2016 Mid-Continent Research Symposium Session 4-C Safety - Innovations in the Use of Data to Enhance Law Enforcement Activities Randy Romanski WisDOT Bureau of Transportation Safety Steven T. Parker UW-Madison Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Lab October 24, 2016 - Madison, Wisconsin
Outline History: Crash Data Past, Near past, Present and Future Engineering Elements Data Quality Audit Crash Data Work Group Broader Look National Perspective Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC) and Crash Data Improvement Program (CDIP) Crash Database Objectives MMUCC Mapping process and went beyond MMUCC 4 DT4000 Crash Form WisDOT Crash Database, Resolve System and WebServices System Modernization Crash Data - Applications & Process Improvements TSC - Community Maps Impacts to Law Enforcement Alternate Workflows Crash Database - Future 2
Crash Data - Past According to the CDIPG, one refrain commonly heard from police is that crash forms are being completed just for insurance companies Paper crash report backlogs in Texas. (GAO-10-454) WisDOT MV4000 Instruction Manual Primary training resource for WI officers Last updated in 1998 Brief and vague concerning engineering fields No baseline definition of when to flag hills or curves Poor definition of traffic barrier No discussion of roundabouts 3
Engineering Elements Data Quality Audit Low accuracy for access control at partially controlled facilities indicates a lack of understanding for what qualifies as partial control When hills or curves are present on at least one approach, when should they be marked? Low traffic-way accuracy is a result of misunderstanding what constitute divided roadways and barriers Roundabout-specific inaccuracies were especially noteworthy in the horizontal curve and traffic-way fields 4
Crash Data - Near Past Crash Elements and Attributes 2012 Brown County Sheriff, La Crosse County Sheriff, City of Madison, City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin State Patrol Oneida Tribal Police, and Analysts. 5
Crash Data Work Group DMV DSP DTIM DTSD DBM TOPS Lab 6
Crash Data - Present Help Screens TraCS has built-in help screens that can be accessed for a data field by pressing the <F2> key. Help is available for each of the forms in the suite. The Help button on the toolbar brings up information about the TraCS software, in general. 7
Broader Look Working towards a change in PDO threshold Old Form to New Form (MV to DT) New Crash Form DT4000, Driver Report Form DT4002 and Fatal Supplement DT3480 100% Electronics by Jan 1, 2017, no more paper forms Amendments are easier BOTS provides funding to agencies to go electronic We have travelled across the state and trained 800+ Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) thus far Outreach Through different conferences (Wisconsin Chief s Association, Governor s conference, Tribal Conference, TraCS Conference) Monthly Newsletter and Quarterly Traffic Safety Reporter Newsletter reaches 6K emails If you have any question or need any help, please contact us at crash.database@dot.wi.gov 8
National Perspective: Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC) FAST Act MMUCC 4 110 Crash Data Elements 77 Collected From Scene 10 Derived 23 Linked 4 Categories Crash Data Elements Vehicle Data Elements Person Data Elements Roadway Elements FAST Act Safety Performance Measures 9
National Perspective: Crash Data Improvement Program (CDIP) The Performance Six Pack Timeliness Accuracy Completeness Consistency Accessibility Integration Traffic Safety Information Systems 10
Crash Database - Objectives Streamline Crash Data Processing Modernize the Data Management System Improve Crash Data Quality MMUCC / MIRE Take Full Advantage of the TraCS Location Dialogue Box (TLT) Enhance Crash Data Access and Interoperability Support More Frequent Updates to the Crash Form Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition TraCS Web Services Web Based Resolve System 11
MMUCC Mapping Process NHTSA and the GHSA have put out literature on how to map MMUCC compatibility, as well as an excel spreadsheet tool to make the process easier. This tool is divided into each of the 4 element types, and lists each MMUCC element with its corresponding attributes. Next to each attribute is a box to input a 1 if the attribute maps, or a 0 if it does not. 12
MMUCC Mapping Process To get the final compatibility, each element is weighted the same for a category (crash, vehicle, etc.). For example, C1-Case Identifier is weighed just as much as C2-Crash Classification, even though C1 only has 1 attribute in it and C2 has 5. If an element attribute does map, next to that box is a field to put the corresponding attribute that maps from the state s crash report. This process is repeated for each of the 110 data elements in MMUCC (collected, linked, and derived). 13
MMUCC Mapping Process The tool has a sheet that displays the results, breaking them into 3 categories: ALL 110 elements Elements collected at the scene Linked or Derived elements The updated WI MMUCC compatibility: 14 14
Went Beyond MMUCC 4 Secondary Crashes Incident Management Motorcycle Non Motorists Citations for All Persons Truck/Bus/Hazmat 15
DT4000 Crash Form 16
DT4000, DT4002, DT3480 Crash Database (Oracle) Crash Report Image Files TraCS Web Services Web Based Resolve System Linkages to WisDOT DMV Systems Data Extracts and External Interfaces Linkages to Other Datasets 17
Data Dictionary System Architecture Server Infrastructure 18
TraCS - DT4000, DT3480 Driver Report - DT4002 Driver Record, WIN, TIME Future: National FARS, FMCSA 19
Web Based Multiple Roles CRU FARS DMV FMCSA Risk Management Version History Enhanced Editing & Validation Enhanced Reporting 20
Crash Data - Applications & Process Improvements Tribal Roads Crash Mapping Work Zone Safety Safety Screening Analysis (SSA) 21
22
TraCS Form Transmission Process Automate Up Front Validation Steps Requirement for Electronic Reporting Maintain Communication & Feedback During Resolve Processing TIME, Wisconsin.Gov Access Unchanged Changes to Data Extracts, WisTransPortal Weed out fields that had become obsolete and identify others that were not being collected (i.e. roundabouts or cell phone use) Form is more intuitive and that there is a great savings at both the state and local level by gathering correct and accurate data Easily describe what happened (i.e., cell phone usage, roundabouts, cross median crashes) 23
Collaboration with U Alabama / CAPS Validation Workflow Automation Management 24
Improve Crash Mapping and Analysis Capabilities Include Photos & Attachments to the Crash Report Linkages to Federal Systems (FARS, FMCSA) Linkages to External Data (EMS, Roadway) Include Additional TraCS Forms Research and Innovation To enable analysis and decision making through downstream applications 25
Thank You! Randy Romanksi Randy.Romanski@dot.wi.gov Steven T. Parker sparker@engr.wisc.edu 26