EXECUTIVE TEAM INFORMATION SYSTEM AND FINANCIAL REPORTING COMPETENCIES, AND VOLUNTARY ADOPTION OF XBRL REPORTING Efrim Boritz, University of Waterloo Jap Efendi, University of Waterloo Jee-Hae Lim*, University of Waterloo (presenter) November 8, 2012 1
XBRL Research Antecedents Firm-specific characteristics Corporate governance Executives Competency?? (IS vs. Financial Reporting, or both) XBRL VFP (Mar.2005) MFP (Apr.2009) XBRL Quality Error Warning Consequences Ex-ante Market Assessment Ex-post Accounting Assessment 2
Our Research Focus Examine whether executives with both IS and financial reporting competencies promote the adoption of XBRL whether participants in the VFP have executive team members with more IS- or financial reporting- related competencies Examine whether the competencies of the executive team affect the quality of the XBRL implementation the excessive use of taxonomy extensions the frequency of errors, such as instance and taxonomy related errors 3
Exe. IS Competency and VFP As the strategic impact of IT became evident, researchers and practitioners argued that the management of IT and leadership in IT must be a shared endeavour between the top executive team and IS professionals. achieving competitive advantage (e.g. financial performance) understanding of IT problems and solutions accelerating the process of new innovations (e.g. e- business, ERP, and XBRL, etc). coping with complex problems and develop innovative strategic solutions improving the dissemination of information to the capital markets H1: Firms with executive team members with higher levels of information system competencies are more likely to participate in the voluntary XBRL filing program. 4
Exe. Financial Reporting Competency and VFP Financial reporting and accounting related competency of executives plays an important role in determining the quality of financial reporting. professional accounting certification or other accounting-related work experience more years of FR-related work experience, advanced degrees, and professional certification (like a CPA). In fact, financial reporting literacy is negatively associated with financial reporting errors H2: Firms with executive team members with higher levels of financial reporting competencies are more likely to participate in the voluntary XBRL filing program. 5
Exe. IS and Financial Reporting Competencies and VFP Quality (Extensions) Extensions: created by firms when necessary to define elements for a specific reporting application not covered by an XBRL industry-level elements (as a proxy for data quality of XBRL filings). the proportion of company-defined elements (extensions) over total elements-- a smaller percentage represents a better fit Debreceny et al. (2011) assess the impact of extensions on the quality and comparability of the XBRL-tagged data, and conclude that more than 40% of the extensions were unnecessary. H3: The quality of the voluntary XBRL filings as measured by the number of extensions used vary according to the level of executives IS and financial reporting competencies. 6
Exe. IS and Financial Reporting Competencies and VFP Quality (Instance and Taxonomy Errors) Taxonomy: A dictionary of the financial terms used in preparing financial statements or other business reports and the corresponding XBRL elements. It defines the specific tags for individual items of data (such as cash and cash equivalents ). Financial reporting function Instance: A well-formed XML document that includes one or more XBRL elements. It is created by mapping financial information to XBRL taxonomies that describe financial facts and the relationships between them. IS related function H4: The quality of the voluntary XBRL filings as measured by the number of taxonomy related and instance related errors and warnings vary according to the level of executives IS and financial reporting competencies. 7
Method Sample: 692 VFP interactive submissions from 138 firms (from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Interactive Financial Report Viewer website during 2005-2009) executives IS/IT and financial reporting competencies Form 10-Ks and DEF-14A manual review via Lexis-Nexis, and twelve online information sources A subsequent cross-match with Compustat Use the propensity score matching approach (PSM): based on SIZE, Profitability (ROA), and MTB Ratio Final Sample: 102 VFP-XBRL vs. 102 Non-VFP-XBRL 8
Measures (DVs) VFP: is one 1 if the firm participated in the VFP, and zero otherwise; VFP Quality: the rates of extension usage (number of extension element / number of total element; the number of instance validation errors and warnings, taxonomy validation errors and warnings, and the combined errors and warnings in the first VFP filings; 9
Measures (IVs) IS competency: ITad: is one if the executive members have IT related academic degree, zero otherwise; ITjob: is one if the executive members have held an IT related jobs, zero otherwise; ITfirm: is one if the executive members have worked at an IT-intensive firm, zero otherwise; Financial Reporting competency: ACCTpro: is one if the CEO/CFO has a professional certification (e.g. CPA, CA, and other accountingrelated certifications), zero otherwise ACCTexp: is one if the CEO/CFO has experience as a public accountant, auditor, principal or chief financial officer, controller, or principal or chief accounting officer, zero otherwise; 10
Measures (IS/IT Area) IS Executives (CIOORITEXPERT): is one if the company has a CIO (Chief Information Officer) or other type of IT expert (Lim et al. 2010; 2011), zero otherwise Strategic IT Role: Automative, ( e.g., replacing human labor by automating business processes); Informative, (e.g., providing new information about business activities to senior management, to employees across the firm, and to customers for better decision making) Transformative, (e.g., redefining business and industry processes and relationships). 11
Measures (CVs) Size: is log Total Assets; LOSS: equals to one if Net Income is < 0, zero otherwise; ROA: is Net Income / Total Assets; MTB: is Fiscal Closing Price / Book Value Per Share; LEV: is long-term debt divided by total assets; R&D: is R&D Expenses / Sales; BOARDSIZE: number of directors; CEOCHAIR: is one if the current CEO serves a chairman of the board, zero otherwise; Industry: includes industry fixed effects using 2-digit SIC codes; Year: includes fixed year effects. Winsorized at 1% and 99% levels. 12
Descriptive Statistics 13
Logistic Regression(IS/IT Area) 14
Results: IS vs. FR 15
Results: Both IS and FP 16
Results: VFP Quality 17
Endogeneity Concern 18
Other Robustness Checks Alternative IT- and Financial Reporting Competency Measures Use an individual components of competency measures: (1) ITad; (2) ITjob; (3) ITfirm (1) ACCTpro; (2) ACCTexp: Use count measures (1) ISCOM2 (min.=zero; max. =3) (2) ACCTCOM2 (min.=zero; max. =2) Alternative VFP Quality EXTENSION2 variable = the number of extension element / (number of extension element + number of official element) 19
Other Robustness Checks Accounting for Corporate Governance board independence (BDIND) = the number of independent board members Board meetings (BMEET) = the frequency of board meetings G-index Alternative Industry Effects three broad industry control dummy variables (Manufacturing, Finance, and Service) based on SIC. HHI index 20
Limitations Suffers from a potential survivorship bias problem. small firms or those with very low executive rank (e.g. some CFO, CIO, or other IT experts) may not have made the final sample used in empirical tests, biasing the results in favour of the hypotheses. Other factors such as IT intensity and/or cumulative IT maturity (e.g. the current state of IT or several new areas of IT investments) could play a critical role in determining the costs or benefits of IT investments. 21
Contributions Extend the literature on the relation between firmspecific characteristics and VFP adoption. executives competencies or associated interests and attitudes that are proxied by competencies can influence decisions about voluntary adoption of XBRL to gain anticipated competitive advantages. Contribute to the debate on the antecedents of XBRL quality. higher IS competencies are more strongly associated with the voluntary adoption of XBRL than executive teams with higher financial reporting competencies. Contribute to the identification of antecedents of XBRL quality. executive team members organizational roles, competency types and competency levels are associated with XBRL quality. 22
Concluding Remarks Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the characteristics of firms and their management teams that influence their adoption of innovative technologies such as XBRL. A guide for investigating voluntary XBRL filings in other jurisdictions and other voluntary disclosures such as XBRL filings for sustainability reporting and voluntary standardized business reporting in XBRL in jurisdictions where such reporting is not mandatory. developing an XBRL adoption strategy. understanding the determinants of the quality of XBRL data. 23