M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S H I N G T O N A I R P O R T S A U T H O R I T Y. Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Wall Program

Similar documents
MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

5 INFORMATION UPDATE TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT TESTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

CHAPTER 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

Virginia Department of Transportation I-66 Tier 2 Environmental Assessment

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK-AND-RIDE DEMAND ESTIMATION STUDY

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. Request for Qualifications Information. Architectural / Engineering Task Contract Design Services

Department of Planning and Land Services Director

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

TABLE 3-24 SUMMARY OF EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS

Logistics Park Kansas City (LPKC) Edgerton, KS. Infrastructure, Development And Transportation. September 30, 2013

Draft Noise Study Report

Airborne Noise and The New NY Bridge Project

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Loudoun County Chamber of Commerce

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D26 SURFACE RAILWAY NOISE AND VIBRATION

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

Noise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Traffic Noise Analysis

The content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Link Noise Mitigation Policy

Environmental Assessment May 2007

Commonwealth Transportation Board Sean T. Connaughton 1401 East Broad Street (804) Chairman Richmond, Virginia Fax: (804)

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

LAS VEGAS STREET RAILROAD CROSSING RR/PUC CONNECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN

AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNTY OF KANE

I-495 HOT LANES PROJECT VIRGINIA CONCRETE CONFERENCE CONCRETE: LEADING THE WAY. Dan Staron, P.E. HNTB Corporation MARCH 4, 2010

SAFETY AND NOISE 9. Safety and Noise

Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Draft

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

Regional Bus Rapid Transit

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

Section 13. Guidelines for the Design of Ground Mounted Sign Supports

Clean Air Act. Compliance

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Transportation Concurrency

South Boston. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Day/Night Noise Level Assessment Tool Users Guide

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

U S H I G H W A Y 1 4 F I N A L E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T S T A T E M E N T ( F E I S

This comparison is designed to satisfy the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines, Section (d), Evaluation of Alternatives, which state that:

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

Law enforcement on proactive protection of noise and vibration pollution for

NOISE STUDY REPORT DESIGN ADDENDUM

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Future System Planning (ST4)

INNOVATION STATION MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT A RECO DEVELOPMENT

E.L. SMITH SOLAR FARM PROJECT UPDATE

Safety, And Quality Of Life Needs

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 7.C STAFF REPORT November 7, 2017 Staff Contact: Barton Brierley

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

SULLYFIELD CIRCLE CHANTILLY, VIRGINIA 20151

CITY OF ELK GROVE SPEED CONTROL PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

9.0 Noise and Vibration

1RUWKZHVW#:LFKLWD 0DMRU#,QYHVWPHQW#6WXG\

Jim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #19

Suncoast Parkway 2/SR Toll 589 FPID: & 3, -4

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA

November 8, RE: Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Detailed Traffic Impact Study Review. Dear Mr. Rowe:

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

King County Flood Control District approves grants for flood prevention projects Regional projects to benefit from district funds

Section 4.0 ALTERNATIVES

Final Recommendations Identification of Improvements, Strategies, and Solutions

Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study

Pentagon City PDSP Amendment. Site Plan #105 PenPlace

South Access to the Golden Gate Bridge Doyle Drive Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4.7 NOISE. Introduction. Decibels and Frequency. Perception of the Receiver and A-Weighting

Zoning Text Amendment

Transcription:

Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Wall Program 1

Purpose The purpose of the Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Wall Program is to guide the repair or replacement of existing noise walls and assess requirements for new noise walls. 2

Need for a Noise Policy As of November 1, 2008, the Airports Authority is responsible for existing noise walls and highway noise mitigation along the Dulles Toll Road (DTR) corridor. The Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy (Noise Policy) establishes assessment criteria to evaluate existing and future highway noise levels, and obligations stated in the Dulles Toll Road Transfer Agreement. To be eligible to receive federal funding on future roadway projects, the Airports Authority must have a noise policy approved by the Federal Highway Administration. 3

Chronology of Noise Policy Development of the Noise Policy began in early 2010. Public meeting held in June 2010; release of Draft Noise Policy. Noise Policy adopted by Board in February 2011. Noise Policy modified in mid 2011 to reflect comments from Federal Highway Administration and new VDOT Guidance. Revised/amended Noise Policy adopted by Board in February 2012. http://www.mwaa.com/file/dtr_noise_policy.pdf 4

Policy Fundamentals Conforms to federal and VDOT guidelines. The Airports Authority s Noise Wall Policy includes a provision to assess the eligibility of established community developments to receive mitigation for existing conditions. Under the provision, 27 Noise Sensitive Areas (NSAs) were defined as geographical areas with defined land uses eligible for noise mitigation consideration according to the Authority s Noise Policy. 5

Noise Measurement Areas Detailed maps and information are posted as PDF file, separate from this presentation. black 66

Process: Noise Policy to Noise Wall Program Development/adoption of Noise Policy. Highway noise sampling/testing. Type I analysis Noise walls that result from a highway improvement (part of future improvements). Type II analysis Re-evaluation of the existing Toll Road for potential noise mitigation. Establishment of a proposed Noise Wall Program. Community approval for reasonable new and replacement Noise Wall projects. Design and Construction. 7

Type II Noise Wall Evaluation Process for New Noise Walls Impact Do noise levels exceed maximum levels per Noise Wall Policy? Feasibility Is the noise wall effective in reducing the noise level? Can it be constructed? Reasonableness Is the noise wall cost-effective? Evaluation of Existing Noise Walls Effectiveness - Does the existing noise wall reduce the noise level effectively? Structural Integrity Is the existing noise wall structurally intact? 8

Highway Noise Sampling and Testing Example of a noise receptor used to measure sound levels Example of 24-hour noise sampling results 9

Highway Noise Model Creation Short Term noise measurements were collected concurrently with traffic counts to account for the volume and types of vehicles. These were obtained to validate the Highway Noise Model. Once the Highway Noise Model was validated, the worst case traffic scenario was applied to the model to produce the worst case noise conditions along the Dulles Toll Road Corridor. Traffic Assumptions for Highway Noise Model Rail Noise included. 4 lanes flowing at 65 mph closest to NSA on the Dulles Toll Road and 2 lanes flowing at 65 mph closest to the NSA on the Dulles International Airport Access Highway (Highest throughput of traffic). The Highway Noise Model also includes traffic on the opposite side of the Dulles Toll Road and Dulles International Airport Access Highway. Worst case noise conditions were then analyzed to begin the process of determining which properties are impacted. 10

Determination of Noise Impact Impacted areas must receive noise equal to or exceeding the following level: 66 db(a)*: Residences, places of worship, schools, hospitals, parks, and trails. 71 db(a)*: Hotels. Legend Example of Worst -Case Noise Conditions at Worldgate Condominiums * Average noise level over a one-hour period. 11

Determination of Noise Wall Feasibility Noise Wall feasibility* is established by: Overall highway traffic noise reduction of at least 5 db(a) is achievable for at least 50% of all impacted properties. Property is accessible for noise wall construction and maintenance. Non-highway noise sources, such as urban streets, do not reduce or limit the effectiveness of the proposed noise wall. *See Page 10 of the Highway Traffic Noise Policy for a complete listing of the Feasibility criteria. 12

Determination of Noise Wall Reasonableness* The maximum area of noise wall per benefited receptor shall be 1,600 square feet (sf) and the maximum allowable height of a noise barrier shall be 30 feet. Example of how reasonableness is calculated: Assume the Highway Noise Model shows 16 Benefited Receptors (BR) for a proposed noise wall that measures 1,000 feet long x 15 feet high = 15,000 sf. The square feet per Benefited Receptor = 15,000/16 BR = 937 sf/br This number is below the 1,600 maximum sf/br, therefore the Noise Wall is considered reasonable. * See page 11 of the Highway Traffic Noise Policy for a complete listing of Reasonableness criteria. 13

Recommended Noise Wall Program Noise Wall Repairs (9) Noise Wall Replacements (2) New Noise Walls (5) Current Wall Effective Outside of Current Noise Wall Parameters 14

Recommended Noise Wall Program Noise Wall Repairs (9) Reflection Lake Victoria Farms Hunter Mill Estates, Hunter Mill Overlook Sun Valley (2 Walls) Cinnamon Creek Wolf Trap Wolf Trap Woods, Carrington Tysons Village Replacement Noise Walls (2) Wolftrap Meadows Bluffs of Wolf Trap New Noise Wall Program (5) Worldgate Condominiums McLean Hamlet Odricks Corner Dulles Greene Apartments Courtyard by Marriott and Summerfield Suites 15

Noise Wall Program Results Dulles Toll Road: Western Section Noise Sensitive Areas and Recommended Noise Wall Program 16

Noise Wall Program Results Dulles Toll Road: Central Section Noise Sensitive Areas and Recommended Noise Wall Program 17

Noise Wall Program Results Dulles Toll Road: Eastern Section Noise Sensitive Areas and Recommended Noise Wall Program 18

Next Steps Complete the existing Noise Wall Repairs, 2012. Community Outreach for New and Replacement Noise Walls, beginning Fall 2012. Design and construct Wolftrap Meadows Noise Wall Replacement, 2012-2013. Design and construct New Noise Walls, 2012-2014. Planned Bluffs of Wolf Trap Noise Wall Replacement, 2014. 19

Additional Information Please contact the following MWAA Offices for information and questions related to: DTR Noise Wall Program and Construction: Engineering Office 703-417-8140 General Noise Questions: Noise Abatement Office 703-417-8745 MWAA is committed to working with every community located along the Dulles Toll Road 20

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Dulles Toll Road Washington Dulles International Airport 21