Chapter 9A. Process Capability & SPC

Similar documents
Chapter 9A. Process Capability & SPC

Engenharia e Tecnologia Espaciais ETE Engenharia e Gerenciamento de Sistemas Espaciais

Acceptance Sampling Using Statgraphics Centurion. Presented by Dr. Neil W. Polhemus

Acceptance sampling is an inspection procedure used to

many quality problems remain invisible to consumers

Quality Management (PQM01) Chapter 04 - Quality Control

Unit QUAN Session 6. Introduction to Acceptance Sampling

Assignment 5 (Solution) Measurement System Analysis and OC curve

Notes for Production and Operations Management- I

Application of statistical tools and techniques in Quality Management

Statistics Quality: Control - Statistical Process Control and Using Control Charts

Sample Mean Range

Online Student Guide Types of Control Charts

LO1: Understand how inspection and testing methods and processes improve quality control

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

Design of Economic Optimal Double Sampling Design with Zero Acceptance Numbers

SQR-009 QUALITY ASSURANCE ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPLIERS

Quality Engineering. Dr. John W. Sutherland

QUICK & DIRTY GRR PROCEDURE TO RANK TEST METHOD VARIABILITY

The materials required over the next two modules include:

Statistical Thinking Session 2 of 4 10:15 to Noon

Student Manual. Lesson 4- Statistical Concepts. Version /

Quality Control Charts

Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Wisconsin - Platteville 3. Statistical Process Control

Ten Requirements for Effective Process Control

Process Control Optimization Manual

Managing Quality in Pharmaceutical Industry Using Six Sigma. Edited by Mahmoud Farouk Moussa TQM, CSSBB, MBA

Daniel Y. Peng, Ph.D.

Address for Correspondence

Measurement System Analysis For Automated Test Systems. Dave Barnard Bob Trinnes Rockwell Automation, Inc

STANDARD PROCEDURE: NWSP R0 (15) Breaking Force and Elongation of Nonwoven Materials (Strip Method)

Measurement Systems Analysis

NHS Improvement An Overview of Statistical Process Control (SPC) October 2011

Evaluation of Quality of Concrete Road Project based on Statistical Quality Control Techniques

A Walk-Through Taguchi Design of Experiment (DOE) Application

Statistical Questions from CPV Monitoring of Bioreactor Data

Big Data and Statistical Process Control. By Marc Schaeffers

THE INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY (IU) Department of Industrial System Engineering

SPECIAL CONTROL CHARTS

Welcome to the course, Evaluating the Measurement System. The Measurement System is all the elements that make up the use of a particular gage.

Process Capability Studies

Case Study of Process Variation in a Steel Tube Manufacturing Industry

Student Activities. Lesson Four. Shopping Wisely 04/09

SAP QM Online Training

Quality Management. Six Sigma Quality An introduction. All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Qualifying Capacitive Sensing Hole Measurement System Technology for Performing Gage R&R Studies

Quality Management System

Quality Management Chapter 14

Sample Size Rationale For Medical Device Package Validation

Overview of Statistics used in QbD Throughout the Product Lifecycle

Cpk. X _ LSL 3s 3s USL _ X. Cpk = Min [ Specification Width Process Spread LSL USL

Inspection Qualification and Implementation of ENIQ in Sweden

VALIDATION OF THE GRADER S ABILITY USING MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Part 1 in this series introduced the reader to Statistical Process Control, and Part 2

Monitoring of the Production Process in Mass Production of Dimensionally Accurate Products

SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (KEY) UNIT- I

Cage Code First Edition. A guide to AQS continuous improvement expectations

Process validation in medical devices

Economic Design of Control Chart

Understanding and accounting for product

INFORMATION DOCUMENT:PRACTICAL EXAMPLES OF SAMPLING PLANS 1

Tech 149: Unit 4 Lecture. Network Systems, Quality Systems, Manufacturing Planning, Control and Scheduling in CIM Environment

For Demonstrations: Automatic Data Collection So Simple The Graphs Just Appear

A. I and IV only B. I, II and III only C. I, III and IV only D. I, II, III and IV

Next Generation SPC Software for Manufacturers of Electronics

Individual Charts Done Right and Wrong

QUALITY ASSURANCE. NORDSTROM PRODUCT GROUP QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FINAL RANDOM INSPECTIONS July 2017

How Will You Know That a Change Is An Improvement?

Lab Discrete Distributions

Chapter 13. Microeconomics. Monopolistic Competition: The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting

Applying ISO 9001 to making cookies

Transforming your Historical Metrics to a Futuristic State

Midterm Review Summer 2009 Chapters 1 7 Stat 111

Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors

Chapter 5 Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 7th Edition by Douglas C. Montgomery. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cork Institute of Technology. Autumn 2005 Manufacturing Engineering (Time: 3 Hours)

Identification of Rogue Tools and Process Stage Drift by using JMP Software Visualization and Analytical Techniques

Mona Loa Malaysian Manufacturing cost per bag... $6.00 $5.00 Add markup at 30% Selling price per bag... $7.80 $6.50

ZODIAC INTERCONNECT US ZODIAC AEROSYSTEMS SEGMENT ZODIAC INTERCONNECT DIVISION

Chapter 13 Monopolistic Competition: The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting

AS9003A QUALITY MANUAL

QCL and DSS Training For Suppliers

Find the unit prices for the following questions. 1. Sampreet bought 3 pairs of flip-flops for $12.60.

Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987)

Investigating Out of Trend Results (OOT s) Dr. Pradeep Nagalkar Head Quality Control (Bio. & Chem.) Haffkine Bio-Pharma. Corp. Ltd.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ROTARY METER PERFORMANCE Kevin Beaver GE Oil & Gas Meters and Instruments Port Northwest Dr.

CHAPTER 13: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Multiple Choice Questions

Six Sigma Dictionary

Process Validation& Contents Uniformity in Tablets via Quality Tools and Process Capabilities

Design and development of relational chain sampling plans [RChSP(0, i)] for attribute quality characteristics

Process-FMEA Quick Guide

John G. Surak PhD Surak and Associates Clemson, SC

LRM Material and Process Spec Review

Consumer and Producer Surplus and Deadweight Loss

Reliability of Power Rating and Labeling

MGT613 POMA A Lot of Solved MCQs

Developing and implementing statistical process control tools in a Jordanian company. R.H. Fouad* and Salman D. Al-Shobaki

Graphical methods for data from a fermentation process. Antje Christensen Per Rexen Novo Nordisk A/S

The Comet Assay How to recognise Good Data

Transcription:

1 Chapter 9A Process Capability & SPC

2 OBJECTIVES Process Variation Process Capability Process Control Procedures Variable data Attribute data Acceptance Sampling Operating Characteristic Curve

3 Basic Forms of Variation Assignable variation is caused by factors that can be clearly identified and possibly managed Example: A poorly trained employee that creates variation in finished product output. Common variation is inherent in the production process Example: A molding process that always leaves burrs or flaws on a molded item.

Taguchi s View of Variation 4 Traditional view is that quality within the LS and US is good and that the cost of quality outside this range is constant, where Taguchi views costs as increasing as variability increases, so seek to achieve zero defects and that will truly minimize quality costs. High High Incremental Cost of Variability Incremental Cost of Variability Zero Zero Lower Spec Target Spec Upper Spec Lower Spec Target Spec Upper Spec Traditional View Taguchi s View

Process Capability 5 Process limits Specification limits How do the limits relate to one another?

6 Process Capability Index, C pk Capability Index shows how well parts being produced fit into design limit specifications. C pk = min X LTL UTL - X or 3 3 As a production process produces items small shifts in equipment or systems can cause differences in production performance from differing samples. Shifts in Process Mean

Process Capability A Standard Measure of How Good a Process Is. 7 A simple ratio: Specification Width Actual Process Width Generally, the bigger the better.

8 Process Capability C pk Min X LTL UTL X ; 3 3 This is a one-sided Capability Index Concentration on the side which is closest to the specification - closest to being bad

Coffee Bean Bag Example 9 Ron Valdez Café roasts and nationally distributes 16 ounce bags of coffee beans. The Omaha World Herald has just published an article that claims that the bags frequently have less than 15 ounces of coffee beans in out 16 ounce bags. Let s assume that the government says that we must be within ± 5 percent of the weight advertised on the bag. Upper Tolerance Limit = 16 +.05(16) = 16.8 ounces Lower Tolerance Limit = 16.05(16) = 15.2 ounces We go out and buy 1,000 bags of coffee beans and find that they weight an average of 16.102 ounces with a standard deviation of.629 ounces.

Cereal Box Process Capability 10 Specification or Tolerance Limits Upper Spec = 16.8 oz Lower Spec = 15.2 oz Observed Weight Mean = 16.102 oz Std Dev =.629 oz C pk X Min LTL UTL X ; 3 3 16.102 15.2 16.8 16.102 Min ; 3(.629) 3(.629) C pk C pk Min.478;.370 C pk.370

11 What does a C pk of.370 mean? An index that shows how well the units being produced fit within the specification limits. This is a process that will produce a relatively high number of defects. Many companies look for a C pk of 1.3 or better 6-Sigma company wants 2.0! Cpk < 1 The process is not capable Cpk = 1 The process is just capable Cpk > 1 The process is capable

Types of Statistical Sampling 12 Attribute (Go or no-go information) Defectives refers to the acceptability of product across a range of characteristics. Defects refers to the number of defects per unit which may be higher than the number of defectives. p-chart application

Types of Statistical Sampling 13 Variable (Continuous) Usually measured by the mean and the standard deviation. X-bar and R chart applications

Statistical Process Control (SPC) Charts Normal Behavior UCL LCL 14 UCL 1 2 3 4 5 6 Samples over time Possible problem, investigate LCL UCL 1 2 3 4 5 6 Samples over time Possible problem, investigate LCL 1 2 3 4 5 6 Samples over time

15 Control Limits are based on the Normal Curve x -3-2 -1 m 0 1 2 3 z Standard deviation units or z units.

Control Limits 16 We establish the Upper Control Limits (UCL) and the Lower Control Limits (LCL) with plus or minus 3 standard deviations from some x-bar or mean value. Based on this we can expect 99.7% of our sample observations to fall within these limits. LCL 99.7% UCL x

17 Example of Constructing a p-chart: Required Data Sample Number Number of Samples 1 100 4 2 100 2 3 100 5 4 100 3 5 100 6 6 100 4 7 100 3 8 100 7 9 100 1 10 100 2 11 100 3 12 100 2 13 100 2 14 100 8 15 100 3 Number of defects found in each sample

18 Statistical Process Control Formulas: Attribute Measurements (p-chart) Given: p = Total Number of Defectives Total Number of Observations s p = p (1- p) n Compute control limits: UCL = p + z s LCL = p - z s p p

19 Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 1 1. Calculate the sample proportions, p (these are what can be plotted on the p-chart) for each sample Sample n Defectives p 1 100 4 0.04 2 100 2 0.02 3 100 5 0.05 4 100 3 0.03 5 100 6 0.06 6 100 4 0.04 7 100 3 0.03 8 100 7 0.07 9 100 1 0.01 10 100 2 0.02 11 100 3 0.03 12 100 2 0.02 13 100 2 0.02 14 100 8 0.08 15 100 3 0.03

20 Example of Constructing a p-chart: Steps 2&3 2. Calculate the average of the sample proportions p = 55 1500 = 0.036 3. Calculate the standard deviation of the sample proportion s p = p (1- p) n =.036(1-.036) 100 =.0188

21 Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 4 4. Calculate the control limits UCL = p + z LCL = p - z s s.036 3(.0188) p p UCL = 0.0924 LCL = -0.0204 (or 0)

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 5 22 5. Plot the individual sample proportions, the average of the proportions, and the control limits 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 UCL p 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Observation LCL

Example of x-bar and R Charts: Required Data 23 Sample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 1 10.68 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 2 10.79 10.86 10.601 10.746 10.779 3 10.78 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 4 10.59 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.73 5 10.69 10.708 10.79 10.758 10.671 6 10.75 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 7 10.79 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 8 10.74 10.779 10.11 10.737 10.75 9 10.77 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10 10.72 10.671 10.708 10.85 10.712 11 10.79 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 12 10.62 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 13 10.66 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.75 14 10.81 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 15 10.66 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728

Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 1. Calculate sample means, sample ranges, mean of means, and mean of ranges. 24 Sample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 Avg Range 1 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 10.732 0.116 2 10.787 10.86 10.601 10.746 10.779 10.755 0.259 3 10.78 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 10.759 0.171 4 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.73 10.727 0.221 5 10.693 10.708 10.79 10.758 10.671 10.724 0.119 6 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 10.705 0.143 7 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 10.735 0.274 8 10.744 10.779 10.11 10.737 10.75 10.624 0.669 9 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10.710 0.132 10 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.85 10.712 10.732 0.179 11 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 10.748 0.163 12 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 10.768 0.250 13 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.75 10.733 0.349 14 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 10.783 0.158 15 10.66 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728 10.692 0.103 Averages 10.728 0.220400

Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 2. Determine Control Limit Formulas and Necessary Tabled Values 25 x Chart Control Limits UCL = x + A R LCL = x - A R R Chart Control Limits UCL = D R LCL = D R 3 4 2 2 From Exhibit TN8.7 n A2 D3 D4 2 1.88 0 3.27 3 1.02 0 2.57 4 0.73 0 2.28 5 0.58 0 2.11 6 0.48 0 2.00 7 0.42 0.08 1.92 8 0.37 0.14 1.86 9 0.34 0.18 1.82 10 0.31 0.22 1.78 11 0.29 0.26 1.74

26 Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 3&4. Calculate x-bar Chart and Plot Values Means UCL = x + A LCL = x - A 10.90 2 2 R 10.728.58(0.2204) = 10.856 R 10.728-.58(0.2204) = 10.601 10.85 10.80 UCL 10.75 10.70 10.65 10.60 LCL 10.55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 5&6. Calculate R-chart and Plot Values 27 UCL = D LCL = D 4 3 R (2.11)(0.2204) R (0)(0.2204) 0 0.46504 R 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Sample UCL LCL

28 Basic Forms of Statistical Sampling for Quality Control Acceptance Sampling is sampling to accept or reject the immediate lot of product at hand Statistical Process Control is sampling to determine if the process is within acceptable limits

Acceptance Sampling 29 Purposes Determine quality level Ensure quality is within predetermined level Advantages Economy Less handling damage Fewer inspectors Upgrading of the inspection job Applicability to destructive testing Entire lot rejection (motivation for improvement)

Acceptance Sampling (Continued) 30 Disadvantages Risks of accepting bad lots and rejecting good lots Added planning and documentation Sample provides less information than 100-percent inspection

Acceptance Sampling: Single Sampling Plan 31 A simple goal Determine (1) how many units, n, to sample from a lot, and (2) the maximum number of defective items, c, that can be found in the sample before the lot is rejected

Risk 32 Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Maximum acceptable percentage of defectives defined by producer. The a (Producer s risk) is the probability of rejecting a good lot Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD) Percentage of defectives that defines consumer s rejection point. The (Consumer s risk) is the probability of accepting a bad lot

Probability of acceptance Operating Characteristic Curve 33 The OCC brings the concepts of producer s risk, consumer s risk, sample size, and maximum defects allowed together 1 0.9 a =.05 (producer s risk) 0.8 0.7 n = 99 0.6 c = 4 0.5 0.4 0.3 =.10 (consumer s risk) 0.2 0.1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AQL LTPD Acceptable Quality Level Lot Tolerance Percent defective The shape or slope of the curve is dependent on a particular combination of the four parameters

34 Example: Acceptance Sampling Problem Zypercom, a manufacturer of video interfaces, purchases printed wiring boards from an outside vender, Procard. Procard has set an acceptable quality level of 1% and accepts a 5% risk of rejecting lots at or below this level. Zypercom considers lots with 3% defectives to be unacceptable and will assume a 10% risk of accepting a defective lot. Develop a sampling plan for Zypercom and determine a rule to be followed by the receiving inspection personnel.

35 Example: Step 1. What is given and what is not? In this problem, Acceptable Quality Level, AQL = 0.01 Tolerance Percent Defective, LTPD = 0.03 Producer s risk, a = 0.05 Consumer s risk, = 0.10 You need c and n to determine your sampling plan

36 Example: Step 2. Determine c First divide LTPD by AQL. LTPD AQL.03.01 3 Then find the value for c by selecting the value in the approprate table n AQL column that is equal to or just greater than the ratio above. Sample Plan table for a 0.05, 0.10 c LTPD/AQL n AQL c LTPD/AQL n AQL 0 44.890 0.052 5 3.549 2.613 1 10.946 0.355 6 3.206 3.286 2 6.509 0.818 7 2.957 3.981 3 4.890 1.366 8 2.768 4.695 4 4.057 1.970 9 2.618 5.426

Example: Step 3. Determine Sample Size 37 Now given the information below, compute the sample size in units to generate your sampling plan c 6, from Table n AQL 3.286, from Table AQL.01, given in problem n AQL / AQL 3.286 /.01 329 (always round up) 328.6 Sampling Plan: Take a random sample of 329 units from a lot. Reject the lot if more than 6 units are defective.