Farm Level Assessment of Farmer s Exposure to Agricultural Risk: Cross-country analysis Shingo Kimura Trade and Agriculture Directorate

Similar documents
Fertiliser Application

Diversifying Your Income Streams

Agricultural Market Performance in the EU after the 2000 and 2003 CAP Reform An Ex-post Evaluation based on AGMEMOD

Producer price index 1998/99 to 2002/03 (July to June) / / / / /03 Year

Teagasc National Farm Survey 2016 Results

THE DISTRIBUTION OF FARM PERFORMANCE: DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE

Market Intelligence October Brexit Scenarios: an impact assessment

A Tax Incentive for Certified Seed: An Assessment

Producer Insurance and Risk Management Options for Smallholder Farmers

Rethinking US Agricultural Policy:

SOME ASPECTS OF AGRICULTURAL POLICY IN AUSTRALIA

Agri-Service Industry Report

Summary. Scope. 1 Summary 27

Agricultural Policy, Agribusiness, and Rent-Seeking Behaviour

Public Policy and Agriculture

The Changing Face Of Manitoba Crop Rotations

2008 Farm Bill: Doug Yoder, Illinois Farm Bureau

2/11/2015. Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Crop years

Crops Rotation and Cover Cropping Plan for SAMPLE FARM

Cultivating Trade: The Economic Impact of Indiana s Agricultural Exports

ARC / PLC Program Overview

Covered Commodities. Pulse Crops

A European Food Prices Monitoring Tool

Simulation model for income risk analyses at the sector level, case of Slovenia

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

*Document produced with support from Oxfam International The complete document can be consulted at:

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

Agri-Service Industry Report

Market opportunities for Queensland agribusiness from FTAs with China, Japan and South Korea. Queensland Production

International Benchmarks for Wheat Production

Horticulture Balanced Scorecard - Economic Assessment

Economic Contribution of Idaho Agribusiness

Baseline Update for U.S. Farm Income and Government Outlays

IN CANADA 2017 GROWING SEASON Canadian Wheat Crop in Review

U.S. Farm Bill Scenarios and Impact on Developing Countries

THE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD INDUSTRY IN RUSSIA: 2015 FACTS AND FIGURES

Ekoniva Corporate Social Responsibility of a Russian Agro-Holding. Washington, D.C. April 26 th 2012 Dr. Christian Ebmeyer

Philippine Agricultural and Food Policies: Implications on Poverty and Income Distribution

POLICY IMPACT ON PRODUCTION STRUCTURE AND INCOME RISK ON POLISH DAIRY FARMS

What the Next Governor Needs to Know About Minnesota Agriculture Chris Radatz

Food price pass-through in the euro area: the role of asymmetries and non-linearities

ION RALUCA, ANDREEA NOVAC CORNELIA, MIHAELA NOVAC OVIDIU, CONSTANTIN

OUTLOOK FOR US AGRICULTURE

Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Irish Agriculture:

Crop Statistics in Germany

Economic catalogue for agricultural products Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development

IN ENGLAND AND WALES 2014/15. Simon Moakes Nicolas Lampkin Catherine Gerrard. March As part of. Hamstead Marshall, Newbury

Agriculture in Hokkaido Japan. January 2018 Department of Agriculture Hokkaido Government

UKRAINE: ESTIMATES OF SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE

Farm Income Review 2014

THE PROFITABILITY OF CONVERSION TO ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEMS

National Farm Survey. Thia Hennessy, Brian Moran, Anne Kinsella, Gerry Quinlan. ISBN

Analysis of Bioenergy Potential of Agriculture

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the first common policy adopted by the

CURRENT STATUS OF AGRICULTURAL MARKET INFORMATION SYSTEM IN INDONESIA. Tahlim Sudaryanto Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Indonesia

Disproportional Joint Cost Allocation at the Farm Level by Means of Maximum Entropy

NORWAY: ESTIMATES OF SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE`

Chapter 9: Adoption and impact of supplemental irrigation in wheat-based systems in Syria

Consequences of 2003 CAP Reform for Dutch Agriculture

STRATEGIE DI APPROVVIGIONAMENTO DELLE COMMODITY AGRICOLE E VALORIZZAZIONE DELLE FILIERE AGRICOLE NAZIONALI

research report The Impact of a Carbon Price on Australian Farm Businesses: Beef Production Australia s Independent Farm Policy Research Institute

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

Commodity Value Enhancement Fund Analysis

Seed Cotton As A Covered Commodity:

Costs of European environmental standards and additional regulations for German agriculture

Agriculture in China - Successes, Challenges, and Prospects. Prof. Zhihao Zheng College of Economics & Management China Agricultural University

Policy Evaluation Model: Connecting the PSE to economic outcomes

WESTERN HEMISPHERE AGRICULTURAL SITUATION

The Farming World. LIVESTOCK GENERAL The main elements of the national herd are: - Cattle 10m Sheep 32m Pigs 4.7m Poultry 159m

Dr. Moses M. Zinnah. Minister of Agriculture. Presentation at Liberian Private Sector Forum 11 th January 2017 Washington, D,C.

JAIN IRRIGATION Presentation for IFC Inclusive Business Conference Washington DC September 22 nd, Dr. Dilip Kulkarni Jain Irrigation

John Deere. Committed to Those Linked to the Land. Market Fundamentals. Deere & Company June/July 2014

Economic Effects of Added Growing Season Rainfall on North Dakota Agriculture

ARC / PLC Program Overview

AGRICULTURE AND NATIONAL ACCOUNTS

Overview. 1. Background. 2. Biofuels in the United States and Canada. 3. Policy objectives. 4. Economic consequences. 5.

Nitrogen Mass Flow in China s Animal Production System and Environmental Implications

Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University

Adoption and Use of Yield Monitor Technology for U.S. Crop Production

Walloon agriculture in figures

Market Fundamentals. August October 2017

INFORMATION NOTE, MAY

CAP Reform and the WTO: Potential Impacts on EU Agriculture

ROB MYERS, PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AND NORTH CENTRAL SARE

Effects of Barriers to Live-sheep Exports: from a Western Australian Perspective

ON-FARM INNOVATION ADOPTION

Agro Biodiversity and Agricultural Policies. in an Uncertain Environment

What is missing? Value Addition

The supply response of Bulgarian agriculture over the transition period

Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE

THE FARM BILL AND THE WESTERN HAY INDUSTRY. Daniel A. Sumner and William Matthews 1

Estimation of Nitrous Oxide Emissions from UK Agriculture

Economic Impacts of Cloud Seeding on Agricultural Crops in North Dakota

GIEWS Country Brief Malaysia

2017 Tennessee Agricultural Outlook. Aaron Smith Crop Economist University of Tennessee Extension

April 9, Dear Subscriber:

Update on the CAP Health Check

MINNESOTA HISTORIC FARMS STUDY Snapshot of Farming Regions SNAPSHOT OF FARMING REGIONS IN 1940

Potential impacts on agricultural commodity markets of an EU enlargement to Turkey

Transcription:

Farm Level Assessment of Farmer s Exposure to Agricultural Risk: Cross-country analysis Shingo Kimura Trade and Agriculture Directorate Fourth meeting of the OECD Network for Farm Level Analysis, 7-8 September 2009

Outline of presentation 1. Description of micro data from 7 countries 2. Assessment of producer s exposure to risks 3. Correlation of agricultural risks across farms 4. Factors that determine income variability 5. Some findings and next steps OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 2

Farm level data from 7 countries Country The Netherlands Italy Estonia New Zealand Farm type Crop farms Field crop farms Cereal farms Specialized crop farms Crop farms Crop and livestock farms Sheep and beef farms Major commodity Wheat, barley, oilseed and sugarbeet Wheat, potato and sugarbeet Wheat, barley and oilseed Rice, potato and tomato Wheat, barley Wheat, oilseeds, oats, barley, cattle and sheep Sheep, lamb, cattle and wool Number of samples 232 97 96 91 104 185 100 Length of the data 12 years 6 years 9 years 5 years 8 years 7 years 10 years OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 3

Risk exposure: Yield variability Higher yield variability at farm level data across countries - Yield is location specific and favorable yield in one place is offset by the unfavorable yield in another place in the aggregated data (= special aggregation bias). Coefficient of variation of wheat yield Wheat Farm level Wheat Aggregate 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Estonia The Netherlands OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 4

Risk exposure: Yield variability Coefficient of variation of barley yield Coefficient of variation of oilseed yield Farm level Aggregate Farm level Aggregate 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Estonia OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 5

Risk exposure: Yield variability Wheat Barley Oilseed Sugarbeet Rye Rice Potato Tomato Corn Beef cattle Sheep Yield coefficient of variation at the farm-level yield Estonia The Netherlands Italy New Zealand 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 6

Risk exposure: Price variability Higher price variability at farm level data, but to less extent - Price is less location specific and the integration of output market equalize the price across locations. Coefficient of variation of wheat price Farm level Aggregate 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 Estonia OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 7

Risk exposure: Price variability Price coefficient of variation at the farm-level yield Estonia The Netherlands Italy New Zealand 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Wheat Barley Oilseed Sugarbeet Rye Rice Potato Tomato Corn Beef cattle Sheep OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 8

Wheat Barley Oilseed Risk exposure: Comparing price and yield variability Wheat Barley Oilseed Price risk seem larger than the yield risk at the aggregated data, but farmer may be exposed more to yield risk than to price risk Comparison of coefficient of variation of price and yield Aggregate level Price Yield 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 Farm level Price Yield 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Estonia Estonia Estonia Estonia OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 9

Oilseed Barley Wheat Risk exposure: Price-yield correlation Lower yield-price correlation at farm level data, but still significant in many cases. Coefficient of correlation of price and yield (Aggregate versus Farm level) Farm level Aggregate 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 10

Risk exposure: Price-yield correlation Farm level correlation of price and yield across commodities Netherland Italy 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Wheat Barley Oilseed Sugarbeet Tomato Rice Corn OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 11

Correlation of risk across farms: Insurability of agricultural risk Insurability of agricultural risks depends on systemic nature of risk, information asymmetricity and transaction costs. Low Chance of moral hazard and adverse selection High Single peril Hail Output price Multiple peril crop yield More idiosyncratic Revenue Income More systemic Single peril Hail Multiple peril crop yield Income Revenue Output price Insurable through markets Insurable with government subsidy Not insurable. Market can offer futures or forward contact OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 12

Correlation of risks across farms Insurability of specific risk depends on the correlations of risk across farms Farm level correlation of price and yield across commodities () Yield Price Revenue (per ha) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 Wheat Barley Oilseeds idiosyncratic systemic OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 13

Correlation of risk across farms: Simulation of insurance policy Simulation of insurance policy indicates that the variability of indemnity payment is much higher than other insurance that the market offers Insurance offered in the market Simulated indemnity payment Indemnity payment Wheat yield insurance Independent Actural correlation Mean 31.71 31.78 Standard deviation 19.70 29.54 Coneffienct of variation 0.62 0.93 Maximum 130.04 276.99 *Insurance is assumed to be 35% deductible and simulation is conducted 1000 times Type of insurance *Miranda and Glauber 1997 Coefficient of variation of total indemnities Auto collision 0.05 Workers compensation 0.09 Homeowners multiple peril 0.12 Commercial multiple peril 0.11 Inland marine 0.06 Fire 0.06 Group accident and health 0.11 Allied lines 0.12 Ocean marine 0.06 Crop-hail 0.15 35% deductible crop insurance program estimated by Miranda and Glauber (1997) OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 14 0.81

What factors are contributing to income stabilization?: Revenue cost correlation Positive correlation between farm revenue and cost is reducing the variability of farm income Farm level correlation of farm revenue and variable cost 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Estonia Netherland Italy New Zealand OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 15

What factors are contributing to income stabilization?: Off-farm income Farmer may be making use of off-farm employment to stabilize household income Correlation of off-farm income and farm revenue Correlation of off-farm income and variable cost 0.05 0-0.05-0.1-0.15 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Netherland Netherland OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 16

What factors are contributing to income stabilization?: Government Subsidy Positive correlation between subsidy and variable cost may be more significant in stabilizing income than subsidy revenue correlation. Correlation between subsidy and farm revenue Correlation between subsidy and variable cost -0.20-0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 Estonia Netherland Italy Estonia Netherland Italy OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 17

Which correlations are important in stabilizing income? Income risk is not a sum of each component Farm Income (I) = Revenue (R) + Subsidy (S) Cost (C). Var( I) Var( R) Var( S) Var( C) 2Cov( R, S) 2Cov( R, C) 2Cov( S, C) Variance components Covariance components OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 18

Which correlations are important in stabilizing income? Variance components Covariance components Farm income Estonia Italy New Zealand Farm income and diversified income Farm income Farm income Farm income Farm income Sub Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Output 76% 71% 65% 41% 71% 63% Crop output 29% 27% Livestock output 39% 36% Other agricultural output 9% 8% Input cost 22% 21% 20% 57% 19% 37% Subsidy 2% 2% 7% 2% 10% On-farm diversified income 6% Sub Total -56% -70% -62% -55% -63% -50% Among output -3% -3% Output and cost -55% -51% -50% -65% -57% -50% Output and subsidy 1% 1% 2% 3% -3% Subsidy and cost -2% -2% -14% -5% -3% Diversified income and output -3% Diversified income and cost -15% Diversied income and subsidy Variance of income relative to the case without correlations 3% 44% 30% 38% 45% 37% 50% OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 19

Does crop diversification reduce revenue risk? Per hectare revenue: monoculture and crop diversification Estonia Netherland Oilseeds 0.31 0.33 Return from each crop Rye 0.29 Spring barley 0.38 Sugarbeet 0.16 0.27 Winter barley 0.23 0.34 0.42 Wheat 0.20 0.31 0.53 0.64 Oat 0.52 Starch potato 1.51 Ware potato 1.41 Seed potato 0.86 Total crop revenue 0.12 0.22 0.29 0.35 Significant reduction of revenue variability OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 20

Does crop diversification reduce revenue risk? Less than one correlation of revenue can reduce the variability of total revenue Wheat Oilseed Barley Wheat 1 0.44 0.71 Oilseed 1 0.43 Barley 1 The Netherlands Estonia Wheat Oat Barley Wheat 1 0.25 0.03 Oat 1 0.68 Barley 1 Ware Seed Sugarbe Starch Wheat Onoin potato potato et potato Ware potato 1-0.12 0.11 0.16 0.46-0.04 Seed potato 1-0.03 0.30 0.36 0.06 Sugarbeet 1-0.01 0.08 0.16 Wheat 1 0.17 0.22 Onoin 1 0.00 Starch potato 1 OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 21

Some preliminary findings Farm - level data is very useful for risk analysis in agriculture Aggregated data can be misleading - Farmer faces higher yield variability, and lower negative yieldprice correlation at the farm level - Farmer may be exposed more to yield risk than price risk. Degrees of correlation across farms are different depending on the agricultural risks Correlations and crop diversification are stabilizing farm income OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 22

Next Steps More country / sector coverage Harmonization of data for cross-country and crosssector comparison of risk exposure More detailed analysis of income stabilization strategies adopted by farmers Policy simulation in each country s setting Application of cluster analysis to other countries OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 23

Thank You Trade and Agriculture Directorate Visit our website: www.oecd.org/agriculture/policies/risk Contact us: shingo.kimura@oecd.org OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate 24