Single Deflection Track Selection

Similar documents
TECHNICAL NOTE On Cold-Formed Steel Construction

Structural vs Nonstructural Members. Roger LaBoube, Ph.D., P.E. Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures

June 1, 2012 PARTIES INTERESTED IN COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS

UL Design System HW-D-1012 continued

Product Designation As specified in the AISI standard for cold formed steel framing General provisions A5.2.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC.

TRAKLOC product catalog STRONGER. clarkdietrich.com

REPORT HOLDER: AEROSMITH FASTENING SYSTEMS 5621 DIVIDEND ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA EVALUATION SUBJECT: AEROSMITH BRAND FASTENERS

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL FLOOR DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER:

CHAPTER 5 FLOORS SECTION R501

The System Slotted Deflection Track (pat# 5,913,788)

research report Performance of Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Shear Walls: Alternative Configurations RESEARCH REPORT RP REVISION 2006

REPORT HOLDER: WARE INDUSTRIES, INC. (DBA Marino\WARE) 400 METUCHEN ROAD SOUTH PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Single & Back-to-Back StiffWall Column Product Profile

Copyright. magazine. CFS Load Bearing Construction

W. Mark McGinley March 3, 2016 ISEA MEETINGS 1

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

REPORT HOLDER: STEEL STUD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (SSMA) 35 EAST WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 850 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS EVALUATION SUBJECT:

AC R1 # Triangle Parkway Suite 100 Norcross, Ga Phone: Fax: AC R1. September 11, 2012

COFS Mission. AISI Standards Hierarchy. North American Standards for Cold-Formed Steel Framing. Member versus System Design. Specification 10/21/2016

Section 906. STRUCTURAL STEEL

LPI 56 Technical Guide

DIVISION: FINISHES SECTION: GYPSUM BOARD ACCESSORIES REPORT HOLDER: CONLAB, INC. dba PREST ON CO.

IAPMO ES. Cover Sheet. Evaluation Criteria of. COLD-FORMED STEEL or WOOD FRAMED / STEEL-SHEATHED SHEAR WALLS

ESR-2961 Reissued September 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in two years.

Originally Issued: 05/20/2013 Revised: 07/07/2017 Valid Through: 05/31/ Design

SECTION NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

DESIGNING WITH STEEL FORM DECK

BEARING METAL STUD FRAMING

REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 1000 PLANO, TEXAS EVALUATION SUBJECT: HILTI LOW-VELOCITY POWER-ACTUATED FASTENERS

SL175 Panel Technical Data Guide

INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER

Assemblies Evaluated For 1. Non Axial Load Bearing Wall 2. Transverse Load Capacity 3. Fire Resistance 4. Abuse Resistance

The Contractor is responsible for quality control, including workmanship and materials furnished by his subcontractors and suppliers.

Figure 1 shows a typical composite beam for reference. The beam shown is a rolled beam section from the built-in section database.

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

TYPICAL BEARING WALL FRAMING

AISI S E1 AISI STANDARD. Errata to North American Specification. for the Design of Cold-Formed. Steel Structural Members.

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES

ProSTUD Drywall Framing System

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS SECTION: METAL WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER:

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR

Structural Comparison between Pan Joist Concrete and Steel Frame Systems for UMCP Student Housing Building B

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

research report Estimating the Response of Cold-Formed Steel Frame Shear Walls RESEARCH REPORT RP REVISION 2006

A. Types of lightgauge metal framing units include the following: 1. C-shaped structural steel studs Uniform Building Code.

Panduit Corporation Tinley Park, Illinois. Outset and Inset Cabinets Seismic Load Rating and Anchorage Design

The Contractor is responsible for quality control, including workmanship and materials furnished by his subcontractors and suppliers.

DIVISION: SPECIALTIES SECTION: DEMOUNTABLE PARTITIONS REPORT HOLDER: KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

STEEL STUD, TRIMS AND ACCESSORIES FOR DRYWALL CONSTRUCTION MONTREAL TORONTO CALGARY EDMONTON VANCOUVER THE STRENGTH WITHIN

SECTION SOUND ISOLATION

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

TECHNICAL NOTE On Cold-Formed Steel Construction

COMBINED ADHESIVE-STEEL PIN APPLICATIONS FOR CFS FRAME SHEAR WALLS

Light Steel Framing Members. Table of Contents

REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 1000 PLANO, TEXAS EVALUATION SUBJECT:

LVL Product Guide 2.0E LVL 1.5E LVL

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR METAL PLASTER BASES (LATH) PREFACE

MECHANICAL BRIDGING AND BRIDGING ANCHORAGE OF LOAD BEARING COLD-FORMED STEEL STUDS. Paul E. Lackey, EIT Nabil A. Rahman, Ph.D.

Lightweight Steel Framing. Composite DeltaStud Load Tables

SECTION GYPSUM BOARD

Contents. Tables. Notation xii Latin upper case letters Latin lower case letters Greek upper case letters Greek lower case letters. Foreword.

REPORT HOLDER: CLARKDIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS 9050 CENTRE POINTE DRIVE, SUITE 400 WEST CHESTER, OHIO EVALUATION SUBJECT:

SECTION STRUCTURAL RETROFIT ROOF SUB-FRAMING SYSTEM

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

Prefabricated Light Weight Steel Structures. Systems Guide WALLS, FLOORS, TRUSSES

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued January 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: SHOP-APPLIED WOOD COATINGS SECTION: SHEATHING REPORT HOLDER:

Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams

Heel Blocking Requirements and Capacity Analysis. Overview Revised 3/22/2017

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

A. Submit the following in addition to the standard requirements.

TYPICAL PHYSICAL STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF PRO TILE

Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)

Administrative Changes

REPORT HOLDER: CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY (CEMCO) CROSSROADS PARKWAY NORTH, SUITE 325 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 91746

Originally Issued: 12/18/2015 Revised: 04/14/2017 Valid Through: 12/31/2017

Product Guide Specification

Retain "Preinstallation Conference" Paragraph below if Work of this Section is extensive or complex enough to justify a conference.

THE SITUATION WITH STEEL DECKS

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Bjorhovde, R. Stub Girder Floor Systems Structural Engineering Handbook Ed. Chen Wai-Fah Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999

SECTION 1043 FENCE MATERIAL

CH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION

LIFE SCIENCES BUILDING STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS

Subcommittee 3, Connections August 15, 2012

I-STUD Shaftwall System

For Best Non-Structural Steel Stud Specifications, Stay Apprised of Industry Standard Requirements

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued October 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

Trusted SECTION: 04 HILTI, INC. TULSA, Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. not specifically. Copyright 2015

REPORT HOLDER: ispan SYSTEMS LP 70 BRENTWOOD DRIVE PRINCETON, ONTARIO N0J 1V0 CANADA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

AN ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF HYBRID STEEL BEAM RC COLUMN CONNECTION

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD I-JOISTS REPORT HOLDER: PACIFIC WOODTECH CORPORATION

Shaftwall and Area Separation Wall Systems.

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Reissued March 2014 This report is subject to renewal March 1, 2015

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD I JOISTS REPORT HOLDER: LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION

CBC SECTION/TABLE NUMBER NEW -CHANGE COMMENTARY. X Flexible and Rigid definitions removed and found in ASCE 7-10

Transcription:

By the Metal Stud Manufacturer s Association Single Deflection Track Selection Editor s Note: This article is the first in a series of industry technical notes on cold-formed steel construction. It was compiled by MSMA with assistance from the Association of the Wall and Ceiling Industries International the Drywall Information Trust Fund and the Northwest Wall and Ceiling Bureau. Since the popular use of steel studs for framing full height walls, there has been a recognition that the top of the wall needs to allow for deflection of the floor or roof assembly above when subjected to an applied live load. The allowance for deflection is essential for interior non-load bearing applications. It has been common practice to utilize either a single track with the wall studs nested into the track (see Figure 1, right) with no attachment of the wall sheathing or stud to the deflection track. An alternate assembly uses a track nested 66 Construction Dimensions r March 1998

into another track with no attachment of the nested inside track to the outside track The track within a track allows the stud at the top of the wall to be attached to the inside track to provide a more uniform load transfer to the outside deflection track flange and to stabilize the studs against rotation. Observations Over the years the question of how to determine the effective width of that portion of the track flange to be used for calculating the required design thickness of the leg for the single track deflection assembly was largely unanswered and was up to the design professional to determine. The design professional could assume an effective width equal to the width of the stud flange bearing against the side of the deflection track (conservative) or a width equal to the on-center spacing of the studs (un-conservative). The Army Corps of Engineers has adopted a procedure (ETL 1110-3-411) that recognizes the width of the stud flange plus a portion of the track flange on each side of the stud as being the effective width b eff (see Figure 1, page 66). It is recommended that the steel used for the deflection track have good ductility characteristics (tensile strength to yield point ratio not less than 1.08, and total elongation not less than 10 percent in a 2-inch gauge length). Good ductility characteristics reduces the possibility of micro cracking during the roll-forming process and provides inelastic reserve. Satisfactory performance is based on the following: n The track thickness must be suffi-

cient to resist plate bending along the effective track flange width, b eff. n Each stud flange must be stabilized to resist rotation of the stud. Deflection Track Thickness Determination Deflection track thickness determination based on the Army Corps of Engineers ETL 1110-3-411 procedure utilizes the effective width of the track leg in plate bending. The equation for determining the required thickness is: where: t= required design thickness, in inches. P = the maximum reaction at the top of the stud, in pounds. e = gap between the track web and the point of application of the reaction P, in inches (design gap times 1.5). F Y = minimum steel yield stress, in psi. b eff = effective width of the track in plate bending, given by W stud = the stud flange width, in inches. Design curves can be developed utilizing a typical interior, non-load bearing stud flange width of 1.25", a yield stress of either 33 ksi or 50 ksi (50 ksi Official Publication of AWCI 71

is noted on the curves) and 16" and 24" on center stud spacing. A series of such curves are given in Figures 2 through 7 (pages 67-72). By knowing the non-load bearing wall height, you can determine the lateral design load (typically 5 psf for interior walls), the design gap (gap between the end of the stud and the track web), the stud spacing and the steel minimum yield stress of the track, the required design thickness of the single deflection track. As an example: Design load 5 = psf Stud spacing = 24" o.c. Design gap = 0.5" Minimum yield stress = 33 ksi Wall height = 15'-0" From Figure 3 design thickness of t = 0.0451" (18 ga.) Note: Maximum allowable wall height = 19.52 feet It is recommended that the depth of the deflection track flange be equal to the design gap plus 1 inch for one-story buildings and equal to two times the design gap plus 1 inch for all other applications to provide engagement of the stud into the deflection track The longer track leg, for multiple story buildings, allows for the floor system supporting the stud wall to deflect while still maintaining engagement of the stud in the deflection track. Note: The minimum uncoated delivered thickness can be equal to 95 percent of the design thickness per the 1996 AISI Specification for The Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, Section A3.4. 72 Construction Dimensions r March 1998