Attachment 1. Categorical Summary of BMP Performance Data for Solids (TSS, TDS, and Turbidity) Contained in the International Stormwater BMP Database

Similar documents
Final Report. International Stormwater BMP Database Summary Statistics

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

International Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Database

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

Assessment of Cold Weather Highway Runoff Water Quality and BMP Performance

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

Water Quality Design Storms for Stormwater Hydrodynamic Separators

Stormwater Runoff Water Quality Characteristics From Highways in Lake Tahoe, California

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for the Reduction of Total Suspended Solids in Agricultural Runoff

Can Stormwater BMPs Remove Bacteria?

SWMM5 LID Control for Green Infrastructure Modeling

SECTION 11 ACUTE TOXICITY DATA ANALYSIS

Applying Regression Techniques For Predictive Analytics Paviya George Chemparathy

Stormwater Treatment Wetlands

APPENDIX E. Calculation of Site-Specific Background Concentration of Arsenic in Soil

A. Manufactured Treatment Device Characteristics

2011 LID Symposium. Estimating Annual Runoff Based on the NRCS Runoff Curve Number. Loews Philadelphia Hotel Philadelphia, PA September 25-28, 2011

Groundwater Statistical Analysis Plan

CONTINUOUS TURBIDITY MONITORING AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS TO ESTIMATE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS AND FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA LOADS IN REAL TIME

Minimum Design Criteria: Shaping the Future of Stormwater Management

Odor Threshold Emission Factors for Common WWTP Processes

Efficiency of Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices: A Literature Review

A HYDROLOGY MODEL FOR MIMICKING PRE AND POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF VOLUMES

A is used to answer questions about the quantity of what is being measured. A quantitative variable is comprised of numeric values.

Modeling Hydrology, Sediment, and Nutrients in the Flathead Lake Watershed Appendix C

Maine Stormwater Conference (Portland, ME, 2015)

August 24, Jean-Philippe Mathevet IAQG Performance Stream Leader SAFRAN Paris, France. Re: 2014 Supplier Performance Data Summary

Outliers and Their Effect on Distribution Assessment

Comparison of Three Turbidity Instruments DTS-12, YSI, and Hydrolab

Vortex Separator. May be more cost-effective pre-treatment devices than traditional wet or dry basins.

ESTIMATION OF FLOW-DURATION CURVES AT UNGAGED SITES IN SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND. By Stacey A. Archfield, Richard M. Vogel, and Sara L.

Calculation of BLM Fixed Monitoring Benchmarks for Copper at Selected Monitoring Sites in Colorado

Current Methods for Flood Frequency Analysis

GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER BACTERIA REDUCTIONS THROUGH BMP IMPLEMENTATION NY/NJ HARBOR TMDL DEVELOPMENT

Statistics Chapter 3 Triola (2014)

CREDIT RISK MODELLING Using SAS

Application of Statistical Methods to Analyze Groundwater Quality

Project Name: Add a unique name that appropriately identifies the submission

STATISTICS PART Instructor: Dr. Samir Safi Name:

Tribal Water Quality Assessment Report (October 2005 to September 2006)

THE LEAD PROFILE AND OTHER NON-PARAMETRIC TOOLS TO EVALUATE SURVEY SERIES AS LEADING INDICATORS

The Impact of SEM Programs on Customer Participation Dan Rubado, JP Batmale and Kati Harper, Energy Trust of Oregon

Biofiltration and Downspout Filter Media Evaluation for BMP Decision-Making at the Port of Vancouver, WA

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Topics. Water Quality Treatment in Permeable Paving. Treatment Mechanisms. Initial and Long-term Performance

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Need to Verify Model TSS Reduction Estimates

Wet Detention Ponds, MCTTs, and other Options for Critical Area Stormwater Control. Robert Pitt University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

PARAMETERS TO REPORT WITH BMP MONITORING DATA. Ben R. Urbonas, P.E. *

Urbanizing Watersheds: Green Infrastructure and Hydrologic Function. Jay Dorsey, PE, PhD ODNR-DSWR October 30, 2014

ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT IN COASTAL CAROLINAS

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Report No Air & Emissions Proficiency Testing Program. Round 9. Particulate Matter on Filter Paper. March 2017

Ambient and Landfill-Impacted Groundwater Quality in the Hudson Valley of Southeastern New York State

Performance of the Sievers 500 RL On-Line TOC Analyzer

Chapter 2 BMP Selection

ROADMAP. Introduction to MARSSIM. The Goal of the Roadmap

PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT

At least 2 feet above the seasonal high water table Overflow path or structure provided

CFD Analysis of Clarifier Performance With and Without Energy Dissipating Inlet

16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land

A NEW METHOD FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY CLARIFIERS Alex Ekster and Cristina Pena San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant City of San Jose

APPENDIX C Technical Approach Used to Generate Maximum Daily Loads

CHALLENGING URBAN BMP ASSUMMPTIONS. John Moll, CEO

Appendix B. Box Plots of Water Quality Data

Appendix 5. Fox River Study Group Interim Monitoring Evaluation

Field Verification of Performance of an Engineered Phosphorus Removal Media Deployed in a Flow Based Stormwater Filter

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Determination of watershed historic peak flow rates as the basis for detention basin design

Technical Summary: Volume Reduction

Heated pavement surfaces transfer thermal energy to stormwater runoff. Typical impact is short term temperature spikes in receiving waters

ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager. Technical Reference. ENERGY STAR Score for Supermarkets and Food Stores in Canada OVERVIEW

SUDS for Roads. Design Tools in new guidance targeted at roads engineers. Chris Jefferies, Taye Akinrelere & Frank Guz University of Abertay Dundee

Statistical Observations on Mass Appraisal. by Josh Myers Josh Myers Valuation Solutions, LLC.

SPRS EVALUATION CRITERIA (Revised JUL 2017)

Evidence Supporting Treatment Practice Based Delineation of Stormwater Runoff Zones

Monitoring. Stormwater NPDES Data Collection and Evaluation Project. Communities Included in NSQD version 3

APPENDIX C PROJECT EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION METHOD

Incorporating Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management at Airports

High-Rate Stormwater Treatment with Up-Flow Filtration

Timing Production Runs

Data Analysis and Sampling

STORMWATER BMPS AND TECHNOLOGY IN 1993

VERIFICATION STATEMENT

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

FocalPoint as an Acceptable Alternative Biofiltration Practice

U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors

The National Stormwater Quality Database (NSQD, version 1.1)

+? Mean +? No change -? Mean -? No Change. *? Mean *? Std *? Transformations & Data Cleaning. Transformations

Stormwater Management at San Diego International Airport

The Impact of Surface Coal Mining on Water Quality in the Northern Great Plains

ort No. 892 Proficiency Testin Roun - Total Solids, Total Suspendedd Solids, Dissolved Solids - January 2015

Task 1: Framework for a Reexamination. Falls Nutrient Strategy

Filterra Bioretention System Water Quality and Hydrologic Field-Scale Performance Evaluation

Report No Waters Proficiency Testing Program. Round No Total Solids, Total Suspended Solids, Total Dissolved Solids - March 2017

State-of-the-Practice Porous Asphalt Pavements. Kent R. Hansen, P.E. Director of Engineering National Asphalt Pavement Association

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

AcaStat How To Guide. AcaStat. Software. Copyright 2016, AcaStat Software. All rights Reserved.

Quantitative Methods. Presenting Data in Tables and Charts. Basic Business Statistics, 10e 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 2-1

Evaluation of the Stormwater Management StormFilter for the removal of SIL-CO-SIL 106, a standardized silica product:

Estoril Education Day

Transcription:

Attachment 1 Categorical Summary of BMP Performance Data for Solids (TSS, TDS, and Turbidity) Contained in the International Stormwater BMP Database Prepared by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Under Support From Water Environment Research Foundation Federal Highway Administration Environment and Water Resources Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers May 2011

Contents 1 Description of Statistics 4 1.1 Tabular Summaries............................................... 4 1.2 Graphical Summaries............................................. 4 2 Bioretention 8 2.1 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 8 3 Bioswale 3.1 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 3.2 Total Dissolved Solids............................................. 12 4 Detention Basin 14 4.1 Turbidity..................................................... 14 4.2 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 16 4.3 Total Dissolved Solids............................................. 18 5 Filter Strip 20 5.1 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 20 5.2 Total Dissolved Solids............................................. 22 6 Manufactured Device 24 6.1 Turbidity..................................................... 24 6.2 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 26 6.3 Total Dissolved Solids............................................. 28 7 Media Filter 30 7.1 Turbidity..................................................... 30 7.2 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 32 7.3 Total Dissolved Solids............................................. 34 8 Porous Pavement 36 8.1 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 36 2

9 Retention Pond 38 9.1 Turbidity..................................................... 38 9.2 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 40 9.3 Total Dissolved Solids............................................. 42 Wetland Basin 44.1 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 44 11 Wetland Channel 46 11.1 Total Suspended Solids............................................. 46 3

1 Description of Statistics Used in this Report This report provides a concise statistical summary of BMP performance data contained in the International Stormwater BMP Database. The analysis focuses on the distribution of effluent water quality from individual events by BMP category, thereby providing greater weight to those BMPs for which there are a larger number of data points reported. In other words, the performance analysis presented in this technical summary is stormweighted, as opposed to BMP weighted 1. The statistical summaries have been organized by BMP and then by constituent. For each data set, influent and effluent summary statistics are presented in a table followed by graphical summaries. 1.1 Tabular Summaries The summary tables include both parametric and non-parametric statistics. Parametric statistics operate under the assumption that data arise from a single statistical distribution that can be described mathematically using coefficients, or parameters, of that distribution. The mean and standard deviation are example parameters of the normal, or Gaussian, distribution. Non-parametric statistics are fundamentally based on the ranks 2 of the data with no need to assume an underlying distribution. Non-parametric statistics do not depend on the magnitude of the data and are therefore resistant to the occurrence of a few extreme values (i.e., high or low values relative to other data points do not significantly alter the statistic) 3. Table 1.1 summarizes the parametric and non-parametric statistics commonly used to describe data sets. Definitions for each summary statistic included in the tables are provided in Table 1.2. Table 1.1: Example Common Parametric and Non-Parametric Descriptive Statistics Statistic Category Parametric Non-Parametric Measures of Location Mean Median Measures of Spread Variance, Standard Deviation Interquartile Range, Median Absolute Deviation Measures of Skew Coefficient of Skewness Quartile Skew Coefficient 1.2 Graphical Summaries In addition to the summary tables provided for each BMP/constituent combination, influent/effluent box plots and non-exceedance probability plots are provided. Box plots (or box and whisker plots) provide a schematic representation of the central tendency and spread of the influent and effluent data sets. Box plots can also be 1 There are several viable approaches to evaluating the BMP Database. Two general approaches that have been presented in the past (Geosyntec and WWE 2008) are the BMP-weighted and storm-weighted approaches. The BMP-weighted approach represents each BMP with one value representing the central tendency of the BMP study, whereas the storm-weighted approach combines all of the storm events for the BMPs in each category and analyzes the overall storm-based data set. The storm-weighted approach has been selected for this report. 2 In this context, ranks refer to the positions of the data after being sorted by magnitude. 3 Helsel D.R., and Hirsch, R.M., 2002, Statistical methods in water resources Hydrologic analysis and interpretation: Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, chap. A3, book 4, 5 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/twri/twri4a3/ 4

used to indicate whether the influent median is statistically different than the effluent median. A key for the box plots is provided in Figure 1.1. Probability plots illustrate the empirical distribution of the data. A comparison of the influent and effluent probability plots indicates whether there may be differences among all percentiles (not just the median) and whether the influent and effluent data sets are similarly distributed. Probability plots also provide a quick method of identifying the probability that an individual sample would be less than or equal to a particular value. For example, the effluent probability plot may be used to identify the probability that a particular water quality threshold would be met (e.g., 40% chance that effluent concentration would be less than or equal to 1 mg/l). It should be noted, however, that there is not a one-to-one correlation between the percentiles in the influent data and the percentiles in the effluent data. For example, the median influent concentration and the median effluent concentrations may not occur in the EMC samples collected during the same storm. Although the influent and effluent concentrations in a probability plot are not paired values, the relative position and slope of the two populations are a good indication of the effectiveness of the BMP. 4 Helsel, D.R. and T. A. Cohn (1988). Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water quality data, Wat. Resour. Res. 24, 1997-2004. 5 Efron, B. and R. Tibishirani (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York. 5

Statistic Table 1.2: Common Parametric and Non-Parametric Descriptive Statistics Definition/Description Count Total number of data points analyzed. Most BMP data sets include only event mean concentrations (EMCs). The exception includes BMPs with permanent pools (retention ponds and wetland basins) where grab samples were also included. Number of Non-detects Mean (95% conf. interval) Std. Dev. Skewness Median (95% conf. interval) 25th, 75th percentiles Number of paired data Wilcoxon p-value Mann-Whitney p-value The plotting position, or regression-on-order statistics (ROS), method described in Helsel and Cohn (1988) 4 was used to estimate censored values using the distribution of uncensored values for each study. The mean of the data points and the 95% confidence interval about the mean. Provides a parametric measure of the central tendency. The confidence interval was computed using the bias corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap method described by Efron and Tibishirani (1993) 5. The standard deviation of the data points. The coefficient of skewness of the data points. The median of the data points and the 95% confidence interval about the median. The confidence interval was computed using the bias corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap method described by Efron and Tibishirani (1993) 5. The difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles is the interquartile range, which is a non-parametric measure of the spread of the data. The number of storm events where influent and effluent samples were simultaneously collected. The statistical significance value for the signed-rank test, which is based on the alternative hypothesis that the median of the paired influent/effluent differences is not equal to zero. This non-parametric test applies only to paired data sets and is performed on logtransformed data (base ) to improve the symmetry of the distribution of the differences between the data pairs. A p-value less than 0.05 indicates that the influent and effluent concentrations are statistically significantly different at the 95% confidence level. The statistical significance value for the rank-sum test, which is based on the alternative hypothesis that the influent and effluent medians differ. This non-parametric test applies to two independent data sets. A p-value less than 0.05 indicates that the influent and effluent median concentrations are statistically significantly different at the 95% confidence level. 6

Outlier > Q3 + 1.5 IQR Q3 + 1.5 IQR 75 th percentile, Q3 Upper 95% CI 50 th percentile, Median Lower 95% CI 25 th percentile, Q1 Arithmetic Mean Q1 1.5 IQR Inner Quartile Range, IQR = Q3 Q1 Boxplot Key Figure 1.1: Graphical explanation of box and whisker plots 7

2 Bioretention 2.1 Total Suspended Solids Table 2.1: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Bioretention BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 5 96 Number of Non-detects 0 15 Number of Studies 6 6 Min, Max 5.0, 370 0.0, 235 Mean 70.6 24.1 (95% conf. interval) (59.4, 83.4) (16.8, 33.7) Std. Dev. 63.3 41.6 Skewness 1.72 3.2 Median 50.0.0 (95% conf. interval) (39.0, 68.0) (6.0, 13.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 2, 94.0 2.75, 24.0 Number of data pairs 87 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 8

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 2.1: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Bioretention BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 2.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Bioretention BMPs 9

3 Bioswale 3.1 Total Suspended Solids Table 3.1: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Bioswale BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 243 265 Number of Non-detects 1 2 Number of Studies 17 19 Min, Max, 474 0.0, 191 Mean 42.9 21.4 (95% conf. interval) (36.1, 51.2) (18.3, 25.1) Std. Dev. 59.7 28.6 Skewness 3.6 2.66 Median 2.0 (95% conf. interval) (15.0, 26.0) (7.0, 1) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 7.0, 58.5 3.0, 3 Number of data pairs 121 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 3.1: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Bioswale BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 3.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Bioswale BMPs 11

3.2 Total Dissolved Solids Table 3.2: Summary of Total Dissolved Solids at Bioswale BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 95 82 Number of Non-detects 0 0 Number of Studies 12 12 Min, Max 5.0, 370 9.0, 200 Mean 86.9 72.4 (95% conf. interval) (75.2, 2) (63.6, 81.9) Std. Dev. 65.1 42.1 Skewness 2.48 0.659 Median 77.0 69.5 (95% conf. interval) (66.0, 79.0) (56.0, 79.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 53.0, 90.0 36.0, 94.0 Number of data pairs 82 Wilcoxon p-value 0.839 Mann-Whitney p-value 0.123 12

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 3.3: Box and Probability Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Bioswale BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) Figure 3.4: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Bioswale BMPs 13

4 Detention Basin 4.1 Turbidity Table 4.1: Summary of Turbidity at Detention Basin BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 85 111 Number of Non-detects 0 0 Number of Studies 7 7 Min, Max 2.0, 3680 0.0, 329 Mean 196 39.0 (95% conf. interval) (91.8, 348) (30.0, 50.1) Std. Dev. 593 53.7 Skewness 4.43 2.99 Median 39.0 19.0 (95% conf. interval) (27.0, 50.0) (15.0, 26.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 19.0, 9 12.0, 42.0 Number of data pairs 47 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 14

000 000 Turbidity (NTU) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 4.1: Box and Probability Plots of Turbidity at Detention Basin BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Turbidity (NTU) 0 0 00 Influent Turbidity (NTU) Figure 4.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Turbidity at Detention Basin BMPs 15

4.2 Total Suspended Solids Table 4.2: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Detention Basin BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 239 265 Number of Non-detects 1 2 Number of Studies 19 19 Min, Max, 34 0.0, 420 Mean 118 37.1 (95% conf. interval) (91.8, 161) (31.6, 44.0) Std. Dev. 265 51.2 Skewness 8.91 4.31 Median 64.0 24.0 (95% conf. interval) (47.0, 76.0) (19.0, 27.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 21.5, 121.0, 44.0 Number of data pairs 194 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 16

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 4.3: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Detention Basin BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 4.4: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Detention Basin BMPs 17

4.3 Total Dissolved Solids Table 4.3: Summary of Total Dissolved Solids at Detention Basin BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 66 62 Number of Non-detects 0 0 Number of Studies 6 6 Min, Max 28.0, 467 12.0, 396 Mean 127 130 (95% conf. interval) (7, 151) (111, 152) Std. Dev. 89.7 83.6 Skewness 1.84 1.17 Median 0 1 (95% conf. interval) (83.5, 129) (79.0, 121) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 65.3, 160 69.3, 179 Number of data pairs 62 Wilcoxon p-value 0.351 Mann-Whitney p-value 0.336 18

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 4.5: Box and Probability Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Detention Basin BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) Figure 4.6: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Detention Basin BMPs 19

5 Filter Strip 5.1 Total Suspended Solids Table 5.1: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Filter Strip BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 232 175 Number of Non-detects 2 9 Number of Studies 14 14 Min, Max 0.0, 400 0.0, 330 Mean 75.7 29.0 (95% conf. interval) (67.0, 85.5) (23.6, 36.2) Std. Dev. 71.1 41.9 Skewness 1.94 4.31 Median 50.5 18.0 (95% conf. interval) (44.5, 58.5) (14.0, 20.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 27.8, 96.0.0, 32.5 Number of data pairs 160 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 20

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 5.1: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Filter Strip BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 5.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Filter Strip BMPs 21

5.2 Total Dissolved Solids Table 5.2: Summary of Total Dissolved Solids at Filter Strip BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 188 151 Number of Non-detects 17 4 Number of Studies 12 12 Min, Max 0.0, 820, 306 Mean 66.1 4 (95% conf. interval) (56.1, 79.3) (93.7, 114) Std. Dev. 80.7 63.8 Skewness 5.03 0.988 Median 46.0 90.0 (95% conf. interval) (33.5, 52.0) (76.0, 98.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 22.8, 82.0 58.0, 134 Number of data pairs 140 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 22

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 5.3: Box and Probability Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Filter Strip BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) Figure 5.4: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Filter Strip BMPs 23

6 Manufactured Device 6.1 Turbidity Table 6.1: Summary of Turbidity at Manufactured Device BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 140 122 Number of Non-detects 11 7 Number of Studies 9 9 Min, Max 0.0, 30 0.0, 639 Mean 27.3 20.5 (95% conf. interval) (15.6, 48.9) (11.2, 36.0) Std. Dev. 97.3 68.5 Skewness 8.51 7.04 Median 6.0 4.0 (95% conf. interval) (5.0, 6.0) (4.0, 5.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 4.0, 9.5 3.0, 8.0 Number of data pairs 111 Wilcoxon p-value 0.00222 Mann-Whitney p-value 0.0231 24

000 000 Turbidity (NTU) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 6.1: Box and Probability Plots of Turbidity at Manufactured Device BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Turbidity (NTU) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Turbidity (NTU) Figure 6.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Turbidity at Manufactured Device BMPs 25

6.2 Total Suspended Solids Table 6.2: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Manufactured Device BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 555 608 Number of Non-detects 2 37 Number of Studies 40 47 Min, Max, 3520 0.0, 991 Mean 128 49.8 (95% conf. interval) (7, 153) (43.4, 57.3) Std. Dev. 277 87.5 Skewness 6.05 5.08 Median 4 23.0 (95% conf. interval) (36.0, 46.0) (19.0, 25.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 16.0, 9 7.0, 51.3 Number of data pairs 508 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 26

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 6.3: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Manufactured Device BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 6.4: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Manufactured Device BMPs 27

6.3 Total Dissolved Solids Table 6.3: Summary of Total Dissolved Solids at Manufactured Device BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 175 207 Number of Non-detects 4 3 Number of Studies 12 19 Min, Max, 114000, 95500 Mean 3460 3530 (95% conf. interval) (1940, 5650) (2060, 55) Std. Dev. 12400 12500 Skewness 6.06 5.38 Median 126 87.0 (95% conf. interval) (96.0, 165) (72.0, 122) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 5, 717 48.0, 386 Number of data pairs 173 Wilcoxon p-value 0.0112 Mann-Whitney p-value 0.166 28

1 6 1 6 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 1 5 000 00 0 1 5 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 6.5: Box and Probability Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Manufactured Device BMPs Effluent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 1 6 1 5 000 00 0 Data 1:1 line 0 00 000 1 5 1 6 Influent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) Figure 6.6: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Manufactured Device BMPs 29

7 Media Filter 7.1 Turbidity Table 7.1: Summary of Turbidity at Media Filter BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 43 48 Number of Non-detects 0 2 Number of Studies 4 5 Min, Max, 64.0 0.0, 274 Mean 25.8 18.1 (95% conf. interval) (20.8, 31.1) (8.4, 34.8) Std. Dev. 17.1 45.0 Skewness 0.526 4.47 Median 25.0 5.0 (95% conf. interval) (14.0, 27.0) (3.5, 6.5) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 13.0, 38.0 3.0, 8.25 Number of data pairs 40 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 30

00 00 Turbidity (NTU) 0 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 7.1: Box and Probability Plots of Turbidity at Media Filter BMPs 0 Data 1:1 line Effluent Turbidity (NTU) 0 Influent Turbidity (NTU) Figure 7.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Turbidity at Media Filter BMPs 31

7.2 Total Suspended Solids Table 7.2: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Media Filter BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 294 286 Number of Non-detects 3 27 Number of Studies 19 20 Min, Max 0.0, 420 0.0, 280 Mean 69.7 19.9 (95% conf. interval) (62.2, 77.7) (16.0, 24.5) Std. Dev. 67.4 36.9 Skewness 2.19 4.0 Median 46.0 7.0 (95% conf. interval) (38.0, 51.5) (6.0, 7.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 26.0, 90.8 3.25, 18.8 Number of data pairs 273 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 32

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 7.3: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Media Filter BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 0 0 00 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 7.4: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Media Filter BMPs 33

7.3 Total Dissolved Solids Table 7.3: Summary of Total Dissolved Solids at Media Filter BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 126 130 Number of Non-detects 8 4 Number of Studies 12 13 Min, Max 0.0, 3620 2.0, 7160 Mean 89.5 152 (95% conf. interval) (48.1, 174) (82.4, 315) Std. Dev. 345 639 Skewness 9.08.2 Median 37.0 54.0 (95% conf. interval) (29.0, 43.0) (47.0, 58.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 19.0, 60.0 38.0, 97.0 Number of data pairs 120 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 34

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 7.5: Box and Probability Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Media Filter BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) Figure 7.6: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Media Filter BMPs 35

8 Porous Pavement 8.1 Total Suspended Solids Table 8.1: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Porous Pavement BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 64 73 Number of Non-detects 0 7 Number of Studies 5 8 Min, Max, 1360 0.0, 764 Mean 93.7 38.5 (95% conf. interval) (47.6, 168) (21.3, 68.6) Std. Dev. 239 0 Skewness 4.69 5.86 Median 22.0 14.0 (95% conf. interval) (16.0, 27.5) (.0, 17.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 12.8, 75.0 7.0, 3 Number of data pairs 61 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value 0.002 36

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 8.1: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Porous Pavement BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 8.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Porous Pavement BMPs 37

9 Retention Pond 9.1 Turbidity Table 9.1: Summary of Turbidity at Retention Pond BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 89 2 Number of Non-detects 0 0 Number of Studies 5 6 Min, Max 2.0, 351 0.0, 27.0 Mean 37.2 3.34 (95% conf. interval) (26.7, 50.9) (2.49, 4.38) Std. Dev. 57.4 4.85 Skewness 3.06 2.66 Median 17.0 (95% conf. interval) (.0, 20.0) (, ) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 8.0, 34.0, 4.0 Number of data pairs 52 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 38

00 00 Turbidity (NTU) 0 0 0.1 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 9.1: Box and Probability Plots of Turbidity at Retention Pond BMPs 00 Data 1:1 line Effluent Turbidity (NTU) 0 0 00 Influent Turbidity (NTU) Figure 9.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Turbidity at Retention Pond BMPs 39

9.2 Total Suspended Solids Table 9.2: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Retention Pond BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 605 605 Number of Non-detects 5 25 Number of Studies 41 40 Min, Max 0.0, 1760 0.0, 306 Mean 133 24.6 (95% conf. interval) (116, 151) (21.9, 27.7) Std. Dev. 216 36.1 Skewness 3.92 3.23 Median 60.0 12.0 (95% conf. interval) (49.0, 70.0) (.0, 12.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 18.0, 148 5.0, 28.0 Number of data pairs 487 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 40

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 9.3: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Retention Pond BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 9.4: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Retention Pond BMPs 41

9.3 Total Dissolved Solids Table 9.3: Summary of Total Dissolved Solids at Retention Pond BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 1 93 Number of Non-detects 0 0 Number of Studies 9 9 Min, Max 6.0, 10 2.0, 1900 Mean 138 313 (95% conf. interval) (115, 169) (233, 409) Std. Dev. 136 434 Skewness 4.02 2.38 Median 4 167 (95% conf. interval) (79.0, 124) (130, 181) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 6, 170 65.0, 365 Number of data pairs 91 Wilcoxon p-value 0.00283 Mann-Whitney p-value 0.00979 42

Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 9.5: Box and Probability Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Retention Pond BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) Figure 9.6: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Dissolved Solids at Retention Pond BMPs 43

Wetland Basin.1 Total Suspended Solids Table.1: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Wetland Basin BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 303 295 Number of Non-detects 1 11 Number of Studies 15 16 Min, Max 0.0, 1260 0.0, 731 Mean 49.3 19.4 (95% conf. interval) (41.1, 61.8) (14.5, 27.1) Std. Dev. 90.0 53.7 Skewness 8.45 9.42 Median 20.0 8.0 (95% conf. interval) (16.0, 26.0) (6.0, 9.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 9.0, 59.0 2.0, 18.0 Number of data pairs 228 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 44

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure.1: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Wetland Basin BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Wetland Basin BMPs 45

11 Wetland Channel 11.1 Total Suspended Solids Table 11.1: Summary of Total Suspended Solids at Wetland Channel BMPs Statistic Inlet Outlet Count 91 88 Number of Non-detects 0 0 Number of Studies 5 5 Min, Max 2.0, 437, 2450 Mean 71.7 88.3 (95% conf. interval) (55.9, 9) (30.7, 189) Std. Dev. 85.1 360 Skewness 2.03 6.09 Median 3 14.0 (95% conf. interval) (22.0, 42.0) (8.0, 16.0) 25 th, 75 th percentiles 17.0, 98.0 6.0, 34.0 Number of data pairs 81 Wilcoxon p-value <0.001 Mann-Whitney p-value <0.001 46

Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 000 00 0 000 00 0 1 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 9599 Non-Exceedance Probability (%) Figure 11.1: Box and Probability Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Wetland Channel BMPs 000 Data 1:1 line Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 00 0 0 00 000 Influent Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) Figure 11.2: Influent vs. Effluent Plots of Total Suspended Solids at Wetland Channel BMPs 47