Developing and Implementing Floating <Title of Presentation>

Similar documents
Exports of LNG from North America

Update on African regasification terminals March 15, 2016

LNG Import Facility Infrastructure Options

DECISIONS BETWEEN RISK AND UNCERTAINTY EXPERIENCES FROM MAJOR LNG PROJECTS

Developing efficient and reliable LNG infrastructure to support Indonesia s fast-growing energy demand

FSRUs: Accommodating Emerging Markets Gas and Power Needs

Convergence of FSRU and Power Projects The Challenge of LNG to Power. 2 nd Annual Japan Ship Finance Forum 7 th December 2017

Overview. Economics of the LNG Project Chain

THE RISE OF SMALL-SCALE LNG/FLNG PROJECTS

member of the TSAKOS GROUP of companies

GLADSTONE TO JAPAN: EXPORT LNG PROJECT. December 2007

3 rd LNG SUPPLY, STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PHILLIPINES FORUM 2016 SMX AURA, MANILA

LNG Producer-Consumer Conference Nagoya, Japan

Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project

Floating LNG What are the key business development risks and mitigation strategies in a FLNG project?

Rahul Sengupta Avinash Nagaraja Kyle Samani Neha Gaddam

LNG Shipping: How Long Will The Good Times Last?

The Evolving Global LNG Industry South Africa Gas Options, Cape Town, 3 rd 5 th October 2016

DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM 2017 DOWNSTREAM PETROLEUM

LNG Import Terminals: Challenges and Opportunities

KOGAS s Technical Capability and Plan on Off-shore Plant Business

GAS, ENERGY STORAGE & HYBRID SOLUTIONS SYMPOSIUM

Parliamentary Brief Regulation of Australian Coastal Shipping July 2014

LNG Houston, February 6-7 th, The case for developing a Floating LNG Receiving Terminal on the US East Coast

On Board Regasification for LNG Ships. 22 nd World Gas Conference WS 3-2 Tokyo 2003 Wayne Perry

Finding Petroleum FPSO Conference

Disclaimer & Important Notice

MARKET DRIVERS AND FLOATING LNG REGAS PROJECTS. John D White, Partner, Baker Botts L.L.P.

LNG as a Bunker Fuel - LNGF (3 Days)

2019 LNG as a Bunker Fuel - LNGF (3 Days)

The Adoption of FSRU For Cost-effective LNG Import Solution

Introduction. FLNG: Costs and Cost Drivers. What is FLNG (and what isn t) FLNG Project Costs

Financial Due Diligence for Solar-Powered IPP

Optimising the Value of LNG Sale Agreements by Formulating Strategic Cargo Diversion and Destination Flexibility Clauses

GRAIN LNG Challenges & benefits for the deployment of LNG in ports. October 2017 BPA Conference, Poole, UK

GLADSTONE LNG leads the way with its first LNG shipment in 2012

FUGRO GROUP LNG FIELD DEVELOPMENT AND FACILITIES. TACKLING your complex challenges. UNDERSTANDING your operational objectives

We deliver gas infrastructure

Project Agreements, Risk Management and Litigation Risk Sean Ralph, General Counsel, Sasol Canada Phil Scheibel, Partner, Rose LLP

EXMAR GROUP Leadership through Innovation

BURNING BRIGHTER, BURNING GREENER. Accenture capabilities for global gas and LNG organizations

EXMAR GROUP: Leadership Through Innovation

LNG Market Prospects. Mr Jae Sung Choi. 1 st November, 2017

Chartering. Capt. Vivek Jain Barrister( England), Solicitor Advocate( England) MBA( Norway)

YES MARITIME SDN BHD

LNG market developments. 12 th of February 2015 Jonathan Raes development EXMAR LNG Infrastructure

Gas Enables New Energy Eco- Systems

INTEGRATED LNG VALUE CHAIN FOR THE BALTIC SEA REGION

DHL INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS SPECIALIZED LOGISTICS SAFELY AND SKILLFULLY EXECUTED

Manual for the Open LNG Regasification Model

General Shipping Terms and Conditions for Sea Freight

LNG Supply, Demand & Pricing

UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION - POWER OPPORTUNITIES

Introduction to Emission Reduction Purchase Agreement (ERPA)

Definition of a lease: Applying the new lease standards

DUAL PLENARY SESSION: Energy Market Integration - Developments in LNG

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. / Cheniere Energy, Inc. Proposed Sabine Pass LNG Facility Expansion Adding Liquefaction Capabilities.

Questions on the LNG Rulebook published by LNG Croatia on January 17, 2018.

Click to edit Master title style

LNG Trading. From Strategy to Practice A THREE-DAY, INTENSIVE COURSE IN LNG TRADING. 2-4 October 2018, Singapore

LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS LIMITED

OMV VESSEL SELECTING CRITERIA (update 07/2017)

DEVELOPER S GUIDE to small-scale LNG terminals

SMALL LNG SOLUTIONS FOR INDONESIA

EUROPEAN ENERGY FORUM 2013

Maritime and Trade Capabilities for Financial Institutions. Maritime & Trade

Pareto conference. 31 August 2011

LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS INNOVATIONS FOR A SPECIALIZED MARKET

LNG Liquefaction Projects A North America Focus

PORT OF VANCOUVER USA Strategic Plan

Höegh LNG - The FSRU provider. Presentation at Marine Money Week 2017 Sveinung J.S. Støhle President & CEO

Business Models for LBG production

PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS LNG SALES AND ASSET OPTIMIZATION RFP # Questions & Answers April 26, 2016

LNG SERVICES GETTING ANSWERS FROM FIELD TO FUEL SOLUTIONS FOR INVESTORS, PRODUCERS, OPERATORS, CONTRACTORS, SUPPLIERS, TRADERS

Global LNG Supply and Demand All Planned Supply

Thermal Waste to Energy Forum Presentation by Paul McCartney, Executive Director CEFC 26 February CEFC Mission

incoterms 2010 Domestic and International Trade Terms Corporate customers

SBM Offshore OIL & GAS. sdv.com

HACC/NACC SHIP CONFERENCE NEW YORK CITY - FEB. 5, Overview of the Liquified Natural Gas Market (LNG)

Nauticor: Distribution Costs for the LNG Value Chain Jan Schubert, Senior Manager Sales & Business Development

VOYAGE CHARTERING SHANGHAI

Investor Briefing - Ichthys LNG Project

Meet Alaska Aligned Alaska = Strong Oil and Gas Industry & Stronger Alaska for another 40 Years

Project Financing for Biomass Power Plants experiences from technical due diligence in Thailand

Structuring LNG Tolling Agreements: Negotiating Fee Structure and Payment, Lifting Terms, Liability, and Other Key Provisions

WÄRTSILÄ MOBILE LNG: EASILY THE BEST

LNG FUEL SOLUTIONS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS NEW FRONTIERS IN ENERGY 2012 SEPTEMBER 25, 2012

Floating LNG Business A breakthrough in offshore gas monetization

Investor Presentation

Energy Efficiency SEEMP

PIPED-GAS REGULATION FEBRUARY 2017

Handling and Transportation of LNG

SPEED UP FOR WHAT? Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) Earnings. The expenses of a shipping company fall into two categories.

Strategic Plan. Society of International Gas Tanker & Terminal Operators Ltd

CASE STUDIES IN PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION: FRANCHISE SHIPPING

LEGAL PRINCIPLES IN SHIPPING BUSINESS Syllabus

LNG AS FUEL: THE TIPPING POINT?

LNG The Roadmap. Martin Houston LNG Asia - Singapore - 14 th February 2017

LIFE CYCLE OF SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES: HULL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEM

Transcription:

17 th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION ON LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG 17) 17 th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION ON LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG 17) Developing and Implementing Floating Regasification <Title and of Presentation> Liquefaction Projects <Title of Presentation> By: By: By: John <Author White, Name>, Baker <Organization> Botts L.L.P. 19 April <Date> 2013

Presentation Outline Floating Regasification Why floating regasification? Project objectives Key risks and mitigants construction and operation The golden rules Floating Liquefaction Project objectives and golden rules Project Structures Key legal issues

Floating Regasification

Why Floating Regas? Time factors Fast track solution use of existing assets (conversion) shorter construction period (new build) easier permitting greater predictability Cost factors less costly than: land-based terminal (shipyard vs. local market issues) developing alternative infrastructure (e.g., pipeline) energy substitute (oil) greater predictability re costs (capex) Greater flexibility seasonality and trading general gas supply or dedicated facility

Floating Regas: Project Objectives Secure safe, reliable and economical use of Vessels on a long-term basis Specifically to: Manage vessel construction/conversion cost and risk Manage capital commitment Maintain alignment with owner/operator Manage vessel operating risk and cost Ensure compliance with HSSE and other applicable laws Maintain project flexibility So that the vessels are available as and when required, and perform in accordance with specifications Energy security

Floating Regas: Vessel Construction Risk Risk that the vessel will not: Be completed according to design Be completed on time and on budget Perform according to agreed specifications Relevant factors include: Design selection Technology utilised Experience of contractors Legal and financial issues financial and performance guarantees, bonds and hold-backs project structure

Floating Regas: Vessel Construction Risk Mitigants Lump Sum Turnkey contracts (fixed cost and scope) Experienced/creditworthy shipbuilder and owner/operator Engineering studies and proven design/technology Completion and delivery tests Experienced management of the process Performance bonds/retainage/locs/guarantees etc. Liquidated damages + performance warranties Shipbuilders' Direct Agreement Tripartite agreement between Shipyard, Owner and Charterer Protects "project interest" of Charterer Essential project financing device

Floating Regas: Vessel Operating Risk Risk that the vessel will not, when completed: perform according to its design and agreed specifications all risks inherent in operating LNG regas vessels delivery and testing loading, berthing and operating the vessel (including trading) ship-to-ship (or across pier) cargo transfers LNG storage, regasification and gas send-out navigation and crewing vessel management and flagging HSSE permitting compliance with all laws

Floating Regas: Vessel Operating Risk Mitigants Experienced/creditworthy owner/operator (OO) Clearly defined operating standards with (at least) consequences for under performance performance warranties safety, security and environmental safeguards Alignment of interests between OO and charterer LDs + performance warranties insurance Shipbuilders' Direct Agreement However, risk allocation and mitigation is also a factor of the chosen shipping arrangements

Bareboat Charter (Demise Charter) Time Charter Transportation Agreement Charter Voyage Agreement Contract of Affreightment Type of Contract Chartering specified Vessel/duration Chartering specified Vessel for specified period Transportation service of agreed quantity with specified Vessel/duration Transportation service for specified route/vessel/period Transportation service of agreed volume for specified route with any Vessel within restrictions Vessel Specified Specified Specified Specified Any Vessel with restrictions Transported Quantity N/A N/A Agreed quantity N/A Agreed quantity Remuneration Bareboat Hire, based on period Hire, based on period Freight-based on loaded quantity (in principle), includes fee for 3rd party transportation manager Spot rate per voyage, Charterer takes risk of transportation price fluctuation Freight-based on loaded quantity (in principle) Vessel Manager Charterer Owner Transporter Transporter Transporter Operator Charterer Owner Transporter Transporter Transporter Trading Route Within agreed area Within agreed area Agreed loading/discharging ports. Change subject to Transporter's consent Agreed loading/discharging ports. Change subject to Transporter's consent Agreed loading/discharging ports. Change subject to Transporter's consent Capital Cost Owner Owner Owner Owner Owner Vessel Cost Owner Owner Owner Owner Owner Operating Cost Charterer Charterer Transporter Transporter Transporter Vessel Performance Risk Charterer Owner Transporter Transporter Transporter Off-Hire Risk Charterer Owner Transporter Transporter Transporter Loss of the Vessel Risk Charterer Owner Transporter Transporter Transporter Weather Delay Risk Charterer Charterer Transporter Transporter Transporter Arrangement of Substitute Charterer Charterer Charterer Charterer Transporter

Floating Regas: The Golden Rules The successful development and operation of any project is dependent upon the following: alignment of interests across the value chain encouraging good/expected behaviour discouraging bad/unexpected behaviour legal and commercial coordination across all project contracts legal devices include: performance warranties (with consequences), deliver-and-pay, take-or-pay, LDs, FM, guarantees, indemnities and certainty of contract(!) allocate risks to those stakeholders best able to manage or mitigate them proven technology and designs experienced, creditworthy participants sound, commercial (pragmatic) structuring

Floating Liquefaction

Floating Liquefaction: Project Objectives Secure safe, reliable and economical use of LNG FPSOs on a long-term basis Specifically to: Manage vessel construction/conversion cost and risk Manage capital commitment and cost Maintain alignment with owner/operator Manage vessel operating risk and cost Ensure compliance with HSSE and other applicable laws Maintain project flexibility So that the vessels are available for use as/when required and perform in accordance with their specifications Also remember the Golden Rules

Floating Liquefaction - Project Structures Three primary project structures for LNG liquefaction projects: Integrated Upstream Model Participants own gas supply and LNG FPSO, and market own LNG Merchant Model Project company that owns the LNG FPSO purchases natural gas from 3d party and sells LNG to offtakers Tolling Model LNG FPSO owner does not take title to natural gas feedstock or LNG produced, but provides liquefaction, processing, storage and marine services

Floating Liquefaction - Integrated Model Physical Assets Upstream Oil and Gas Assets Gas Ownership Gas Producers Leases/ Licenses Joint Operating Agreement(s) LNG FPSO EPC Contracts LNG LNG Offtake LNG Buyers Joint Marketing Agreement LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement(s)

Floating Liquefaction - Integrated Model Benefits: Alignment of interest throughout value chain May have tax and accounting benefits (may be able to use early losses from LNG FPSO construction to offset revenues from natural gas or liquids production) Promotes financeability by reducing cross-default risk Each gas supplier may control its own marketing Risks: Requires identical ownership of upstream and downstream assets

Floating Liquefaction - Project Model Physical Assets Ownership Contracts Upstream Oil and Gas Assets Gas Gas Producers Lease/License/ JOA Gas Sales Agreement(s) LNG FPSO Project Company EPC Contract LNG LNG Offtake LNG Buyers LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement(s)

Floating Liquefaction - Project Model Benefits: Allows Project Co. to generate potentially higher returns based on value of LNG/gas price spread Allows Project Co. sponsors greater control in sourcing gas and marketing LNG Risks: Project Co. assumes market and counterparty default risks both upstream and downstream Requires Project Co. to obtain finance for LNG FPSO based on LNG sales and project revenues

Floating Liquefaction - Tolling Model Physical Assets Ownership Contracts Upstream Oil and Gas Assets Gas Gas Producers Leases/ Licenses Joint Operating Agreement(s) LNG FPSO Tolling Company EPC Contracts LNG LNG Offtake LNG Buyers Liquefaction Tolling Agreement(s) LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement(s)

Floating Liquefaction - Tolling Model Benefits: Avoid commodity price and marketing risks Allows flexibility in ownership -- does not require that all upstream parties be owners of LNG FPSO Reduced risk can help project financing of LNG FPSO, if the tolling customers have sufficient creditworthiness Risks: Sponsors do not profit from LNG sales If the gas supplier (toller) is an affiliate of sponsor, security and cross-default issues can affect financing

Floating Liquefaction - Select Legal Issues Upstream issues that may impact structure Will the cost (capex and opex) of LNG FPSO be cost recoverable under the relevant granting instrument? Do local laws prohibit any aspect of the above project structures? Will production allocations influence marketing strategies? Where does title to the gas pass to stakeholders? Will title pass as LNG? Are there any domestic supply obligations? What is the basis for valuing production entitlement?

Floating Liquefaction - Select Legal Issues Construction issues EPCIC contract likely amalgam of FPSO and LNG EPC and shipbuilding concepts Contract structure given relatively separate aspects of construction: hull, topsides and tanks over all contractual responsibility avoiding finger-pointing integration risk construction, components and modules Staged of completion and delivery process Responsibility of contractor group EPC IC Testing procedures Performance warranties

Floating Liquefaction - Select Legal Issues Operating issues maintaining operating activities potentially far from land for 20+ years, where any operating failure potentially results in a shut-in Developing an operating strategy involves: Aligning interest of all stakeholders (LNG value chain philosophy) Careful allocation of risks among industry specialists Reasonable and proportionate balance of risks and rewards partnering risk and costs to manage the unknowns Pragmatic KPI basis for reviewing activities The golden rules

Floating Liquefaction: The Golden Rules The successful development and operation of any project is dependent upon the following: alignment of interests across the value chain allocate risks to those stakeholders best able to manage or mitigate them proven technology and designs experienced, creditworthy participants sound, commercial (pragmatic) structuring

Thank You