National Customer Service Survey SM Mobile Phone Customer Service

Similar documents
Transform your support services into an exceptional customer experience. An Extension of Your Business. First Data Consumer Experience Management

Lenovo is a leader in x86-based server customer satisfaction scores in 1H16. August 2016 TBR T EC H N O LO G Y B U S I N ES S R ES EAR C H, I N C.

IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Hosted and Cloud Contact Center 2016 Vendor Assessment

Employer Implementation Overview

What Customers Are Thinking

Glossary 1. For a complete glossary of support center terminology, please visit HDI s Web site at HDI Course Glossary

Service Strategy Maturity: A Model for Business Performance

CASE STUDY EQM and the Impact on First Contact Resolution

The Social Marketer vs. the Social Enterprise Social media in financial institutions is in transition.

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TECHNOLOGY SURVEY

Polypropylene Resin Supplier Customer Value & Loyalty Benchmarking Study

NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER SUCCESS STORY

2018 Senior Living Study. Beyond Measure jdpower.com

Event & Experiential Marketing Industry Forecast & Best Practices Study. FOURTH ANNUAL EventTrack. executive summary.

HDPE & LLDPE/LDPE Resin Supplier Customer Value & Loyalty Benchmarking Studies

Survey Use & Design. SE 350 Software Processes & Product Quality

The Rules of Engagement

A Guide to the Net Promoter Score for Your Business

Customer Advocacy: The B-to-B Secret Sauce. Lisa Nakano Service Director Customer Engagement Strategies Service April 2017

Technology Solution Partners Featured:

Not Your Mother s Call Center Using Context to Maximize Customer Experience and Operational Excellence

Multimedia Cloud Contact Center E-Guide: A Must Read Powerful Purchasing Guide

Uncover the true value of your customer support organization

Network Operations Center

THE MILLENNIAL SMARTPHONE POLL

T H E B O T T O M L I N E

State of Sustainable Business Survey October 2013

Unleashing the Enormous Power of Call Center KPI s. Call Center Best Practices Series

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE: REAL BENEFITS FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. by David Tilson

Reliance BPO. People Process Technology

Call Center Benchmark India

Customer Service in a Multi-Channel World 2. Table of Contents

3 Keys To Winning Millennials Hearts & Business

State of Customer Service Experience 2017

Satisfy customers. Grow their loyalty.

Best practices for deploying a modern, predictive IVR system

CUSTOMERS EXPERIENCE WITH APPAREL AND ACCESSORIES WEBSITES A SUBCATEGORY OF THE FORESEE EXPERIENCE INDEX: RETAIL EDITION. Eric Feinberg Vice President

KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR EXAMINING CHANNEL PARTNER LOYALTY AN ICLP RESEARCH STUDY IN ASSOCIATION WITH CHANNEL FOCUS BAPTIE & COMPANY

The Accenture 2011 High Performance Finance Study. Redefining High Performance in the Insurance Finance Function

The Future Of Agencies

Client Experience Management

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ACCOUNT BASED MARKETING:

Mastio & Company s. LTL Carrier Customer Value & Loyalty Benchmarking Study. Metrics to Manage the Shipper Experience

RFP GMU GRAPHIC DESIGN & MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

To Bot or Not to Bot. How to balance human interaction with automation as AI takes hold in business. Volume 1, 2017 TTEC Insights

Enterprise Voice Transformation: Migration from TDM to IP

CONTACT CENTER SATISFACTION INDEX

Conducting Marketing Research

BEST PRACTICES: 2015 Credit Card Mobile Sites and Apps

Market Analysis and a Detailed Study of a Leading Cloud Telephony and SMS Gateway Company Pawan Kumar Naik 1 Praveen Kumar 2 Dr.S.A.

Elevating the Customer Experience in the Mobile World

Managed IT Services. Eliminating technology pains in small businesses

Why Search + Social = Success For Brands The Role Of Search And Social In The Customer Life Cycle

2015 Global State of Multichannel Customer Service Report

THE TRANSFORMATION OF CUSTOMER SUPPORT

Mastio & Company s. Global Freight Forwarder Customer Value & Loyalty Benchmarking Study. Metrics to Manage the Shipper Experience

Evolving Technical Support for the Connected Home

The SOURCE for Contact Centers

Diversity and Inclusion. Executive Summary

Marketing Mobile with Mobile: Lessons in Strategy

Hanging Up Happy: How to Turn Contact Centers into Customer Satisfaction Centers

REVOLUTIONIZING CONTACT CENTER QUALITY MANAGEMENT WITH SPEECH ANALYTICS

Leveraging Big 4 Consulting Best Practices to Bolster Your Business Development Strategies

Service Desk KPIs Definitions & Correlations

"Evidence-Based Customer Focus"

Voice of Customer : Understanding Customer Experience On the Go

Metrics that Matter for Omnichannel Contact Centers

How. Gen. Driving Financial Industry. Change MARKETING SERVICES

The Service Desk Balanced Scorecard By Jeff Rumburg. Managing Partner at:

Managed IT Services. Eliminating technology pains for small businesses

(Page 1 of 3) 68% of full-service customers with a smartphone use a mobile application to contact/monitor their carrier regarding service issues.

Mastio & Company s. Global Freight Forwarder Performance Benchmarking & Loyalty Study. Metrics to Manage the Shipper Experience

Deb Frodl GE Capital Fleet Services & ecomagination August 17, 2012

Selecting the most appropriate review scales in 360 degree assessments. part of our series of Tools

The Balanced Scorecard

Water Conservation Quantitative Research Report Summary

Inspect what you expect.

Enterprise Uses of Speech Analytics

2014 Technician / Service Advisor Survey:

IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Life Science Sales and Marketing Digital Transformation 2016 Vendor Assessment

CREATING THE EMR ADVANTAGE THE ARCH COLLABORATIVE EMR BEST PRACTICES STUDY NOVEMBER 2017 PERFORMANCE REPORT

Customer Care Services

The Employee Net Promoter Score: A (new) Metric for Assessing Your Workforce Engagement Profile

Service Desk Metrics

The Customer Complaints X-Ray

Voice of the Category Manager Survey 2017

Human Resource Professionals. Human Resource Professionals. Executive Summary Report Spring, A Survey of. for. Gatti & Associates.

Award for Call Handling:

NEAT EVALUATION FOR INTELENET GLOBAL SERVICES: Market Segments: CX Improvement Focus & Overall

Don t start your RFP before you do a needs analysis by Roy Wollen

ITW 2009 Health and Wellness Enrollment Campaign PartnerComm Team PartnerComm Inc./Illinois Tool Works Inc. Arlington, Texas, U.S.

2012 International Customer Management Institute (ICMI). All Rights Reserved icmi.com I

TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES HOSPITALS AND CLINICS. Robert Jehling Associate Vice President and Chief System Access & Patient Experience Officer

Metric of the Month. First Contact Resolution Rate By Jeff Rumburg. Managing Partner at:

MAJOR INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TRENDS

BlueDirect BlueCross Blue Shield of Florida

Converging Communications And Technology STRATAGY. Voice Processing

Understanding and Mitigating IT Project Risks BY MIKE BAILEY AND MIKE RIFFEL

Implementing an Employee Engagement Programme

Risks, Strengths & Weaknesses Statement. November 2016

Transcription:

National Customer Service Survey SM Mobile Phone Customer Service Based on data collected from July 2009 to February 2010 Peter U. Leppik President and CEO, Vocal Laboratories Inc. 2010 Vocal Laboratories Inc. About This Study The National Customer Service Survey compares the customer service quality for different companies in the same industry, using survey data and call statistics from the companies customers. As part of this ongoing research, we interview customers of competing companies immediately after a customer service call. About This Release The data in this report is based on 1,142 completed telephone interviews conducted between July 2009 and February 2010. The study involved interviews with customers of AT&T,,, and. We collected enough data to make direct comparisons of these companies support effectiveness. Methodology Consumers were recruited online to participate in this study, and called an alternate toll-free phone number for customer service. This alternate number forwarded to the company s published customer service phone number and allowed Vocalabs to track the progress of each call. Selected participants were called back immediately after the end of the support call and interviewed about their experience. The full data set, including survey responses and interview recordings, is available on a subscription basis. The National Customer Service Survey is a continuation of Vocalabs ongoing research, formerly called Service Quality Tracker. Vocalabs has been publishing syndicated industry research on phone-based customer service quality, including mobile phone customer service, since 2004.

Summary of Key Findings Customer satisfaction with mobile phone customer service calls has a significant impact on loyalty, willingness to recommend, and overall company satisfaction. Customers who said they were Very Satisfied with the call were 3 times as likely to say they would repurchase again than customers who were dissatisfied with the call, and 3 times as likely to say they would recommend the Company to a friend or colleague. Customers who were Very Satisfied with the call were 6.5 times more likely to say they were Very Satisfied with the company. Of the call factors measured, problem resolution had the greatest impact on customer service call satisfaction. Seventy-nine percent of customers who said their problem was resolved on the call said they would repurchase again, compared to 45% of customers who said their problem was not resolved on the call. and lead AT&T and in customer service. Sixty-six percent of customers and 65% of customers said they were Very Satisfied with the customer service call, compared to 63% of AT&T customers and 59% of customers. and s strong performance can be attributed to their superior call resolution rates. Sixty-six percent of and 67% of customers reported that their problems were resolved during the call, while 64% of AT&T and 63% of customers said their problems were resolved on the call. and customers are more likely to purchase again from the company and are more likely to recommend the company to colleagues and friends than customers of AT&T and. Seventy-six percent of and of customers said they would repurchase, compared to only of AT&T customers and 64% of customers. Eighty percent of customers and 75% of customers said they were willing to recommend the company, compared to 72% of AT&T customers and 65% of customers. If you had to decide today, would you purchase again from {Company}? Yes Maybe No AT&T 7% 33% 64% 8% 28% 9% 21% 76% 8% 16% 0% 10% 20% 30% 50% 90% 100% If the situation arose, would you recommend {Company} to a friend or colleague? AT&T 72% 19% 9% 65% 26% 9% 75% 18% 7% 12% 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 50% 90% 100% Page 2

Evaluating the Impact of Call Factors on Business Outcomes Customer service is an inherent part of the customer experience for many businesses, and how well that service is delivered can have a profound and lasting effect on the customer s willingness to buy again in the future. The high-level business objective in providing customer service is generally to serve the customer in the least expensive way, while having the greatest positive impact on customer satisfaction, loyalty, and promotion. To achieve this objective, it is critical to understand what factors under the company s control may have a positive or negative impact on customer opinions, and which of these factors are more important in achieving a particular company s business objectives. To gain insight into these factors, we ask consumers a variety of questions relating to what happened during the customers support call, the customers opinions of the company and the customers opinions of the service received. We group this data by Call Factors (what happened during the call), Call Outcomes (customer opinions about the call), and Business Outcomes (customer opinions about the company and intent to purchase). Our analysis of survey results focuses on determining which Call Factors have the greatest impact on Call Outcomes and, in turn, Business Outcomes. Impact of Call Factors on Business Outcomes Call Factors No Problems with IVR Able to Reach a Person Easy to Reach a Person Reasonable Wait Time No Irrelevant Steps Agent was Professional Escalate if Needed Call Outcomes Satisfied with IVR Satisfied with Agent Business Outcomes Satisfied with Company Problem was Solved Page 3

Call Satisfaction and Business Outcomes During the study period, Vocalabs interviewed 1,142 mobile phone customers immediately following a phone-based customer service experience. Of the customers surveyed, 52% said they were Very Satisfied with the call. Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed said they were likely to purchase again from the Company, while 73% reported they would recommend the Company to a friend or colleague. Very Satisfied with Company Business Outcome Metrics We found that customer satisfaction with the call had a significant impact on overall satisfaction, loyalty, and willingness to recommend. Eighty-three percent of customers who said they were Very Satisfied with the call reported they intended to repurchase from the company again, compared to 28% of those who were dissatisfied with the call. Eighty-eight percent of customers who were Very Satisfied with the call said they were willing to recommend the company to a friend or colleague, while just 29% of customers who were dissatisfied with the call said they would recommend the company. Impact of Call Satisfaction on... % customers who are "Very Satisfied" with Company 100% 90% 50% 30% 20% 10% 0% Page 4 Company Satisfaction 11% 6.5x increase Dissatisfied with Call 73% 0% 10% 20% 30% 50% 90% 100% Survey results also revealed that satisfaction with the automated portion of the call has a significant impact on overall satisfaction. Customers who were Very Satisfied with the automated portion of the call were 2.5 times more likely to be satisfied with the compay overall, compared to customers who were dissatisfied with their experience. % customers likely to repurchase from Company 100% 90% 50% 30% 20% 10% 0% 28% 3x increase Dissatisfied with Call 83% % customers willing to recommend Company % customers who are "Very Satisfied" with Company 100% 90% 50% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 90% 50% 30% 20% 10% 0% 29% 3x increase Dissatisfied with Call Impact of IVR Satisfaction on Company Satisfaction 28% 2.5x increase Dissatisfied with Call 88% 71%

Key Drivers of Customer Satisfaction Vocalabs uses its Impact Opportunity Analysis method to prioritize call factors by their potential impact on call and business outcomes. The Impact Opportunity Analysis provides a powerful framework for quantifying the potential improvement to business objectives that could be achieved based on an improvement in a specific call factor. Effort, training and resources can be prioritized based on where there is the greatest ability to improve outcomes. Call Factor Improvement: Quantifying the Impact The Impact Opportunity estimates how much a business outcome will improve if a given problem that customers experience could be solved completely. It combines the impact of each problem, as measured by the difference between business outcomes for people who experienced the problem and those who did not, with the percentage of customers who reported experiencing that problem. Based on the results of mobile phone customer service calls for the current study period, an improvement in problem resolution has the greatest potential to improve high-level business objectives. Failing to solve a customer s problem has a strong effect on customer satisfaction (high impact) and happens to a large percentage of customers (large opportunity). Impact of Problem Resolution on Problem Solved 61% of respondents Opportunity (Problem Not Solved) 25% of respondents Impact (% point change in ) Impact Opportunity Likelihood to repurchase 79% 45% 35% 8.5% Overall, 61% of all respondents said they would repurchase again from the Company. Based on the Impact-Opportunity method, solving every customer s support problem could hypothetically result in an 8.6 percentage point increase in customers reporting they would repurchase. This is based on the following calculation: Impact * Opportunity (79%-45%) * 25% = 8.5% Impact of Call Factors on Impact Catastrophes Opportunities Impolite Agent Refuse to Escalate Problem Not Resolved Hard to Reach Agent Hold Too Long Irrelevant Steps IVR Problems Impact Opportunity Categories Opportunities Greatest opportunity to improve top-line business objectives Catastrophes Infrequent problems with dramatic impact on business outcomes Irritations Minor issues that happen frequently but have limited impact on business outcomes Hiccups Problem affects limited number of customers and has limited impact on outcomes Hiccups Irritations Opportunity Page 5

Comparing Service Satisfaction: AT&T,, and The National Customer Service Survey for Mobile Phone Customer Service launched in July of 2009, giving us eight months of continuous survey data on customers perceptions of the quality of customer service they receive from the leading wireless providers, AT&T,, and. Business Outcomes Fifty-six percent of AT&T and customers reported that they were Very Satisfied with the company following the customer service call. customers were the least satisfied among customers surveyed, with only 45% reporting they were Very Satisfied and 22% reporting they were dissatisfied. had the highest scores for loyalty and willingness to recommend. Seventysix percent of customers said they would purchase again from the company and said they would recommend to a friend or colleague. While AT&T customers were generally satisfied with the call, they scored lower on loyalty than customers of the other wireless companies in the study. Onethird of AT&T customers reported that they would not repurchase again from the company, compared to only 16% of customers. lagged in the area of willingness to recommend. Only 65% of customers reported that they would recommend the company to a friend or colleague, 15 percentage points behind. Twenty-six percent of customers said they would not recommend the company, compared to just 12% of customers. Overall Satisfaction Please rate your overall satisfaction with {Company}. AT&T -15% 56% -22% -15% -16% Dissatisfied 45% 52% 56% Very Satisfied If you had to decide today, would you repurchase again from {Company}? AT&T -33% -28% -21% -16% No Yes 64% 76% If the situation arose, would you recommend {Company} to a friend or colleague? AT&T -19% 72% -26% 65% -19% 75% -12% No Yes Page 6

Call Outcomes led the four major mobile phone carriers in call satisfaction. Sixty-six percent of customers were Very Satisfied with the experience, with second-place garnering 65% Very Satisfied. Sixty-three percent of AT&T and 59% of customers gave their service experiences the top rating. customers were least satisfied with the automated portion of the call, compared to customers from AT&T, and. Nearly one-third of customers were dissatisfied with the interactive voice response (IVR) or automated portion of the call, while only 22% of customers were dissatisfied. Call Satisfaction Please rate your satisfaction with the call today. AT&T -20% 63% -19% -14% -18% Dissatisfied IVR Satisfaction How satisfied were you with the automated system on the call? 59% 65% 66% Very Satisfied AT&T -25% 44% Call Factors In addition to the high-level metrics discussed above, we track a number of metrics related to specific events on the call. These metrics are based on survey questions related to agent performance, the automated portion of the call, and problem resolution. and were best able to resolve customers problems on the call, with 67% of T- Mobile and 66% of survey respondents reporting that their problem was solved. Our research has consistently shown that problem resolution is one of the most important factors in driving overall satisfaction and other business goals, suggesting that and T- Mobile s strong performance overall is largely attributable to their superior problem resolution. The other notable difference among the companies is that a significantly higher percentage of subscribers reported problems with the automated portion of the call than any of the other three companies. Specifically, customers were far more likely to report that the automated speech system had difficulty understanding them, suggesting that speech recognition errors are the cause of the reported problems. -22% -26% -30% Problem Resolution Did you get what you needed on your call today? Dissatisfied 42% 36% Very Satisfied AT&T -27% 64% -29% -25% -26% No 63% Yes 67% 66% Problems with the Automated Portion of the Call Did the automated system have any problems with your call today? AT&T -19% 81% -20% -29% 71% -19% 81% Yes No Page 7

About the Author Peter U. Leppik is president and CEO of Vocalabs. After several years as an investment analyst following call center technologies, he founded Vocal Laboratories Inc. in 2001 to apply scientific principles of data collection and analysis to the problem of improving customer service. Leppik is a frequent industry speaker on the topic of measuring and improving customer service quality in call centers and automated speech environments. He is also coauthor of Gourmet Customer Service: A Scientific Approach to Improving the Caller Experience. Leppik has led efforts to measure, compare and publish customer service quality across a range of industries through third party, independent research, and works with industry associations to sponsor research to advance the state of the art in customer service. At Vocalabs, Leppik has assembled a team of professionals with deep expertise in survey methodology, data communications and data visualization to provide clients with best-in-class tools for improving customer service through real-time customer feedback. Mr. Leppik holds B.S. degree in Physics from the University of Minnesota and an M.S. degree in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. About Vocal Laboratories Inc. Vocalabs helps leading brands improve customer service by collecting timely and actionable feedback about customer service quality. We interview customers immediately after a customer service call, retail store visit or IVR interaction while the memory of the experience is still fresh. Using our powerful hosted survey and reporting platform, clients discover and share insights to improve business decisions. Vocalabs customers include Fortune 1000 companies, telecommunications carriers, industry consultants and equipment vendors. Vocalabs award-winning services include immediate, live-agent surveys and usability testing for speech recognition and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) systems using large consumer panels. Vocalabs also conducts independent research on customer satisfaction with phone-based customer service. Vocalabs current syndicated research covers computer technical support and mobile phone customer service. Learn more at www.vocalabs.com. NCSS Data Set Availability The National Customer Service Survey (NCSS) is sponsored and unwritten by Vocalabs to track the quality of phone-based customer service across industry verticals. Current research includes Computer Tech Support (covering Apple, Dell and HP) and Mobile Phone Customer Service (covering AT&T,, and ). Each full dataset, including survey results and recordings, is available on an annual subscription basis. Clients access the dataset, including survey responses and recordings, through Vocalabs hosted survey reporting and analysis tool. Please contact us for pricing and additional information. Vocal Laboratories Inc. (Vocalabs) 8421 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 260 Golden Valley, MN 55426 USA Telephone: +1 952.941.6580 Website: www.vocalabs.com Page 8