VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Similar documents
Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIR QUALITY

Ozone Air Quality Standards: EPA s Proposed January 2010 Revisions

National Ambient Air Quality Standards, Implementation Plans and Public Participation. Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND INTENTION TO SUE PURSUANT TO 30 U.S.C. 1270(a)(2) and M.C.A

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MARATHON DANE COUNTY Branch

In Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1408

APPENDIX E EMISSIONS ESTIMATE FOR GENERAL CONFORMITY

AIR POLLUTION TRAGEDY: A CASE STUDY. {Air & Air Pollution

FACT SHEET MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS

Maryland Clean Air Progress Report

Implementation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS): Opportunities for Public Participation

Why We Are Interested In Coal-fired Generation

9/24/98 FACT SHEET FINAL RULE FOR REDUCING REGIONAL TRANSPORT OF GROUND-LEVEL OZONE (SMOG) AND TWO RELATED PROPOSALS

2013 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5): Designating Nonattainment Areas

Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

Interesting facts about coal-fired power plants, mercury, and other pollutants:

Draft 10/28/13. Guidance for 1-Hour SO 2 Nonattainment Area SIP Submissions October 2013

Environmental Regulatory Changes Potentially Affecting Coal Fired Facilities

11/10/2014 Oklahoma s SIP Submittal Infrastructure Checklist 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Update 1

Pollution: Los Angeles: Worst Air Quality in USA

Human exposure and health effects of air pollution in priority areas. Rico Euripidou Rico Euripidou

Northeast Ohio NAAQS Nonattainment Factsheet Covering the counties of Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage and Summit

Air Quality: EPA s 2013 Changes to the Particulate Matter (PM) Standard

December 19, Dear Mr. Wehrum:

June 21, Polska śegluga Morska

March 17, The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C.

Analysis of the Public Health Impacts of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative,

Re: Technical Information Regarding BART Limits for White Bluff and Reasonable Progress Limits for Independence

WASHINGTON COUNTY. Air Quality PM2.5

AIR DISPERSION MODELING

Reducing Power Plant Emissions: EPA s New Proposed Rules For Mercury

OVERVIEW of SIP for Annual PM2.5 Standard MWAQC December 12, 2007

IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT

Status of 8-hour Ozone and PM 2.5 Standards. Lydia N. Wegman STAPPA / ALAPCO Meeting Stowe, Vermont September 30, 2002

Action on Climate Change and Air Pollution

2006 Sulfur Dioxide Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

NAAQS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTATION UPDATES. Anna Marie Wood, Director Air Quality Policy Division OAQPS, U.S. EPA AAPCA Fall Meeting September 21, 2017

Re: Petition for Rulemaking to Address Failure of the San Joaquin Valley, CA to Attain the 1 Hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone

OZONE IN NORTH TEXAS AND THE CLEAN AIR ACT

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION BROADWAY NEW YORK. NY

ENCLOSURE 3 Pennsylvania s April 8, 2013 Letter Regarding 1-hour SO 2 Designations ALLEGHENY COUNTY

NAAQS AND OTHER IMPLEMENTATION UPDATES. Anna Marie Wood, Director Air Quality Policy Division OAQPS, U.S. EPA NACAA Fall Meeting September 2017

POLLUTION CONTROL HEARINGS BOARD FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1. Identity of Appealing Parties and Representatives

Pollution, Soil, and Columbia Missouri

Study: Gallatin Coal Plant

ARE Fall 2005 Lecture Slides - Clean Air Act - Part 2 (October 12, 2005)

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Lauraine G. Chestnut*, David M. Mills. Stratus Consulting Inc., P.O. Box 4059, Boulder, CO , USA

June 20, Unreasonable Delay in Completing ESA Consultations on Pesticide Registrations BACKGROUND

Summary. Air Quality in Latin America: An Overview Edition. 1. Introduction. Produced by the Clean Air Institute

Understanding the NAAQS and the Designation Process

Clean Air Act History

Environmental Council of the States State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials

February 14, Lieutenant General Todd T. Semonite

Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (1979) ENTERED INTO FORCE: 16 March 1983

EPA Enforcement Organizational Structure

Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Request to Desist from Reinstatement of C2P2 Program and for Timetable to Complete Actions Required by the Office of Inspector General

Facts About Pesticides, Salmon, and the Endangered Species Act

EPA Clean Air Interstate Rule: Recent Court Decision and Its Implications. Good morning Chairman Carper, Senator Voinovich and Members of the

NJDEP Comments on STAPPA/ALAPCO/WESTAR List of Issues to be Addressed in the PSD Reform Initiative

November 5, Department of Environmental Quality

EARTHJUSTICE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE OMBUDS SERVICES. DATE ISSUED: August 8, PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: August 31, 2016

CHAPTER 2 - Air Quality Trends and Comparisons

NAAQS and Other Implementation Updates

Legal Review of Clean Air Act Cases. Terry Salem, Staff Attorney, TCEQ

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION

Encouraging Energy Efficiency through the Clean Air Act

A Primer on Pending Environmental Regulations and their Potential Impacts on Electric System Reliability

Ecosystem Ecology. Community (biotic factors) interacts with abiotic factors

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

Health Co-benefits of Carbon Standards for Existing Power Plants

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Part 52. [EPA-R04-OAR ; FRL Region 4]

PLAN TO IMPROVE AIR QUALITY IN THE WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VA REGION

GAO AIR POLLUTION. Air Quality and Respiratory Problems in and Near the Great Smoky Mountains. Testimony

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) March 18, 2014

C HAMBER OF C OMMERCE OF THE U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA. May 2, Re: Routine Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement Proposed Rule

Diminishing Views: Air Quality in Western National Parks

ITEM 9 Action October 18, 2017

Re: Contamination of Protected Underground Sources of Drinking Water; Request for Enforcement Action

VIA REGISTERED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, TO THE ATTENTION OF DAVID R. MULLEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PEASE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

NATIONAL PORT STRATEGY

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Analysis of SO 2 Modeling Issues for Ameren Power Plants in the Greater St. Louis Area

Allegheny County Health Department

U.S. EPA s s Clean Air Gasification Initiative

Please Note: Suggested citation of this presentation is:

What s Next for Designations?

The Dangers of the Dirtiest Diesels: The Health and Welfare Impacts of Nonroad Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Fuels

June 29, Jon Tack, Bureau Chief Water Quality Bureau Iowa Department of Natural Resources Via Dear Mr.

2010 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

What is air pollution?

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52 [EPA-HQ-OAR ; FRL ] RIN 2060-AO24

2012 Nutrient Regulations Update

LAWSUIT TO PROTECT SALMON FROM PESTICIDES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Transcription:

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Scott Pruitt Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency William Jefferson Clinton Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Re: Clean Air Act Notice of Intent to Sue pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604(b)(2) for failure to make findings of failure to submit under 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(1)(B) and failure to take final action under 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(2) (4). Dear Administrator Pruitt: On behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity, the Center for Environmental Health, and the Sierra Club, I am writing to inform you that they intend to file suit against you for a failure of the Administrator [of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)] to perform any act or duty under this chapter which is not discretionary with the Administrator. 42 U.S.C. 7604(a)(2). As detailed below, EPA has failed to undertake mandatory duties with regard to sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) pollution in numerous areas throughout the Country. EPA should remedy its violation of this mandatory duty to better protect the public from the harmful effects of sulfur dioxide. Exposure to SO 2 in even very short time periods such as five minutes has significant health impacts, including decrements in lung function, aggravation of asthma, and respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity. EPA has also determined that exposure to SO 2 pollution can aggravate existing heart disease, leading to increased hospitalizations and premature deaths. SO 2 also contribute to the formation of acid rain, which damages trees, crops, historic buildings, and monuments and alters the acidity of both soils and water bodies. Acute and chronic exposures to SO 2 lead to foliar injury, decreased photosynthesis, and decreased growth of vegetation. EPA s draft Integrated Review Plan acknowledged that oxides of sulfur (SOx) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) have a potential to negatively affect endangered species. EPA s draft Integrated Review Plan even identifies four federally listed endangered species three endangered species in the genus Isoetes and the endangered green pitcher-plant (Sarracenia oreophila). The U.S. Fish and

Page Two Wildlife Service (FWS), has already identified many other federally protected species that are negatively affected by atmospheric pollution from SOx. In addition, because SO 2 emissions may be transmitted long distances, they contribute to visibility impairment problems in many national parks and wilderness areas. EPA has previously found that current levels of oxides of nitrogen and sulfur are sufficient to cause acidification of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, nutrient enrichment of terrestrial ecosystems and contribute to nutrient enrichment effects in estuaries that could be considered adverse[.] 77 Fed. Reg. 20,218, 20,241-42 (April 3, 2012). SOx also facilitate mercury methylation. This creates the form of mercury which is especially dangerous to humans and wildlife. On June 2, 2010, EPA revised the primary SO 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by establishing a new one-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion ( ppb ) which is met when the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of the daily maximum one-hour average concentrations is less than or equal to 75 ppb. The primary SO 2 NAAQS was set at this level in order to protect public health from the serious threats posed by short-term exposure to SO 2. Due to both the more stringent numerical limit and shorter averaging time as compared to the previous SO 2 NAAQS, the 2010 SO 2 NAAQS is far more protective of human health than the prior SO 2 NAAQS and promises huge health benefits. EPA estimated that 2,300 to 5,900 premature deaths and 54,000 asthma attacks a year will be prevented by the new standard. Timely implementation of the new NAAQS is critical. Considering the scientific evidence, each year implementation of the one-hour SO 2 NAAQS is delayed, up to 5,900 more people will die prematurely and 54,000 asthma attacks will occur unnecessarily. Further, EPA estimates that the net benefit of implementing the 75 ppb SO 2 NAAQS is up to $36 billion dollars. Those individuals who suffer from health impacts caused by exposure to SO 2 levels above the NAAQS will have greater medical costs with each year implementation is delayed and, as a result, the monetized benefits of implementing the one-hour SO 2 NAAQS will go unrealized. Further, the ability of those individuals to enjoy everyday activities such as exercise, school, and work will continue to be negatively impacted.

Page Three I. FAILURE TO TAKE FINAL ACTION ON SIP SUBMITTALS The Clean Air Act requires that if, six months after a state submits a SIP submittal, EPA has not made the completeness finding and has not found the submittal to be incomplete, the submittal is deemed administratively complete by operation of law. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(1)(B). EPA must take final action on an administratively complete submittal by approving in full, disapproving in full, or approving in part and disapproving in part within 12 months of the completeness finding. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(2) - (4). Table 1 lists 2010 SO 2 NAAQS nonattainment SIP elements which various states have submitted. It has been more than 12 months since these submittals were found administratively complete by EPA or deemed administratively complete by operation of law. Yet, EPA has not taken final action approving or disapproving, in full or part, these submittals. Therefore, EPA is in violation of its mandatory duty to take final action for the submittals listed in Table 1. TABLE 1 AREA & STATE ELEMENT(S) COMPLETION DATE FINAL ACTION DUE DATE Lemont, IL 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR), Reasonably Available Control Measure, Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACM/RACT), Reasonable Further Progress (RFP). Pekin, IL 3/3/2016 3/3/2017

Page Four Indianapolis, IN Morgan County, IN Southwest, IN Terre Haute, IN Muscatine, IA Detroit, MI Jackson County, MO 11/26/2016 11/26/2017 11/30/2016 11/30/2017

Page Five Lake County, OH Muskingum River, OH Steubenville, OH Steubenville, WV Rhinelander, WI 10/03/2015 10/3/2016 10/03/2015 10/3/2016 10/03/2015 10/3/2016 RACM/RACT, 10/2/2016 10/2/2017 RACM/RACT, Nonattainment NSR 10/3/2015 10/3/2016 Hillsborough County, FL Nassau County, FL Nonattainment NSR 10/3/2015 10/3/2016 Jefferson County, Nonattainment NSR 12/5/2015 12/5/2016 MO II. FAILURE TO MAKE FINDING OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT EPA is required to determine whether a state implementation plan (SIP) submittal is administratively complete. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(1)(B). If, six months after a submittal is due, a state has failed to submit any required SIP submittal, there is no submittal that may be deemed administratively complete, and EPA must make a determination stating that the state failed to submit the required SIP submittal. Id. This determination is referred to as a finding of failure to submit.

Page Six EPA designated all of the areas listed in Table 2 nonattainment for the 1971 SO 2 NAAQS. The nonattainment SIP were due by no later than the dates listed in Table 2. See https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/reports/so2 1971_so2_sip_- _primary_standard_enbystate.html; EPA has a mandatory duty to make a completeness finding under 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(1)(B) by no later than six months after the due dates for the submittals. The States in Table 2 have failed to submit nonattainment SIPs for the areas listed in Table 2 as of the date of this letter. Yet, EPA has failed to issue a finding of failure to submit, as required under 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(1)(B), regarding the nonattainment SIPs for the areas listed in Table 2. TABLE 2 AREA & ELEMENT(S) SUBMITTAL DEADLINE (No later than) Hayden, AZ 1971 primary SO 2 SIP 5/15/1992 New Jersey portion of the Northeast 5/15/1992 Pennsylvania-Upper Delaware Valley Interstate AQCR (part) 1971 primary SO 2 SIP. As required by 40 C.F.R. 54.3, the persons providing this notice are: The Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA. 94612 Attn: Jonathan Evans, Tel: (510) 844-7100 x318 Center for Environmental Health 2201 Broadway, Suite 302 Oakland, CA 94612 Attn: Caroline Cox Tel: (510) 655-3900 Sierra Club 2101 Webster St., Ste. 1300 Oakland, CA 94612 Attn: Zachary Fabish Tel: (202) 675-7917

Page Seven While EPA regulations require this information, please direct all correspondences and communications regarding this matter to the undersigned counsel. The Center for Biological Diversity, the Center for Environmental Health, the Sierra Club and their counsel would prefer to resolve this matter without the need for litigation. Therefore, we look forward to EPA contacting us within 60 days about coming into compliance. If you do not do so, however, we will have to file a complaint. Sincerely, Robert Ukeiley Senior Attorney Environmental Health Center for Biological Diversity 1536 Wynkoop St., Ste. 421 Denver, CO 80202 (720) 496-8568 rukeiley@biologicaldiversity.org Counsel for Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Environmental Health and Sierra Club