Ohio Department of Transportation

Similar documents
Construction Administration Updates

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

I-10 KENDALL EXTENSION. Open House

Performance Based Practical Design (PBPD)

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9

DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

ITEM 9 Action October 18, 2017

Interstate 66 Widening from. RFQ Information Meeting. January 4, 2012 Christiana Briganti-Dunn, P.E. District Project Manager

2017 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call

AREAWIDE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION

500 Interchange Design

The State of Ohio Bridges

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

Updated August 1, 2016

CUY-IR MNT FY2018 Tree Removal PRUNING/OR TREE/BRUSH REMOVAL

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

Traffic Noise Analysis

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

KANSAS WORK ZONE SAFETY AND MOBILITY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES

Safety. Introduction. Total System

Building Interstate 69 As A Series of Upgrade Projects

Logistics Park Kansas City (LPKC) Edgerton, KS. Infrastructure, Development And Transportation. September 30, 2013

Members of the Board of Directors. Laurena Weinert, Clerk of the Board

Section 13. Guidelines for the Design of Ground Mounted Sign Supports

I-15 South, MP 0 to MP 16 Environmental Assessment. Public Hearing. August 7, :00 PM to 7:00 PM

Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects

CITY OF ELK GROVE SPEED CONTROL PROGRAM GUIDELINES

2012 PAVEMENT CONDITIONS & SCENARIOS

FINAL INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

DBE/EDGE Contract Development Goal Update

Pollinator Strategy for Ohio DOT

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONTRACT LETTING. March 9, 2018

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NON-NHS BRIDGE R&R POLICY

Introduction. The term Significant as used in NEPA is defined at 40 CFR and requires consideration of both context and intensity.

November 8, RE: Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Detailed Traffic Impact Study Review. Dear Mr. Rowe:

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

The term Significant as used in NEPA is defined at 40 CFR and requires consideration of both context and intensity.

Memorandum. 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468, Portland, OR tel fax

34 th Street SBS Community Advisory Committee Meeting #6. March 28, 2012

Alternative Project Delivery Status Update 2013

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

BMI Precast PRECAST & PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PRODUCTS

3 INTERSTATES. The Carolina Crossroads Project Team Welcomes You

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

IOWA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)

Creek) Bridge Replacement with environmental, survey, and bridge design. Geotechnical work will be performed by ODOT.

Measures for Highway Maintenance Quality Assurance

Chapter 4 Bridge Program Drawings

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD

Chapter URBAN & RURAL FREEWAY DESIGN

CUY-90-Innerbelt ODOT PID No 77510

Welcome to the Public Information Centre. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. June 25, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

HIGHWAY ENGINEERING II

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

APPENDIX A: SHORT-TERM PROJECT DEPLOYMENTS

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project. Public Information Meeting

Ohio Department of Transportation Central Office 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, OH John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director

APPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

Alder Drive / Blair Road Bridge Replacement Projects

MAINE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

A Low Volume Test Road for Ohio

Perpetual Pavement Demonstration

SUPPLEMENTAL ECMS ADVANCED INFORMATION JULY 14, 2016 (ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO APPEAR IN THE PROPOSAL)

NOISE STUDY REPORT DESIGN ADDENDUM

# 5 ) UN THREE CUPS YARD NORTH AMERICA CULTIVATION FACILITY SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

Section 3-01 General Concepts, Design Standards and Design Exceptions TABLE OF CONTENTS

KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Full Depth Pavement Reclamation

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)

Ohio Department of Transportation

Ian Kidner, GISP GIS Systems Administrator Office of Technical Services

US 53 Noise Mitigation

CO TAQA Technical Report

SECTION 616 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL

2011 Regional Asphalt Meetings. Frequently Asked Questions

Commercial Tax Abatement

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)

Noise Reduction and Asphalt Rubber. Douglas D. Carlson RPA Deputy Director Asphalt Rubber Greenbook Workshop 08/22/02 UCSB, California

ADOT Yuma District. Alvin Stump, P.E. ADOT Yuma District Engineer Rural Transportation Summit January 20, 2012

Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1

May 20, 2015 Russ Dudley VDOT - Local Assistance Division. May 20, 2015 Todd Halacy VDOT - Local Assistance Division

SECTION 5 EXCEPTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

Barriers, Parapets, and Railings

Transcription:

Ohio Department of Transportation District 6 400 E. William Street Delaware, Ohio 43015 (740) 833-8000 8000 John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Jack R. Marchbanks, District Deputy Director August 25, 2016 Subject: Noise Wall Survey US Route 33 Road Widening ODOT Project FRA-33-24.26 PID 98111 Groveport, Franklin County, Ohio Second Mailing Dear occupant/property Owner; The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is proposing to widen US Route 33 (US 33) from the existing four-lane roadway configuration to a six-lane roadway from the Interstate 270/US 33 interchange to the Hamilton Road/US 33 interchange. The new travel lanes would be constructed along the existing outside lanes of US 33. Additional project work will include rehabilitation of the existing US 33 pavement, widening the bridges over Big Walnut Creek, upgrading signs to reflect the new roadway configuration, relocating light towers and traffic signal work at the US 33/Hamilton Road interchange. Construction is scheduled to begin during the summer of 2018, although the schedule is dependent upon available funding, among other factors. As part of the environmental process, a traffic noise analysis was completed for the project. The analysis determined that noise abatement, in the form of a noise barrier wall is warranted for the project and that your property was identified as a location where noise levels would be reduced by a noise barrier wall. The approximate location of the noise barrier wall and the locations of properties benefited by the noise barrier wall are shown on the enclosed map. The purpose of a noise barrier wall is to reduce the level of traffic noise near your property; it will not eliminate all traffic noise. Homes located the closest to US 33 will have noise levels reduced by approximately half with construction of the noise barrier wall. Other benefited homes will receive a minimum 5-decibel noise reduction, which would be a substantial noise reduction. If constructed, the noise barrier wall would be approximately 13 feet in height and constructed along the US 33 edge of shoulder. Construction of the noise barrier wall will result in no cost to property owners. Property owners and occupants benefiting from the noise reduction are asked to provide input on whether or not they desire to have the recommended noise barrier wall constructed as part of the roadway project. The decision to construct a noise barrier wall will depend on the benefited property owners/occupants response to the enclosed noise wall survey. Response from the initial survey form mailed on July 19, 2016 is as follows: 52 property owners/occupants voted in favor of the noise barrier wall. No property owners/residents voted against the noise barrier wall. A minimum of 67 property owners/occupants must vote in favor of the noise barrier wall to have it built. An additional 15 property owners/occupants voting in favor of the noise barrier wall is necessary for the noise barrier wall to be built. You are receiving this notice because you did not respond to the initial letter and survey form. This letter may be your final chance to express an opinion on whether a noise barrier wall should or should not be built. If the majority of benefitted property owners/occupants do not want the noise barrier wall, or if there is a www.transportation.ohio.gov/dist /Dist6 ODOT is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider of Services

lack of interest in response to the survey, then ODOT will not construct the noise barrier wall. Please take a few minutes to provide feedback: 1) Please fill out the enclosed postage-paid noise wall survey form to let ODOT know whether the recommended noise barrier wall should or should not be constructed, or indicate if you have no opinion. You may also call or e-mail Cindy Wengerter or Eric Sainey at ODOT District 6 to inform them of your desires for or against the noise barrier wall. 2) On the attached survey form, please select the color and texture that you would prefer for the residential side of noise barrier wall. Please pick only one color and one texture. 3) Return the completed survey by September 8, 2016. If you do not respond, it will count as no opinion. A low response rate from your neighborhood will be considered a lack of interest and may result in the noise barrier wall not being constructed. Also, please be advised that ODOT representatives may visit your neighborhood to discuss the recommended noise wall with individuals who have not returned this second noise barrier wall survey. If you have any questions or need additional information about the recommended noise wall or the proposed road-widening project, please feel free to contact us: Cindy Wengerter, PE/Project Mgr. or Eric Sainey, Environmental Coordinator ODOT District 6 ODOT District 6 400 E. William St. 400 E. William St. Delaware, Ohio 43015 Delaware, Ohio 43015 Cindy.Wengerter@dot.ohio.gov Eric.Sainey@dot.ohio.gov 740-833-8507 740-833-8065 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 11, 2015, and executed by FHWA and ODOT.

NOISE BARRIER SURVEY SHEET FRA-33-24.26 Proposed Noise Barrier Wall Project Responses to this questionnaire will be used to determine whether a noise barrier should be built and, if so, what it should look like. Name: Signature: Printed: Mailing Address: E-mail address (optional) Telephone # (optional) Please return the completed questionnaire by mail to the address on the reverse side. The deadline for comment is August 2, 2016. Or e-mail your response to Eric.Sainey@dot.ohio.gov. Provide your name, address, vote and color/texture preferences. If we do not receive a response from you by the deadline, we will count that as you not supporting the construction of a noise wall. A positive response rate lower than 50% from all of the benefitted receptors in your neighborhood (see attached map) will be considered a lack of interest and no noise barrier wall would be built. A noise barrier SHOULD be built A noise barrier SHOULD NOT be built No opinion on whether a noise barrier wall should be built Please indicate your first, second, and third preference from the six available designs shown below. These are the available designs for the noise barrier wall facing your property. If you indicated that you do not desire a noise barrier or do not have an opinion, you may still vote on the design in case the overall results indicate a desire for the noise barrier to be built. Note: The noise barrier wall is intended to reduce the existing noise levels - it would not eliminate all traffic noise. Please fold this comment sheet along the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape the sheet closed, and mail. Postage is already applied. Thank you for your time and consideration. 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 Concrete Noise Barrier Concrete Noise Barrier Concrete Noise Barrier Dry Stack Texture - Grey Color Dry Stack Texture - Tan Color Fieldstone Texture - Tan Color 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 Concrete Noise Barrier Concrete Noise Barrier Fiberglas Noise Barrier Ashlar Texture - Grey Color Ashlar Texture - Tan Color Horizontal Groove Grey Color Additional Comments: The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 11, 2015, and executed by FHWA and ODOT.

Eric Sainey, Environmental Coordinator Ohio Department of Transportation, District 6 400 East William Street Delaware, Ohio 43015

3555 Elk Run Ct. 3561 Elk Run Ct. 3557 Elk Run Ct. 3559 Elk Run Ct. 3567 Elk Run Ct. 3569 Elk Run Ct. 3579 Elk Run Ct. 3581 Elk Run Ct. 3599 Elk Run Ct. 3601 Elk Run Ct. 3565 Elk Run Ct. 3571 Elk Run Ct. 3570 Elk Run Ct. 3576 Elk Run Ct. 3572 Elk Run Ct. 3574 Elk Run Ct. 3590 Elk Run Ct. 3592 Elk Run Ct. 3594 Elk Run Ct. 3596 Elk Run Ct. 3600 Elk Run Ct. 3602 Elk Run Ct. 3597 Elk Run Ct. 3603 Elk Run Ct. 3604 Elk Run Ct. 3606 Elk Run Ct. 3956 Grand Bend Dr. 3610 Elk Run Ct. 3612 Grand Bend Dr. 3990 Grand Bend Dr. 3992 Grand Bend Dr. 3964 Grand Bend Dr. 3612 Elk Run Ct. 3980 Grand Bend Dr. 3991 Grand Bend Dr. 3986 Grand Bend Dr. 3988 Grand Bend Dr. 3967 Grand Bend Dr. 4010 Grand Bend Dr. 3975 Grand Bend Dr. 3983 Grand Bend Dr. 4018 Nile Ave 4026 Nile Ave. 3986 Nile Ave. 4011 Grand Bend Dr. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 11, 2015, and executed by FHWA and ODOT. NSA 5 Benefited Receptors FRA-33-24.26 (98111)

4034 Nile Ave. 4040 Nile Ave. 4048 Nile Ave. 3684 Potomac St. 4015 Nile Ave. 3690 Potomac St. 3698 Potomac St. 4023 Nile Ave. 4031 Nile Ave 3704 Potomac St. 4039 Nile Ave 3693 Potomac St. 3716 Potomac St. 3701 Potomac St. 3722 Potomac St. 3709 Potamac St. 3717 Potomac St. 3730 Potomac St. 3725 Potomac St. 3738 Potomac St. 3733 Potomac St. 3746 Potomac St. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 11, 2015, and executed by FHWA and ODOT. NSA 5 Benefited Receptors FRA-33-24.26 (98111)