Using Thermal Modeling to Evaluate Cladding Support Systems

Similar documents
Is Your Envelope Effective? BCBEC Luncheon January 29, 2009

The Role of Control Layers in Building Enclosure Design

Insulating Exterior Assemblies : Batt, Blown / Spray, Board and Beyond

Reduce Wall Condensation Potential with Insulated Sheathing TECH SOLUTIONS 214.0

PH-CALCULATION Dynamic simulation with WUFI

Best Practice Recommendations for Wall Retrofit on the Two-Story Flexible Research Platform (FRP) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).

Thermal Bridging in Residential Construction

Thermal Performance of Nvelope NV1 Clip System

Building Enclosure Details and Assemblies for Wood-Frame Buildings

See how to use WUFI in conjunction with ASHRAE s New Standard 160, Design Criteria for Moisture Control in Buildings.

ELEVATION FOR DETAIL REFERENCE ONLY

See how to use WUFI in conjunction with ASHRAE s New Standard 160, Design Criteria for Moisture Control in Buildings.

A Study on the Evaluation of the Heat Transmission Performance and Improvement of Thermal Insulation of Stone Finished Curtain Wall System

Energy Efficiency: Designing Wood-Frame Buildings for Occupant Comfort

Energy equivalent R-value

Thermal Performance of Nvelope NV1 Clip System

ELEVATION FOR DETAIL REFERENCE ONLY

ELEVATION FOR DETAIL REFERENCE ONLY

Building America Special Research Project: High-R Walls Case Study Analysis

Sealing the Envelope with SPF Insulation

The Role of Control Layers in Building Enclosure Design

Gold Bond BRAND Gypsum Sheathing

Reconsidering the Approach towards Determining Overall Building Enclosure Thermal Performance for Code Compliance

Building Science Fundamentals Thermal Control: Insulation & Thermal Bridges May 29-30, Straube buildingscience.com 1 of 24

Johns Manville MinWool Water & Fire Block Mineral Wool Insulation

Dryvit Systems and Green / Sustainable Design

When R-Value Doesn t Measure Up

Why Control Heat flow? How to Control Heat Flow? Thermal Performance. Modes of heat transfer: Thermal Control: Insulation & Thermal Bridges

Experimental Assessment of Hygrothermal Performance of Wood Frame Wall System in Suzhou's Lake Tai Climate Zone

ELEVATION FOR DETAIL REFERENCE ONLY

ELEVATION FOR DETAIL REFERENCE ONLY

UL Design System HW-D-1012 continued

2013 COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS

Incorporating Insulating Sheathing into the Design of the Thermal and Moisture Management System of the Building Enclosure

Local Temperature Measurements on Full-Size Systems in the Laboratory: Insight into the Extent of Thermal Bridges in Building Envelope Components

Building Enclosure Performance for Existing and New Buildings

Insulation Retrofit Options

COLD CLIMATE HOUSING RESEARCH CENTER CCHRC. Whole Wall R-Values

Energy Conservation & Building Envelope. Objectives. Introduction. Determine the Building Envelope of a House Calculate Heat Loss of a Building

MOISTURE ACCUMULATION IN WALLS: COMPARISON OF FIELD AND COMPUTER-PREDICTED DATA

Thermal bridges heat flow models with Heat2, Heat3, and a general purpose 3-D solver

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: COMPOSITE WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER: FUNDERMAX GMBH

Balancing the Control of Heat, Air, Moisture, and Competing Interests

InSoFast Outperforms R-13 Fiberglass

Condensation The Real Story. Dan Tempas Sr. Scientist

Continuous Insulation Systems for Exterior Walls

Parapet Wall Design Brian Erickson, P.E., RRC Ryan Krug - 8:30 am 10:00 am

Wood-Frame wall Assemblies

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: COMPOSITE WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER: PARKLEX USA

ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES IN VARIOUS CLIMATES

Impact of Insulated Concrete Curb on Concrete Balcony Slab

Energy Efficient Buildings in Germany An Introduction

Carpenter Level 2 Rev. September 2017

Introducing TJ Insulated Structural Framing Components

Cladding Attachment Solutions for Exterior Insulated Commercial Walls

Meeting Residential Energy. Construction. Copyright Materials. Loren Ross, P.E. Manager, Engineering Research American Wood Council

EIFS The cladding with the lowest carbon footprint

Parex Continuous Insulation (CI)

Understanding the National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings, 2011

Interpretation Variables and Common Areas of Confusion. Of the 2009 IECC

NCAT. Energy Code Evolution

Thermal Bridging in Building Thermal Envelope Assemblies: Repetitive Metal Penetrations

MOISTURE CONDITIONS IN WALLS AND CEILINGS OF A SIMULATED OLDER HOME DURING WINTER

Zack LeRoy Panel Pros Inc., Keene, NH (800)

INSULATION RETROFIT DESIGN ENERGY SOLUTIONS CENTRE YUKON GOVERNMENT

En e r g y Ef f i c i e n c y, Co n t i n u o u s In s u l at i o n a n d Ou t s u l at i o n Sy s t e m s

INSTALLING WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERS & FLASHING

INTRODUCTION TO WUFI PASSIVE & PHIUS+ 2015

Integrated Air & Water Barrier Systems

KNIGHT WALL SYSTEMS GUIDE DETAILS:

Integrated Wall Retrofit Solutions for Existing Masonry Construction for Commercial Buildings

PART 1 BUILDING ENVELOPE THERMAL ANALYSIS (BETA) GUIDE

ENERGY PERFORMANCE R-VALUE: PART 2, EXAMPLES OF INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATION OF ENERGY EQUIVALENT R-VALUE FOR BUILDING ENCLOSURES;

Proceedings Cold Climate HVAC Sisimiut, Greenland, March 2009

Figures 1A-1C Light frame and mass wall systems with continuous insulation for codecompliant. commercial building construction.

MEETING THE DEMAND FOR HIGH-EFFICIENCY FAÇADES

Adapted vapour control for durable building enclosures

How do you install yours?

TECH SOLUTIONS Hot Box Testing of Four Different Metal Building Roof Assemblies Determines Insulation Efficiency

Flood and Hurricane Resistant Buildings by Joseph Lstiburek

2006 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE

KNIGHT WALL SYSTEMS GUIDE DETAILS:

Airspace R-Values. Educational Overview. Revised 12/6/2016

California Building Envelope Solutions

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: FIBER CEMENT SIDING REPORT HOLDER: RIEDER FASERBETON ELEMENTE GmbH

A New Insulation Solution

THERMAL DESIGN GUIDE FOR EXTERIOR WALLS PUBLICATION RG-9405 JANUARY 1995

Insight. The Hollow Building. By Joseph W. Lstiburek, Ph.D., P.Eng., Fellow ASHRAE

DuPont RainVent Batten Installation Guidelines

Insulation Technologies and Installation Specifications for Better Energy Performance of Commercial Buildings

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: FIBER-CEMENT SIDING REPORT HOLDER: EQUITONE

Mid-Rise Wood Construction Solutions Guide

Energy Efficiency, Continuous Insulation and Outsulation Systems

CommercialComplete WALL SYSTEMS. Visit Division7.owensCorning.com to view our new Division 7 thermal & moisture protection ebook!

CSI Boston Technical Paper No. 1: Specifying Air Barriers Air Barriers

RainBarrier Installation Guide

How to Meet Code and Manage Moisture in an Environment of Increasing Air Tightness Requirements. Ted Winslow

Rainscreen Gaps in Exterior Walls

Design of Mineral Fibre Durability Test Based on Hygrothermal Loads in Flat Roofs.

Transcription:

Evaluate Cladding Jonathan Baron, AIA BEC Boston February 25, 2013

BEC Thermal Bridging Series January available products Knight Wall Systems Cladding Corp. Exo tec February evaluating products March reducing structural thermal bridges (balconies, steel, etc.)

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George Box

Agenda: Continuous Cladding vs. Cladding Brackets Options for Non continuous Cladding Support Modeling THERM vs. WUFI Modeling Absolute vs. Relative Values Sample Problem (Residential Wall) Case Study evaluating the performance of a bracket system compared to continuous zees The Problem Approach Process Analysis Results

Reducing energy consumption requires tighter building envelopes and increased insulation.

Reducing energy consumption requires tighter building envelopes and increased insulation. Efficacy of increased insulation is often compromised due to thermal bridging of studs and cladding support.

Reducing energy consumption requires tighter building envelopes and increased insulation. Efficacy of increased insulation is often compromised due to thermal bridging of studs and cladding support. Standard practice of continuous cladding support does not meet building codes.

Reducing energy consumption requires tighter building envelopes and increased insulation. Efficacy of increased insulation is often compromised due to thermal bridging of studs and cladding support. Standard practice of continuous cladding support does not meet building codes. Performance loss due to thermal bridging is substantial, but HOW MUCH.

Reducing energy consumption requires tighter building envelopes and increased insulation. Efficacy of increased insulation is often compromised due to thermal bridging of studs and cladding support. Standard practice of continuous cladding support does not meet building codes. Performance loss due to thermal bridging is substantial, but HOW MUCH. How to effectively design better performing walls.

Options available for reduced thermal bridging: Residential Vertical Furring Strips on Exterior Insulation

Options available for reduced thermal bridging: Residential Vertical Furring Strips on Exterior Insulation Commercial Non continuous Brackets (BEC January)

Options available for reduced thermal bridging: Residential Vertical Furring Strips on Exterior Insulation Commercial Non continuous Brackets (BEC January) How to evaluate and justify use of nonstandard construction

Thermal Modeling: THERM vs. WUFI

Thermal Modeling: THERM vs. WUFI THERM is a state of the art, Microsoft Windows based computer program developed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) for use by building component manufacturers, engineers, educators, students, architects, and others interested in heat transfer. Using THERM, you can model two dimensional heat transfer effects in building components such as windows, walls, foundations, roofs, and doors; appliances; and other products where thermal bridges are of concern. THERM's heat transfer analysis allows you to evaluate a product s energy efficiency and local temperature patterns, which may relate directly to problems with condensation, moisture damage, and structural integrity. WUFI Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)/Fraunhofer IBP is a menu driven PC program which allows realistic calculation of the transient coupled one dimensional heat and moisture transport in multi layer building components exposed to natural weather. It is based on the newest findings regarding vapor diffusion and liquid transport in building materials and has been validated by detailed comparison with measurements obtained in the laboratory and on outdoor testing fields.

Thermal Modeling: THERM vs. WUFI Heat transfer through building components Heat and moisture tranport in multi layer building components

Thermal Modeling: THERM vs. WUFI Heat Flow Thermal Two dimensional (slice) Through a geometric assembly of materials of different properties Static Output Model through a detail Heat and Moisture Flow Hygrothermal One dimensional (slice) Through a layered assembly of materials of different properties Dynamic Output Model through an opaque wall

Thermal Modeling: THERM vs. WUFI Good for studying thermal bridges Not good for studying moisture and mold potential Not good for studying thermal bridges Good for studying moisture and mold potential

Thermal Modeling: Relative value as opposed to absolute value Relative this detail should allow less heat flow than that one. Minimal effort (few hours) Moderate value of data (larger factor of error) Moderate understanding of building science required Absolute based on given external and internal temperatures and humidities, we can expect condensation to happen at this point in the assembly. Extreme effort (days or weeks) Precise data (smaller factor of error) Expert understanding of building science required

Thermal Modeling: Relative value as opposed to absolute value Value Effort

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall Siding Building Felt Sheathing Batt Insulation GWB

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall Siding Building Felt Sheathing Batt Insulation GWB

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall Siding Building Felt Sheathing Batt Insulation GWB U Factor 0.0686 U=1/R R Value 14.5

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall U Factor 0.0747 U=1/R R Value 14.5 13.4

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall Framing Factor 25%

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall Framing Factor 25% U Factor 0.0851 U=1/R R Value 14.5 13.4 11.8 19% reduction

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall

Thermal Modeling: Sample Case Residential Wall

Thermal Modeling: Metal Studs

Thermal Modeling: Metal Studs Nominal Value 14.5 R Value 6.8 53% reduction

The base case (from exterior to interior: The test case Cladding Cladding Vertical hat channels Vertical hat channels 2 or 4 insulation coplanar with 2 or 4 insulation coplanar with Continuous Zees Brackets @ 32 o.c. v. / 30 o.c. h. and continuous angle Air barrier Air Barrier 1/2 Sheathing 1/2 Sheathing 6 metal studs coplanar with or without 6 metal studs coplanar with or without 6 batt insulation 6 batt insulation 5/8 Gypsum Board 5/8 Gypsum Board Brackets based on Cladding Corp. F2.10

The base case (from exterior to interior: The test case

Brackets based on Cladding Corp. F2.10

How to craft the problem for study using thermal modeling Therm allows a 2D slice Wall is a 3D assembly Solution: Create two models, one exterior (vertical) and one interior (horizontal)

How to craft the problem for study using thermal modeling Using Thermal Modeling to

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Run model

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Run model

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Run model

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Run model

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Run model

Model Process: Adiabatic Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) Exterior CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Adiabatic Interior Run model Adiabatic: occurring without gain or loss of heat.

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Interior Run model

Model Process: Draw Geometry Determine representative samples (model length) CAD linework (.dxf v.12) Import as an underlay Trace geometries Assign materials (use ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals for non default materials) Set boundary conditions (Exterior, Interior, Adiabatic) To gain U value data, set boundary condition as a U factor surface Run model

Model Process: Model each condition Base case (zees) Test case (bracket at bracket) Test case (bracket at field) Perform for 2 XPS, 2 MW, 4 XPS, 4 MW

Model Process: Model each condition Base case (zees) Test case (bracket at bracket) Test case (bracket at field) Perform for 2 XPS, 2 MW, 4 XPS, 4 MW

Model Process: Model each condition Base case (zees) Test case (bracket at bracket) Test case (bracket at field) Perform for 2 XPS, 2 MW, 4 XPS, 4 MW

Model Process: Model each condition Base case (zees) Test case (bracket at bracket) Test case (bracket at field) Perform for 2 XPS, 2 MW, 4 XPS, 4 MW

Model Process: Model each condition Base case (zees) Test case (bracket at bracket) Test case (bracket at field) Perform for 2 XPS, 2 MW, 4 XPS, 4 MW

Model Process: Model each condition Base case (zees) Test case (bracket at bracket) Test case (bracket at field) Perform for 2 XPS, 2 MW, 4 XPS, 4 MW

Data Analysis: Average the data as necessary 32 28 4

Data Analysis: Average the data as necessary Add exterior model results to interior model

Results: The base case (from exterior to interior: The test case No batt Nom. R = 14.7 Modeled = 14.1 4% reduction No batt Nom. R = 14.7 Modeled = 10.0 30% reduction

Results: The base case (from exterior to interior: The test case With batt Nom. R = 33.7 Modeled = 19.8 With batt Nom. R = 33.7 Modeled = 15.7

Results: Using Thermal Modeling to No Batt in Batt in Stud Cavity Cavity R Values R Values 2" XPS Nominal Value 14.67 33.67 Modeled Value with Cont. Z @ 24" o.c. 10.02 15.72 Mod. Value w/ Brackets 30" o.c. x 32" o.c. 14.11 19.80 4" XPS Nominal Value 23.29 42.29 Modeled Value with Cont. Z @ 24" o.c. 10.33 16.77 Mod. Value w/ Brackets 30" o.c. x 32" o.c. 22.62 29.06 2" Mineral Wool Nominal Value 13.03 32.03 Modeled Value with Cont. Z @ 24" o.c. 9.07 15.51 Mod. Value with Brackets 30" o.c. x 32" o.c. 12.14 18.58 4" Mineral Wool Nominal Value 19.99 38.99 Modeled Value with Cont. Z @ 24" o.c. 10.05 16.49 Mod. Value with Brackets 30" o.c. x 32" o.c. 18.34 24.78

Why is this important? Using Thermal Modeling to

Conclusions: Reducing bridges results in reduced heat flow. Architects can and should model bridges to accurately predict assembly performance. The bigger the bridge, the greater the heatloss. Understand relative value of models rather than absolute. Better predictions should be factored into HVAC design. Smaller HVAC systems = energy savings. "Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George Box

Resources: THERM Google THERM and LBNL. http://windows.lbl.gov/software/therm/therm.html for the free download http://windows.lbl.gov/software/therm/6/therm63_docs.htm for manual http://windows.lbl.gov/software/therm/tutorials.html for tutorials WUFI Google WUFI and ORNL http://www.ornl.gov/sci/ees/etsd/btric/wufi/software.shtml for download BETEC LinkedIn Group: http://tinyurl.com/betecgroup Discussion BEC Boston LinkedIn Group: http://tinyurl.com/bec boston