Guidelines for Case Study Presentation

Similar documents
Guidelines for Case Study Presentation

2006 Iowa Farm Costs. and Returns File C1-10. Ag Decision Maker. Definition of Terms Used

FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

L Kansas State University (I. Department of Agricultural Economi<ii} FARM MANAGEMENT DATA BANK DOCUMENTATION LARRY N. LANGEMEIER--

2004 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper September 2005

2007 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

MEASURING SCOPE EFFICIENCY FOR CROP AND BEEF FARMS. M. R. Langemeier 1 and R. D. Jones 1

2006 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2007

2007 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

Farm Financial Record Keeping Using Quicken for Windows Category List

2014 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

2009 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2010

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

2014 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

2015 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

2015 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

2011 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper October, 2012

Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2000 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profi t Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Crop Enterprises

~il~~:~~ii~!. ~...~: {(.~i. !!.~I~ji!': i~i( l:;i;!i:i;i;i:::-: :: C: ..::::)~::m~:l::::t:m:;::;;%::;:!;:;:;:j;.:;:;::::;::j::j:j\:;..

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 1998 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Economics 230 Lab 4 Section 1 2 Due September 24 Fall 2010 WHOLE FARM BUDGET

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2016

Measuring Farm Financial Performance

Appendix I Whole Farm Analysis Procedures and Measures

KANSAS MASTER FARM FAMILY WORKBOOK

RISK ADJUSTED COST EFFICIENCY INDICES Elizabeth Yeager, Michael Langemeier. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Costs to Produce Corn and Soybeans in Illinois 2017

Lowland cattle and sheep farms, under 100 hectares

2012 Risk and Profit Conference Breakout Session Presenters. 15. History By The Numbers: A Look At Kansas Agriculture s History Using KFMA Data

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

SDA cattle and sheep farms, 120 hectares and over

The sales price for Pasture equivalents is zero. Check the feed prices on the last section of the Budgets.

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

PROJECTING CASH FLOWS ON DAIRY FARMS

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS and SELECTED FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS FROM 978 WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

1. Under 60k SO Farm Business Income ( per farm)

Differences Between High, Medium, and Low Profit Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Crop Enterprises

Major Cost Items on Wisconsin Organic, Grazing, and Confinement (Average of All Sizes) Dairy Farms

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. August, 2009

Perceived versus Actual Competitive Advantage. Michael R. Langemeier Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010

April 1983 A.E. Ext

A. Circle the best answer. Put a square around your second choice, if you want. If your second choice is correct you get half credit.


2017 Ohio Farm Business Summary

The entire report is available at:

Kentucky Farm Business Management Program. Annual Summary Data: Purchase Area Farms 2011

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2001 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

Cost Efficiency Estimates for a Sample of Crop and Beef Farms

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

The entire report is available at:

Martin and Peg Smith Case

Chapter 7. Dairy -- Farm Management Wayne A. Knoblauch, Professor George J. Conneman, Professor Emeritus Cathryn Dymond, Extension Support Specialist

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms 2013

THE BENEFITS OF FINANCIAL BENCHMARKING TO FARMERS IN THE UNITED STATES

Full Season Soybeans Enterprise 1998 Costs and Returns

The entire report is available at:

Economic Research Service The USDA Commodity Costs and Returns (CAR) Estimation Project

The entire report is available at:

Kentucky Farm Business Management Program. Annual Summary Data

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 140 COWS OR FEWER, 2013 JULY 2014 E.B

Evaluating Farm Resources

1998 Double Crop Soybean Costs and Returns

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch April 25, 2012

Accounting for Agriculture

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 140 COWS OR FEWER, 2014 JUNE 2015 E.B

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

2009 Organic Farm Performance

2013 Ohio Farm Business Analysis

Enterprise Diversification to Improve Efficiency and Profitability

Wheat Enterprises: 1999 Costs and Returns

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2008 On Selected WISONSIN DAIRY FARMS

POULTRY FARM BUSINESS SUMMARY. stewart Ackerman Kristen Park. Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

2003 High Yielding Dairy Farms Compared By Profitability

The data for this report were collected by Iowa Farm Business Association consultants and compiled by Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.

2015 LEASE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District MITCHELL County

State Farm Business Management Program Database. Crop Farm Sort

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Crop Farm Sort

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 80 COWS OR FEWER 2002 PARTICIPANT COPY OCTOBER 2003 E.B

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 120 COWS OR FEWER, 2011 JULY 2012 E.B

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2009 on Selected WISONSIN DAIRY FARMS

FAPRI-UMC Report December 8, 2005

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 70 COWS OR FEWER 2000 AUGUST 2001 E.B

USING PRODUCTION COSTS AND BREAKEVEN LEVELS TO DETERMINE INCOME POSSIBILITIES

USING ENTERPRISE BUDGETS TO IMPROVE CUSTOMER S PROFITS. Kevin Shelley 1 and Matt Hanson 2

Wisconsin Agricultural Economics Outlook Forum

North Dakota Farm Bureau North Dakota Farmers Union Monsanto 1 Star in Star Partner Program

Transcription:

Guidelines for Case Study Presentation - 2017 Attached is some financial information about a grain and beef farm in Jackson County, Kansas. The farm financial information on the attachment are the KFMA results for the 13 farms in the KFMA program in this county. The family farm in our case study happens to match the average farm in Jackson County exactly. Thus, you can consider the attached financial information to be the same as the family farm here. The farm family consists of a husband and a wife (Tom and Jane Smith) and their two kids (Nate and Steve). Both Nate and Steve are in college. While this farm has been doing fine financially, the Smith s one child, Nate, has expressed some interest in returning to the family farm. Nate has a steady girlfriend and anticipates getting married in about 3 or so years. Steve, on the other hand, has less interest in the farm and has no plans to ever enter farming. He is majoring in engineering and anticipates landing a job in Kansas City when he graduates. You should address this case study from the point of view of Nate. Nate has one more year of college before he joins the family operation. Nate s parents are both in their late 50 s and would like to farm for 10 more years before retiring. At that point, Nate would be the main operator/decision maker for the farm. Also, the small neighboring farmer is retiring. His farm consists of 500 acres (400 crop land and 100 acres of pasture). This neighboring farmer is friends with the Smith s and he has no children interested in going back to his farm. Thus, these 500 acres could be either purchased or rented at a fair price. About the farm The Smith s farm consists of 1,500 total acres with 780 crop acres, 700 pasture acres and the remainder of the farm in buildings and timbers. Note, don t get concerned about the number of acres on the printout adding up correctly. The average acres are based on those farms that have that characteristic. For example, only 12 of the 13 farms have pasture and the pasture average of those farms is 699. The end result is that when you add up acres on this report, it will total more than 1,411. It won t really affect anything in the analysis. Of these 1,500 acres, the Smiths own 500 acres and rent another 1,000 acres. The rented acres are split between cropland and pasture. The Smiths raise corn, grain sorghum, soybeans, wheat, and alfalfa hay. In addition, they have 102 beef cows and 18 dairy cows. The 3 pages of financial information have more detailed information about their farm, the revenue and expenses for 2015, and their beginning and ending balance sheet for 2015.

Assignment Your school s assignment for the case study is as follows: Develop a business plan that is addressed to ONE of the 3 parties. Again, Nate is putting this business plan together. The parents, Tom and Jane Smith The lender of the local bank who would help with the financing of the farm The brother, Steve, who will not be going back to the farm. 1) Develop a 4-minute PowerPoint presentation that is essentially a business plan for Nate returning to the family farm. Your presentation should focus on aspects that are important to who you are addressing (i.e., either Nate s parents, the lender, or his brother). There should be some financial analysis and the level of financial analysis should be adjusted depending upon who is being addressed. For example, the lender focus would probably be on making sure the farm provides enough income for 2 families over the short-term and whether buying or renting the other farm makes sense. A focus on the parents would probably address transition issues and making sure Nate becomes the farm owner over time. A focus on the brother Steve would probably address how Steve is going to get his fair share, etc. 2) The PowerPoint presentation will be the only part being graded. There are no other materials to turn in. The presentation should be geared toward anyone with a strong interest in the farm (i.e., other family members, lenders, input suppliers, etc.) 3) The material in the packet is not the only source of information for building your case study. The USDA has additional information about crop production, yield histories, cost of production, etc. for the state of Kansas. In addition, Kansas State University, through AgManager.info has plenty of information and tools that could be used for a case study. Google is always your friend as well, particularly when it comes to researching many of these decisions. 4) The attached rubric provides details about how the presentations will be scored. This year, every team will start with one point (the rubric only goes to 49 points). In addition, no team will score lower than 25 points.

2015 Data - Kansas Kansas Farm Management Association County Averages Annual ProfitLink Summary Jackson (13 Farms) Income and Expense Analysis 1 Beef 109,695 2 Dairy and Milk 113,250 3 Sheep 4 Swine 5 Poultry and Eggs 6 Other Livestock/Hedging 386 7 Custom Feeding 8 Feed Purchased -72,157 9 Livestock Value Produced $151,174 10 Corn 77,099 11 Grain Sorghum 12 Soybeans 54,634 13 Sunflowers 14 Wheat 5,032 15 Hay and Forage -351 16 Other Crop 6,427 17 Government Payments 1,687 18 Crop Insurance Proceeds 10,630 19 Machine Work 6,337 20 Other Income/Hedging 18,917 21 Value of Farm Production $331,583 22 Hired Labor 27,964 23 Machinery Repairs 37,739 24 Irrigation Repairs 25 Building Repairs 4,746 26 Seed/Other Crop Expense 34,210 27 Crop Insurance 6,688 28 Fertilizer-Lime 54,685 29 Machine Hire 17,580 30 Organization Fees, Publications 4,421 31 Vet-Med-Drugs 9,472 32 Misc Crop Expense 830 33 Misc Livestock Expense 2,235 34 Dairy Expense 9,792 35 Gas-Fuel-Oil 16,539 36 Irrigation Energy 79 37 Real Estate Taxes 5,547 38 Personal Property Taxes 1,065 39 General Farm Insurance 8,058 40 Utilities 7,361 41 Cash Farm Rent 30,822 42 Herbicide-Insecticide 16,595 43 Conservation 1,415 44 Auto Expense 346 45 Total Operating Expense $298,186 46 Interest Paid 23,154 47 Depreciation-Machinery 37,070 48 Depreciation-Buildings 5,636 49 Total Farm Expense $364,046 50 Net Farm Income ($32,463) 51 Unpaid Family Labor 5,492 52 Unpaid Operator Labor 67,052 53 Current Asset Charge 13,328 54 Non-Current Asset Charge 74,010 55 Return to Labor & Management -125,294 56 Return to Capital -81,854 Ratios 57 Total Expense Ratio 1.0979 58 Adjusted Total Expense Ratio 1.3167 59 Economic Total Expense Ratio 1.5801 60 Operating Profit Margin Ratio -0.2469 61 Asset Turnover Ratio 0.1594 62 % Return on Assets -0.0394 63 % Return on Equity -0.0660 64 Average Current Ratio 2.5489 65 Average Debt to Asset Ratio 0.2353

2015 Data - Kansas County Averages Kansas Farm Management Association Annual ProfitLink Summary Jackson (13 Farms) Assets/Loans January 1 December 31 January 1 December 31 66 Current Assets 433,414 328,176 67 Non-Current Accts Receivable 27,176 47,674 68 Breeding Livestock 181,433 196,705 69 Machinery and Equipment 288,577 301,692 70 Buildings 49,720 48,040 71 Owned Land 1,126,184 1,130,999 72 Total Assets 2,106,504 2,053,286 73 Current Liabilities 136,725 162,071 74 Non-Current Liabilities 344,176 335,752 75 Net Worth 1,625,602 1,555,463 Labor 76 Number of Operators 0.94 77 Number of Workers 1.42 78 Total Work Days 321 79 Value Farm Production/Worker 233,636 80 Net Farm Income/Worker -22,874 Per Operator Basis 81 Total Assets 2,216,283 82 Value of Farm Production/Operator 353,327 83 Net Farm Income/Operator -34,592 Other Factors 84 % Crop Acres Irrigated 85 % Tillable Land 51.05 % 86 Crop Machine Cost/Total Expense (%) 25.04 % Acres Owned Rented Owned Rented Total Cnt Acres Cnt Acres Cnt Total Cnt Acres Cnt Acres Cnt 87 Total Acres 1411 13 494 11 993 13 88 Non-Irrigated Crop Acres 780 12 292 10 537 12 89 Irrigated Crop Acres 90 Total Crop Acres 780 12 292 10 537 12 91 Pasture Acres 699 12 192 10 539 12 92 Farmstead-Timber Acres 60 10 60 10 Crop Value, Costs, Acres Total Per Crop Acre Per Harv Acre Total Per Crop Acre Per Harv Acre 93 Acres 780.33 760.70 94 Crop Mach Invest 227,773 291.89 299.43 95 Crop Mach Cost 91,147 116.81 119.82 96 Gross Crop Value 237,067 303.80 311.64 97 Crop Prod Costs 234,980 301.13 308.90 Non-Irrigated Acres Cnt Acres Acres Yield Acres Yield Cnt Acres Acres Yield Acres Yield 98 Corn 12 234 125 122.87 168 143.22 99 Grain Sorghum 100 Soybeans 11 262 176 36.20 182 34.97 101 Sunflowers 102 Wheat 6 94 86 31.63 103 Other Crops 104 Alfalfa Hay 6 31 105 Other Hay & Forage 11 212 60 169 106 DC Grain Sorghum 107 DC Soybeans 108 DC Sunflowers Irrigated Acres Cnt Acres Acres Yield Acres Yield Cnt Acres Acres Yield Acres Yield 109 Corn 110 Grain Sorghum 111 Soybeans 112 Sunflowers 113 Wheat 114 Other Crops 115 Alfalfa Hay 116 Other Hay & Forage 117 DC Grain Sorghum 118 DC Soybeans 119 DC Sunflowers Avg Livestock Inventories and Sales 120 Beef Cows 102 121 Dairy Cows 18 122 Ewes 123 Litters Farrowed 124 Beef Feeders 80 125 Swine Feeders 126 Turkeys

2015 Data - Kansas County Averages Jackson Cash Expense Accrued Expense Exp Inv Change Non-Cash Costs Total Costs* Livestock Total Crop Total Crop Acre 780 13 Farms Hired Labor 27,964 27,964 16,424 11,540 14.79 15.17 Operator Labor 67,052 67,052 23,262 43,789 56.12 57.56 Family Labor 5,492 5,492 1,318 4,174 5.35 5.49 Total Labor $100,509 $41,005 $59,504 $76.25 $78.22 Gen Mach Repair 24,032 24,032 5,285 18,487 23.69 24.30 Crop Mach Repair 3,493 3,493 3,493 4.48 4.59 Irrigation Equip Repair 0 Machine Hire 15,487 2,093 17,580 1,341 16,239 20.81 21.35 Gas-Fuel-Oil 16,935-397 16,539 5,074 11,228 14.39 14.76 Farm Auto Expense 346 346 346 0.44 0.45 Depr - Motor Vehicle 22,520 22,520 4,586 17,312 22.19 22.76 Depr - Machinery 14,550 14,550 2,885 11,378 14.58 14.96 Total Machinery $99,059 $19,171 $78,483 $100.58 $103.17 Seed-Crop Expense 35,740 462-1,992 34,210 34,210 43.84 44.97 Crop Insurance 6,688 6,688 6,688 8.57 8.79 Fertilizer-Lime 57,239-2,554 54,685 5,885 48,800 62.54 64.15 Irrigation Fuel 79 79 79 0.10 0.10 Crop Stor-Marketing 830 830 830 1.06 1.09 Herbicide-Insecticide 17,679-1,084 16,595 284 16,312 20.90 21.44 Crop Supplies 51 101 152 152 0.20 0.20 Total Crop Expenses $113,239 $6,169 $107,070 $137.21 $140.75 Dairy Expense 9,795-3 9,792 9,792 Feed Purchased 72,108 100-51 72,157 72,157 Vet-Medicine-Drugs 9,472 9,472 9,472 Lvstk Marketing-Breeding 2,235 2,235 2,235 Livestock Supplies 10,110-48 10,061 10,061 Total Lvstk Expenses $103,717 $103,717 Building Repair 4,746 4,746 1,142 3,604 4.62 4.74 Conservation 1,415 1,415 1,415 1.81 1.86 Depr - Buildings 5,636 5,636 2,752 2,884 3.70 3.79 Total Improvement $11,797 $3,894 $7,904 $10.13 $10.39 Interest Paid 23,154 23,154 5,819 17,133 21.96 22.52 Cash Farm Rent 30,822 30,822 12,753 18,069 23.16 23.75 Net Curr Asset Chg 13,328 13,328 3,314 10,014 12.83 13.16 Net Int Asset Chg 21,445 21,445 10,636 10,583 13.56 13.91 Net LT Asset Chg 52,566 52,566 16,317 36,249 46.45 47.65 Total Asset Charges $141,314 $48,840 $92,048 $117.96 $121.00 Fee-Publ-Travel 4,425-4 4,421 1,144 3,277 4.20 4.31 Real Estate Tax 5,547 5,547 1,071 4,477 5.74 5.89 Property Taxes 1,065 1,065 253 812 1.04 1.07 Gen Farm Insurance 8,058 8,058 2,540 5,462 7.00 7.18 Farm Utilities 3,956 3,956 2,906 1,050 1.35 1.38 Utilities 3,405 3,405 2,683 722 0.92 0.95 Total Other Expenses $26,451 $10,596 $15,799 $20.25 $20.77 Total $396,874 Kansas Farm Management Association Annual ProfitLink Summary $2,647 ($6,024) $202,589 Harv Acre 761 $596,087 $233,391 $360,807 $462.38 $474.31 * Total costs may include costs allocated to custom work and/or other enterprises

2017 Case Study Evaluation Sheet School: Title: Reviewer: Note: Please do NOT shake hands with any of the judges. We want to allow you adequate time for set-up and prevent the spread of germs. Topic/Rating Possible Point Score for each Category Unacceptable (0 to 2) Marginal (C: 2 to 4) Acceptable (B: 4 to 6) Exceptional (A: 6 to 7) 1 3 5 7 Points Comments Structure of Presentation Not possible to understand presentation due to absence of structure. Difficult to follow presentation due to erratic topical shifts and jumps. Most information is presented in logical order which is easy to follow. Presented in a logical, interesting and novel sequence, which is easily followed. PowerPoint Slides Missing or impossible to read. Misspellings and other mistakes Unattractive, hard to follow, either too busy or not enough info Ok appearance. Slightly too busy or lacking in info Attractive and easy to follow. Contains the right amount of info Knowledge of Subject Material No grasp of information. Reading entirely from notes. Uncomfortable with information. Heavy reliance on notes. At ease with content and able to elaborate and explain to some degree. Minimal use of notes. Demonstration of full knowledge of the subject with explanations and elaboration. Methods and Analysis Methods and results were unclear. Hard to understand the findings of the model and implications for the problem being examined. Methods were somewhat unclear. Results were not strongly supported by the methods used. Methods were ok but not the best choice for the problem. Results were weakly supported from the model and methods. Methods used were appropriate. Very clear and logical approach to how the conclusions and results were reached Delivery & Speaking Skills Significant mumbling and incorrect pronunciation of terms. Voice level too low or too high. Monotonous, no eye contact, rate of speech too fast/ slow Occasional mispronunciation of terms. Little eye contact, uneven rate, only little expression Voice is clear and at a proper level. Most words pronounced correctly. Some eye contact, steady rate, excessively rehearsed Clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms. Good eye contact, steady rate, enthusiasm, confidence Candidate Appearance Sweats, Shorts, flip-flops, hair uncombed Jeans with either t-shirt or polo. Also FFA jacket with non-dress shirt Business casual: Dockers or other dress slacks, polo shirt, blouse, dress shoes Professional: FFA jacket (or suit or sport coat), shirt, tie, dress slacks, skirt, dress, dress shoes Presentation Length Too long or too short. +/ 2 minutes +/ 1.5 minutes +/ 1 minutes +/ 30 seconds Point Average (= total points/7) Please list any other comments on the back of this sheet.