GROUP HOUSING PREWEANED DAIRY CALVES: SOCIALIZATION VS. DISEASE TRANSMISSION

Similar documents
Current issues in animal welfare - what must be done and how do we improve?

Objectives. Economic Comparison of Conventional vs. Intensive Heifer Rearing Systems. Problems with the Historical Approach to Rearing Calves

Fall Calf Care Audit Form

2011 Cost of Producing Peppermint under Rill and Center-Pivot Irrigation in Washington State

FEASIBILITY OF DIFFERENT HARVEST METHODS FOR CIDER APPLES: CASE STUDY FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON

DUAL-PURPOSE WINTER CANOLA IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST: FORAGE MANAGEMENT

An Economic Comparison of Conventional vs. Intensive Heifer Rearing

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Animal Welfare Standards for the Dairy Industry: Background and Justification

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

RECOMMENDED CROP SPECIES AND WHEAT VARIETIES FOR ACIDIC SOIL

Open Access RESEARCH. Daniela Klein Jöbstl 1*, Tim Arnholdt 1, Franz Sturmlechner 2, Michael Iwersen 1 and Marc Drillich 1

Dairy Organizational Communication: Assessing the Structure Drs. W.M. Sischo, C. Crudo, and D.A. Moore

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2017 Project Report. Development of a Calf Health Risk Assessment Tool for Northern New York Dairy Farms

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Use of the Swine Feed Management Plan Checklist in Feed Management Plan Development. Introduction

WSU WILKE RESEARCH AND EXTENSION FARM OPERATION, PRODUCTION, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE FOR 2013

Part 1 Johne s Disease Overview A concise summary of the latest facts about Johne s disease and recommended methods for diagnosis and control.

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

2012 Enterprise Budget for Establishing and Producing Irrigated Alfalfa in the Washington Columbia Basin

BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES. Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

2013 Dairy Farm Labour and Calf Management Survey

Maximize milk component production

2015 COST ESTIMATES OF ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING RED RASPBERRIES IN WASHINGTON STATE

Makin Me Dizzy Pen Moves and Facility Designs to Maximize Transition Cow Health and Productivity. Clinical and Sub- Clinical Disease Prevention = +

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

2012 Cost Estimates of Establishing, Producing, and Packing Red Delicious Apples in Washington

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

Crossbreeding Systems in Beef Cattle 1

Role of Pre-weaning and Weaning Vaccination in Health Maintenance

The importance of Water and Fibre

WSU WILKE RESEARCH AND EXTENSION FARM OPERATION, PRODUCTION, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE FOR 2015

RANGE COW NUTRITION MANAGEMENT EVALUATOR

Beef Cattle Library. Weaning Management of Beef Calves 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences

2010 Cost Estimates of Establishing and Producing Organic Apples in Washington

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

Real Herds Real Heifers: The Cost of Raising Today s s Dairy Heifer

Dairy E-News. March 2015 Vol. 4, No. 1

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

AN EVALUATION OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT PRACTICES BEING USED ON IRRIGATED SOILS IN THE COLUMBIA BASIN

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

The Five Key Factors in Transition Cow Management of Freestall Dairy Herds

Value of Preconditioned Certified Health Programs to Feedlots

Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm

FARMFEED LIMITED. Adding value to Zambian crops through livestock SOME OF THE BASICS FOR DAIRY FARMING IN ZAMBIA

Florida Cow-Calf and Stocker Beef Safety and Quality Assurance Handbook: Record Keeping for Beef Quality Assurance 1

University of Florida Presentation. By: Jerry Bohn

Current Issues with Feeding Preweaned Heifers

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Laurens County 4-H Market Swine Project

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

DAIRY HEIFER REARING STRATEGIES 1) Birth to 6 months

Irrigating with Booms vs. Big Guns in Northwestern Washington

Calf Nutrition and Colostrum Management

Dairy Farms: Where Cows Come First

Management Calendar for North Carolina Producers

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Spotted Profits VS. Solid Profits Jessica Leetch AGEC 4960 March 1, 2010

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010

Preparation Prevents Poor Performance

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Pet Rabbit Record Book

OUR PROGRAMS FIT YOUR MANAGEMENT PLANS.

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

ONTHLY BEEF MANAGEMENT CALENDAR & WORKBOOK

Internal Herd Growth Generating Profits through Management

COLLECTING AND RELEASING BIOLOGICAL WEED CONTROL AGENTS IN WASHINGTON STATE

Equal Employment Opportunity Plan

COW/CALF CORNER The Newsletter

Quality, Care, Comfort

Iowa Farm Outlook. More Beef Expansion Ahead. March 2018 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 2095

AABP Guidelines. training of animal handlers. AABP euthanasia guidelines can be found at

New trends in calf feeding and housing The good and not-so-good! Bob James

MONITORING HEIFER PROGRAMS

Identifying Transition Cows at Risk and How Best to Manage Them

Dairy Herd Synchronization Programs. William M. Graves Extension Dairy Scientist

Beef Cattle Institute Hosts Antimicrobial Meeting

Puerto Rico - Various

What Do Livestock Feeders Want from Seed Corn Companies?

TAKE HOME MESSAGES Illinois Parameter < 18,000 18,000 22,000 > 22,000

Effects of Creep Supplementation While Grazing Improved Irrigated Pastures

Cattle on Feed. U.S. Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD METHODS TO ESTIMATE MANURE PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT CHARACTERISTICS FROM DAIRY CATTLE

If your property includes a

ANAEROBIC DIGESTER PROJECT AND SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Prevalence of Shiga-Toxin Producing Escherichia Coli in Two Cohorts of Beef Cattle is Associated with Diversity of Microflora and Animal Age

November Feed Price Evaluations

Body Condition Scoring of Beef Cattle for Youth Producers What It Is and How to Use It

Introduction BEEF 140

Introduction. Classes of Feed Additives. Antibiotics and Sulfas

Taking Advantage of Natural Behavior Improves Dairy Cow Performance

Blade Farming s Revolutionary Beef and Veal Production System

Transcription:

GROUP HOUSING PREWEANED DAIRY CALVES: SOCIALIZATION VS. DISEASE TRANSMISSION By Amber L Adams-Progar, Assistant Professor/Dairy Management Specialist, Washington State University Department of Animal Sciences, Pullman, WA. Dale A. Moore, Clinical Professor/Director of Veterinary Medicine Extension, Washington State University Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Pullman, WA FS255E Page 1 ext.wsu.edu FS255E

Group Housing Preweaned Dairy Calves: Socialization vs. Disease Transmission Hand-rearing dairy calves away from their dams may alter calf behavior development, especially social behavior. Traditionally, dairy producers have invested in individual hutches or pens to raise newborns to weaning, but pair or group housing systems are increasing in popularity and may potentially improve calf social behavior development. Research on calf behavior has shed light on the potential effects of individual versus pair or group housing. The objective of this publication is to provide a brief summary of the advantages and disadvantages of calf group housing for dairy producers and veterinarians considering this type of housing system. In particular, this publication focuses on calf behavior, health, and performance. Please consult WSU Extension Publication EM045E Dairy Calves and Their Environment: Improving Health, Welfare, and Performance for detailed information on dairy calf housing systems. Behavior A calf reared by its dam in a natural environment spends its time either alone or with its dam until it is about one week old and begins interacting with other calves. Rearing dairy calves in individual hutches or pens from birth to weaning may have a detrimental impact on a calf s social development (Bøe and Færevik 2003). Calves raised in pairs or groups demonstrate several favorable behaviors over calves raised individually. Some of these behaviors include decreased aggression, increased lying time, and an increased amount of time spent at the feeder. Decreases in aggressive behaviors improves not only animal and handler safety, but also minimizes the number of agonistic interactions and displacements (one animal forces another animal to move) that occur near feeding areas, which is a behavior commonly noticed when grouping or regrouping animals (Miller and Woodgush 1991). An increased amount of time spent at the feeder is associated with higher starter feed intakes and growth rates (De Paula Vieira et al. 2010). Group housed calves also begin eating novel foods before individually housed calves (Costa et al. 2014). Feedstuffs used in rations on a dairy may routinely change according to feed price fluctuations and availability, so the ability of cattle to more easily accept and consume different feeds is noteworthy. Table 1 summarizes the behavioral differences seen in pair or group housed calves when compared to individually housed calves. For example, calves reared in a pair housing system are 71% more social than calves reared individually (Jensen and Larsen 2014). Health During the first 90 days of life, approximately 23% of calves will develop one or more diseases. Diarrhea is more prevalent than respiratory disease during the first six weeks of life with most diarrhea cases reported during the first week (Svensson et al. 2003). Producers and veterinarians are concerned group housing will lead to even more calf health issues. A couple of studies (including Wells et al. 1996 and Kung et al. 1997) have found no differences in the number of treatments (treated with medications such as antibiotics) administered to calves or calf mortality rates when comparing calves in group housing versus individual housing; however, differences in health have been detected in other studies. Based on these studies, individually housed calves tend to have lower rates of respiratory disease (Cobb et al. 2014) and therefore lower treatment rates and decreased potential for the development of antibiotic resistance (Duse et al. 2015). Due to the lack of consistent results, a multitude of questions remains unanswered in regards to how pair or group housing impacts calf health. Table 2 highlights the effects of pair, group, or individual housing on calf health. For example, calves reared in pairs have a 13% lower heart rate when exposed to a novel environment than calves reared individually, indicating that pair-housed calves may cope with stressful situations more easily (Jensen and Larsen 2014). Table 1. Effects of pair or group housing on calf behavior in relation to individual housing. FS255E Page 2 ext.wsu.edu

Table 2. Effects of pair, group, or individual housing on calf health. Table 3. Effects of pair or group housing on calf performance, in relation to individual housing. Performance Related Resources Taking into consideration the behavioral and health implications of pair or group housing, many producers are interested in how calf performance may be affected by these housing systems. So far, calves housed in pairs or groups tend to have higher starter intakes and, in turn, higher average daily gains than individually housed calves. Calves housed in pairs and groups may have average daily gains that are 14% and 16%, respectively, higher than calves housed individually (Jensen et al. 2015; Valnícková et al. 2015; Table 3). Veterinary Medicine Extension: Calf Housing & Environment Additional Considerations Advantages and disadvantages exist for individual, pair, and group housing systems. Before deciding which housing system is most appropriate for a dairy, producers should also consider the following: Cleaning protocols for calf care equipment (pens, buckets, bottles, etc.) should be in place and all calf care employees should be trained on proper cleaning procedures. Consult a veterinarian before drastically altering calf management practices. Colostrum management (quality and quantity) is vital to calf success regardless of housing system. FS255E Page 3 ext.wsu.edu Veterinary Medicine Extension: Resources WSU Dairy News Summary Following best management practices for calf care will ensure that the time and effort invested into calves result in healthy, high-producing cows with excellent well-being. When considering pair or group calf housing systems, producers and veterinarians need to carefully consider the potential advantages (improved calf growth and social behavior development) and disadvantages (disease transmission) of these systems. References Bøe, K.E and G. Færevik. 2003. Grouping and Social Preferences in Calves, Heifers and Cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 175 190. Cobb, C.J., B.S. Obeidat, M.D. Sellers, A.R. Pepper-Yowell, and M.A. Ballou. 2014. Group Housing of Holstein Calves in a Poor Indoor Environment Increases Respiratory Disease but Does Not Influence Performance or Leukocyte Responses. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 3099 3109.

Costa, J.H.C., R.R. Daros, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, and D.M. Weary. 2014. Complex Social Housing Reduces Food Neophobia in Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 7804 7810. Valnícková, B., I. St?hulová, R. Šárová, and M. Špinka. 2015. The Effect of Age at Separation from the Dam and Presence of Social Companions on Play Behavior and Weight Gain in Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 5545 5556. De Paula Vieira, A., A.M. de Pasillé, and D.M. Weary. 2012. Effects of the Early Social Environment on Behavioral Responses of Dairy Calves to Novel Events. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 5149 5155. Wells, S.J., D.A. Dargatz, and S.L. Ott. 1996. Factors Associated with Mortality to 21 Days of Life in Dairy Heifers in the United States. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 29: 9 19. De Paula Vieira, A., M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, and D.M. Weary. 2010. Effects of Pair versus Single Housing on Performance and Behavior of Dairy Calves Before and After Weaning from Milk. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 3079 3085. Duse, A., K.P. Waller, U. Emanuelson, H.E. Unnerstad, Y. Persson, and B. Bengtsson. 2015. Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Preweaned Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 500 516. Duve, L.R., D.M. Weary, U. Halekoh, and M.B. Jensen. 2012. The Effects of Social Contact and Milk Allowance on Responses to Handling, Play, and Social Behavior in Young Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 6571 6581. Jensen, M.B. and L.E. Larsen. 2014. Effects of Level of Social Contact on Dairy Calf Behavior and Health. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 5035 5044. Jensen, M.B., L.R. Duve, and D.M. Weary. 2015. Pair Housing and Enhanced Milk Allowance Increase Play Behavior and Improve Performance in Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 2568 2575. Kung, L., S. Demarco, L.N. Siebenson, E. Joyner, G.F. Haenlein, and R.M. Morris. 1997. An Evaluation of Two Management Systems for Rearing Calves Fed Milk Replacer. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2529 2533. Miller, K. and D.G.M. Woodgush. 1991. Some Effects of Housing on the Social Behavior of Dairy Cows. Animal Production 53: 271 278. Svensson, C., K. Lundborg, U. Emanuelson, and S. Olsson. 2003. Morbidity in Swedish Dairy Calves from Birth to 90 Days of Age and Individual Calf-Level Risk Factors for Infectious Diseases. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 58: 179 197. FS255E Page 4 ext.wsu.edu

Copyright 2017 Washington State University WSU Extension bulletins contain material written and produced for public distribution. Alternate formats of our educational materials are available upon request for persons with disabilities. Please contact Washington State University Extension for more information. Issued by Washington State University Extension and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension programs and policies are consistent with federal and state laws and regulations on nondiscrimination regarding race, sex, religion, age, color, creed, and national or ethnic origin; physical, mental, or sensory disability; marital status or sexual orientation; and status as a Vietnam-era or disabled veteran. Evidence of noncompliance may be reported through your local WSU Extension office. Trade names have been used to simplify information; no endorsement is intended. Published April 2017. FS255E Page 5 ext.wsu.edu