Current Report. Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: CR

Similar documents
Current Report. Oklahoma Farm and Ranch Custom Rates, CR-205

Current Report. Oklahoma Farm and Ranch Custom Rates, CR-205

Crop Leases in River Valley District 2016 Survey Data from Clay, Cloud, Washington, and Republic Counties

2017 LEASE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District LINCOLN County

How Will Farmers Respond to High Fuel and Fertilizer Prices?

2017 Trends in Nebraska Farmland Markets: Declining Agricultural Land Values and Rental Rates

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

2017 LEASE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District OSBORNE County

Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing

2015 LEASE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District OSBORNE County

2012 Enterprise Budget for Establishing and Producing Irrigated Alfalfa in the Washington Columbia Basin

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

Table 1: Table 2: Total Responses. Per Pair

2017 Agricultural Land Valuation Study

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, soybeans,

Agricultural Productivity Valuation

Baseline Update for U.S. Farm Income and Government Outlays

The data for this report were collected by Iowa Farm Business Association consultants and compiled by Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.

PROJECTING CASH FLOWS ON DAIRY FARMS

Pershing County Alfalfa Hay Establishment, Production Costs and Returns, 2006

2017 Alfalfa Enterprise Budget

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

1998 Missouri Crop Costs and 2000 Crop Cost of Production Estimates

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2002

Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2003

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms - Case Studies of Texas High Plain Agriculture. Diana Jones Dustin Gaskins Jay Yates

Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2006

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, soybeans, Ag Decision Maker

Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management

December 2012 SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE LAND LEASE SURVEY

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Kansas Custom Rates 2016

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, soybeans,

CRP EVALUATING THE OPTIONS CROP HAY GRAZE SELL RENT RECREATION LEASE

South Dakota Agricultural Land Market Trends The 2012 SDSU South Dakota Farm Real Estate Survey. Dr. Larry Janssen and Dr.

FACTSheet. Custom Work Charges in Maryland 2015

Michael E. Salassi and Michael A. Deliberto 1

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Bermudagrass is a valuable forage for many livestock

Land Values of Kansas Cropland and Pasture

Economic Comparison of SDI and Center Pivots for Various Field Sizes

Enterprise Budget. Sweet Corn, Willamette Valley Region. EM 8376, Revised August 1995

Precision Farming and Land Leasing Practices

OPERATING INPUTS Units Price Quantity $/Acre Wheat Seed Bu./acre $ $ Custom Harvest Acre $ -

Extension. Establishing a Fair Pasture Rental Rate

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Master Cattleman Quarterly

RETUR COSTS A 8 R R. and 96 LI6R R

South Dakota Farmland Market Trends

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2008

Enterprise Budget. EM 8849 January 2004

Enterprise Budget. Annual Ryegrass, Conventional Tillage, Volunteer Seeding and No-Till, Willamette Valley Region

INVESTING IN NEW VARIETIES OF ALFALFA: DOES IT PAY?

2011 Cost of Producing Peppermint under Rill and Center-Pivot Irrigation in Washington State

Mississippi Agricultural Land Values Sales Report: 2015

Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE

Producer Decisions Under the 2014 Farm Bill: Program Yield Update Decisions

The recent boom in ethanol

2016 Iowa Farm. Custom Rate Survey File A3-10 Many Iowa farmers hire custom machine work. Ag Decision Maker. Average Charge. Median Charge Range

Enterprise Budget. Meadowfoam Seed, Willamette Valley Region, Page 1

Business Planning and Economics of Forage Establishment and Cost of Production in Nova Scotia

The cash rental rate information presented

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Land Values and Cash Rents

FEATURING Land, Rent, Custom Rate Surveys Legal Considerations Worksheets Historical Data Written Forms Glossary Resources

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

ARC / PLC Program Overview

The cash rental rate information presented

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

2016 North Idaho Forage & Grazing School: Economics of Grazing Cover Crops

CONTRACT FEED PRODUCTION ARRANGEMENTS

This report summarizes estimated costs of improving

Impact of the 2012 Drought on Field Crops and Cattle Production in Arkansas Preliminary Report

Land Use Value Appraisal: Calculating Landlord Net Income. Leah J. Tsoodle Agricultural Land Use Survey Center. For

2010 Growing Season - Harvey County, Kansas Land Cover Summary

Kansas Agricultural Land Values

2008 Sunflower Performance Tests

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010

Conservation Tillage in Oklahoma: Perceptions and Demographics of Producers

Custom Machinery Rates Applicable to Kentucky (2010)

MCLENNAN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL LAND QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES (JANUARY 1, 2005)

Total PRODUCTION Units Price Quantity $/Acre Pecans Lbs. $ $ 1, Other Income Acre $ - Total Receipts $ 1,160.00

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

Advanced Crop Science, IV-23

Iowa Farm Outlook. June 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Regional Hay-Pasture Situation and Outlook. Percent of National All Hay Stocks

Facts About Texas and U.S. Agriculture

The Impacts of Increasing Fuel Costs on Nevada s Agricultural Enterprises

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Trends in U.S. Tobacco Farming

With rising energy costs, input costs and

Roundaway Plantation

Iowa Farm Outlook. February 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Cattle Inventory Report Affirms What Happened in 2015 and What May Happen in 2016

Advanced Crop Science Instructional Framework

Iowa Farm Outlook. December 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Replacement Quality Heifer Prices Supported by Latest Data

Southwest District PAC Issue Identification Agriculture/Natural Resources & Rural Development 2017 Program Year

Transcription:

Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report CR-23 39 Oklahoma Cropland Rental Rates: 28-9 Damona Doye Regents Professor and Extension Economist Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets are also available on our website at: http://osufacts.okstate.edu Roger Sahs Extension Assistant Specialist Rental agreements and rates are influenced by the landowner s costs, the tenant s expected earnings, previous rates charged, competition for the land, government programs, tax laws, and the non-agricultural economy. The results of a statewide farmland leasing survey conducted in November of 28 are reported here. Respondents were individuals contacted through the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service who agreed to complete periodic surveys. In addition, questionnaires were sent as part of a mailing by the Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics Service. Approximately 22 surveys were returned with useable data. Figure shows the regions of the state used in reporting survey results: northwest, southwest, north central, and east. On average, crop cash lease agreements had been in effect for 3 years (Table ). Average lease sizes ranged from 223 acres in eastern Oklahoma to 33 acres in northwest Oklahoma. Most tenants and landlords in Oklahoma appear to be satisfied with their lease agreements. More than % of the respondents classified both their cash and crop share leasing agreements as good or excellent from the standpoint of fairness. Twenty-one percent of respondents with cash lease agreements and 27% of respondents with crop share agreements classified their leasing agreements as adequate from the standpoint of fairness. Cropland Cash Rental Rates Cash leases require a fixed payment, typically cash (or infrequently, a specified yield such as bushels of wheat). Survey results document some regional differences in rental rates and average sizes of tracts rented. Cash rental rates for dryland wheat were highest in the eastern region of the state, averaging $3.44 per acre, compared to $3.28 to $34.78 in other regions of the state (Table 2). The range in reported rental rates was from $ to $8 per acre. The state average of $33.4 increased more than $3 per acre compared to the 2 average of $29.93. Figure 2 shows the distribution of responses (22) for dryland wheat cash rental rates. None of the respondents reported a rental rate less than $ per acre, % reported a rental rate between $ and $9 per acre, 24% reported a rental rate between $2 and $29 per acre, 4% reported a rental rate between $3 and $39 per acre, 24% reported a rental rate between $4 and $49 per acre, and 7% of the respondents reported a rental rate of $5 or more per acre. Dryland grain sorghum average rental rates were almost the same as wheat at $32.7 per acre while dryland alfalfa averaged significantly higher than wheat at $43.9 per acre. (Note that there were only 7 responses on grain sorghum rates and only 7 responses on dryland alfalfa rates, thus the averages and distributions are less reliable than they would be with more observations.) Northwest North central Cropland Share Rental Rates In a crop share lease, certain costs are often shared in the same proportion that production is shared. 2 In crop share leases statewide, the tenant on average receives around 2/3 of dryland wheat, alfalfa, or grain sorghum, while paying slightly more of the fertilizer, herbicide, insecticide, and chemical application expenses (Table 3). On average, the tenant pays nearly all seed and harvesting (combining, hauling, cutting, raking, baling) expenses. Figure 3a shows the distribution of survey responses regarding the tenant s share of production. Figure 3b shows Southwest East Figure. Regions Used in Reporting Farmland Leasing Survey Results Averages reported are the simple average of rates reported by the respondents. They are not weighted by acres in the lease agreement. 2 Advantages and disadvantages of different types of lease agreements are discussed in OSU Extension Fact Sheets F-24 and F-25. Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University

the distribution of responses for the tenant s share of crop inputs and expenses. These graphs indicate that the tenant typically pays either 2/3 or all of the fertilizer, herbicide, insecticide, chemical application, lime costs, and energy inputs associated with irrigation. The graphs also show that the tenant typically pays all seed, harvesting, and hauling costs. Figure 3c shows the distribution of responses for hay inputs and expenses. Other Lease Terms Many lease agreements specify terms and conditions beyond the rental rate, which affect the value of the lease and the real rental rate. For instance, tenants may or may not be allowed to hunt, harvest pecans, graze cattle, cut timber, use buildings, improvements, and lease out hunting privileges. Lime application costs or similar costs for improvements in which the benefits are shared over a number of years may be shared by the landlord and tenant, or if the tenant pays for them initially, repaid by the landlord at a fixed rate per year. Tenants may be required to maintain fences, spray weeds annually, provide liability insurance, share oil field damages, maintain terraces, and leave strips of grain in the field for game. Landlords may provide a well and water, fencing material, or land for a mobile home. Tenants may ask for several months notice if the landlord wishes to terminate the lease agreement. In some cases, leases contain an option to buy with rental payments applied to the purchase price. Historical and Regional Perspective Table 4 provides historical data on pasture rental rates for Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, and Texas for 999-28 as reported by the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Concluding Comments Fair rents must be negotiated between tenant and landlord. Regional or state average rental rates may be used as a beginning point for discussion and negotiation of rental rates. However, differences in land quality, improvements, and restrictions on land use can greatly impact the value of potential leases. Likewise, differences in family living expenses and hired labor costs can be substantial for different operations, affecting the maximum rental bids. New legal restrictions and liability factors may instigate changes in future farm lease agreements. Some farm management firms include language that explicitly requires the tenant to be a good steward of the land. The tenant is expected to follow label restrictions in the use of pesticides, to remain in compliance with the farm s conservation plan, and to dispose of wastes in a manner approved by the Environmental Protection Agency. Some leases already stipulate precisely what fertilizers, pesticides, and seed may be used on the property. Both landlords and tenants must be aware of changing environmental laws and regulations to avoid potentially costly liabilities. Related Publications Visit http://www.osuextra.com and select OSU Fact Sheets, and then choose Departmental List, Agricultural Economics, Farm Management (or Agribusiness Management) and the specific Fact Sheet number. Specific addresses for the referenced articles are: Developing Cash Lease Agreements for Farmland, OSU F-24 at http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/get/ Document-793/F-24web.pdf Developing Share Lease Agreements for Farmland, OSU F-25 at http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/get/ Document-778/F-25web.pdf 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 5 5 Average-$33.4 24-9 - 9 2-29 3-39 4-49 5+ Rental Rate ($/acre) Figure 2. Relative Frequency of Responses for Dryland Wheat Cash Rental Rates, 28. 4 24 n=22 7 CR-23.2

Table. Crop Cash Agreement Statistics by Region, 28-9. Northwest Southwest North Central East State Acres in Lease Average 33 587 587 223 552 Range 45-, -4, 3-7,45 3-4 -4, Average Years Lease Held Average 5 4 3 3 Range -5-45 -5 2-25 -5 Number of Observations 27 5 49 42 Table 2. State Crop Cash Rental Rates, 28-9. Cash Rent per Acre Average Range No. of Observations Dryland Wheat Northwest $3.28 $-8 2 Southwest $3.9 $-5 45 North Central $34.78 $9-55 4 East $3.44 $22- State $33.4 $-8 22 Dryland Grain Sorghum $32.7 $2-55 7 Dryland Alfalfa $43.9 $25-85 7 Other Crops $52.2 $-5 9 Other crops (number of observations in parenthesis) include dryland annual forages (2), dryland soybeans (4), dryland corn (), dryland cotton (2),irrigated grains (5), and unspecified (5). 23.3

Table 3. Crop Share Lease Provisions (), 28-9. Average Range No. of Observations Acres in Lease 44 7-5,4 95 Average Years Lease Held 8-58 95 of Receipts (Percentage) Dryland Wheat 5-75 89 Dryland Alfalfa 7 5-83 5 Dryland Grain Sorghum 5-7 2 Other Hay 3 5-7 5 Other Crops 8 7-75 of Expenses (Percentage) Average Range No. of Observations Crop Seed 95 5-9 Fertilizer 73 5-92 Herbicide 79 5-88 Insecticide 78 5-84 Chemical Applications 87 5-87 Harvesting 97 5-75 Hauling 9 5-38 Irrigation Energy 93 7-5 Lime Application 59-32 Cotton Ginning and Processing 7 7-75 4 Hay and Other Seed 8 5- Fertilizer 79 5-7 Herbicide 8 5-8 Insecticide 8 5- Chemical Applications 87 5- Cutting 97 5-3 Raking 97 5-3 Bailing 97 5-3 Hay Hauling 9 5-25 Irrigation Energy 2 Lime Application 2 Rental shares of % of the crop for the tenant or zero percent of expenses are generally special situations, usually reflecting concessions or unusual circumstances in another part of the lease. However, as lime improves the soil and this improvement is retained by the landlord if the lease is terminated, it is not unusual for the landlord to pay all lime expenses. 2 Insufficient information. CR-23.4

Table 4. Average Gross Cash Rent (Dollars per Acre) for Cropland, Selected States, 999-28. 999 2 2 22 23 24 25 2 27 28 Oklahoma Dryland 27. 2. 27. 27. 27.5 3. 29. 28. 27. 29. Kansas Dryland 35. 35.5 3. 3. 3. 37.5 38.5 39. 4. 45. Irrigated. 7. 72. 7. 8. 72. 73. 74. 82. 88. Missouri Dryland 59. 2. 5.. 7. 7. 79. 79. 79. 85. Texas Dryland 8. 2. 2. 2. 2. 23.7 23. 23. 23. 25. Irrigated 49. 53. 53. 53. 55. 5. 57.5 47.5 53. 55. Source: Agricultural Statistics Service, Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics 28, USDA/NASS, Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, http://www.nass.usda.gov/ok/. Figure 3a. Relative frequency of responses for items in cropland share agreements, 28-9. Production 8 Share: % Dryland Wheat 92 n = 89 8 Share: 7% Dryland Alfalfa 73 n = 5 4 4 2 2-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 3 7 7-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Other Hay Other Crops Dryland Grain Sorghum 8 Share: 3% n = 5 n = Share: 8% 82 8 8 Share: % n = 2 7 4 33 4 4 92 2 2 8 2 8-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 - 35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 - 35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 CR-23.5

Figure 3b. Relative frequency of responses for items in cropland share agreements, 28-9. Crop Inputs and Expenses Seed Fertilizer Herbicide 8 Share: 95% n = 9 8 8 Share: 73% 74 n = 92 8 Share: 79% n = 88 4 4 4 55 4 2 4-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 2 5-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Insecticide Application of Chemicals Harvesting 8 Share: 78% n = 84 8 Share: 87% n = 87 8 Share: 97% n = 75 92 4 35 4 3 4 2 2 2 5-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 4 4-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Hauling Lime Application Cotton Ginning & Processing 8 Share: 9% n = 38 89 n = 32 n = 4 Share: 59% Share: 7% 8 8 4 4 44 4 5 5 2 2 9 3 22 2 5 5-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 3-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 - 35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Irrigation Energy 8 Share: 93% n = 5 8 4 2 2-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 CR-23.

Figure 3c. Relative frequency of responses for items in cropland share agreements, 28-9. Hay Inputs and Expenses 8 Share: 8% Seed Fertilizer Herbicide n = Share: 79% n = 7 Share: 8% n = 8 8 8 4 3 55 4 35 4 4 2 8 9-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Share: 8% 2 8-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 7 7-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Insecticide Application of Chemicals Cutting n = Share: 87% n = Share: 97% n = 3 8 8 93 4 3 44 4 3 4 2 9-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 9 3-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 7-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 Raking Baling Hauling 8 Share: 97% n = 3 93 93 n = 3 n = 25 Share: 97% Share: 9% 8 8 92 4 4 4 2 7-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 7-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 2 8-35 3-3 4-7 72-8 8-99 CR-23.7

The Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Bringing the University to You! The Cooperative Extension Service is the largest, most successful informal educational organization in the world. It is a nationwide system funded and guided by a partnership of federal, state, and local governments that delivers information to help people help themselves through the land-grant university system. Extension carries out programs in the broad categories of agriculture, natural resources and environment; family and consumer sciences; 4-H and other youth; and community resource development. Extension staff members live and work among the people they serve to help stimulate and educate Americans to plan ahead and cope with their problems. Some characteristics of the Cooperative Extension system are: The federal, state, and local governments cooperatively share in its financial support and program direction. It is administered by the land-grant university as designated by the state legislature through an Extension director. Extension programs are nonpolitical, objective, and research-based information. It provides practical, problem-oriented education for people of all ages. It is designated to take the knowledge of the university to those persons who do not or cannot participate in the formal classroom instruction of the university. It utilizes research from university, government, and other sources to help people make their own decisions. More than a million volunteers help multiply the impact of the Extension professional staff. It dispenses no funds to the public. It is not a regulatory agency, but it does inform people of regulations and of their options in meeting them. Local programs are developed and carried out in full recognition of national problems and goals. The Extension staff educates people through personal contacts, meetings, demonstrations, and the mass media. Extension has the built-in flexibility to adjust its programs and subject matter to meet new needs. Activities shift from year to year as citizen groups and Extension workers close to the problems advise changes. Oklahoma State University, in compliance with Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 94, Executive Order 24 as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 972, Americans with Disabilities Act of 99, and other federal laws and regulations, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices, or procedures. This includes but is not limited to admissions, employment, financial aid, and educational services. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 3, 94, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Edwin L. Miller, Interim Director of Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma. This publication is printed and issued by Oklahoma State University as authorized by the Dean of the Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources and has been prepared and distributed at a cost of 42 cents per copy. 39 GH Revised. CR-23.8