THE ECONOMICS OF LNG SUPPLY BASED ON HYBRID PV-WIND POWER PLANTS First insights on economics of global PtG based LNG trading in 2030 Mahdi Fasihi and Christian Breyer Neo-Carbon Energy 2 nd Researchers Seminar Lappeenranta, 16.03.2015
Agenda Motivation Methodology and Data Results Further Study Summary 3
Motivation LNG is a solution for NG transportation in long distances RE-LNG A non-diminishing reserve Fixed cost No Pollution No Carbon emission cost A step toward fuel security Natural Gas proved reserves 2013 Data source: BP Statistical Review June 2014 4
Agenda Motivation Methodology and Data Results Further Study Summary 5
RE-LNG Value Chain Hybrid PV-Wind Methane Production Methane Liquefaction LNG Shipping LNG Regasification 6
Data Plants Location Source: Breyer Ch., Rieke S., Sterner M., Schmid J., 2011. Hybrid PV-Wind-Renewable Power Methane Plants An Economic Outlook, 6 th IRES, Berlin, Nov. 28-30 1) Patagonia, Argentina: 2) Japan: Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plant Regasification Plant Electrolysis+Methanation Plant Liquefaction Plant 7
Data Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plant 1-axis tracking PV plants FLH: 2490 h Capex: 550 /kw Irradiation: 3000 [kwh/m 2 /a] PR: 0.83 LCOE: 19.9 /MWh el FLH: 3500 h Capex: 800 /kw Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plant Place: Patagonia, Argentina Capacity: 5 GW el each FLH: 5691 h 5% overlap Cost assumptions for year 2030 7% WACC LCOE: 22.84 /MWh el LCOE: 23 /MWh el 8
Data Power to Gas (Electrolysis and Methanation) Water CO 2 Electricity (100%) H 2 (78%) CH 4 (64%) Oxygen Heat Electrolysis + Methanation Place: Argentina Capacity: 5 GW el FLH: 5691 h Lifetime: 30 y Overall eff.: 64% Electrolysis eff.: 78% Methanation eff.: 82% Cost assumptions for year 2030 Capex: 500 /kw el Water and CO 2 with additional costs 9
Data Liquefaction Conventional LNG is over 97% liquid methane (CH 4 ) Cooling Methane to -162 ºC. Volume decreases 600 times Liquefaction Plant: Place: Patagonia, Argentina Volume: 1732.5 mcm/a Methane Lifetime: 25 y Efficiency: 96% Capex: 0.196 m /mcm/a NG Opex: 3.5% of capex, annually Pure Methane vs. NG Higher efficiency Simpler facilities Lower cost Source: KBR Company_LNG Liquefaction- Not All Plants Are Created Equal 10
Data LNG Shipping From: Patagonia, Argentina To: Japan, Yokohama Marine Distance: 17500 km Capacity: 138000 m 3 LNG Speed: 20 knots Time on sea, one way: 20 days Boil-off gas: 0.1 %/d Efficiency: 99.9 %/d LNG ships required: 2.4 Lifetime: 25 years Capex: 151 m /unit Opex: 3.5% of capex, annually LNG-powered ships use boil-off gas as the marine fuel. Source: seaspout.wordpress.com 11
Data Regasification LNG is heated by sea water to be reconverted to NG Cold energy of regasification can be used for extracting liquid oxygen and nitrogen gas from air Regasification Plant: Place: Japan, Yokohama Volume: 1630.7 mcm/a Methane Lifetime: 30 years Efficiency: 98.5% Capex: 0.074 m /mcm/a NG Opex: 3.5% of capex, annually Source: gastechnews.com 12 NEO-CARBON ENERGY 2nd Researchers Seminar Mahdi Fasihi mahdi.fasihi@lut.fi
Agenda Motivation Methodology and Data Results Further Study Summary 13
Results Cost Distribution in RE-LNG Value Chain LCOE (7% WACC): 59.32 /MWh th 23.21 USD/MMBtu LCOE (5% WACC): 49.88 /MWh th 19.51 USD/MMBtu USD/ = 1.35 14
Results Market potential (2 scenarios) 30 25 RE-SNG cost and Natural Gas price in Japan CO 2 emission cost: NG CO 2 emission: 56 t CO2 /TJ Cost [USD/MBtu] 20 15 10 5 0 60 80 100 120 140 160 Crude oil price [USD/bbl] NG price (no CO2 emission cost) NG price (+ 25 /t CO2 emission cost) NG price (+ 50 /t CO2 emission cost) RE-SNG cost (7% WACC) RE-SNG cost (5% WACC) The first breakeven can be expected for produced RE-SNG with a WACC of 5% and NG price with CO 2 emission cost of 50 /t CO2 and a crude oil price of 100 USD/bbl. 0-50 /t CO2 0-4 USD/Mbtu USD/ = 1.35 LNG price in Japan: 88.6% of crude oil price. Regasification cost has been added 15
Agenda Motivation Methodology and Data Results Further Study Summary 16
Further Study Gas to Liquids (GtL) GtL is a refinery process to convert natural gas or other gaseous hydrocarbons into longer-chain hydrocarbons. Fischer Tropsch process Benefits: Lower shipping cost No special plant needed at destination Different types of products Higher efficiency: 65% 50-80% 15-25% 0-30% Source: Wikipedia 17
Further Study Power to Liquids (PtL) The idea is to transform water and CO 2 to high-purity synthetic fuels (petrol, diesel, kerosene) with the aid of renewable electricity. Benefits: Integrated system Lower shipping cost No regasification plant at destination Different types of products Higher efficiency: 70% 18
Further Study Different Possibilities Value Chain Diesel Kerosene Wax Methanol Diesel Kerosene Wax 19
Agenda Motivation Methodology and Data Results Further Study Summary 20
Summary The idea is to use hybrid PV-Wind power plants power to produce RE-SNG. Liquefaction plant, shipping and regasification plant are needed for delivering RE-SNG to far-off regions. RE-SNG is a non-diminishing carbon free fuel, which will insure both fuel security and environmental issues. The cost of delivered RE-SNG in Japan is 19.51 USD/MBTU (5% WACC). For crude oil price more than 100 USD/bbl and CO 2 emission cost of 50 /t CO2, RE-SNG is competitive to conventional NG price in Japan. This would be an upper limit for the conventional LNG price in the long-term. Substitution of fossil fuels by hybrid PV-Wind power plants could create a PV market potential in the order of several TWp. PtG-GtL and PtL are the other options which need more investigations. 21
Summary Re-LNG Value Chain (an overview of all data and assumptions) Hybrid PV-Wind [1] Methanation [1] Liquefaction LNG Shipping Regasification Patagonia, Argentina Argentina to Japan Yokohama, Japan Capacity: 5 [GW el,each] Capacity: 5 [GW el] Volume: 1732.5 Marine Distance: 17500 [km] [10] Volume: 1630.7 3500 h Wind Electrolysis eff.: 78% [mcm/a Methane] Ship size: 138000 [m 3 LNG] [11] [mcm/a Methane] 2490 h PV Methanation eff.: 82% Speed: 20 [knots] [8] Capex: 0.196 FLH: 5691 (5% overlap) FLH: 5691 Boil-off gas: 0.1 [%/day] [8] [m /mcm/a NG] [2] Efficiency: 99.9 [%/day] PV, irradiation: 3000 [kwh/m2/a] Capex (2030): 500 [ /kw el] LNG ships required: 2.4 Opex: 3.5% PV, PR: 0.83 Capex: 151 [m /ship] [2] [of capex, annually] [2] Wind capex (2030): 800 [ /kw] Opex: 3.5% [of capex, annually] [2] PV capex (2030): 550 [ /kw] [5] Charge and discharge time: 1 [day] [7] Capex: 0.074 [m /mcm/a NG] [2] Opex: 3.5% [of capex, annually] [2] Lifetime: PV: 40 [y], Wind 30 [y] 30 [y] 25 [y] [3] 25 [y] [6] 30 [y] [9] Efficiency 64 % 96% [4] 98 % 98.5% [8] LCOE(WACC 7%): 22.84 [ /Mwh el] 26.69 [ /MWh th] 4.45 [ /MWh th] 3.61 [ /MWh th] 1.73 [ /MWh th] LCOE(WACC 5%): 19.04 [ /Mwh el] 22.41 [ /MWh th] 3.83 [ /MWh th] 3.12 [ /MWh th] 1.48 [ /MWh th] 22
NEO-CARBON Energy project is one of the Tekes strategy research openings and the project is carried out in cooperation with Technical Research Centre of Finland VTT Ltd, Lappeenranta University of Technology (LUT) and University of Turku, Finland Futures Research Centre.
References [1] Breyer Ch., Rieke S., Sterner M., Schmid J., 2011. Hybrid PV-Wind-Renewable Power Methane Plants An Economic Outlook, 6th IRES, Berlin, Nov. 28-30 [2] Lochner S. and Bothe D., 2009. The development of natural gas supply costs to Europe, the United States and Japan in a globalizing gas market Model-based analysis until 2030, Energy Policy, 37, 1518 1528 [3] Castillo L., Dorao C.A., 2010. Influence of the plot area in an economical analysis for selecting small scale LNG technologies for remote gas production, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2, 302-309 [4] Kotzot H., Durr Ch., Coyle D., Caswell, Ch. 2007. LNG liquefaction not all plants are created equal, 15th International Conference & Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG 15), Barcelona, April 24-27 [5] Breyer Ch., projections on current Tier1 PV industry cost, cost roadmaps and learning curve impact [6] Maxwell D. and Zhu Z., 2011. Natural gas prices, LNG transport costs, and the dynamics of LNG imports, Energy Economics, 33, 217 226 [7] Bahadori A., 2014. Natural Gas Processing - Technology and Engineering Design, Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, pp. 591 632 [8] Khalilpour R. and Karimi I.A., 2012. Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas, Energy, 40, 317-328 [9] Neto C. and Sauer I., 2006. LNG as a strategy to establish developing countries gas markets: The Brazilian case, Energy Policy, 34, 4103 4114 [10] www.sea-distances.org/ [11] Vanem E., Antãob P., Ivan Østvikc I., Comas F., 2008. Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 1328-1344 24