Institute of Ag Professionals

Similar documents
Institute of Ag Professionals

DETERMINING THE GROWTH STAGES OF CORN AND SOYBEANS

Agronomic Practices for Optimizing Corn Silage Production in Central Minnesota. Royalton, MN February 12, 2009

4.3 Irrigated corn best practice guide

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Institute of Ag Professionals

Institute of Ag Professionals

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

Purpose and Introduction:

Irrigating for Maximum Economic Return with Limited Water

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Corn Agronomy Update

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

EVALUATION OF ADAPT-N IN THE CORN BELT. Introduction

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management. Larry Zibilske, Ph.D.

Institute of Ag Professionals

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1

2017 Cover Crop Story Chris & Ryan Lee Fairfax, MN

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques

Institute of Ag Professionals

Grain Sorghum 101. Copyright 2015 Sorghum Partners All Rights Reserved

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

K-State Research and Extension. Abnormal Corn Ears

Vernon Center Technical Report # prepared by. Brian Olson John Sij Todd Baughman

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

Tillage and Crop Residue Removal Effects on Evaporation, Irrigation Requirements, and Yield

Institute of Ag Professionals

County Farm Centre May 2014 Your May issue:

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Irrigation Scheduling Of Field Corn Under Institutional Constraints

Water management: Table Of Contents

Grain Yield. Soybean Growth and Development. Yield Components of Soybean. Plants/Branches per area Lauer

Institute of Ag Professionals

1. Wheat stubble burning: Pros and Cons 1 2. Management options for drought-stressed corn 3

2012 Minnesota Canola Production Center (CPC)

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPENDIX A. Corn Planting Guide

Corn and Soybean Practices following Severe Drought. Roger Elmore and Andy Lenssen Department of Agronomy, ISU

PROCEEDINGS 2017 Crop Pest Management Short Course & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Interpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water

Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE 2013 Demonstration Reports

EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison

LAT IS ALL we sell in agriculture. Whether

Soybean Irrigation Management

FUTURE OF TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS

Current Impact of Changes in Corn Plant Density

USE OF STRIP-TILLAGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS

Bob Pearce, David Ditsch, Jack Zeleznik, and Wade Turner

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2011 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Economics of Irrigation Ending Date for Corn 1

POTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE. Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames

Western Illinois University/Allison Organic Research Farm. Tillage/Cover Crop Experiment

SF723 (Revised) Barley

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 8: Employing Conservation Tillage Practices

Environmental Impacts on Forage Quality

Solving the SOIL HEALTH Puzzle? WE HAVE YOU COVERED. lacrosseseed.com soil1st.com SEED. Soil First Mix Decision Tree

Phosphorus and Potassium Recommendations for Illinois Crops

WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH OPTION HERBICIDE APPLIED IN FIELD CORN

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Considerations for Corn Residue Harvest in Minnesota

SUMMER DROUGHT: CAUSE OF DIEBACK IN PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEED FIELDS?

A top issue: Quality. Manual of Tomato and Eggplant Field Production

Planting after fallow: What is the fallow syndrome and how do I manage it? Joel Ransom

Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

SMALL GRAINS SEEDBED PREPARATION AND RESIDUE MANAGEMENT 1 Kent L Brittan ABSTRACT

Institute of Ag Professionals

Proceedings of the 3 rd Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

EVALUATING CENTER PIVOT, NOZZLE-PACKAGE PERFORMANCE

Annual Ryegrass Variety Report Mike Plumer University of Illinois Extension June 2008

Fertilizing High Producing Alfalfa Stands

Determining Optimum Nitrogen Application Rates for Corn Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski, Carrie Laboski, and Scott Sturgul 1

Crop Water Requirement. Presented by: Felix Jaria:

Calibre BMR Forage Sorghum

Guidelines for Safe Rates of Fertilizer Placed with the Seed

Strip-tillage Successes, watch-outs based on soil type, soil drainage, and climate

Soybean Response to Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization Rate on Silt Loam Soils

Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Influence on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains

KEEPING livestock well fed during the

For nmental. of 10. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 15 (No 6) 2009, Agricultural Academy

NAYLORSEED. The New Science of Alfalfa. Phirst Extra Hybrid Brought to alfalfa growers using Hybrid Alfalfa Technology.

Basic Irrigation Scheduling Tools & Irrigation System Evaluation

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Irrigation Scheduling: Sensors, Technical Tools, and Apps

Utilizing farmers changed nitrogen application technologies to demonstrate improved nutrient management practices year 2

Transcription:

Institute of Ag Professionals Proceedings of the 2013 Crop Pest Management Shortcourse & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show www.extension.umn.edu/agprofessionals Do not reproduce or redistribute without the written consent of author(s).

Advancing Agronomic Management to Mitigate Drought Stress in Corn Jeff Coulter Extension Corn Specialist coult077@umn.edu z.umn.edu/corn

From Rhoads & Bennet (1990); Shaw (1988)

Corn response to irrigation timing (sandy soil in Illinois during 1988 drought) Irrigation timing Yield (% of maximum) Full irrigated 100% Not irrigated 17% Planting to silking 27% Silking to maturity 88% From Hoeft et al. (2000)

ET = Evaporation (E) + transpiration (T) Water use in corn: E = 25% T = 75% Transpiration cools leaves (carries away heat) Transpiration drives nutrient transport Transpiration is an unavoidable consequence of the need for the interior of the leaf to be open to the outside air so it can take in CO 2

Gradients of water potential cause movement of water from soil to plant to atmosphere -3 bars = soil near root -5 bars = soil adjacent to root -6 bars = xylem in root (tissue for transporting water) -8 bars = xylem in leaf -70 bars = air inside stomata -700 bars = air just outside stomata -950 bars = air beyond unstirred layer adjacent to leaf

Typical scenario in the Corn Belt Water surplus in spring Water deficit during grain filling

Available soil water Lamberton, MN 2013 vs. historic average (1966-2011) Plant available soil water (inches) http://swroc.cfans.umn.edu/weatherinformation/ SoilMoisture/2013vsHistoricAverage/index.htm

Drought stress during vegetative stages Reduces plant height Can reduce ear length

Drought stress around pollination Delays silking: Severe drought stress can delay silk emergence until pollen shed nearly complete Causes kernel abortion, especially for the latefertilized kernels near tip of the ear

Drought stress during grain fill Promotes early senescense = less leaf area for photosynthesis Shortens grain filling period = lighter kernels Predisposes plants to stalk rots & stalk lodging

Reduce the risk of drought stress 1. Promote water infiltration = protect soil organic matter & avoid destroying soil structure 2. Promote soil permeability (water movement under saturated conditions) = avoid compaction & protect soil aggregates 3. Reduce potential for soil crusting = limit tillage & leave surface residue after planting 4. Plant early = build root system before the soil dries out; complete pollination & kernel set before driest part of season

In the absence of subsoil moisture, excess leaf area & water use during vegetative growth can deplete soil water before the sensitive reproductive stages

Reduce the risk of drought stress 5. Promote root growth = timely planting facilitates moist soil for deep roots. If not impaired, roots can grow 1-3 ft. deep under irrigation & 5-7 ft. deep without irrigation 6. Plant hybrids of varying maturity = spread risk of moisture stress at pollination 7. Hybrid drought tolerance & root ratings 8. Manage plant population 9. Optimum fertilization = promote crop growth & efficient water utilization 10. Control weeds = weeds use large amounts of water

Yield potential & stress tolerance are related For environments with severe drought stress, breeding has focused on reducing the risk of total yield loss: Decreased water use = lower yield potential when no to moderate drought stress Less leaf area Lower rates of transpiration Earlier silking & maturity From Lopes et al. (2011)

Yield potential & stress tolerance are related For environments with no to moderate drought stress, breeding has focused on: Increasing yield potential through shoot mechanisms Increased transpiration rates Increased stay green Maintaining growth under declining water status From Lopes et al. (2011)

New drought-tolerant hybrids How do new drought-tolerant hybrids compare with normal high-yield hybrids in MN: In the absence of drought stress? Under varying degrees of controlled drought stress? Is this affected by N supply? No side-by-side evaluation of new drought-tolerant hybrids & agronomics under controlled drought stress in MN

Drought stress study in 2013 3 timings of drought stress: None Stress from R2 R6 Stress from V14 R6 2 hybrids: drought-tolerant vs. not 3 N fertilizer rates: 0.5X; 1.0X; 1.5X 3 levels of soil N supply potential due to previous crop: Low (rye); moderate (soybean); high (alfalfa)

Rainfall & irrigation amounts

No stress Drought stress

Hybrids tested Normal hybrid: NK Brand N36A-3000GT 96-day relative maturity Selected for maximum yield when no drought stress Drought-tolerant hybrid: NK Brand N42Z-3011A 99-day relative maturity Agrisure Artesian TM Technology

N application by previous crop 40 lb N/ac at planting; remainder sidedressed at V6

1) Anthesis began 3 days later for the drought-tolerant hybrid 2) Anthesis-silking interval was slightly narrower for the drought-tolerant hybrid (averaged across previous crops, drought stresses, & N rates) LSD (0.10)

1) Anthesis occured earlier when no drought stress 2) Inconsistent effect of N rate on the start of anthesis (averaged across previous crops & hybrids) LSD (0.10) Time of drought stress

1) Anthesis silking was 1 to 1.5 days earlier when no stress 2) Little effect of N rate on anthesis silking interval (averaged across previous crops & hybrids) LSD (0.10) Time of drought stress

Chlorophyll meter used to assess: - leaf chlorophyll (indicator of leaf N concentration) - stay green

Drought stress reduced chlorophyll & accelerated its decline (averaged across previous crops, hybrids, & N rates) LSD (0.10)

Drought-tolerant hybrid had lower chlorophyll levels (averaged across previous crops, drought stresses, & N rates) LSD (0.10)

N deficiency reduced chlorophyll & accelerated its decline (averaged across previous crops, drought stresses, & hybrids) LSD (0.10)

No drought or N stress Drought stress V14 R6 & N stress (0.5X N rate)

Silage yield was higher with drought-tolerant hybrid (+3% for R2 R6; +9% for V14 R6) (averaged across previous crops & N rates) LSD (0.10)

1) Yield was 11% higher with drought-tolerant for V14 R6 2) Yield was similar for R2 R6 & V14 R6 with drought-tolerant (averaged across previous crops & N rates) LSD (0.10) Time of drought stress

Normal hybrid, no drought stress Normal hybrid, stress V14 R6 Drought-tolerant, no drought stress Drought-tolerant, stress V14 R6

Silage yield with 0.5X N rate was 8-10% less when drought stress, but 22% less when no drought stress (averaged across previous crops & hybrids) LSD (0.10)

Grain yield with 0.5X N rate was 12-16% less when drought stress, but 27% less when no drought stress (averaged across previous crops & hybrids) LSD (0.10) Time of drought stress

0.5X N rate, no drought stress 0.5X N rate, stress V14 R6 1.0X N rate, no drought stress 1.0X N rate, stress V14 R6

1) Silage yield did not differ among N rates after alfalfa 2) Silage yield was less with the 0.5X N rate after soybean & rye (averaged across drought stresses & hybrids) LSD (0.10)

1) Top yield with 1.5X N rate, & with 1.0X N rate after alfalfa 2) Yield loss with 0.5X N rate was largest after soybean & least after alfalfa (averaged across drought stresses & hybrids) LSD (0.10)

Alfalfa, 0.5X N rate Alfalfa, 1.0X N rate Soybean, 0.5X N rate Soybean, 1.0X N rate

Summary Drought affects corn in MN each year & it is most common during the 2 nd half of the growing season Drought-tolerant hybrids have not been evaluated under controlled drought stress in MN, leading to variable results that are linked to site-specific weather We compared a popular drought-tolerant hybrid for central MN to a representative high-yield check hybrid

Summary Grain & silage yields did not differ among hybrids when no drought stress Drought-tolerant hybrid had higher silage yield when stress (+3% for R2 R6; +9% for V14 R6) Drought-tolerant hybrid had 11% higher grain yield when drought stress from V14 R6 Grain yield of drought-tolerant hybrid was similar when drought occurred from V14 R6 or R2 R6

Summary Hybrid selection should still be based on yield & agronomic characteristics across multiple locations Drought-tolerance should not reduce yield, & can result in higher yields when drought stress, especially when it occurs around pollination Drought-tolerant hybrids do not appear to have different N requirements

Thank you! z.umn.edu/corn