Bus Service RFI Routes Overview on Process

Similar documents
Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

The RIDE Access Center (TRAC) Update June 26, 2017

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

Bus Maintenance Strategy Update

Brooke Fossey, Transportation Planner

AUTOMATED DATA COLLECTION TECHNIQUES

2017 Employee Attendance Strategic Plan FMCB January 30, 2017

SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: police direct traffic as pedestrians, cars and streetcars pass by long ago; Muni centennial logo.

CTA Transit Operations & Technology Management Divisions

GM Remarks 3/27/2017

Miami-Dade Transit. Alice N. Bravo, P.E. Director. Miami-Dade Transit 1

Commuter Rail: Best Practices and Revenue Growth Proposal. March 6, 2017

Use of ITS Data in Transit Planning and Management at Metro Transit (Minneapolis / Saint Paul) John Levin Director of Strategic Initiatives

On Time Performance. PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sept 24, Presented by Kenneth Mc Donald - COO Sonali Bose - CFO

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

LYNX Flexible Services

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

9 Before and After Study Plan

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Nevin Grinnell Marketing January 10, 2012

Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis. NH Capitol Corridor. Public Scoping Meeting. March 5, 2014

State-Mandated Performance Audit

The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA)

Frequently Asked Questions on Metro s MicroTransit Pilot (MTP)

Cleveland HealthLine Bus Rapid Transit

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

6. 3. Transit Smart Fare System. Attachment 1

Assistant Director of Transportation

MBTA Parking Updates FMCB Presentation May 16, 2016

Why a Public-Private Partnership might be used to deliver passenger rail

TRANSIT SERVICES Business Plan

Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration

2018 Fare Change Proposal

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Fuel Crisis Contingency Plan Update. Staff Report

Guidebook: Managing Operating Costs for Rural and Small Urban Public Transit Systems

Transportation Asset Management Applications in Transit & Rail Organizations Part I

BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Prepared by TransPro Consulting July

Subject 2015 MiWay Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Recommendation

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

Lethbridge Transit Master Plan. Final Report Presentation July 17, 2017

Climate Change Resiliency Program

Caltrain Fare Study Update

Transit, Intercity Bus, Taxi 8-1

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Setting up a five agency Electronic Fare Management (EFM) system in the Florida Suncoast region

Vital Signs Scorecard of Operational Performance KPIs

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Calgary Transit Funding and Fare Strategy Calgary Transit 2011 June

California State Rail Plan. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission November 2, 2017

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (20)

Vital Signs Scorecard

GO RAIL NIAGARA SERVICE EXTENSION

Tahoe Area Regional Transit

Policy on LEED Certification

DC Circulator Fare Adjustment Plan. April 2018

REPORT RAPPORT REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF OTTAWA CARLETON MUNICIPALITÉ RÉGIONALE D OTTAWA CARLETON. Our File/N/Réf Your File/V/Réf.

Transportation Economics and Decision Making. L e c t u r e - 8

EASTLAKE WOODLANDS CONTROLLED ACCESS PATROL POST ORDERS

ITS in a Paratransit Taxi System: Building in Taxi Equipment Options and Increasing Monitoring and Cost Controls

Vital Signs Report. A Scorecard of Metro s Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Chief Performance Officer

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

AUGUST 8, 2012 FINAL AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS AND OTHER MATTERS

Transportation Report to SPC on Transportation and Transit 2017 March 15. ISC: UNRESTRICTED TT Page 1 of 7 ROUTEAHEAD UPDATE

BRIEF OBSERVATION OF TRANSANTIAGO DE CHILE

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

Appendix F: Fare Policy Recommendations

Re-Engineering Call Handling and Customer Complaint Processing

Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FY17-R-002

ITCS and Passenger Information System for Dubai

METRO SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee February 16, 2006

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Introduction to Transportation Systems

VRE AT WORK PREPARING VIRGINIA RAILROADING FOR ITS NEXT QUARTER CENTURY

Public Transit Bus Operator Full-time Springfield Area Transit Company. Submitting your Cover Letter and Resume

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

METRO MANAGEMENT RESPONSES TO FISCAL 2005 FISCAL 2008 STATE REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

2018 transit accessibility plan DRAFT

Greater Roanoke Transit Company d/b/a Valley Metro 1108 Campbell Avenue S.E., Roanoke, Virginia 24013

Report of the Metro Mobility Task Force

Maryland Transit Administration s Strategy: Applying Multimodal Methods to Transportation Infrastructure Maintenance

2016 Kelowna Regional Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Project Update

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: 2016 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION STUDY

TTC AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT NO.

CHAPTER 1 COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION BASIC INFORMATION

Department of System-Wide Accessibility (SWA)

CHAPTER IV REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT PROVIDERS

Task 5: Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

Camden County Travel Management Coordination Center Demonstration Project NJ

Transit Marketing Study

Transcription:

Bus Service RFI Routes Overview on Process 8/14/2015 1

Goals of the exercise Expand service by leveraging third parties to provide service on low ridership routes and redeploying buses and operators to higher ridership routes Use contracting flexibility to test public / private partnership on selected routes Analyze marginal operating costs for each of the selected routes and net financial impact to the system when those routes are operated by third parties Generate savings by avoiding marginal costs on low ridership routes and reducing overall bus system-wide cost per trip 2

What are the characteristics of the selected routes? Total Ridership: The selected routes cover less than 2.5% of total MBTA bus weekly rides Moderate Ridership Routes: Express Bus Routes : Late Night Service: Total Routes Selected: 1.42% of total weekly rides 0.94% of total weekly rides 0.06% of total weekly rides Less than 2.5% of weekly rides Average Riders per Trip: Selected routes have ridership well below the system average Average Riders per Trip (weekday) 40 30 31.1 20 17.0 14.4 10 10.1 0 MBTA Systemwide Express Routes Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Moderate Use Routes Late Night Service 3

Costs included in the bus service marginal operating cost model Bus Operations Labor Bus operators Inspectors / Bus Supervisors Garage Superintendent Dispatchers Bus Instructors Maintenance Labor Car Cleaners / Automotive Forepersons Auto Maintenance Forepersons Fuelers / Machinists Maintenance Supervisors Other Vehicle Depreciation / Mid-Life Overhaul costs Materials/Services Uniforms /Vehicles Cleaning Diesel fuel Not included: Facility depreciation Administration/Management Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Marginal Operating Cost Model (No Fixed Costs Included in the Model) 4

Annual revenue and marginal cost for selected bus routes Annual Revenue / Marginal Cost $5.0M $4.5M Total Cost: $16.7M Total Rev: $6.4M 0.0 $1.9M Annual Revenue $0.1M -5.0 Annual Marginal Cost -$1.7M -$6.0M -10.0 -$8.9M Moderate Ridership Routes Express Routes Late Night Bus Service Average Fare Fare Recovery % $0.93 $3.56 $0.93 21% 75% 4% Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Marginal Operating Cost Model (No Fixed Costs Included in the Model) 5

Total annual net subsidy (marginal operating loss) for selected routes Annual Subsidy $0.0M -2.5-5.0-7.5 -$7.0M -$1.6M -10.0 -$1.7M -$10.3M -12.5 Moderate Use Routes Express Routes Late Night Bus Service Total Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Marginal Operating Cost Model (No Fixed Costs Included in the Model) 6

Net marginal cost per trip varies widely across the three categories Net Marginal Cost per Trip $30.00 20.00 $20.01 10.00 0.00 $3.51 Net Marginal Cost per Trip Moderate Ridership Routes $1.19 Express Routes Late Night Bus Service Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Net Marginal Cost per Trip is the Calculated by Netting Marginal Cost against Revenue divided by total trips 7

Cost per trip for selected bus routes is 3x the system-wide average Net Marginal Cost per Trip $4.00 3.00 $3.01 2.00 1.00 Net Marginal Cost per Trip $0.98 0.00 Selected Routes Average MBTA Systemwide Average Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Net Marginal Cost per Trip is the Calculated by Netting Marginal Cost against Revenue divided by total trips 8

Partnership with third party operators should reduce system-wide cost per trip Illustrative to show full potential savings Marginal Cost per Trip $1.00 $0.98 -$0.05 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 $0.93 Key chart assumption: Third party providers provision selected routes at no cost to the MBTA If third-party providers require a subsidy, this analysis will change RFI process is designed to test this assumption 0.00 Current systemwide average Savings from selected routes Future state average Any partnership with third party operators that reduces the annual subsidy below $10M will generate system-wide cost per trip cost savings Source: MBTA Internal Data Service Planning Team Marginal Operating Cost Model (No Fixed Costs Included in the Model) 9

Overview on the RFI process and strategy Structure of RFI RFI will gather information from potential partners on best-practice ideas for improving bus operations through provisioning of bus operations by third parties Respondents are encouraged to assume the current fare structure will be kept in place, but the MBTA welcomes submission of information on different approaches to fare-collection, pricing and/or gain share. If respondent proposes a different fare structure, it would need to undergo staff and FMCB review Timing / Process Goal will be publish the RFI within the next two weeks Management is planning a vendor conference here at MassDOT when respondents can ask questions and discuss ideas We also plan to interview one or more potential responders after RFI receipt and evaluation RFP process would occur after vendor conference, interviews and FMCB debrief Source: MBTA Internal Data 10