dpd Seattle Permits CAM Environmentally Critical Areas: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas

Similar documents
Joint Public Notice. LOCATION: In Salmon Bay, Lake Washington Ship Canal, at Seattle, Washington.

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

Permit Requirements for Landslide-Prone Areas in the City of Seattle. Slope Stability and Vegetative Soil Stabilization in the Puget Sound Region

CHAPTER 6 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS APPLYING TO SHORELAND AREAS AND PUBLIC WATERS

Sustainable Natural Environment Fish Habitat

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Department of the Army Permit Application

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Natural Resources KEY ISSUES SCENIC AREA ACT PROVISIONS CHAPTER 3. not adversely affect natural resources [Section 6(d)(3)].

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION

(1)(A)Inventory of the following existing natural resources on the USFSP Campus or within the context area adjacent to the University.

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

Critical Areas Ordinance

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Ordinance No Lot Surface Drainage

Environment & Conservation Introduction

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL CITY CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter 6 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation

(For individual lake and stream classifications in Cook County, refer to Appendix II)

RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION CHAPTER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL TABLE OF CONTENTS

KRISTOPHER J. KRZYSTON, CEI, CEM

Article 5: Conservation Overlay Districts

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Culverts

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

Environmental Information Worksheet

Planning & Development Services

Clallam County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update

Chapter 516 Shoreland Districts

Chapter MINERAL EXTRACTION AND MINING OPERATIONS

State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Areas of Critical State Concern Implementation Status Report Apalachicola Bay Area

CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT

BLOCK, LOT ; Section Requirement Status of Permit Review Status of C.O. Review The first 6 items are relevant to the principal building (house):

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

CITY OF LONGVIEW SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM

TOWN OF WAYLAND MASSACHUSETTS CONSERVATION COMMISSION

Habitat Management Workshop Report

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

SECTION 3 NATURAL RESOURCES

Maryland s Living Shorelines Program. Bhaskaran Subramanian February 27, 2015

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

SKAGIT COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINDINGS OF FACT. APPLICATION NUMBER: Shoreline Substantial Development Application PL

Aquatic Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management

CHAPTER 5: CONSERVATION ELEMENT

15A NCAC 07H.0209 COASTAL SHORELINES (a) Description. The Coastal Shorelines category includes estuarine shorelines and public trust shorelines.

PRESENTERS. Contact Information: RW Armstrong Union Station, 300 S. Meridian St. Indianapolis, IN

Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

Fish Habitat Design, Operation and Reclamation Workbook and Worksheets for Placer Mining in the Yukon Territory

5.5 NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS AND COASTAL ZONE

The Shoreline Management Act and Use of State-Owned Aquatic Lands

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Trails Permitting Process

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Lower Green River Corridor Plan Request for Proposals:

Shoreline Master Program VISIONING OVERVIEW

Fish Habitat Design, Operation and Reclamation Workbook and Worksheets for Placer Mining in the Yukon Territory

A MODEL RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

AP Environmental Science

Understanding the State Planning Policy July 2017 Changes to state interest statements, policies and assessment benchmarks

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Stormwater Management Manual (SWMM)

MODEL LAND USE REGULATIONS

PUBLIC NOTICE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Port of Los Angeles Berths : Wilmington Waterfront Promenade

WETLANDS AND OPEN WATERS Compensatory Mitigation Definitions of Factors

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas

PUBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

Appendix D - Evaluation of Interim Solutions

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

Protecting Your Water Resources

CHAPTER 3 Environmental Guidelines for WATERCOURSE CROSSINGS GOVERNMENT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND LABOUR

AUMA Policy Paper 2013.A1

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

Deleted Text: Strikethrough Proposed Changes: Underlined Staff Comments: Italics Unaffected Omitted Text: ( )

MARINE POLLUTION DEGRADATION MITIGATION MANAGEMENT IS ESSENTIAL FOR IMPROVING MARINE ENVIRONMENT

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Bureau of Mining and Minerals Regulation. Regulation of Mines. Howard J. Hayes, Program Administrator

Public Notice. Applicant: Lennar Homes Project No.: SWF Date: October 29, Name: Mr. Darvin Messer Phone Number:

Standards for SWMF s. (Stormwater Management Facilities) Lacombe County s Guide to Developing Stormwater Management Facilities

General Plan Update Workshop 6 Agriculture, Conservation, & Open Space February 23, 2005

RIPARIAN PROTECTION Questions & Answers

Regional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010

iswm TM Criteria Manual City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June Chapter 1

Final Draft Shoreline Master Program

Chapter 6. Aquatic Biodiversity. Chapter Overview Questions

615 W Alder St. Community Services Department Shelton, WA Planning Division (360)

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015

CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

Sections:

Part 4: Floodplain, Riparian, & Lakeshore Regulations

Transcription:

dpd Department of Planning and Seattle Permits CAM Client Assistance Memo 326 part of a multi-departmental City of Seattle series on getting a permit Environmentally Critical Areas: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas February 23, 2009 Designated Wetlands and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas receive protections under Seattle s Environmentally Critical Areas Ordinance (Seattle Municipal Code 25.09). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas include: shoreline habitats riparian corridors (streams and small lakes) urban natural open space habitat areas priority habitat for species such as Great Blue Heron and Bald Eagles Individuals living near a Wetland or Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area should consult this Client Assistance Memo (CAM) to understand how these regulations may affect the maintenance and redevelopment of their property. The Shoreline Master Program (Seattle Municipal Code 23.60) contains additional regulations for shoreline areas. The Floodplain code (Seattle Municipal Code 25.06) contains additional regulations for floodplains that are summarized in Client Assistance Memo (CAM) 111. Applicants may also need to consult with various state and federal agencies when proposing development in or near these areas. The State Office of Regulatory Assistance website (www.ora. wa.gov) provides a good resource for identifying state and federal agencies with regulatory requirements. City of Seattle Department of Planning & Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Diane Sugimura, Director PURPOSE OF ECA REGULATIONS Environmentally critical areas (ECAs) contain the most environmentally sensitive lands within the City of Seattle. Protecting these areas provides multiple benefits by preserving valuable habitat areas, protecting water quality, and avoiding future building problems due to flooding and erosion. The Environmentally Critical Areas Ordinance, in conjunction with other City regulations such as the Shoreline Master Program and the Floodplain code, protects these benefits while balancing the need for development in the urbanized environment of Seattle. setbacks and vegetated buffer areas required by the ECA code provide habitat for a variety of aquatic and terrestrial species, and also play a role in protecting wildlife from human disturbances such as light, noise, and runoff. Vegetation along waterways and shorelines also provides shade for aquatic habitat and nutrients, such as leaves, branches and insects, which are critical to functioning habitat. ECA protections also provide an additional benefit by protecting water quality. Natural vegetation along waterways helps to slow, filter, and absorb urban run-off containing oil, pesticides, fertilizers and bacteria. This buffering also reduces the peak volume and speed of stormwater which can help prevent flooding and scouring of waterways and shorelines. Limiting development in critical areas also helps reduce potential impacts to buildings and structures. Because shorelines, riparian corridors, and wetlands have naturally varying borders and may be prone to flooding and erosion, property adjacent to these areas may be at greater risk. Setting development back from their edge and protecting vegetation are effective measures to reduce flooding and prevent erosion. ECA LOCATIONS DPD maintains maps of ECAs that are available to the public through the DPD website (www.seattle.gov/ dpd/research). Maps for wetlands and fish and wildlife conservation areas are advisory and are intended www.seattle.gov/dpd 700 5th Avenue, Suite 2000 P.O. Box 34019 Seattle, WA 98124-4019 (206) 684-8600 Printed on totally chlorine free paper made with 100% post-consumer fiber

DPD Client Assistance Memo #326 ECAs: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas page 2 to aid in the identification of critical areas rather than delineate their exact boundaries. Technical studies, such as surveys and wetland delineations, prepared by qualified professionals may be required. Unmapped wetlands and streams are subject to regulations since the site conditions define the critical area. Applicants undertaking development or other regulated activities should visit DPD early in their planning process to determine whether an ECA may exist on or near their property and what regulations apply. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All development on parcels containing wetland, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, and their associated buffers or management areas, must meet the general standards for stormwater control, erosion control, and vegetation protection as outlined in SMC 25.09.060. A definition of development" is contained in the clarification of terms section of this CAM. Use of pesticides and fertilizers is not allowed within fifty feet of a riparian watercourse, wetland or shoreline except in specific circumstances detailed in SMC25.09.060L. Due to the important role that vegetation plays in providing habitat and buffering ECAs from noise, light, and stormwater runoff, the removal, maintenance, and pruning of trees and vegetation within riparian corridors, wetlands, shorelines, and their buffers is only allowed in limited circumstances. CAM 331, Environmentally Critical Areas: Tree & Vegetation Overview, details tree and vegetation protections that exist in ECAs. In addition to these general standards, specific standards apply to each ECA area as generally described below. Wetlands (see SMC 25.09.160) The City of Seattle regulates wetlands based on their ecological values as determined by the Washington State Wetland Rating System. Under this system, wetlands are classified into four categories: I (highest quality) to IV (lowest quality) based on their habitat, hydrologic, and water quality value. Individuals wishing to know the rating of a specific wetland should contact a DPD ecologist to determine what information is available. If existing data is not adequate to assess the wetland rating, landowners may need to hire a wetlands specialist to rate and delineate the wetland before any development activity is allowed. Requirements for Wetland Professionals and Wetland Delineation Reports are detailed in Director s Rule (DR) 19-2006. No new development within wetlands and their buffers is allowed, except as described below and in the exemptions, variances, and exceptions section of this CAM. Buffer sizes are based on category and the habitat value of the wetland as shown below. Wetland Buffer Distances Habitat Value from Wetland Rating System High Moderate Low Category I & II 200 feet 110 feet 100 feet Category III 85 feet 85 feet 60 feet Category IV 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet in Category I, II or III wetlands less than 100 square feet that do not abut another wetland or waterway may be allowed where certain conditions are met. in Category IV wetlands less than 1,000 square feet that do not abut another wetland or waterway may be allowed where mitigation is approved and undertaken to replicate lost functions and values as described in SMC 25.09.160C3. In order to protect the functions of wetlands, the City of Seattle has established buffers surrounding regulated wetlands to prevent excess run-off, provide habitat, and minimize disturbance. The sizes of these buffers are shown in the preceding chart. Wetland buffers may be averaged in some situations to allow development closer to the wetland in a limited area as long as a wetland professional demonstrates that it will not reduce wetland functions or values, the total area of the buffer remains the same, and minimum buffer widths are maintained as described in SMC 25.09.160D1. Buffers surrounding Category IV wetlands may also be reduced along the entirety of the wetland to not less than 35 feet if the lot was in existence before October 31, 1992, and DPD finds that strict interpretation of the code would cause unnecessary hardship, averaging the buffer would not relieve the hardship, and mitigation is undertaken as described in SMC 25.09.160D2. New development on parcels containing wetlands, even if the development is outside of the buffer, must also meet basic development standards preventing excessive runoff and lighting from affecting the wetlands. Applicants may also be required to consult with the Army Corp of Engineers when undertaking projects in or near wetlands.

DPD Client Assistance Memo #326 ECAs: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas page 3 Shorelines (see SMC 25.09.200 and 23.60) The shorelines along Puget Sound, Lake Washington, the Duwamish River, Lake Union, and the Ship Canal are important for habitat, including water quality protection. These areas also function as corridors for the passage of salmon and other priority species listed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Accordingly, all new development within 100 feet landward of these shorelines must be mitigated for any loss of ecological function. Mitigation usually takes the form of native plantings that will protect the shoreline from the effects of development or replace vegetation lost to development. Mitigation may be done on or off site, although a greater amount of offsite mitigation will be required. Elevated standards for stormwater management are also required as part of construction in a shoreline buffer. The City of Seattle also mandates no build setbacks from the shoreline depending on the use of the property to be developed. No setback is required for development for water-dependent and water-related uses due to the need of water access in these cases; however, impacts from this development must be mitigated. Shoreline setbacks for residential properties are detailed in Director s Rule (DR) 7-2007: Determination of Residential Setbacks in the Shoreline District. Other development must be setback 25 feet from the Shoreline. In all cases, the shoreline setback will be measured from the ordinary high water mark (OHW). The provisions of the Shoreline Master Program (SMC 23.60) also apply to development within 200 feet of the shoreline. The Shoreline Master Program contains additional permit and submittal requirements as well as general and area-specific regulations regarding land use, public access, views, parking, signage, and other development standards and environmental protections. Bulkheads, Docks, and Other Related Projects in Shorelines Shoreline stabilization, including bulkheads, rip rap, and bioengineered solutions, is regulated by the City of Seattle because it can both protect private property and significantly modify shoreline ecology. The nearshore environment of large waterbodies such as Lake Washington, the Duwamish River, and Puget Sound contain biologically rich habitat and are important for the functioning of the entire aquatic environment. In Seattle, these areas provide significant plant production that shelters and feeds shallow and deep water organisms and provides critical migration corridors for salmon. Bulkheads damage this critical habitat by filling shallow waters, removing natural vegetation, and preventing the natural flow of sediment and nutrients into the water. Bulkheads also reflect and intensify wave energy, which can wash away sediment, deepen the nearshore, and leave a rocky, turbulent environment. Major repair of an existing bulkhead is allowed only when it's necessary for the continued operation or expansion of a water-dependent or water-related use or when a bioengineered solution will not achieve the same level of shoreline stabilization and property protection. Bioengineered solutions are an alternative to bulkheads which use plants, logs, and additional sand and gravel to provide stabilization and erosion control. Docks, piers, and other structures for moorages accessory to a residential property are generally allowed on most of Seattle s shorelines; however, specific regulations pertaining to the size, layout, and number of allowed piers apply. Standards for piers and floats accessory to residential development are found in SMC 23.60.204. Mitigation will also be required to offset any adverse impacts. Breakwaters, jetties, dolphins, floats, and other similar structures are allowed only in specific circumstances detailed in SMC 23.60. Riparian Corridors (see SMC 25.09.200) All areas within 100 feet of a stream or small lake are designated as riparian management areas and receive special protection. For new lots created on or after May 9, 2006, no new development will be allowed within the entire 100 foot riparian management area. For lots created before that date, the first 75 feet from Type II and III waters with anadromous fish present for any part of the year and the first 50 feet from all other riparian corridors are a no build area (anadromous fish are known to be present in the Thornton, Piper s, Longfellow, Taylor, and Fauntleroy creek systems). These distances are measured from the top of the stream bank. No new development is allowed in this area except in cases where it is found to be necessary for access. For lots created before May 9, 2006, the remainder of the 100 foot riparian management area outside of the no build area is a limited development area. Within this area, new development is allowed as long as it meets the following conditions or institutes an alternative restoration plan that meets or exceeds this level of protection:

DPD Client Assistance Memo #326 ECAs: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas page 4 Riparian Corridor Management Area (for lots created before May 9, 2006) without anadromous fish Limited Area 50 ft. no build area with anadromous fish Limited Area 75 ft. no build area No building allowed Riparian Management Area 100 ft. from watercourse bank is limited to 35 percent of the limited riparian development area and lot coverage can not exceed lot coverage allowances in SMC Title 23a. Stormwater protections are instituted as described in 22.802.016. is mitigated by planting native plants or other beneficial action. Other Priority Habitat & Species Areas To protect other critical habitat, DPD may establish species habitat management plans to protect species designated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or Seattle City Council. on land identified as a wetland, fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, or an associated buffer must comply with any species habitat management plan set out in a Director s Rule. These rules may impose additional conditions including establishment of additional buffer zones, preservation of important vegetation and habitat features, limitation of access to habitat areas, or seasonal restriction of construction activities. Applicants proposing development in an ECA should consult DPD regarding the presence of any species habitat management plans that may affect the property. Regulations for Great Blue Heron Habitat Areas are discussed in Director s Rule (DR) 5-2007. Variances, Exemptions and Exceptions In order to provide flexibility in special circumstances and allow reasonable use of property, the ECA ordinance provides for exemptions, variances, and exceptions. These provisions are detailed in CAMs 327, 328, and 330; however, they are summarized here for reference. The appropriateness of each should be reviewed in the order provided. Exemptions Exempts certain activities and projects, such as limited maintenance work, certain public projects, and emergency actions from many of the requirements of the ECA code where specific criteria are met (See CAM 327). Small Project Waiver Allows additions to existing development of up to 150 square feet cumulatively in riparian management areas and wetland buffers with mitigation in the form of planting native plants or other measures to protect the critical area and/or buffer on lots that have existed since October 31, 1992 (See CAM 327). Yard and Setback Variances Allows variances from the zoning code to reduce yard and setback sizes as an alternative to developing within a wetland buffer or riparian corridor management area for lots created prior to October 31, 1992 (See CAM 330). Exception Modification of ECA development standards and other requirements when necessary to allow reasonable use of a property (See CAM 328). CLARIFICATION OF TERMS Anadromous Fish are fish that migrate from the sea into freshwater rivers for breeding, such as shad and salmon. means all components and activities related to construction or disturbance of a site, including but not limited to land disturbing activities. includes but is not limited to construction, addition or replacement of impervious surface, clearing, grading, filling, or draining. Water-dependent use means a use which cannot exist in other than a waterfront location and is dependent on the water by reason of the intrinsic nature of its operations.

DPD Client Assistance Memo #326 ECAs: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas page 5 The following uses, and similar uses, are included: Ferry and passenger terminals, marine construction and repair, aquaculture, cargo terminals for marine commerce or industry, boat launch facilities, marinas, tour boats, cruise ships, tug and barge operations, shoreline recreation, moorage, yacht clubs, limnological or oceanographic research facilities. Water-related use means a use which is not intrinsically dependent on a waterfront location but whose operation cannot occur economically without use of the water adjacent to the site. The construction, maintenance, and use of facilities such as docks, piers, wharves, or dolphins shall be required. The following uses, and similar uses, are included: Seafood and fish processing, lumber and plywood mills, sand and gravel companies, concrete mix and cement plants, water pollution control services, marine electronics, marine refrigeration, marine sales, freeze/ chill warehouses, and boat rigging operations. Other Helpful Documents CAM 103B, ECA Site Plan Requirements. CAM 209, Master Use Permit Application Requirements for Shoreline Permits. CAM 209A, Shoreline Substantial Exemptions Application Instructions. CAM 327, ECA Exemptions and Modifications to Submittal Requirements. CAM 328, ECAs: Exceptions. CAM 329, ECAs: Administrative Conditional Use Permit Application Instructions and Submittal Requirements. CAM 330, ECAs: Yard & Setback, Steep Slope and Wetland Buffer Variances. CAM 331, ECAs: Tree and Vegetation Overview. CAM 331A, ECAs: Vegetation Restoration. CAM 331B, ECAs: Hazard Trees. DR 19-2006, Requirements for Wetland Professionals and Wetland Delineation Reports. DR 3-2007, Application Submittal Requirements in Environmentally Critical Areas. DR 4-2007, Permanent Markers Delineating ECAs and Associated Buffer Areas. DR 5-2007, Great Blue Heron Management Plan. DR 7-2007, Determination of Residential Setbacks in the Shoreline District. Access to Information Links to electronic versions of DPD Client Assistance Memos (CAMs), Director's Rules, and Forms are available on the "Publications" and "Codes" pages of our website at www.seattle.gov/ dpd. Paper copies of these documents are available from our Public Resource Center, located on the 20th floor of Seattle Municipal Tower at 700 Fifth Ave. in downtown Seattle, (206) 684-8467.