Examples of key binding elements in the PIP decisions

Similar documents
Comments from: Leem (Les entreprises du Médicament)

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

European Medicines Agency policy on changes in scope of paediatric investigation plan (PIP) decisions

Please note that these comments and the identity of the sender will be published unless a specific justified objection is received.

Development of paediatric formulations - points to consider

Submission of comments on 'Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials' (EMA INS/GCP/394194/2011)

Procedural advice on publication of information on negative opinions and refusals of marketing authorisation applications for human medicinal products

Guideline on Pharmaceutical Development of Medicines for Paediatric Use

Challenges of sensory evaluation (palatability/acceptability) of pharmaceutical products for adults and children

Guidance on format of the risk management plan (RMP) in the EU part VII: Annexes

Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products

Adoption by CVMP for release for consultation 11 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 May 2010

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

Roles and responsibilities of members and alternates, rapporteur and peer reviewers, experts and observers of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO)

Recommendation on elements required to support the medical plausibility and the assumption of significant benefit for an orphan designation

Pharmacovigilance. An agency of the European Union

Draft agreed by Scientific Advice Working Party 5 September Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation 19 September

Guidelines on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Interested parties (organisations or individuals) that commented on the draft document as released for consultation.

Medicinal product no longer authorised

Title: Processing pharmacovigilance data in renewal procedures for centrally authorised medicinal products for veterinary use

Guideline on requirements for the production and control of immunological veterinary medicinal products

European Medicines Agency decision

Questions and answers on the 'Guideline on the limits of genotoxic impurities'

Submission of comments on Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products (CHMP/437/04 Rev1)

European Medicines Agency decision

Submission of comments on 'Reflection paper on the use of extrapolation in the development of medicines for paediatrics' (EMA/199678/2016)

Guidelines on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) PAEDIATRIC COMMITTEE (PDCO) COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE NON-CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FIXED COMBINATIONS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

European Medicines Agency decision

Explanatory note on fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

2013 activity report of the Modelling and Simulation Working Group (MSWG)

ICH Topic M 4 Q Location issues for Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Quality Questions and Answers

Pharmacovigilance: Information systems and services

Monthly statistics report: December 2017

Monthly statistics report: November 2016

International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS)

DEVELOPMENT PHARMACEUTICS AND PROCESS VALIDATION

SPOR data management services - high level changes

Issues identified by stakeholders: follow-up from EMA s ATMP workshop

EMA Comments on Implementing Measures for Pharmacovigilance (PCIM/11/01)

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency practical guidance on the application form for centralised type IA and IB variations

Applying for EU marketing authorisation. For medicinal products for human use. An agency of the European Union

Standard operating procedure

European Medicines Agency decision

Concept paper on the development of a guideline on quality and equivalence of topical products

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT GUIDELINE ON THE NON-CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FIXED COMBINATIONS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

VICH GL42: Pharmacovigilance: data elements for submission of adverse event reports (AERs)

Draft agreed by SWP, vswp and GMP/GDP Inspectors WG September Adopted by CVMP for release for consultation 8 November 2016

IDMP Medicinal Product: How complex could it get?

Formulations for clinical trials in children: possibilities and pitfalls? Robert Ancuceanu, PhD Member of PDCO and FWG

Pharmaceutical Regulatory Authority GUIDELINE ON APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF UNREGISTERED VETERINARY MEDICINES ALREADY ON THE ZAMBIAN MARKET

Conditional marketing authorisation

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES

505(b)(2) Why Now? Ken Phelps. Gemma Casadevall, PhD. President & CEO, Camargo Pharmaceutical Services, LLC. Chief Scientific Officer, Medichem, S.A.

Guideline on setting specifications for related impurities in antibiotics

Report from the Paediatric Committee on its first anniversary

APPLICATION FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF A PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT FOR HUMAN USE IN UGANDA

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

Furthermore, the level of information and the subsequent assessment will vary on a case by case basis.

Overview of the Agency s role, activities and priorities for An agency of the European Union

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) POSITION PAPER ON NON-CLINICAL SAFETY STUDIES TO SUPPORT CLINICAL TRIALS WITH A SINGLE MICRODOSE

Warfarin suspension. Group B Presentation

Minutes of the ninth meeting of the EMA Human Scientific Committees Working Party with Patients' and Consumers' Organisations (PCWP)

Guideline for the conduct of efficacy studies for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use

Draft agreed by Quality Working Party 7 June Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation 28 June 2018

Comments from: Name of organisation or individual. Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD)

Balancing the time, cost and risk of drug development. Christina Gustafsson, PhD Pharm, Formulation Scientist at Pharmaceutical Development, APL

EVALUATION OF NEW FILM COATING PROCESSES AND MATERIALS

Pre-accession product information linguistic review process (PALC III)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

EMA perspective on increasing focus on review of device components of medicinal products

Guideline on the design of studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fish vaccines

Ethical considerations for clinical trials on medicinal products conducted with the paediatric population

ICH Guideline S3A: Note for guidance on toxicokinetics: the assessment of systemic exposure in toxicity studies - questions and answers

Formulation Development & CTM Manufacturing Services

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Scientific advice and its impact on marketing authorisation application reviews

Interested parties (organisations or individuals) that commented on the draft document as released for consultation.

Guideline on the processing of renewals in the centralised procedure

Guideline on the processing of renewals in the centralised procedure

Guideline on the non-clinical requirements for radiopharmaceuticals

Commission. Product. Notification. Decision. Issued 2 / affected 3 amended on. 06/06/2018 n/a

Guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and/or intramuscular administration (SCIg/IMIg)

Reflection paper on non-clinical studies for generic nanoparticle iron medicinal product applications

Introductory cover note to the List of European Union reference dates and frequency of submission of Periodic Safety Update Reports

Recent experience in scientific advice and marketing authorisations

Opinion/ Notification 1 issued on. Commission Decision Issued 2 / amended on

Optimising early access tools: Revision of the guidelines on Accelerated Assessment and Conditional Marketing Authorisation

VICH Topic GL29. at Step 7 GUIDELINE ON PHARMACOVIGILANCE OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS. MANAGEMENT OF PERIODIC SUMMARY UPDATE REPORTS (PSUs)

The role of patients at the EMA

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

(Information) INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION

REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A DRUG

Reflection paper on risk mitigation measures related to the environmental risk assessment of veterinary medicinal products

First UNGAP meeting Food-Drug Interactions Regulatory Aspects

Transcription:

16 December 2013 EMA/174403/2013 Human Medicines Development and Evaluation 7 Westferry Circus Canary Wharf London E14 4HB United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7523 7040 E-mail info@ema.europa.eu Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union European Medicines Agency, 2013. Reproduction is authised provided the source is acknowledged.

Type of request Description (example) Comments General Development of a particular pharmaceutical fm Development of a particular strength Development of an age-appropriate pharmaceutical fm and/ strength [without specifying details, meaning composition, strengths, etc.] Development of <multiparticulate (granules)>, <film-coated tablets>, <very small tablets (minitablets)>, <dry powder in a single dose sachet>, <i. v. solution>, <al liquid>, <al solution>, <al suspension>, etc. Development of <xx mg film-coated tablets>, <yy mg/ml al suspension>, <zz mg/ml al solution>, <xx µg + yy µg per actuation, pmdi>, <xx µg + yy µg per actuation, DPI>, etc. Development of a vial containing less than 10-fold of the lowest dose f adults These requests are very general and do not specify any details of the pharmaceutical fm and/ strength to be developed. Such requests could be accompanied by additional request to contact the PDCO when infmation about the pharmaceutical fm to be developed and its composition and/ strength become available. This type of general request may be used in cases of early development when only limited infmation is available e.g. when even the fmulation f adults has not been developed yet. These requests are justified when the product is at an advanced stage of development, when most details about the active substance and various development scenarios have already been expled. Such request should be reflected in the opinion either when proposed by the applicant and agreed by the PDCO, when proposed by the PDCO (and agreed by the applicant). These requests are usually imposed when the dosing regimen is known. In der not to limit the applicant and bind to a particular strength, a range of strengths (e.g. 5 10 mg) can be used to define the flexibility level during development. EMA/174403/2013 Page 2/5

Development of an alternative route of administration Development inclusion of a medical device (administration device) Development of a pharmaceutical fm f <intrathecal use>, <i.v. use>, <al use>, etc. A pre-filled pen < other device, should be specified> which can deliver doses of <xx mg xx yy mg>, <specify the dose the range>, must be made available f paediatric use. To develop an appropriate measuring device allowing accurate dosing of small volumes (x to y ml) of the <liquid fmulation>. Compatibility testing An al syringe with suitable graduation should be added to the liquid fmulation to be developed. Development of an appropriate dispensing device f <filmcoated very small tablets (minitablets)>, <granules>, <pellets>, etc. To study the compatibility of <the active substance> with <specify the products (substances) to be tested with> When requesting compatibility testing with other active substances ( medicinal products), these need to be specified in the request. Compatibility testing should be requested in situations when it is known that the product will be administered concomitantly (intensive care units, critically ill patients, situations where administration volume is critical, etc.). When requesting compatibility testing, a close collabation with clinical experts is required to determine which active substances medicinal products should be used. Although compatibility testing involves pharmaceutical evaluation, the need f such measure entirely depends on EMA/174403/2013 Page 3/5

clinical aspects. Acceptability palatability testing To study the compatibility/stability of <the active substance>, <pharmaceutical fm> with common food and drinks. A study on administration of <the active substance the pharmaceutical fm> via nasogastric tube. The dose recovery after extrusion through the feeding tube should be demonstrated using rinsing volumes relevant to the target population. In addition compatibility with the tube should be studied. The acceptability, including palatability, of <specify the dosage fm, e.g. al solution, al suspension, etc.> should be confirmed during the clinical trial with the target population. (if relevant) Acceptability of <specify the dosage fm, e.g. tablets, capsules, etc.> should be tested during the clinical trial with the target population. Compatibility with food and drinks should be requested whenever it is feseen that the product (substance) will be mixed with food drinks (sprinkling granules powder on food mixing them with liquids, etc.). Whenever a product is to be administered via nasogastric tube, it should be demonstrated that this is feasible. Requests to use rinsing volumes relevant to the target population are imptant and should always be part of the key binding element. Whenever an al liquid fmulation is proposed, it is advisable to include a request f confirmation of acceptability of this fmulation during a trial with the target population. In case of liquid fmulations, acceptability includes palatability testing (taste, texture, flavour, etc.). In case of tablets, especially when proposed to the younger subsets of paediatric patients (6 8 years of age), when the tablets size is large, their acceptability should be investigated and confirmed. Usually palatability testing f tablets is not needed. Due dates f acceptability (palatability) testing should be aligned with due dates f clinical studies during which the testing takes place. Having different deadlines may result in submission of the data as part of another application (due to compliance check rule). EMA/174403/2013 Page 4/5

Please note that when requesting acceptability (palatability) testing, a close collabation with clinical experts is required, to ensure that the request is appropriately incpated in the design of a clinical study. Although acceptability (palatability) testing relates to pharmaceutical aspects, its evaluation can only be perfmed as part of the clinical program. Requests not to use (include) certain excipients in the fmulation Preservative free <eye drops>, <al liquid fmulation>, <etc.> must be developed. To replace <name the colouring agent, e.g. sunset yellow, etc.>, <name the sweetener, e.g. aspartame, etc.>, <name the solvent, e.g. ethanol, etc.> with another <colouring agent>, <sweetener>, <solvent> with better safety characteristics. To remove <name the colouring agent, e.g. sunset yellow, etc.>, <name the sweetener, e.g. aspartame, etc.>, <name the solvent, e.g. ethanol, etc.> from the fmulation. Dilution/complex manipulation To develop <a dosage fm> <strength> which requires single dilution pri administration. EMA/174403/2013 Page 5/5