Streaming BIM Lifecycle Information Murray Hestley, Whiting-Turner Construction Eric Nulton, Penn State University
The Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned on completion of this program will be reported to CES Records for AIA members. Certificates of Completion are available on request. This program is registered with the AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
Copyr i ght This presentation and the materials provided are protected by U.S. and International copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation or materials without written permission is prohibited. AGC of America, 2012
Cour se Descr i pt i on As owner, designer, and facility manager, the Office of Physical Plant (OPP) at the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) has been successful with Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation beyond construction. This has been achieved by keeping the end in mind and focusing on the use of BIM at project conception for building operations. By teaming with the Computer Integrated Construction (CIC) research group, developers of the BIM Project Execution Planning Guide, OPP has developed a strategic plan, and documented lessons learned from a large-scale BIM implementation. Penn State is currently integrating information into their facilities management system with a focus on preventative maintenance. Penn State is working extensively with vendors and Whiting-Turner to develop the integration between BIM software and their existing facilities management program. This strategy includes providing visualization of asset information, visibility of owner/operator data requirements, and feedback of building performance. The integration workflow includes a central database with a bidirectional link as the model and associated information will be accessed differently. The goal of this project was to develop a system, working within each of the project team's workflows, and was tested and validated on a University Park campus facility.
Lear ni ng Obj ect i ves Attendees will be able to: IDENTIFY BIM Initiatives at Penn State University UNDERSTAND Penn State and Whiting Turner's methods, strategies, and lessons learned for harvesting BIM data and importing it into a CMMS DEFINE Strategies for developing effective BIM to FM integration methodology.
How Does Penn State Define BIM?
Bui l di ng A Constructed Environment
Inf or mat i on Facility Data Room Information Energy Consumption Space Classifications Asset Data Make Model Serial # Voltage Horse Power Warranty Etc
Model Rendering Coordination Model Maintenance System
AND How Is Penn State DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE BIM FM INTEGRATION?
Implementation Methodology CONDUCT EXPERT INTERVIEWS WITH ALL OPP DEPARTMENTS PRIORITZE AREAS OF POTENTIAL INTEGRATION ORGANIZE FOCUS GROUP ANALYZE EXISTING SYSTEMS AND WORKFLOWS DEVELOP BIM TO FM INTEGRATION WITH FOCUS GROUP TEST&VALIDATE WITH INDUSTRY FEEDBACK/PILOT PROJECT
Interview Questions WHAT INFORMATION IS CURRENTLY TRACKED? HOW IS THIS INFORMATION TYPICALLY USED? WHAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CAN BE BENEFICIAL? WHO ARE YOUR KEY PLAYERS?
Interview Outcome OPP Department Interest Level Barrier to Entry BIM Technology Competency Information Overlap Predecessor Successor Advantage 1 Design & Construction High Medium High 6 2,4 High 2 Work Control Center High Low Very High 1 4,8 High 3 4 5 6 7 HMC Design & Construction Energy and Engineering Commonwealth Services Campus Planning & Design Facilities Resources & Planning High Low High 1 2 High High Medium High 1,2 2 High Medium Medium Medium 1 2 Medium Medium Medium Medium --- 1 Medium Medium Medium Medium 1 --- Medium 8 Buildings and Grounds Low High Low 2 2 Medium 9 Campus Sustainability Office Low High Low 6 --- Low 10 Environmental Health and Safety Low High Low 1 --- Low 11 Administrative & Financial Services Low High Low 1 --- Low *Departments are ranked in order of integration priority.
Why Utilize BIM for Operations and Maintenance? NOT MAINTENANCE FRIENDLY
Why Utilize BIM for Operations and Maintenance? MAINTENANCE FRIENDLY
Items Not Designed for Maintenance Cost 2 TIMES 4 TIMES 25 OVER Preventative Maintenance Corrective Maintenance YEARS
Why Utilize BIM for Operations and Maintenance? Improved Facility Visualization
Why Utilize BIM for Operations and Maintenance? Improved Facility Information
Penn State Projected Savings YEARLY 164,000 TOTAL WORK ORDERS 109,000 PM work orders @ 1.5 hrs each 55,000 CM & EM work orders @ 5 hrs each 438,000 man hours per year SAVING 45 MINUTES PER DAY PER PERSON TOTAL $2.2M POTENTIAL YEARLY SAVINGS Research and interoperability issues Estimated savings of ten percent in operations
Penn State Millennium Science Complex BIM to FM Pilot Study
BIM to FM Pilot Study Goals PROVIDE VISUALIZATION OF ASSET INFORMATION REDUCE COST AND PLANNING TIME PROVIDE VISIBILITY OF OPERATOR DATA REQUIREMENTS DELIVER FEEDBACK BUILDING PERFORMANCE
Pilot Phases 1. FACILITY DATA EXPORT Design & Construction Data Maintenance System
Deliverables Process VDC Process Map Schematic Design Preliminary Design 3D Civil Design Project Goals Defined Deliver Design Models Design Review & Coordination Fire Protection Design Criteria BIM Process Map Responsibility Matrix Define Standards Deliver Manufacturer Equipment Data Fire Protection Pkg Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, HVAC, Mechanical, and Electrical Bid Packages
VDC Process Map Permit Drawings Revise models No Construction Drawings & GMP FM Combine models Clash Detection Yes Pass Coordinated BIM Model Update models Repeat with other models Coordination No Yes Pass Prepare price Permit set Review and Approved Review & approve Issue building permit Consultant Input Trade Bid Packages
Deliverables Process VDC Process Map Schematic Design Preliminary Design 3D Civil Design Project Goals Defined Deliver Design Models Design Review & Coordination Fire Protection Design Criteria BIM Process Map Responsibility Matrix Define Standards Deliver Manufacturer Equipment Data Fire Protection Pkg Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, HVAC, Mechanical, and Electrical Bid Packages
Pilot Phases 1. FACILITY DATA EXPORT 2. BIM DATA SYNCHRONIZATION Design & Construction Data Maintenance System
Current Design & Construction Program Architecture Design Model HVAC Model Structure Design Model Concrete Model Steel Model Mechanical Piping Model MEP Design Model Civil/Site Design Model Electrical Model Plumbing Model Design Geometry Construction Geometry Data Transfer Fire Sprinkler Model Technology Model Facilities Management
Proposed Design & Construction Program HVAC Model Design Geometry Architecture Design Model Construction Geometry Concrete Model Structure Design Model Data Transfer Steel Model MEP Design Model Mechanical Piping Model As-Built Composite Model Civil/Site Design Model Electrical Model Plumbing Model Fire Sprinkler Model Technology Model Database Facilities Management
Pilot Phases 1. FACILITY DATA EXPORT 2. BIM DATA SYNCHRONIZATION 3. VISUALIZATION INTEGRATION Design & Construction Data Maintenance System
Data Transfer Process Design Stage Construction Stage Operations Stage DATA DATA Design Construction Input Input 3D MODEL Model Creation Extract Data ASSET DATA Owner Gatekeeper OG FM DATABASE Model Updated Update Data UPDATE Renovation Stage
AND How Is Penn State DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE BIM FM DATA INTEGRATION?
TYPICAL PUMP Information Requirements ENTERPRISE ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IBM MAXIMO WHICH PREVENTATIVELY MAINTAINS 50,000 MEP Assets Equipment Number Fluid Flowrate Total Head Pressure Pump RPM Construction Drawing ID Driver Voltage Phase A Driver Voltage Phase B Driver Voltage Phase C Driver Motor Amperage Phase A Driver Motor Amperage Phase B Driver Motor Amperage Phase C Type Model Model Number Manufacturer PENN STATE OFFICE OF PHYSICAL PLANT FACILITY ASSET REQUIREMENTS
Level of Development Definition LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION Contains LOD 510 LOD 100 facility and geometry data in as-built conditions. PSU Asset Attribute's List data Operations and Maintenance manuals Warranty information Submittal information Contains LOD 200 facility and geometry data in as-built conditions. LOD 520 PSU Asset Attribute's List data Operations and Maintenance manuals Warranty information Submittal information LOD 530.
Updated Modeling Standards in Contract
BIM for Owners Additional Information at bim.psu.edu
Questions?
Thank You! Murray Hestley Whiting-Turner Murray.hestley@whiting-turner.com Eric Nulton Penn State University Eric.nulton@psu.edu