Questionnaire of the Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

Similar documents
2. What do you think is the significance, purpose and scope of enhanced cooperation as per the Tunis Agenda?

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT. Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

ICC BASIS submission to enhanced cooperation consultation

2. What do you think is the significance, purpose and scope of enhanced cooperation as per the Tunis Agenda? a) Significance b) Purpose c) Scope

2. What do you think is the significance, purpose and scope of enhanced cooperation as per the Tunis Agenda? a) Significance b) Purpose c) Scope

CSTD Working Group on Improvements to the IGF Recommendations

General Assembly s overall review of the implementation of WSIS outcomes. Official Form for Written Submissions

UK - ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT

General Assembly s overall review of the implementation of WSIS outcomes. Official Form for Written Submissions

INTERSESSIONAL PANEL OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD) Budapest, January 2016

Delegations will find in Annex draft Council conclusions on Internet Governance as prepared by the Presidency.

Submissions from entities in the United Nations system and elsewhere on their efforts in 2016 to implement the outcome of the WSIS

Hundred and seventy-fourth session

Economic and Social Council

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCEINTIFIC and CULTURAL ORGANISATION

Economic and Social Council

Draft decision prepared by the working group on institutional arrangements and rules of procedure

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

THE INTERNET GOVERNANCE FORUM (IGF) 1. Background and context

auda response to the Open Consultation on Enhanced Cooperation on International Public Policy Issues Pertaining to the Internet

Information and communications technologies for development

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD), twentieth session Geneva, 8-12 May 2017

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD)

General Assembly s overall review of the implementation of WSIS outcomes. Official Form for Written Submissions

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

General Assembly s overall review of the implementation of WSIS outcomes. Official Form for Written Submissions

DECLARATION ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE. We, the Heads of State and Government of the African Union, meeting in our <session number, venue, date TBC> ;

SPEAKING NOTES FOR MR. PATRIZIO CIVILI ASSISTANT SECRETARY-GENERAL FOR POLICY COORDINATION AND INTER-AGENCY AFFAIRS

We aim at distributing to all Member States the revised version of the modalities resolution on Thursday 19 November 2015.

UNITED NATIONS MANDATES ON NGO ACCREDITATION AND PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS

Session 191: Measuring the Information Society: Challenges and Trends

Draft Charter of the African Internet Governance Forum (AfIGF)

THE INTERNET GOVERNANCE FORUM

General Assembly Economic and Social Council

WSIS+10 High-Level Event Open Consultation Process

r encourage Member States to continue to actively participate in the discussions on this impoitant matter.

Internet Governance. Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works

Draft Outcome Document 7 December Preamble

Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest considerations.

28 February Miroslav Lajčák. All Permanent Representatives and Permanent Observers to the United Nations New York

Council Working Group on international Internet- related public policy issues

WSIS+10 High-Level Event Open Consultation Process

29 March Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Procedures and practices in civil society involvement by DESA

UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN - ECLAC

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

14 October Excellency,

Diversity of Cultural Expressions

World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) - ongoing processes in the UN sphere

WSIS+10 High-Level Event Open Consultation Process

NGO Proposal on the Structure for the 2011 Review of the Human Rights Council s Work and Functioning

Questionnaire on the Process to Follow-up and. Review of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Mechanisms for Stakeholder Engagement with UNEP in Light of the Rio + 20 Outcome

Economic and Social Council

Recommendation of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation

First name: Lea Last name: Kaspar. Country: Various

2. Confirming that effective co-operation is only possible through effective communication;

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

Economic and Social Council

Commission on Science and Technology for Development

UNEP Funding Strategy Universal Membership Global Responsibility

Scope, modalities, format and organization of the high-level meeting on universal health coverage

Future programme, organization and methods of work of the Commission on Sustainable Development

UNEP/EA.4/19. United Nations Environment Assembly of the. United Nations Environment Programme

SECOND EURO-MEDITERRANEAN MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE ON THE INFORMATION SOCIETY. Cairo 27 February 2008 DECLARATION

Economic and Social Council

RELATIONS WITH NON-GOVERNMENTAL PARTNERS SUMMARY

Modalities for the 2016 Economic and Social Council Forum on Financing for Development follow-up Proposals by the ECOSOC Bureau

(I) ~ 16 December Excellency,

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

Arrangements for observer participation in the Board meetings

12 th CEPA Meeting Working Group III on Citizen Engagement in Managing Development, Open Government Development

20 June Excellency,

(In Support Of the ECOSOC Annual Ministerial Review) CONCEPT NOTE A. BACKGROUND. 1. The Annual Ministerial Review

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/L.297

UN Programme on Public Administration

Further to my letter dated 12 June 2018,1 have the honour to enclose

The World Telecommunication Development Conference (Istanbul, 2002),

Frequently Asked Questions About Conducting a National WSIS Consultation Process

6 July Excellency,

Lambert Okrah Major Groups Partnership on Forests Public Seminar March 9, 2016 Tokyo, Japan

Strengthening and Upgrading of UNEP. Elizabeth Mrema On behalf of Bakary Kante, Director Division of Environmental Law and Conventions, UNEP

General Secretariat Delegations Rio+20: Outcome and follow-up to the UNCSD 2012 Summit - Council conclusions

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/61/L.56 and Add.1)] 61/266. Multilingualism

8 June Excellency,

How to obtain Consultative Status with ECOSOC

New York, November 14 th 2015

Statistics Processing in ITU

I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly

United Nations General Assembly's Overall Review of the Implementation of WSIS Outcomes

General Assembly Economic and Social Council

United Nations General Assembly s Overall Review of the Implementation of WSIS Outcomes

Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

The World Summit on the Information Society: An overview of follow-up

Outcome of the sixth session of the United Nations Forum on Forests

UNHQ, New York, 9 July 2008

Agenda item 10 (a) External representation and collaboration

Deliverable D1.20 MCP Standardisation Plan

Transcription:

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD) Questionnaire of the Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation Pursuant to and in order to fulfill the mandate given by the United Nations General Assembly in its Resolution 67/195 (2012) on information and communications technologies for development, the UN CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation elaborated the following questionnaire. The questions below need to be responded in the context of the Tunis Agenda of the World Summit on Information Society, 2005. All Member States of the United Nations, Permanent Observers, United Nations system agencies, non-governmental organizations in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council, Sector members of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and entities accredited to the World Summit on the Information Society not otherwise included in one of those groups are invited to fill out this questionnaire. Other relevant entities involved in Internet related public policy issues are welcome to provide their input by filling out the questionnaire. The information solicited through this questionnaire will only be used in aggregate form, unless otherwise authorised by the respondent. Do you authorise us to cite/share your views individually? Yes No Country: Organization: Address: E-mail: 1. Which stakeholder category do you belong to? (A) Government (B) Intergovernmental and international organizations (C) Non-Government (D) If non-government, please indicate: a) Business community b) Civil society c) Technical and academic community (E) If non-government, please indicate if you are: i) WSIS accredited ii) ECOSOC accredited iii) Participating in the work of the CSTD 1 iv) ITU accredited v) Other (Please specify): 1 Pursuant to ECOSOC Decisions 2011/237, 2011/238 or 2011/239. 1

2. What do you think is the significance, purpose and scope of enhanced cooperation as per the Tunis Agenda? (a) Significance: (b) Purpose: (c) Scope: 3. To what extent has or has not enhanced cooperation been implemented? Please use the space below to explain and to provide examples to support your answer. 2

4. What are the relevant international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet? (Please try not to exceed 200 words and list in order of priority, if possible) 5. What are the roles and responsibilities of the different stakeholders, including governments, in implementation of the various aspects of enhanced cooperation? 3

6. How should enhanced cooperation be implemented to enable governments, on an equal footing, to carry out their roles and responsibilities in international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet? 4

7. How can enhanced cooperation enable other stakeholders to carry out their roles and responsibilities? 8. What are the most appropriate mechanisms to fully implement enhanced cooperation as recognized in the Tunis Agenda, including on international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet and public policy issues associated with coordination and management of critical Internet resources? 5

9. What is the possible relationship between enhanced cooperation and the IGF? 10. How can the role of developing countries be made more effective in global Internet governance? 6

11. What barriers remain for all stakeholders to fully participate in their respective roles in global Internet governance? How can these barriers best be overcome? 12. What actions are needed to promote effective participation of all marginalised people in the global information society? 7

13. How can enhanced cooperation address key issues toward global, social and economic development? 8

14. What is the role of various stakeholders in promoting the development of local language content? 15. What are the international internet-related public policy issues that are of special relevance to developing countries? 9

16. What are the key issues to be addressed to promote the affordability of the Internet, in particular in developing countries and least developed countries. 17. What are the national capacities to be developed and modalities to be considered for national governments to develop Internet-related public policy with participation of all stakeholders? 10

18. Are there other comments, or areas of concern, on enhanced cooperation you would like to submit? 11