Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Guidance for Industry

Similar documents
DSCSA Implementation: Product Tracing Requirements for Dispensers Compliance Policy (Revised)

Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Products

Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE

Acceptability of Draft Labeling to Support ANDA Approval Guidance for Industry

This guidance is for immediate implementation.

Definitions of Suspect Product and Illegitimate Product for Verification Obligations Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act Guidance for Industry

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Guidance for Industry Compounding Animal Drugs from Bulk Drug Substances

Guidance for Industry Tablet Scoring: Nomenclature, Labeling, and Data for Evaluation

Guidance. Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs DRAFT GUIDANCE

Established Conditions: Reportable CMC Changes for Approved Drug and Biologic Products Guidance for Industry

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Environmental Assessment: Questions and Answers Regarding Drugs With Estrogenic, Androgenic, or Thyroid Activity Guidance for Industry

Compounding Animal Drugs From Bulk Drug Substances; Draft Guidance for Industry;

Product Identifier Requirements Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act--Compliance Policy;

Guidance for Industry Reference Product Exclusivity for Biological Products Filed Under Section 351(a) of the PHS Act

New and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 2)

Verification Systems Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act for Certain Prescription Drugs Guidance for Industry

Pharmacy Compounding of Human Drug Products Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Draft Guidance for Industry on Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements--the Food and

Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

The Deemed to be a License Provision of the BPCI Act Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry

Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

September 2, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 14, 2011

Guidance for Industry

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; Prescription Drug Labeling Improvement and. Enhancement Initiative; Request for Comments and Information

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators and Sponsors

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations. Draft Not for Implementation

CGMP Requirements for Investigational Products

FDA Quality Metrics, Data Integrity and Application of Statistics Throughout Process Validation in a Global Economy

Request for Quality Metrics Guidance for Industry

Medical Device Accessories: Defining Accessories and Classification Pathway for New Accessory Types. Draft Guidance for Industry and

Dissolution Testing and Acceptance Criteria for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Containing High Solubility Drug Substances

Current Good Manufacturing Practice Requirements for Combination Products

Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Classification of the Gynecologic

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry New Chemical Entity Exclusivity Determinations for Certain Fixed-Combination Drug Products

Microdose Radiopharmaceutical Diagnostic Drugs: Nonclinical Study Recommendations Guidance for Industry

Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of BsUFA Products Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

Use of Public Human Genetic Variant Databases to Support Clinical Validity for Genetic

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; The Content of Investigational

GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY. Questions and Answers

Document issued on: March 19, The draft of this document was issued on May 20, 2010.

Guidance for Industry Pediatric Study Plans: Content of and Process for Submitting Initial Pediatric Study Plans and Amended Pediatric Study Plans

GUIDANCE FOR SPONSORS, INDUSTRY, RESEARCHERS, INVESTIGATORS, AND FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION STAFF

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices

List of Drug Products That Have Been Withdrawn or Removed From the Market for Reasons of

`HUMAN DRUG CGMP NOTES

Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Absorbable Lung

AbbVie Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of Abbreviated New Drug Applications for

Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Evoked Photon Image Capture

De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation) Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application

FDA identifies this generic type of device as: Absorbable perirectal spacer.

GUIDELINE FOR THE STABILITY TESTING

March 4, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Medical Devices; Cardiovascular Devices; Classification of the Adjunctive Cardiovascular

Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry

Report on the Performance of Drug and Biologics Firms in Conducting Postmarketing

Advanced Surgical Concepts, Ltd. Jonathan Kahan Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004

August 14, Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

22 January Division of Dockets Management (HFA 305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm Rockville, MD 20852

Distinguishing Medical Device Recalls from Product Enhancements and Associated Reporting Requirements

Authorization of Emergency Use of an Injectable Treatment for Nerve Agent or Certain

Medical Devices; Exemption From Premarket Notification; Class II Devices; Over-the-Counter

U.S. Traceability: the Drug Supply Chain Security Act

Guidance for Industry and FDA:

Guidance for Industry Q3B(R2) Impurities in New Drug Products

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Under this license, you are approved to manufacture aflibercept drug substance intermediate, drug substance, and formulated bulk at

Guidance for FDA Reviewers

Guidance for Industry

State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Drugs, Devices, and Cosmetics

Guidance for Industry

VALPROIC ACID National Drug Code Directory

Guidance for Industry

Quality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review

Removal of Certain Time of Inspection and Duties of Inspector Regulations for Biological

Infectious Disease Next Generation Sequencing Based Diagnostic Devices: Microbial

Report on the Performance of Drug and Biologics Firms in Conducting Postmarketing

Draft Guidance for Industry, Clinical Laboratories, and FDA Staff. In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays

Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Classification of the Closed Loop

Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Biosimilar Biological Product Sponsors or Applicants Guidance for Industry

Interpretation of the Deemed to be a License Provision of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009

Overcome the Top Challenges of Handling OOS Results by Knowing FDA Observations

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE National Drug Code Directory

ONDANSETRON National Drug Code Directory

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Procedures for Handling Post-Approval Studies Imposed by PMA Order

ANDREW BALO SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, REGULATORY, BIOMETRICS, & CLINICAL AFFAIRS DEXCOM, INC 6340 SEQUENCE DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92121

Medical Devices; Gastroenterology-Urology Devices; Classification of the Endoscopic

Transcription:

Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document should be submitted within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance. Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. For questions regarding this draft document, contact (CDER) Bill Harvey at 240-402-4180. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) August 2017 Pharmaceutical Quality/Manufacturing Standards (CGMP) Revision 1

Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Guidance for Industry Additional copies are available from: Office of Communications, Division of Drug Information Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Bldg., 4 th Floor Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 Phone: 855-543-3784 or 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-431-6353 Email: druginfo@fda.hhs.gov https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/default.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) August 2017 Pharmaceutical Quality/Manufacturing Standards (CGMP) Revision 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. BACKGROUND... 2 III. POLICY... 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Guidance for Industry 1 This draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page. I. INTRODUCTION The last few decades have seen an increasing demand in various health care settings for solid oral dosage form drug products repackaged into unit-dose containers, which hold a quantity of drug for administration as a single dose. The increase in unit-dose repackaging has led to questions regarding stability studies and appropriate expiration dates for these repackaged products. This guidance describes the conditions under which FDA does not intend to take action regarding required stability studies for these repackaged products and the expiration date to assign under those conditions. 2 This guidance addresses repackaging of prescription and over-the-counter solid oral dosage form drugs into unit-dose containers by commercial pharmaceutical repackaging firms that are required to register with FDA under section 510 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and to comply with current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations in 21 CFR parts 210 and 211. 3 The guidance does not address repackaging involving the following: Other dosage forms (e.g., sterile, liquid, topical). 1 This guidance has been prepared by the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. 2 This draft guidance replaces the draft guidance for industry Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Drugs: Compliance Policy Guide (2005). In addition, this draft guidance, once final, will supersede Compliance Policy Guide 480.200 Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Drugs (1995). 3 As described in 21 CFR 207.3(a)(8), manufacturing or processing includes repackaging or otherwise changing the container, wrapper, or labeling of any drug package to further the distribution of the drug from the original place of manufacture to the person who makes final delivery or sale to the ultimate consumer. 1

34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 Products repackaged by State-licensed pharmacies, Federal facilities, and outsourcing facilities as defined under section 503B of the FD&C Act. 4 In general, FDA s guidance documents do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required. II. BACKGROUND FDA s CGMP regulations for finished pharmaceuticals require that each drug product bear an expiration date determined by appropriate stability testing and that the date must be related to any storage conditions stated on the labeling, as determined by stability studies ( 211.137(a) and (b)). 5 The expiration date for a drug product packaged in a single-dose container should be placed on the primary container unless it is not feasible to do so. 6 Samples used for stability testing must be in the same container-closure system as that in which the drug product is marketed ( 211.166(a)(4)). This is to ensure the drug product s safety and efficacy over its intended shelf life and to ensure that data representing the marketed product are available in case quality issues arise during the drug product s intended shelf life. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) General Chapter <7> Labeling states that the label of an official drug product shall bear an expiration date. 7 For unit-dose repackaged products, USP General Chapter <1178> Good Repackaging Practices recommends that the expiration date not exceed (1) 6 months from the date of repackaging; or (2) the manufacturer s expiration date; or (3) 25% of the time between the date of repackaging and the expiration date shown on the manufacturer s bulk article container of the drug being repackaged, whichever is earlier. III. POLICY For solid oral dosage form drugs repackaged into unit-dose containers, FDA does not intend to take action regarding the requirements of 211.137 and 211.166 (i.e., expiration dating determined by stability studies) if these products are assigned an expiration date that does not exceed (1) 6 months from the date of repackaging, or (2) 25 percent of the time between the date 4 Repackaging by state-licensed pharmacies, Federal facilities, and outsourcing facilities is addressed by separate guidance. See, for example, guidance for industry Repackaging of Certain Human Drug Products by Pharmacies and Outsourcing Facilities. We update guidances periodically. To make sure you have the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA Drugs guidance Web page at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/default.htm. 5 Stability testing and stability studies are described in 211.166. 6 Under 21 CFR 201.17, when single-dose containers are packed in individual cartons, the expiration date may properly appear on the individual carton instead of the immediate product container. 7 Here and elsewhere in this guidance, the USP version referenced is USP 39, 8/1/2016. 2

70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 of repackaging and the expiration date on the container of the original manufacturer s product, whichever time period is shorter, and if the following conditions are met: (1) The unit-dose container complies with Class A or Class B standards as described in USP General Chapter <671> Containers Performance Testing, Packaging System Classification for Single-Unit Containers and Unit-Dose Containers for Solid Oral Dosage Forms. Under this condition, containers complying with the Class B standard are used only if (a) appropriate data on the moisture permeability of the Class B material and the moisture sensitivity of the drug product are available, and (b) a risk assessment of these data provides a high level of confidence that use of such containers will not compromise the quality of the product throughout the assigned expiration dating. 8 (2) If the drug product is sensitive to light as indicated by the manufacturer (e.g., Protect from light on its labeling), the unit-dose repackaging container-closure system provides light protection equal to or greater than that of the drug product s original containerclosure system. (3) The drug product s original container has not been opened previously and the entire contents are repackaged in one operation. (4) Repackaging and storage occur in an environment that is consistent with the conditions described in the original drug product s labeling. If temperature and humidity are not specified in the original labeling, the product should be maintained at controlled room temperature and in a dry place (as defined in USP <659> Packaging and Storage Requirements) during the repackaging process, including storage. (5) The drug product s labeling does not caution against repackaging. 9 In addition, FDA does not intend to take action regarding the requirements of 211.137 and 211.166 for an expiration date exceeding the ones described above (i.e., (1) 6 months from the date of repackaging, or (2) 25 percent of the time between the date of repackaging and the expiration date on the container of the original manufacturer s product, whichever time period is shorter), provided the following: (1) The above five conditions are met. (2) Supportive data from appropriate studies, using an adequate number of samples, demonstrate that the container-closure system used for repackaging is at least as protective of the drug product as is the original packaging. Appropriate studies should 8 Containers meeting USP <671> Class C and Class D standards do not meet condition (1). 9 Directions in the package insert such as Keep these tablets in the original container and Do not repackage are examples of a caution against repackaging in the product s labeling. 3

111 112 113 114 115 be based on sound science and a risk-based assessment to ensure that product quality is maintained up to the expiration date. 10 (3) The expiration date of the repackaged product does not exceed the original manufacturer s expiration date. 10 Satisfactory comparison of container-closure systems is possible through several methods, e.g., testing for protection from moisture, oxygen, and light, as appropriate; comparing the properties of the original containerclosure system to a new system by stress testing, which refers to product testing after storage under exaggerated conditions (e.g., high temperature and high humidity); degradation testing after storage under long-term or accelerated conditions. 4