Evaluating Risk of Heritage LNAPL Bodies. International Petroleum Environmental Conference 10/14/14

Similar documents
Rethinking LNAPL Recovery Metrics. Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Discharge vs. Drawdown A Critical Diagnostic Tool for the API LNAPL Transmissivity

LNAPL Recovery Using Vacuum Enhanced Technology. Theresa Ferguson, R.G. June 2014

Innovative Remediation of Light Non Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPL): Development of a Conceptual Site Model Leading to a Sustainable Remedial Design

LNAPL Volume and Mobility Estimation to Assess When to Stop Active Recovery. by Louis Sabourin, P.Eng. and David Tarnocai, P.Geo.

ITRC Technical and Regulatory Guidance: Evaluating LNAPL Remedial Technologies for Achieving Project Goals

Got LNAPL? Technical Update and Strategic Management. Thank you for joining. This webinar will begin at 3pm BST, 4pm CEST and 10am EST.

Mary Ann Parcher ES&T, a Division of GES

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF. Jacob M. Hartsock for the Master of Science. in Physical Sciences presented on April 14, 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 2. The effect of remediation on the distribution and mobility of both the LNAPL and water within the zone of interest.

Multiphase Extraction (MPE):

EBC Site Remediation & Redevelopment Program: Evaluation and Closure of NAPL Sites

LNAPL Recovery and Remedy Transitions A Case Study at a Railyard Fueling Facility

Screening Distances for Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Risk Assessment

Evaluation of VI Data Relative to Separation Distance Screening Criteria A Michigan Case Study

Comparing Sustainable Natural Source Zone Depletion and Active Remediation Technologies

Techniques Used to Evaluate Potential LNAPL Mobility

4. LNAPL Conceptual Site Model (LCSM)

Technology Presentation NEIWPCC (2016) Presenter: Noel Shenoi ( We support our men and women who have served our country

MANAGING RISK AT LNAPL SITES

Science Olympiad. Mentor Invitational Hydrogeology ANSWER KEY. Name(s): School Name: Point Totals

This section presents the physics of multi-phase fluid flow in porous media.

A Comparison of Natural Source Zone Depletion and Active Remediation Rates

The Basics. Understanding the Behavior of Light Non- Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPLs) in the Subsurface February 2005

ITRC LNAPL Guidance / Training Workshop

BOS 200 Remediation at a Iowa City Terminal Coralville, Iowa USA

Evaluating the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Influence of purging the surrounding monitoring wells for groundwater sampling during a hydraulic conductivity test in a monitoring well.

LNAPL REMEDIATION USING ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING

Conceptual Model. Evaluating Hydrocarbon Removal from Source Zones and its Effect on Dissolved Plume Longevity and Magnitude. Source.

Case Study: Considerations for Applying the Triad Approach at the Hartford Hydrocarbon Plume Site, Hartford, Illinois

COKE OVEN AREA SPECIAL STUDY AREA INTERIM MEASURES WORK PLAN PHASE 1

STRATEGIES FOR LNAPL REMEDIATION

Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY - GEOL 406/506

CHAPTER V HYDROCARBON RECOVERY SYSTEMS/EQUIPMENT

Welcome Thanks for joining us. ITRC s Internet-based Training Program. LNAPL Training Part 1:

REMEDIATION OF A PETROLEUM SPILL USING PURE OXYGEN

Site Assessment Using Laser-Induced Fluorescence at Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites

Evaluating Natural Source Zone Depletion at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites New Toolkit of Technologies

Management & Remediation of Sites in the Petroleum Industry:

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND MINERAL ENGINEERING GEOEE 408 CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY

Welcome Thanks for joining us. ITRC s Internet-based Training Program. LNAPL Training Part 1:

Draft Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Information Paper. Michael Lowry, RTI International Matthew Young, EPA OUST

SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004

No associated notes.

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

VOCs, including fuel oxygenates, via EPA Analytical Method The second soil sample from MW-24 (MW ) was analyzed for Total Organic Carbon.

Tidal Effect on LNAPL Mobility

LNAPL Extraction Practicability Assessment. Transpacific Industries Group Ltd Tullamarine Closed Landfill

Report on: Approaches and Methods for Evaluation of Light non- Aqueous - Hydrogeological Assessment Tools Project

In Situ Chemical Oxidation of VOCs and BTEX Plume in Low-Permeability Soils. Amit Haryani, PE, LSRP

Alternative Cleanup Methods for Chlorinated VOCs

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR MULTI-PHASE EXTRACTION SYSTEMS USING UNSATURATED AND SATURATED SOIL PROPERTIES

CEE 370 Environmental Engineering Principles

Light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) are organic liquids such as gasoline, diesel, and other petroleum hydrocarbon

Residual LNAPL Remediation Using BOS 200 at Budget Rental Car Site in Louisville, Kentucky USA

Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.

In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project

The Hydrologic Cycle (with emphasis on groundwater)

REPORT ON GUIDANCE ON ASSESSMENT OF LIGHT NON- AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID MOBILITY FOR SITE CLASSIFICATION PURPOSES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA.

Emma Kirsh, B.Sc., P.Geol & Douglas Sweeney, M.Sc, P.Eng. SEACOR Environmental Inc.

Presenters' Contact Information

Green Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Groundwater Using Oxygen Injection in Western Maine

Assessing Technical Impracticability in a Karst Setting at Anniston Army Depot

February 23, 2010 Version 0.0

Light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) are organic liquids such as gasoline, diesel, and other petroleum hydrocarbon

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

PROOF-OF-CONCEPT EVALUATION PASSIVE IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED-BENZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS USING GREEN TECHNOLOGY

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Technologies and Case Studies. Dan Socci EthicalChem. SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 4, 2016

Laser-Induced Fluorescence & Tank Cleanups

Empirical Data to Evaluate the Occurrence of Sub-slab O 2 Depletion Shadow at Petroleum Hydrocarbon- Impacted Vapor Intrusion Sites

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) as a long-term management technique for contaminated sites

Free Product (LNAPL) in a Well Debunking the Alarmist Attitude/Stigma Pertaining to Environmental Risk

WELLHEAD PROTECTION DELINEATION REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF BEAR LAKE DECEMBER 2002

In Situ, Low Temperature Thermal Remediation of LNAPL with Pesticides and Other Recalcitrant Compounds

BEST PRACTICES MANUAL FOR BIOSLURPING

Movement and Storage of Groundwater The Hydrosphere

Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of a Refinery Benzene Groundwater Plume

MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

In Situ Geochemical Stabilization (ISGS) for NAPL Management. Fayaz Lakhwala, Ph.D. PeroxyChem

Detailed discussion of the Petroleum Vapor Database is provided in Davis R.V., 2009, LUSTLine #61 and EPA Jan

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

FINAL. Source Reduction Effectiveness at Fuel Contaminated Sites Technical Summary Report. Prepared For

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation from Pilot Study to Full-Scale Implementation

Occurrence of Polar Organic Compounds in Groundwater Resulting from Biodegradation Implications for Petroleum Site Investigations and Remediation

How To Effectively Recover Free Product At Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites

Screening Criteria to Evaluate Vapor Intrusion Risk from Lead Scavengers

FAX

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance

Enhanced In Situ Hydrocarbon Recovery: Dual Phase Vacuum Extraction and Pneumatic Fracturing Project

New England Storage Tank Conference

Surfactant Enhanced Extraction to Expedite Remediation of Carbon Tetrachloride Source Zone at an Active Grain Elevator Facility Eric Dulle, PE

Cost-Effective In-Situ PHC/VOC Remediation Biostimulation as a Residual Source Mass Remediation Strategy

LNAPL CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL & MINIMIZING REBOUND WHEN APPLYING IN- SITU CHEMICAL TREATMENT

A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways

Transcription:

Evaluating Risk of Heritage LNAPL Bodies International Petroleum Environmental Conference 10/14/14

Evaluating Risk Source ITRC after Huntley and Beckett 2002

What is a Heritage LNAPL Body One or many of the following: Significantly aged LNAPL body Inherited LNAPL site with no prior remediation Prior remediation but no source reduction data

What is a Heritage LNAPL Body One or many of the following: Significantly aged LNAPL body Inherited LNAPL site with no prior remediation Prior remediation but no source reduction data

Remediation History 3 Vacuum Wellpoint Systems No LNAPL Recovery Data Total Flow, but Not from Individual Pumping Wells

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

Vapor Torkelson Geochemistry, Inc. Stieglitz Park ITF, Whiting Refinery Sample ID : 145A Acquired : May 30, 2012 13:43:24 c :\ez chrom\chrom \12099\145a -- C hannel A Weathered diesel range fuel, small concentrations of finished gasoline product Page 1 of 1 (1) 50 50 M i l l i v o l t s 25 nc4 i C5 nc5 2M Pentane ol efi nc6 n a c b 2, 4 DMP B nz Isooct ane nc7 MCHX T ol nc8 EB m/p-xyl nc9 1, 2,4 T MB nc10 nc11 Naph IP 13 IP 15 IP 16 nc14 nc12 IP 14 nc13 P ri st ane nc15 nc16 IP 18 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 M inutes nc17 nc18 P hytane nc19 nc20 nc21 nc22 nc23 nc24 nc25 nc26 nc27 nc28 nc29 nc30 nc32 nc33 nc35 nc36 nc38 nc40 25 M i l l i v o l t s

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

8/20/1998 8/20/1999 8/20/2000 8/20/2001 8/20/2002 8/20/2003 8/20/2004 8/20/2005 8/20/2006 8/20/2007 8/20/2008 8/20/2009 8/20/2010 8/20/2011 8/20/2012 8/20/2013 8/20/2014 Elevation (MSL) Direct Contact ANI NWI CGWS GS TOS BOS 587 583 579 575 571 567

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

LNAPL Migration

LNAPL Migration New Monitoring Wells Geologic Classification and TPH Grab Sampling Undisturbed Cores and Discrete Interval TPH Subsampling

Depth LNAPL Migration LNAPL Saturation 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 2 4 6 Water Table 8 10 12 14

Depth LNAPL Migration LNAPL Saturation 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Water Table 2 4 Fine to Medium (SW) 6 8 Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium (SP) 10 Well Graded Sand with Gravel, medium to coarse (SW) 12 14 Well Graded Sand, fine to medium, trace gravel (SW)

Depth LNAPL Migration LNAPL Saturation 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Sn Grab 2 Water Table 4 6 Fine to Medium (SW) 8 Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium (SP) 10 12 14 Well Graded Sand with Gravel, medium to coarse (SW) Well Graded Sand, fine to medium, trace gravel (SW)

Depth LNAPL Migration 0 LNAPL Saturation 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Sn Grab 2 Water Table 4 Screen Length 6 Fine to Medium (SW) 8 10 12 14 Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium (SP) Well Graded Sand with Gravel, medium to coarse (SW) Well Graded Sand, fine to medium, trace gravel (SW)

LNAPL Migration Undisturbed Cores Sampled for Pore Fluid Saturation Data and Capillary Pressure Saturation Curves PFS PFS TPH O/W Pc PFS PFS TPH O/W Pc PFS PFS PFS

Depth LNAPL Migration 0 LNAPL Saturation 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Sn Grab Sn Core 2 Water Table 4 Screen Length 6 8 10 12 14 Fine to Medium (SW) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium (SP) Well Graded Sand with Gravel, medium to coarse (SW) Well Graded Sand, fine to medium, trace gravel (SW)

Depth LNAPL Migration 0 LNAPL Saturation 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Sn Grab Sn Core 2 Sn API RP 40 4 Water Table 6 Screen Length 8 Fine to Medium (SW) 10 12 14 Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium (SP) Well Graded Sand with Gravel, medium to coarse (SW) Well Graded Sand, fine to medium, trace gravel (SW)

LNAPL Migration Monitoring Wells with Mobile LNAPL T n Tests Completed (Manual Skim or Baildown)

Depth (ft) ANT (ft) LNAPL Migration Baildown Test 5.0 DTW (blue), Water Table (purple), DTP (red), ANT (green) 6 6.0 5 7.0 4 8.0 9.0 3 10.0 2 11.0 1 12.0 0 6/16/14 0:00 6/17/14 0:00 6/18/14 0:00 6/19/14 0:00 6/20/14 0:00 6/21/14 0:00 6/22/14 0:00 6/23/14 0:00 Time (minutes)

Normalized Drawdown (s/s initial ) (ft/ft) LNAPL Migration 1.0 API LNAPL Transmissivity Workbook Calculation of LNAPL Transmissivity from Baildown Test Data 0.9 STEP 1: RESET OUTPUT SUMMARY 0.8 0.7 RESET STEP 4: LNAPL TRANSMISSIVITY SUMMARY Output Summary T=0.03125 ft2/day 0.6 0.5 STEP 2: ENTER DATA & VIEW FIGURES STEP 3: CHOOSE WELL CONDITIONS Mean LNAPL Transmissivity (ft 2 /d) 0.25 T=0.0625 ft2/day 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Unconfined Confined T=0.125 ft2/day T=0.25 ft2/day Perched T=0.5 ft2/day T=2 ft2/day T=1 ft2/day 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Time (min) Standard Deviation (ft 2 /d) 0.08 Coefficient of Variation 0.30

Depth LNAPL Migration 0 2 LNAPL Saturation 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Sn Grab Sn Core Sn API RP 40 Water Table 4 Residual Sn 6 Screen Length 8 Fine to Medium (SW) 10 12 14 Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium (SP) Well Graded Sand with Gravel, medium to coarse (SW) Well Graded Sand, fine to medium, trace gravel (SW)

Evaluating Risk Vapor Direct Contact LNAPL Migration Dissolved Phase

Dissolved Phase 809 803A 804 806 Chemical Name Screening Level 10/14/1991 9/23/1991 9/23/2013 10/3/2013 9/26/2013 9/24/1991 10/30/2013 (µg/l) Benzene 5 0.24 1100 57 U J 0.50 U Methylene Chloride 5 5.0 122 U J 5.0 U 1-Methylnaphthalene 9.7 5.0 10 13 U 0.95 0.96 1.2 U Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 6 50 100 13 28 B U 9.5 9.6 12 U Naphthalene 1.4 5.0 10 12 14 J U 0.95 0.96 1.2 U

Dissolved Phase Dissolved phase sampling: September and October 2014

Dissolved Phase Full Dissolved Phase Plume Analysis: 2013/2014

Next Steps Evaluate recent dissolved phase data Modeling dissolved phase contaminant transport without system pumping Evaluate natural attenuation using CO 2 flux study, temperature profile study and evaluation of bioavailable electron acceptors

Preliminary Conclusions Vapor risk minimal Direct contact risk must be addressed by future remedy at isolated areas of high water table LNAPL mobility testing showed localized areas of potentially recoverable volumes but minimal risk reduction by LNAPL recovery Dissolved phase data suggests low risk but data gaps must be filled

Evaluating Risk Unknown Low Risk Approaching Residual Source ITRC after Huntley and Beckett 2002

Thank You Questions Colin McLeod colin.mcleod@urs.com