Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015

Similar documents
N Sentinel: Nitrogen Monitoring for Higher Yields and Greater Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Validation of Ontario s N Fertilizer Recommendations For Corn In High Yielding Environments: 2013 Summary

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

Fall Strip Tillage and Fertilizer Placement

Nitrogen Fertilization for Corn

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

GETTING THE MOST FROM N AND P APPLICATIONS ON PROCESSING CROPS. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator Impact of Nitrogen Application Timing on Corn Production

HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES? Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Options for in-season adjustment of nitrogen rate for corn

Frenzy. Late Nitrogen. Late Nitrogen Frenzy. Ben Rosser, OMAFRA Dave Hooker, UG-Ridgetown

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

Soil and fertilizer management in vegetable production

Validation Of Ontario s N Fertilizer Recommendations For Corn In High Yielding Environments: 2012 Summary

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

NNY Agricultural Development Program Project Report

Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing

Environmentally Sustainable Utilization of Nitrogen on Corn 2015

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Nitrogen input decisions with tight crop production margins

Nitrogen Application Method and Timing For Corn Production on Clay Soils

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Integrating Technologies to Enhance the Simplicity of Strip Tillage Systems

Use of the Late-Spring Soil Nitrate Test

SIDEDRESSING NITROGEN: USEFUL ON ALL SOILS? Larry G. Bundy 1. Introduction

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2

Nitrogen management in annual vegetable crops

NITROGEN EFFICIENCY AND FALL N APPLICATIONS. Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Improve Nitrogen Management by Considering the Source

Products for Improving the Efficiency of N Fertilizers. Greg Binford University of Delaware

N Management Recommendations for Maize: Quantification of Environmental Impacts and Approaches to Precise Management

Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits

SOIL NITRATE TESTS FOR WISCONSIN CROPPING SYSTEMS. L.G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Drought Implications for Nutrient Management. Charles Wortmann

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key November 2, 2018

CORN RESIDUE HARVESTING EFFECTS ON YIELD RESPONSE TO N FERTILIZATION

Introduction. Manure Management Facts Prioritization and Rotation of Fields for Manure Application. July 2014

Managing fertilization and irrigation for water quality protection

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

Between a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability

Clain Jones

Purdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

Using the Pre-Sidedress Soil Nitrate Test (PSNT)

Plant Nutrient Uptake Timing and Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers N Conference, Havre December 8, 2010

Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration

Nitrogen dynamics with a rye cover crop

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key March 30, 2007

Top Strip-Till Practices for Corn and Soybean

Potential Uses for Agrotain and Polymer Coated Products

Nutrient Management (NM)

Vertical Tillage: Does it Help the Transition to No-till?

Effective Nitrogen and Potassium Banding for Corn with Strip Tillage and High-Clearance Applicators

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN ORGANIC VEGETABLES

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

How Do You Evaluate Precision Ag Strategies On Farm? Lessons Learned from the GFO Precision Ag Project

Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Starter Fertilizer for Corn in Vermont

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Cropping System Nutrient Management

Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

FERTILIZER SOURCES Extension Agent Agronomy College September 24, 2014

Advances in Fertilizer Technologies for Improved Nutrient Management

Nitrogen Fertilization of Corn

Nitrogen Calibration for Corn. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

FERTILITY PLACEMENT FOR CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS DICK WOLKOWSKI DEPARTMENT OF SOIL SCIENCE UW-MADISON

INFORMATION FOR INDUSTRY PERSONNEL ONTARIO MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD'

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

Results from On-farm N Rate Response Trials. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea

Corn nitrogen rate management: Facts, concepts, and Mother Nature

Nitrogen Management Tools for Reducing Nitrogen losses in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

NITROGEN TIMING AND SOURCES. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

For nmental. 2 of 10. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

Fine-tune Nitrogen Management Using 4R Stewardship

Processing Tomato Research Update

Determining nutrient needs

Liquid Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

Adjusting nutrient management when using cover crops. Matt Ruark, UW-Madison & UW-Extension Jaimie West, UW-Madison

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

Value of Poultry Manure Nutrients for Crop Production. Antonio Mallarino and John Sawyer Department of Agronomy

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. Nutrient Management. (Acre) Code 590

Spring Wheat Nitrogen Response X Fungicide Interactions

Transcription:

Purpose: Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015 To determine the background soil nitrogen (N) levels available from organic N pools in 2015. Methods: OMAFRA Field Crop Staff in collaboration with farm cooperators and agribusiness people and the partnership of SGS-AgriFood Labs for analysis, again conducted the annual survey of background nitrogen nitrate levels across the province. The contribution of all the individuals and companies involved is greatly appreciated. Over the period Wednesday June 3 rd through Friday June 5 th, over 130 fields were sampled across the province. Note that samples were collected after the heavy rains of the weekend of May 30-31 where some areas received up to 4 inches although amounts varied widely. Rainfall events are known to reduce soil N levels due to leaching or dinitrification depending on soil type, time of year, amount of flow etc. Delaying sampling a few days after significant rains is always advised but sometimes impossible based on corn stage etc. Results: Soil nitrate levels in 2015 survey fields were considerably higher when compared to the OMAFRA soil N surveys conducted in earlier years (2005-2014). The 2015 soil N survey targeted fields where N containing fertilizer was not broadcast applied this spring, had no recent history of manure and the previous year crop was corn, soybeans, edible beans or cereals. Medium textured soils (loam, silt loam and sandy clay loam) had soil nitrate levels that averaged 15.8 PPM (Table 1), which was 4-5 ppm higher than the surveys historic average of 11.0 PPM. Survey average nitrate levels for recent years on medium textured soils were 9.8 ppm in 2014 (wet May), 10.7 ppm in 2013 (cool wet spring), 12.2 PPM in 2012 (warm spring) and 9.5 PPM in 2011 (cool spring). Mineralization of organic nitrogen is influenced by temperature, precipitation, time and field history. Drier than normal spring conditions reduce the amount of N loss due to leaching or denitrification and probably explains the relatively high early June soil nitrate levels observed in the 2015 survey. Spring nitrate levels in 2015 do not appear to be significantly affected by soil texture. Historically, soil nitrate levels have been lower on clay and sandy textured soils when compared to loam and silt loam soils. Sandy and clay soils are more sensitive to heavy rainfall in terms of nitrate loss (through leaching and denitrification respectively) and the dry spring conditions in 2015 minimized risk of N loss through these processes. Previous crops (cereals vs. soybeans) usually had small effects on average soil nitrate levels observed in 2015 (Table 2). Where corn was the previous crop, sample numbers were small so an individual sample with high level can impact the average substantially. 1

On the medium and coarse soils nitrate levels averaged lower in no-till fields (Table 3). Tillage accelerates the rate of N release from organic matter and this process probably accounts for higher soil nitrate levels observed in mulch-till and conventional-till fields (Table 3). Table1. Summary of Soil Nitrate Levels by Soil Texture Class (ppm) Soil Texture Class 1 Average of Nitrate N Summary: Recommendations The higher than usual average soil nitrate levels observed in this year s survey suggests that fertilizer N requirements in 2015 may be less than the rates generally needed in most years. To confirm fertilizer N requirements for individual corn fields producers should be using a PSNT test on their fields to determine the adjustment amount of fertilizer nitrogen required compared to normal rates of nitrogen that they typically apply at side dress or with late applications. Where nitrogen has previously been applied and following some significant rain amounts, the high level of mineralization in 2015 suggests that sufficient nitrogen should be available to finish the crop. A 1PPM change in PSNT test level suggests a change in recommendation of about 10 lbsn/ac. If the traditional average PPM level of soil nitrate for early June timing is 11.0 ppm, then normal rates of fertilizer nitrogen might be 40-50 lbsn/ac less this year because of higher than normal soil nitrate availability observed in many survey fields in 2015. This however, cannot be determined without taking a PSNT soil sample yourself. Remember that soil nitrogen tests are based on a well-mixed composite of multiple 30cm/12inch cores collected across the field. must be quickly cooled and kept cool in transport to the labs for rapid and accurate analysis. A PSNT test taken in early June having a test value over 25ppm indicates that there is probably sufficient soil nitrogen supply to meet corn nitrogen requirements. However, a 2

change in the PSNT table to include yield goal as a parameter in the recommendation shows that the amount of nitrogen needed above 25ppm will occur under higher yield expectations (Table 4.) Table 2. Summary of Soil Nitrate Levels by Soil Texture Class and Previous Crop (ppm) Soil Texture Class 1 Previous Crop Class 2 Average of Nitrate N Cereals 14.8 6 Corn 13.6 2 Soybeans 14.0 25 Cereals 11.7 11 Corn 17.5 3 Soybeans 13.6 25 Cereals 18.3 13 Corn 12.9 1 Soybeans 14.6 26 2 Previous Crop Class where Cereals is spring and winter, Edible beans is Adzuki, Obito, White beans The Nitrogen rates in Table 4 represent the total amount of Nitrogen recommended. Side dress rates applied should subtract the starter nitrogen rate already applied from the above table rates to determine the actual amount to apply as a side dress or in-crop broadcast application. The yield projections chosen must be proven yields that have occurred on the farm. Further research is needed to understand the amount of nitrogen made available to the crop from in-crop late spring applications of broadcast nitrogen (urea, dropped piped UAN, etc). The table values above are calibrated based on an injected side dress application method. Where preplant nitrogen was previously broadcast to the field before soil sampling, this table does not offer reliable nitrogen recommendations. 3

Table3. Summary of Soil Nitrate N by Soil Texture Class and Tillage Class (ppm) Soil Texture Tillage Class 2 Average of Class 1 Nitrate N CT 16.4 10 MT 13.7 14 NT 12.3 9 CT 12.4 16 MT 14.1 16 NT 14.0 7 CT 15.5 21 MT 17.9 14 NT 10.9 5 2 Tillage Class where CT= conventional tillage including fall and spring passes MT= minimum, vertical and strip tillage mostly in spring NT= notill Next Steps: This Ontario Soil N Survey has occurred annually for a decade. It may continue in 2016 although the GFO sponsored Sentinel N project may supersede it in future. Acknowledgements: We wish to thank the many farmers, agri-business personal, OMAFRA summer students, and SGS labs for their contribution to this project. Project Contacts: Ben Rosser, OMAFRA, ben.rosser@ontario.ca Ian McDonald, OMAFRA, ian.mcdonald@ontario.ca Ken Janovicek, UG, kjanovic@uoguelph.ca 4

Location of Project Final Report: Table 4. Pre-Sidedress Nitrogen Soil Test (PSNT) fertilizer N recommendations based on soil nitrate concentration (PPM) and expected yield (bu/acre). Soil Nitrate (PPM) Expected Yield (bu/ac) 120 143 167 191 215 239 Sidedress Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendation (lb N/acre) 0 176 197 218 240 261 282 2.5 163 184 205 225 246 267 5 151 171 191 211 231 252 7.5 138 158 177 197 216 236 10 126 144 163 182 201 221 12.5 113 131 149 168 187 206 15 99 117 135 153 172 190 17.5 83 102 120 138 156 175 20 57 86 105 123 141 159 22.5 0 60 88 107 126 144 25 0 0 63 90 110 128 27.5 0 0 0 66 92 111 30 0 0 0 0 68 93 32.5 0 0 0 0 0 69 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 5