based Cropping Systems

Sod-based Rotation (Bahia) Impact on Cropping Systems. David Wright

Case Study: The Integration of Beef Cattle into a Peanut and Cotton Crop Rotation System that Involves a Perennial Grass

Evaluating BMPs on farm:

Efficient Cotton Production

GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COVER CROP IN SOD- BASED PEANUT-COTTON CROPPING SYSTEMS

Carinata Fit into SE Cropping Systems

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1

The Science of Integrated Crop Livestock Systems

A MULTI-STATE PROJECT TO SUSTAIN PEANUT AND COTTON YIELDS

Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product

Vol. 30:5 May WEED CONTROL Drought and Weed Control... 3 Early-Season Weed Control... 3

FORAGE Perennial Grasses Followed by Corn or Other Grass Crops...2. PEANUTS Expanded Peanut Production...2 Inoculants for Peanuts...

Peanut Variety Performance in Florida,

Agronomy Notes October 2010 Volume 34:10 Features: Crops: Forage: Weed: Control: Miscellaneous:

COTTON Cotton Yields and Yield Potential...2

CORN Projected Dry Spring and Corn Planting Date...2. COTTON Consider April Planted Cotton...2. FORAGE Spring Grazing Management...

DATES TO REMEMBER. FL Weed Science Society Annual Meeting, Ft. Pierce Corn Silage Field Day, Citra

Alternate Methods to Manage Soybean Rust: David Wright and Jim Marois. Disease control is one of many management decisions (timeliness is critical)

KNOWING YOUR FIELD A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers

Economics of Grazing Cover Crops

Results of 2002 Early, Mid, and Full Season and Roundup Ready Cotton Variety Tests in Florida 1

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

VALUE OF PERENNIAL GRASSES IN CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEMS

Warm-Season Grass-Legume Mixtures Options for North Florida

Success With Cover Crops

SEED

Agronomy Notes. Features: April-August Weed Science: Crop Science: Miscellaneous:

IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF YOUR PASTURES. Jose Dubeux, IFAS - NFREC NW FL Beef Conference and Trade Show 2015

FORAGE YIELD OF TEN NO-TILLAGE TRIPLE CROP SYSTEMS

Evaluating Unique Paspalum Germplasm for Use in Nitrate Mitigation in the Suwannee River Basin

PLANT PATHOLOGY SERIES TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Reducing Livestock Production Costs by Grazing Annuals and Cover Crops

Agronomy Notes. Features: December 2010 Volume 34:12. Crops: Forage: Weed: Miscellaneous:

TILLAGE AND THIMET EFFECTS ON THREE PEANUT CULTIVARS: TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS CONTROL

What Works: Farming Practices

1. When transitioning from endophyte-infected tall fescue to an improved forage in the pasture.

Cool Season Grass Establishment. Doug Shoup Southeast Area Agronomist

Extension In-Service March 26, 2013 Las Cruces, NM

Corn and Wheat by Dr. Erick Larson

EFFECTS OF PERENNIAL GRASSES ON SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS IN COTTON AND PEANUT ROTATIONS IN VIRGINIA J.

eupdate Extension Agronomy

SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL COVER CROPS WORKSHOP Jonesboro, AR July 24-25, 2013

Relative Ranking and Risk to Sustainability of Pest Management Tools in the Virginia- Carolina Region of the United States

International Research and Development. Designing a Crop Rotation Plan with Farmers

Nebraska- MCCC State Report 2014

INFLUENCE OF PASTURE PLANTING METHOD ON ANNUAL COOL SEASON PASTURE FORAGE AVAILABILITY FOR GRAZING BY GROWING BEEF CATTLE A FOUR YEAR SUMMARY

WINTER ANNUAL GRAZING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS EFFECTS ON SWEET CORN

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

IMPROVING PASTURES BY RENOVATION Ed Ballard,Retired Animal Systems Educator University of Illinois Extension

Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

1. Potassium deficiency in corn and soybeans 1 2. Residue treatment in continuous no-till wheat systems 3

Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler. Interpretative Summary

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

NRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality

Agriculture and Society: Part II. PA E & E Standards 4.4

Crop Rotations Under Irrigation. Irrigation Agronomy Workshop April 9, 2013 Outlook, SK Gary Kruger PA CCA Irrigation Agrologist

Self-Study Course. Continuing Education. Water balance and nitrate leaching under corn in kura clover living mulch

Conservation Agriculture Soil Health Matters

MINIMIZING DISEASES OF PEANUT IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. The 2015 Version of the Peanut Disease Risk Index (Peanut Rx)

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key November 2, 2018

The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Irrigation Management of Perennial Forages

Use of Telone II and Temik 15G to Improve Yields and Returns of Cotton Grown in Northwest Florida Fields Infested with Root-Knot Nematodes 1

Challenges to Producing Peanuts Using the Organic Approach

Agronomic and soil quality trends after five years of different tillage and crop rotations across Iowa

Literature Survey of Studies Comparing Organic vs. Conventional Farming Methods

EVALUATION OF COVER CROP TERMINATION METHODS IN CORN PRODUCTION

Minimizing Tall Fescue Toxicity

MINIMIZING DISEASES OF PEANUT IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. The 2016 Version of the Peanut Disease Risk Index

Cucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012

Mississippi No- tillage Update Report

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

!" #$ %&'(%)#*+,-.%/+'01%20+3',4%56,7808,.8!

Grazing Improves Tillering and Grain Yield of Dual-Purpose Winter Canola Roger Nkoa Ondoua 1 ; Olga S. Walsh 2 ; Kefyalew Desta, Steven Fransen 3 1 :

Vegetable Yields across Tillage Systems after Grazing

Introduction- Project Background

Overseeding as ~ pest management tool in alfalfa in the Sacramento Vallef

Use of Telone II and Temik 15G to Improve Yields and Returns of Cotton Grown in Northwest Florida Fields Infested with Reniform Nematodes 1

Solving the SOIL HEALTH Puzzle? WE HAVE YOU COVERED. lacrosseseed.com soil1st.com SEED. Soil First Mix Decision Tree

IN THIS ISSUE PAGE. CORN Conservation Tillage for Cotton...2

PASTURE RENOVATION EFFECTS ON JIGGS BERMUDAGRASS PRODUCTION. Robert A. Lane 1. Abstract

Grazing Impacts on Pasture Composition

COVER CROPS- A CLOSER LOOK STEPHANIE MCLAIN NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE; WORTHINGTON FIELD OFFICE

AGRONOMY NOTES. July, 2004 IN THIS ISSUE

An Agronomic Look at Low Lignin Crops.

Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) Biology, Ecology, and Management in Florida Grazing Lands 1

Cover Crops for Soil Health and Water Quality

Soil Health Research Landscape Tool, v Data Dictionary Soil Health Institute 12/21/2016

Introduction Growth Habits and Requirements Recommended Cultural Practices Pest Control Harvesting and Handling...

CONSERVATION TILLAGE IN GEORGIA COTTON PRODUCTION: RESULTS OF A 2005 SURVEY

National Cover Crop Webinar Questions and Answers

Evaluation of perennial cereal rye longevity and forage production when harvested at different stages of maturities and under grazing.

U.S. COTTON TEN YEAR SUSTAINABILITY GOALS PATHWAYS TO PROGRESS

PenningtonCoverCrops.com SOIL-911

Maximizing the Value of Foliar Fungicides in Corn by Mark Jeschke, Agronomy Research Manager

Corn Residue Removal by Grazing and Effects on Grain Yield. Introduction

Getting the Most out of Bahiagrass Fertilization 1

Transcription:

Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques David Wright, Jim Marois, Duli Zhao, and Cheryl Mackowiak IFAS-North Florida Research and Education Center University of Florida, Quincy, Florida 32351 E-mail: wright@ufl.edu Abstract Perennial grasses are the backbone of the U.S. livestock industry and are widely recognized as a key in conserving soil. Certain government programs require perennial grasses such as the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) as a way to enhance and protect soil quality while setting aside land from production. Perennial grasses are used along roadsides all across the country to provide stable slopes for water runoff and to keep erosion to a minimum while providing a firm foundation for auto traffic with their immense root systems. Most perennial grasses have a wide tolerance to soil fertility, moisture, ph and other environmental conditions making them a good choice for various uses. Research has shown the benefits of perennial grasses to following crops; however, it is seldom reintroduced into the rotation once fields are taken out for row crop production. Our research has focused on a short term system that keeps perennial grasses in the rotation with row crops and has been found to be economically and environmentally advantageous. Several of our publications highlight the increasing organic matter content and water infiltration along with improved plant growth and yields of following crops that economically take 2-3 years in the conventional rotation to make the profit that is made the first year after perennial grasses. In both conventional and the perennial grass rotations, conservation tillage techniques have been adhered to in order to provide information for growers on implementing then in a farming system. As a general rule perennial grasses have been turned under when going to a row crop or have had intense tillage prior to planting a row crop. The sod based rotation has been shown to conserve natural resources, increase crop yields, and improve long-term agricultural sustainability and profitability. Introduction In the southeast USA, peanut, cotton and corn are major summer agronomic crops requiring a long growing season. However, regional farmers face great challenges in maintaining production sustainability and profitability using the traditional crop rotation system of peanut-cotton-cotton. For instance, Florida ranks 15th in cotton yield and total production among 17 states where cotton is planted (USDA, 25). In 1 U.S. peanut production states, mean peanut yield of Florida ranks 8 th in 27. The major challenges include multiple pests, infertile soils, low soil organic matter (OM), and low soil water holding capacity. Integration of perennial grasses, such as bahiagrass, into the current rotation system of peanut and cotton has been proposed and proved by several studies (Katsvairo et al., 27; Wright et al., 27). For example, including bahiagrass in the rotation adds significantly to the soil organic and nitrogen pools as well as helps diminish nematodes and other pests normally found with annual row crops (Boman et al., 1996; Elkins et al., 1977; Marois, 22; Marois and Wright, 22). Our current sod based rotation research is a multi-states project (Florida, Alabama and Georgia). In Florida (Marianna) and Alabama (Headland) sites, cattle are used to graze the grass produced as cow-calf operation. At another Florida site and a Georgia site, the grass is harvested as hay. Winter annual forages planted after cotton and peanut are also used for grazing or harvested as hay. In this paper, we summarized our sod based rotation studies at University of Florida s North Florida Research and Education Center (NFREC).

Sod Based Rotation Studies in Florida Four major field trials of the sod based rotation research at the University of Florida s NFREC include: (1) Comparison of the sod based peanut-cotton rotation system (Bahiagrass-Bahiagrass-Peanut- Cotton) and a conventional peanut-cotton rotation system (Peanut-Cotton-Cotton). This study consists of the two cropping systems, two levels (low N and high N) of N applications and two irrigation regimes (irrigated and non-irrigated) with three replications to determine long-term sustainability, profitability, and N and water use efficiencies of the sod based rotation. Bahiagrass in this study is used for hay; (2) Bahiagrass kill date and tillage method effects on peanut growth, yield and grades in the sod based rotation. This study was conducted at two locations (Marianna and Quincy of the NFREC) and has two bahiagrass kill dates (fall vs. spring) and six tillage methods (strip-till, disk+turned, disk+chisel, paratill+strip-till, disk+strip-till, and strip-till+45 kg N ha -1 ) with four replications; (3) Corn growth and yield responses to crop sequences in sod based peanut-cotton-corn rotations. The study includes three crop sequences, (i) bahiagrass-bahiagrass-corn-corn, (ii) bahiagrass-bahiagrass-cotton-corn, and (iii) bahiagrass-bahiagrass-peanut-corn with four replications; (4) Integration of cattle into the sod based peanut-cotton rotation system. In the system, bahiagrass and winter cover crops are grazed by cattle. This is a center pivot irrigation system at Marianna with a total of 16 acres. Four quadrants are four phases of the system (bahia-bahia-peanut-cotton). To investigate short-term and long-term impacts of cattle on soil properties, crop growth and yield as well as economic returns, three 5 x 5 ft exclusion cages have been established in each quadrant. In these studies, we investigated soil physical, chemical and biological properties, including soil bulk density, soil penetration resistance, soil water infiltration, soil water content and water holding capacity, soil conductivity, soil organic matter and mineral nutrient concentration and availability, soil earthworm population and soil respiration; plant disease, insects and weeds pressure; crop growth, physiology, yields and quality; system inputs and net returns. Highlights When rotating summer crops with bahiagrass, both nutrients and water in the deep soil profile are utilized, due to improved rooting depth of the crops following bahiagrass. Rooting depth can be improved as much as 1 times, as compared to conventional cropping systems (Katsvairo et al., 25; Katsvairo et al., 26). Improved water capture reduces irrigation needs from a normal application of approximately 3 cm of irrigation per year to as little as 5 cm, with similar or greater yields (Wright et al., 24; 25; 26; 27). This results in as little as 17% of the current water use for irrigation. Most important findings of the sod-based rotation effects on soil properties and on crop growth and yields from our studies at Quincy in last several years have been published on Agronomy Journal (Katsvairo et al., 26; Katsvairo et al., 27a; Katsvairo et al., 27b; Katsvairo et al., 28a), Journal of Food Science and Agriculture (Katsvairo et al., 28b), Proceedings of Southern Conservation Agricultural Systems Conferences (Marois et. Al., 27; Wright et al., 27; Zhao et al., 27a; Zhao et al., 27b), and Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Production and Research Conferences (Katsvairo et al., 27; Wright et., 27; Wright et al., 28; Zhao et al., 28). To better understand crop growth and physiological responses to sod

based rotation, we are currently investigating crop insects and diseases as affected by crop rotations in addition to crop yields. Preliminary results from the Quincy research site indicate that sod-based rotations can considerably reduce insect, disease, and weed pressure, improve crop water status, increase crop yields and water use efficiency. Peanut Results of our sod based peanut-cotton rotation with two bahiagrass kill dates (fall vs. spring) and different tillage studies at two locations (Marianna and Quincy, FL) have indicated that bahia kill date did not affect peanut yield and strip-till can reach high or equivalent yield compared to the intensive tillage method. Therefore, farmers have a wide window to kill bahiagrass for their peanut crop in sod based rotation using conservation tillage. Sod based peanut yields in 26-27 ranged from 4, to 4,5 lbs acre -1, when using strip tillage, which is 6 to 8% higher than state average yield (about 25 lbs acre -1 ) of peanut in the Southeast USA (Zhao et al., 27a). In our replicated plot studies, the sod based peanut yield was significantly higher than conventional peanut (Fig. 1). We also found that increase in peanut yield in sod based rotation is mainly associated with reduction in insect and disease pressure in normal and wet years (Fig. 2) and with mitigation of water deficit stress in dry years (Data not shown). Peanut yield (lbs. acre -1 ) 5 4 3 2 1 Sod based 22 23 24 25 26 27 Year Fig. 1. Sod-based and conventional peanut yields in 22-27 at NFREC, Quincy, FL. The indicates that the difference is significant. Aflatoxin concentration in peanut kernels is the major concern for food safety and product quality. It is known that water deficit stress during pod development and maturity is a major factor increasing kernel aflatoxin level. Our preliminary results showed that sod based rotation greatly reduced peanut kernel aflatoxin concentration in a drought year especially for non-irrigated peanut (Fig. 3). Therefore, sod based rotation can reduce drought effect on nonirrigated peanut in the Southeast.

3 1 1 25 8 Sod-based 8 Sod-based Thrips (No. plant -1 ) 2 15 1 Leaf Spot Severity 6 4 TSW Incidence (%) 6 4 5 2 2 Sod-based 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Days after Planting 23 24 25 26 Year Fig. 2. Comparison of seedling thrip population, leaf spot severity, and tomato spotted wilt (TSW) incidence of peanuts grown in conventional and sod-based crop rotations in Quincy, FL. 4 Aflatoxin (ppb) 3 2 1 Irr. Non-irr. Irr. Non-irr. Sod-based Fig. 3. Effects of irrigation and crop rotation on peanut kernel aflatoxin concentration in Quincy, FL in 27. Note: 27 was a very drought year in the Southeast. Cotton Florida mean cotton lint yield fluctuates around 7 lbs. acre -1 (USDA, 25), whereas cotton lint yield in our sod-based rotation has reached 151 lbs. acre -1 (Zhao et al., 28a). Because sod based rotation improves soil quality, especially soil organic matter, nutrients, and water holding capacity, it is necessary to refine N fertilizer rate and reduce irrigation. Avoiding rank cotton

growth by adjusting N, irrigation and application of Pix is the key step for high yield of the sod based cotton. Currently, we found that the sod based rotation can greatly reduce cotton seedling disease, such as Rhizoctonia root rot compared to conventional cotton (Fig. 4). Additionally, the sod based cotton has significantly less weed, especially morningglory population than the conventional cotton (Fig. 4). Sod Cotton 1.6 Conv. Cot t on1 Conv. Cot t on2 Morningglory population (no m -2 ) 1.2.8.4 b a a Root rot disease. Cotton Cotton 1 Cotton 2 Sod-based Fig. 4. Cotton Rhizoctonia root rot disease and morningglory population of the sod based and conventional cotton at Quincy, FL. in 28. o Economic analyses carried out on a sod-based rotation have shown profits are 2-4 times greater when the rotation is fully implemented as compared to the conventional rotation system. We expect that this system has the potential to add $1-2 acre -1 profit for producers. A business management model for the sod-based rotation has been developed (Marois et al., 21; Marois, 23b) and modified based on our research data and farmer input. The model is available at the University of Florida s website (nfrec.ifas.ufl.edu/sodrotation.htm) for downloading. Typically, the model shows increased profits due to fewer inputs of irrigation, fertilization, pesticide and herbicide applications, and increased yields on row crops (Marois et al, 21) and water use efficiency. The long-term positive impacts of the sod-based rotations on soil quality, environment, climate change, and agricultural sustainability are even more significant. Bahiagrass and winter cover crops Average yields (i.e. forage biomass) of first- and second-year bahiagrass in the sod based rotation are approximately 22 and 76 lb acre -1, respectively. Oat winter cover crop shoot biomass at pre-heading stage can reach 4 to 6 lb acre -1. Forage can be used for hay or grazing by cattle. Therefore, bahiagrass and cover crops can add value to the sod based system.