U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Similar documents
ABSTRACT FARM COSTS AND RETURNS STUDIES

RETUR COSTS A 8 R R. and 96 LI6R R

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE e ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE e JUNE 1968 FCR -59. ALBERT R. MANN library JU and RETURNS

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Drought Practices. C. V. Plath James R. Gray. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College Corvallis. Circular of Information 591 August 1958

CATTLE MAY HAVE A DECENT, BUT VOLATILE YEAR

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Cattle Inventory Increases; Impact of Tariffs Hangs Over Markets By James Mintert, Director, Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

A Method for Determining Ranch Profit Probabilities When Livestock Yields Are Normally Distributed

2014 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

2007 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

2015 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

2009 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2010

Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Cow-Calf Operations

2004 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper September 2005

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

2006 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2007

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

Background and Assumptions

Elko County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns, 2006

Background and Assumptions

2007 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2016 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture. DeDe Jones Steven Klose

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

2011 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper October, 2012

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Agriculture: expansions highlighted developments

2014 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Benchmarking Your Herd s Economic Facts

TIMELY INFORMATION. DAERS 08-4 August Making Adjustments To The Cattle Herd Due To Higher Production Costs

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Tools to Help Beef Cattle Producers Make Economically Sound Restocking Decisions

TIMELY INFORMATION. Agriculture & Natural Resources AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND RURAL SOCIOLOGY, AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL

2015 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2018 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture

Contribution of Federal Lands to Wyoming Range Livestock Production, 1992

Iowa Farm Outlook. Department of Economics August, 2012 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Comings and Goings. Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch April 25, 2012

Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

John Deere s Outlook on Cattle Economics

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

OPERATING INPUTS Unit Price Quantity Total $/Head. Grain Head $ - 1 $ - $ - Other Feed Additives Head $ - 1 $ - $ -

The Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production

2006 Iowa Farm Costs. and Returns File C1-10. Ag Decision Maker. Definition of Terms Used

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

COSTS AND RETURNS OF SAMPLE RANCHING BUSINESSES IN VARIOUS AREAS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Slope Farms. Our farm. Our work with other farmers. Experience with leasing land. Models for seasonal grazing

Devin Murnin. Director of Industry Programs Colorado Cattlemen s Association

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

CATTLE EXPANSION IS UNDERWAY

Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

Martin and Peg Smith Case

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Northern Utah Small Cow-Calf Pasture Finished Beef Production Costs & Returns, 2012

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms 2013

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

High Plains Ranch J. Hewlett and J. Parsons

Howard County Ag. Day: Beef Cow Economics

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

TRADE-OFF BETWEEN COW NUMBERS, CALF SIZE, AND SALE DATE INCORPORATING SEASONAL FACTORS AND SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDING

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Australian Beef Financial performance of beef farms, to

Major Cost Items on Wisconsin Organic, Grazing, and Confinement (Average of All Sizes) Dairy Farms

~il~~:~~ii~!. ~...~: {(.~i. !!.~I~ji!': i~i( l:;i;!i:i;i;i:::-: :: C: ..::::)~::m~:l::::t:m:;::;;%::;:!;:;:;:j;.:;:;::::;::j::j:j\:;..

Agriculture: issues of the past resurface

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM NEW YORK SMALL HERD FARMS, 140 COWS OR FEWER, 2013 JULY 2014 E.B

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. August, 2009

Cost and Return per Lamb - Long Range

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

Profit = Income - Costs. Profit = Income - Costs. What are overhead costs? Estimated average cow costs What are variable costs?

District 11-Projected Cow-Calf Enterprise Budget Breeding Cow Herd on Improved Pasture

Outlook for the Cattle Industry in the Nineties

STATEMENT OF FARMING INCOME AND EXPENSES

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms Case Studies of Texas High. Plains Agriculture

Crunching the Numbers for Taxes and Analysis. Chris Prevatt University of Florida, Range Cattle REC Extension Economist

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Focus. Analyzing the Impact of Drought Conditions on Texas High Plains Agriculture

Transcription:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV 2 1872 and RETURNS

FARM COSTS AND RETURNS STUDIES This report is part of a continuing nationwide study of costs and returns on commercial farms and ranches in selected farming regions. The study is conducted under the general supervision of Wylie D. Goodsell, Farm Production Economics Division, Economic Research Service. Objectives, methodology, procedure, and terms are uniform for all areas studied. The costs and returns studies cover the following commercial farms and ranches by type and size: Dairy Farms, Southeastern Wisconsin and Central New York Cash Grain Farms, Corn Belt Hog Beef-Feeding Farms, Corn Belt Cotton Farms, Mississippi Delta Cotton Farms, Southern High Plains, Texas Tobacco Farms, Coastal Plain, North Carolina Tobacco-Livestock Farms, Bluegrass Area, Kentucky Wheat-Fallow Farms, Pacific Northwest, Northern Plains and Southern Plains Northwest Cattle Ranches Migratory-Sheep Ranches, Utah-Nevada Southwest Cattle Ranches Information on the studies can be obtained from Farm Production Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 225.. TYPES OF FARMS INCLUDED IN FARM COSTS AND RETURNS STUDIES HUDIH MJNC. l!fvjsid l),~, DCPAI1TMENT Of' 11Gfi!CULTU111C: ii

COSTS AND RETURNS SOUTHWEST CATTLE RANCHES, 1971 By James R. Gray, Wylie D. Goodsell, and Macie J. Belfield l/ Abstract: Net returns on Southwestern cattle ranches in 1971 continued a decline which began in 197 as the drought of 197 continued past mid-1971. Net ranch production declined to 74 percent of 1965-67. Production expenses were 13 percent higher than in 197. Feed costs and grazing fees increased a fourth over 197 and were over a half again as large as the 1965-67 average. Ranchers received a record average of $39.4 per hundredweight for steer calves. Investment per ranch increased in 1971, mainly because of higher livestock values. Key Words: Southwest, costs, returns, production, investment, beef cattle, ranches. INTRODUCTION Cattle ranching is the predominant farming enterprise in a 34-county area spanning west Texas, southern New Mexico, and Southeastern Arizona (fig. 1). These ranches produce feeder calves for further conditioning and finishing in feedlots located in central Arizona, the Texas Panhandle, and the Midwest. Cattle graze all year long on the sparse grasses and browse species of the area, requiring about 6 acres per animal unit (cow and suckling calf). In years when abundant precipitation occurs in the late spring, summer, and early fall, brood cows produce large, high-quality calves. In drought years such as 1971, range forage supplies are inadequate to support grazing livestock through the winter. Also, when precipitation is delayed until fall, ranchers are forced to feed supplements to their herds. Fewer breeding animals, lower calving rates, lighter calves, and larger feed costs are typical of drought periods in the Southwest. ll Professor, New Mexico State University; Agricultural Economist and Statistical Assistant, Farm Production Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, respectively.

LOCATION OF SOUTHWEST RANCHES STUDIED ~... - ' - -.:~~ ~~ ::: ~~~~~--- ~: i~~~~~ ~~'-'~ -- -- - - - '-~\,,-:::_- U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NEG. ERS 645-1(12) ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE Figure 1 Large areas of Federally-owned grazing land are common in western New Mexico and Arizona, whereas most lands in Texas and eastern New Mexico are privately or State owned. The major source of income for these ranches is the sale of calves. About 26 high-quality calves are produced each year from the typical herd of 3 brood animals. Calving percentages are usually in the mid- 8's, which is lower than in most Western livestock producing areas. Death losses vary from 2 to 4 percent, depending on the severity of early spring weather conditions and the frequency and gravity of drought. In 1971, typical ranch herds were reduced to 28 brood animals and produced about 23 calves. Calving percentages were in the low 8's, while death loss was about 4 percent. Some forced selling of brood animals occurred in the spring because of the severe drought. The typical ranch reported here is based on a survey of ranches with 2-5 head of brood cows, averaging about 3 head. Ranches with 2-5 head of cows and heifers produce nearly two-fifths of the area's calves. Most operators with less than 2 cows and heifers are either employed part-time off the ranch or have a major farming enterprise in combination with livestock. Operators with more than 5 head often have hired managers and combine enterprises such as crop farming, registered cattle, and cattle conditioning or feeding. 2

COSTS AND RETURNS OF SOUTHWEST CATTLE RANCHES Net returns to ranch operator labor and management and total capital in 1971 averaged nearly $7,7 per ranch, a fourth less than the 197 level and 37 percent less than the record high in 1969 (table 1). In other major Western cattle producing areas, ranch returns increased from 197 to 1971. Prices received by Southwestern ranchers in 1971, about 8 percent above a year earlier and 4 percent above the 1965-67 average, were more than offset by lower production, sharply increased expenditures for feed, and higher prices paid for production items and services. Steer calf prices average $39.4 per hundredweight, 4 cents above the previous high in 1951. Prices received for yearlings, cows, and bulls were also record high. Slaughter cow prices at $22.1 per hundredweight were $2.55 more than in 197 and rivaled 1965 calf prices. Slaughter bulls brought an average of $27.83 per hundredweight, $8.57 more than in 197. Southwestern ranchers were unable to realize as much benefit from favorable 1971 livestock market prices as ranchers in other Western livestock areas because they had to reduce breeding herds. In addition, large numbers of yearlings were sold early in the year because of the droughto Later, favorable ranch conditions after August encouraged some holdback of animals. Large amounts of supplemental feeds, both roughages and concentrates, were fed from January through August. Hay prices averaged a record $43.8 per ton, up 17 percent from the 197 level and 57 percent from the 1965-67 average. Calving percentages decreased again in 1971 to 83 percent, 5 percentage points lower than the 1965-67 average. Because of favorable fall grazing conditions and heavy feeding of supplements early in the year, market weights of cattle and calves were comparable with those of both 1969 and 1965-67. Steer calves weighed 42 pounds and heifer calves, 48 pounds. Gross ranch income rose 3 percent over 197 but was 5 percent below the 1969 record. Prices received by ranchers played an important role in the gain. Despite favorable prices, cash receipts from yearlings accounted for only 15 percent of 1971 gross income, versus 29 percent of 197's total. As weather improved later in 1971, ranchers held back 26 percent of the heifer calves in an attempt to build back breeding cow numbers. This compared with 17 percent withheld in 197. Capital per ranch reached $544, in 1971, 31 percent over the 1965-67 average and 3 percent more than in 197. Unlike other years, the increase was mainly due to higher values of the livestock herd rather than higher land values. Total value of livestock increased 17 percent while total value of real estate increased only 1 percent. Per-acre values of land decreased in the Arizona portion of the study area, held constant in New Mexico, and increased slightly in the Texas portion, repeating the 197 experience. 3

Table 1.--Costs and returns, Southwest cattle ranches Item Unit Average 1965-67 197 1971 1./ Total land operated 11... : Acre Land owned............. : Livestock on ranch: All cattle : Number Cows and heifers, 2 years old and over.: Calf crop.... : Total ranch capital, Jan. 1 3/ ; Land and buildings 7... : Livestock... : Machinery and equipment. : Crops.......... : Total cash receipts : Calves......... : Steers and heifers. : Other cattle........ : Value of perquisites : Inventory change: : Livestock... : Crops............. : Gross ranch income... : Total operating expense : Feed and grazing fees : Livestock purchase : Other livestock expense : Crop expense.... : Machinery purchase. : Other machinery expense : Ranch buildings and fences : Labor hired....... : Taxes...... : Other.... : Return to operator labor and management, : and capital!:!/..... ; Interest paid. o = Return to operator labor and management and equity capital : Percent Dollar 17 '72 1,16 391 297 88 414,59 353,35 5,67 1,57 31,313 17 '972 5,799 7,542 1,49 376 33,98 23,659 7,431 3,14 339 1,542 2,557 1,866 3,587 1,85 1,392 9,439 Ranch production and price indexes (1965-67=1) Net ranch production.............. : Range condition.......... : Prices received for products sold : Prices paid, including wages to hired labor....... : 1 1 1 1 17 '72 1,32 395 277 84 525,97 44,44 73,15 12,38 35,589 18,126 1,424 7,39 1,791-788 36,592 26,562 9,262 1,75 438 1,764 2,95 2,65 4,666 2,97 1,57 1,3 7,644 2,386 84 96 13 115 17 '72 1,32 387 28 83 544,4 446,3 85,59 12,15 35,542 19,35 5,336 1,856 2,35 1 37,587 29,899 11,49 2,76 557 1,751 2,999 2,73 5,148 2,187 1,618 7,688 7,361 327 74 91 14 121 11 Preliminary. 2/ Land rented is grazing land. Some of it is rented on an animal unit month basts and some on an acre basis. These charges are included in expenditures for feed and grazing fees. Thus the value of this land rented is not included in ranch capital, and no real estate tax or related cost is included in ranch expenditures. 3/ Does not include estimated value of grazing permits or rented land. 4/ The Tnformation presented here assumes ranches are debt-free and producers are-full owners, primarily for comparability between types of farms. 4

Investment in land and buildings including range structures accounted for 82 percent of total ranch capital. Livestock investment rose to 16 percent of the total from 14 percent in 197 and machinery investment remained at 2 percent. The major operating expense is feed including grazing fees. In 1971, this cost was a fourth higher than in 197 and 55 percent more than in the 1965-67 period. Feed purchases in 1971 consisted of 17 tons of alfalfa hay at $43.8 per ton, 26 tons of protein concentrate at $98 per ton, and grains, salts, and minerals. Costs to graze public land increased substantially in 1971, continuing the rapid up-trend of recent years. Grazing fees increased from 33 cents per animal unit month in 1969 to 44 cents in 197 and 64 cents in 1971. State-owned lands were leased at an average fee of 3 cents per acre in 1971 and private lands were leased for 53 cents per acre, down 3 cents from 197 because of lower grazing capacities. In 1971, livestock replacements were again held to a minimum as ranchers attempted to control expenses. On the average only 4 bulls were purchased. Average bull replacement prices, along with other breeding cattle prices, increased sharply, with ranchers paying an average of $52 per bull. Other livestock expenses consist of medicines, vaccines, and veterinary fees. Although the total quantities of medicines and veterinary services usually change little from year to year, expenses increased sharply in 1971 because of the Venezuelan equine encephalomylitis scare. Ranchers chose to vaccinate their horses, averaging 9 per ranch, even though effectiveness of the vaccine was unknown. Other livestock expenses jumped 27 percent from 197 to 1971. Hired labor expenses ranked second only to feed and grazing fees in 1971. Labor costs are mostly for a full-time man plus 3 to 4 months of day labora Wage rates increased 9 percent and food costs 6.5 percent. About 18 percent more day labor was required to feed cattle in the first half of the year and to repair wear and tear and flood damage to range structures in the second half. Overall, labor costs increased 1 percent from 197 to 1971. Crop enterprises are negligible on Southwest cattle ranches, but substantial outlays are made each year for operation of pickup trucks, other trucks, automobiles, tractors, and related equipment. Despite higher prices in 1971, machinery expenses of $4,75 per ranch for repair, replacement, and operating costs were substantially the same as in 197. Purchase of new equipment was again deferred as a result of the drought. However, after 3 years of deferment, much of the machinery on ranches (with the exception of the ranch pickup) needed replacement. Higher prices for machinery and equipment also discouraged replacement. Real estate and personal property taxes were a relatively large expense. The property tax bill in 1971 increased 4 percent from a year earlier, and 21 percent from the 1965-67 period. Other expenses included telephone service, electricity, business insurance, and other miscellaneous costs. Higher rates for some of these items increased their overall cost by 3 percent. 5

Total operating expenses increased 13 percent from the 197 level, mainly because of the very large increase in feed costs. Had ranchers held 1971 feed outlays to the 1965-67 average level, their total operating expenses in 1971 would have been only 9 percent higher than the 1965-67 average. This indicates that ranchers have been doing an outstanding job of holding costs despite drought and inflation. Some causes of major income changes are shown by the indexes of production and prices (table 1). Net production in 1971 was considerably below 1965-67 and the low level of 1969 and 197, mainly because of poor range conditions. Record high livestock prices in 1971 averted a financial disaster for Southwestern ranchers. Prices received advanced another 1 points from the high 197 level, while prices paid advanced 6 points. RETURNS TO CAPITAL The average net ranch income, about $7,7, was the return to operator labor and management and to total capital. Table 2 presents the return on investment and return on operator's equity. The return on total ranch capital was.5 percent in 1971, substantially below the rate of return on ranches in other Western areas. Return to the rancher's equity (termed operator's capital) was lower than return to total ranch capital, because rates charged on borrowed money were higher than the rate earned in the ranching operation. In 1971, Southwest ranchers carried real estate mortgages and production loans of approximately $11, per ranch, leaving operator's capital at about $435,. The average rates charged by institutions servicing ranchers' loans were 6.1 percent for real estate mortgages and 7.6 percent for production loans. Since interest rates charged were well above the.5-percerit return to total ranch capital, operators received no return in 1971 on their equity capital. Table 2.--Net ranch income and returns to resources, Southwest cattle ranches, 1971 Item Net ranch income (return to operator labor. and management and total capital) : Interest paid on mortgages 1/... : Income available for family living : Charge for operator's labor 2/ : R eturn to opera t or I s cap~ "t-1 a : Total ranch capital : Operator's capital : Return on total ranch capital : Return on operator's capital :.. Unit Dollar do Percent 1971 7,688 7,361 327 5,13-4,83 3/544,4 1/434,56 3/.5 17-1.1 1/ Real estate mortgage of $64,6 at 6.1 percent and operating loans of $44,88 at 7.6 percent. 2/ Annual wage rate to a full-time hired hand x 1.25, plus perquisites. 11 Excludes estimated value of grazing permits. 6