AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE

Similar documents
Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

Engineer s Report Drainage District #93 Main Tile Improvements Wright County, Iowa MEC Figure 1: Wright County Drainage District #93

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017

Conservation District Business Plan Steuben County Soil and Water Conservation District

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Outcomes. Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Margaret Barondess - MDOT

Hydrology and Flooding

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Demonstration Project

DESIGN BULLETIN #16/2003 (Revised July 2007) Drainage Guidelines for Highways Under Provincial Jurisdiction in Urban Areas.

Porter County Soil & Water Conservation District Five Year Strategic Plan

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

BCWMC Capital Improvement Program (approved April 19, 2018; pending minor Plan amendment)

Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study

A Presentation of the 2013 Drainage Research Forum. November 14, 2013 SDSU Extension Regional Center Sioux Falls, SD

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Environmental Information Worksheet

The newly updated and comprehensive SWMP shall:

FINDINGS: Olsson used a three-step analysis strategy to develop a benefit cost ratio that would indicate the relative feasibility of this project.

Economics of Implementing Two-stage Channels

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities

Understanding Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) (SWPPPS)

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

PRESENTERS. Contact Information: RW Armstrong Union Station, 300 S. Meridian St. Indianapolis, IN

SECTION 7.0 PROJECT FEASIBILITY, ENGINEER S RECOMMENDATION AND DESIGN ISSUES NEEDING RESOLUTION

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

FY Biennial Budget Request Mille Lacs SWCD

Wastewater Treatment & Water Supply Alternatives Analysis

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

MCWD Mid-Year Highlights. Key Highlights

GRASS-LINED CHANNEL (acre) CODE 840

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Technical Memorandum

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES

C Fish Lake C Rice Lake C Mud Lake C Weaver Lake C Elm Creek*

Information for File # PRH

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Highway Drainage 1- Storm Frequency and Runoff 1.1- Runoff Determination

King County Flood Control District approves grants for flood prevention projects Regional projects to benefit from district funds

CHAPTER 2 EROSION CONTROL

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Transfer of Review. Presentation for Wastewater Practitioners Group.

Annual Report 2016 July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016

Presentation Overview

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

BOONE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

ALABAMA S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. Protection of Water Quality During Timber Harvesting

APPENDIX A. Project Scoping

Will be modified map from GIS 6/16 EOD

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Erosion & Sedimentation Control Policy

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

DRAINAGE & DESIGN OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Blue Earth County Code

The Clean Water Act Waters of the US Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture?

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment. MidAmerican Energy Company

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

Government Conservation Programs

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

BUDGET AND RESOURCES

Option 11. Divert Water from Miocene and Hendricks Canal to Supply the Ridge

Strategies for nitrate reduction: The Cedar River Case Study

Upper Mississippi River Conference 2016 Action Agenda: Raise the Grade

East St. Tammany Storm Surge Protection Project Request

Red Rock Lake: A Path Forward

Project Drainage Report

Contents: Purpose and objective Water and energy conservation 1 1

Implementing Stormwater Management through Split-Flow Drainage Design

Local Water Quality and Watersheds. Raccoon River & Des Moines River Watersheds. Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Implications and Strategies for Iowa

Constructed Wetland Channel T-9

IA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

Public Notice ISSUED: June 29, 2017 EXPIRES: July 31, 2017

Water Plans. Water Plans: Houston County LWMP amended 2012 Winona County LWMP

Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study PLAN FORMULATION ADDENDUM

2A Stormwater Regulations and Permitting A. Iowa Drainage Law and Resources 1 B. Regulated Activities 1

6.1 Recommended Overarching Actions to Support Nutrient Reduction Strategy Implementation

Erosion and Sedimentation Pollution Control (ESPC) Plan Narrative

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

V. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

FEMA s Mitigation Support for Resiliency: Innovative Drought and Flood Mitigation Projects

UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist

Transcription:

AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING True Expertise + Sustainable Solutions

Facing the Challenges Together With over 40 years of experience, ISG is focused on improving drainage capacity and crop yields while positively addressing water quality through innovative nutrient reduction practices. Producers face enough natural elements every day without needing to worry about the challenges of prolonged wetness, soil saturation, and environmental impacts. ISG s multi-disciplinary team is acutely aware of these challenges and can contribute an unparalleled level of expertise to the agricultural industry, local governments, and state agencies as we work collaboratively to ensure mutually beneficial results. At ISG, we understand that drainage is critical to the success of the agricultural community and have helped producers across the Upper Midwest experience valuable water management practices. Through a combination of efforts, ISG has directly saved landowners project costs that in many cases, allowed savings to be utilized to perform additional repairs of improvements to the systems that were initially felt would be too costly. ISG s extensive conservation drainage experience has demonstrated that there are significant benefits to hiring a professional engineer, which include: Proper Design: Results in a long term solution that minimizes future maintenance costs. Complete + Accurate Plans/Specifications: Clearly defines work to be completed, providing a basis for competitive bidding. Accurate Quantities: Reduces the unexpected costs associated with quantity overruns. Superior Coordination with Various Agencies: Utilizes positive relationships with DNR, NRCS, County and State Highway Departments, and other agencies. Whether it be tile repair, extension, district watchman services or open ditch clean out, ISG has intimate knowledge of sustainable agriculture solutions that result in higher yields, increased operational efficiencies, and cleaner water. AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE WORK Drainage Studies + Reports for Repairs and Improvements Open Ditch + Tile System Survey and Designs Integrated Water Quality Treatment Wetland Delineation Wetland Planning + Design Watershed Boundary Reviews Reclassifications of Benefits Services Right-of-Way Acquisitions District Watchman Services NRCS Technical Service Provider Services Annexations Services Flood Control Levee Design and Maintenance Construction Staking + Observation Construction Management

COUNTY DITCH NO. 62 BIOREACTORS Faribault County, Minnesota This 700-acre watershed that drains into the Blue Earth River had a tile outlet that was in poor condition, damaged, and failing in many areas. A partnership was developed among the Drainage Authority, Faribault County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), and a landowner who offered a grassed swale site that was ideal for bioreactors. ISG designed three bioreactors into the drainage repair to maximize the efficiency of nitrate reduction while also meeting the time limitations for water storage. Each bioreactor is 135 by 25 by 5 deep and is aligned with tile so each can be filled consecutively once capacity is met. This increases effectiveness as more peakflow from the system is treated. A stormwater quality unit was also installed to remove sediment and debris prior to entering the bioreactors. This water quality project did not take land out of production and utilized grant funding. COUNTY DITCH NO. 57 Blue Earth County, Minnesota This community-based water quality and treatment demonstration project showcases how landowners, local government, and state agencies can develop a watershed approach to improving water quality and replacing outdated drainage systems. Recognized as the first public multi-purpose drainage project in Minnesota, Blue Earth County Ditch 57 received a 2012 American Council of Engineering Companies Award of Excellence. www.is-grp.com

JUDICIAL DITCH NO. 46 Jackson County, Minnesota This 739-acre watershed in far southern Minnesota had 100 year-old tile that was in disrepair and drastically undersized for today s standards and production practices. The improvement included increasing the drainage capacity with new mainline and branch tile. A pond at the outlet with a lowflow structure provides peak flow reductions and sediment storage, decreasing the amount of total suspended solids leaving the watershed and improving water quality. Installing controlled drainage systems allow producers to regulate water levels in their fields, which is helpful in dry years because more rainfall is stored in the soil when it is needed during the growing season. Installation of water quality inlets in road ditches and fields prevents erosion and sediment from entering the buried tile system. NAGEL DRAINAGE DISTRICT Monona County, Iowa After erosion occurred from two high water events in 2010, ISG was called in to act as drainage engineer and ultimately a request was submitted for rehabilitation assistance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). An $18.7 million project was approved by the USACE that involved the setback of over four miles of existing levees along both banks of the district facility. ISG coordinated construction administration, acquired additional right-of-way, located an adequate soil borrow source, and traced crop damages outside the newly acquired right-of-way for payment by the district.

DRAINAGE DITCH 15 Palo Alto County, Iowa Palo Alto County volunteered to be part of this pilot project with the Iowa Department of Agriculture to demonstrate a market driven approach that would improve both production and achieve significant environmental benefits through combining updates to tile drainage infrastructure with targeted water quality wetland restorations. This integrated approach was designed by ISG to reduce surface runoff that can lead to phosphorous and other agricultural chemical runoff as well as address the higher nitrate levels associated with tile drainage. Drainage improvements and a strategically located and sized wetland were placed in the watershed. As one of five pilot projects of the Iowa Wetland Landscape Systems Initiative, this ISG designed project included construction of 0.70 miles of open ditch; 6.7 miles of tile; design and construction of a nutrient removal wetland encompassing 42.7 acres; 404 permitting with channel mitigation plan; and development and coordination with the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) for mitigation of farmed wetlands. This project provided the means to demonstrate that wetlands can provide mitigation, thereby making this market driven approach feasible for application across the rest of Iowa s drainage districts that are nearing the end of their design life and will need to be modernized over the next few decades. MDA CONSERVATION DRAINAGE Mower County, Minnesota In conjunction with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Nature Conservancy, and Mower County, two drainage surge basins were designed and constructed utilizing areas currently not tilled. Existing tile flow and overland flow was diverted into each basin to provide stormwater storage and treatment for agricultural runoff. Each basin utilizes control structures to allow the water levels to fluctuate and provide for testing of flow rate, sediment and nutrient load. Other best management practices, including a large woodchip bioreactor were designed as a part of the project. Ongoing research by the MDA will provide detailed information on how small surge basins can improve water quality in an agricultural watershed. www.is-grp.com

DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 65 Pocahontas County, Iowa ISG was appointed to investigate and recommend drainage improvements to Drainage District No. 65 s antiquated system of open and subsurface drains. The system dated back to 1913 and had proven incapable of efficiently removing excess waters. Dedicated to giving back through support of the industries it serves, ISG engineers were actively involved in the development of the IDALS- and ISU-supported Iowa Drainage and Wetlands Landscape Systems Initiative. The initiative combined drainage improvements with nitrate-removal wetlands for a potentially voluntary self-funded means of reducing pollution, improving water quality, improving agricultural productivity, and boosting landscape diversity. COUNTY DITCH NO. 25 Blue Earth County, Minnesota This project, near St. Clair, Minnesota, had large portions of open ditch that were in need of cleaning, slough repair, and tile inlet repair. In addition, it was discovered that two county road crossings were constructed 2.5 feet higher than the legal ditch profile when they were reconstructed 30 years ago. Blue Earth County Public Works offered to pay for the culvert replacement. In the end, the land owners saved $62,000 which enabled them to afford the cleaning of an additional 2,700 feet of ditch beyond the scope of the original project. Along with the cleaning of the ditch, a wetland bank was constructed on the upper end of the system, which provided storage and water quality treatment in the watershed.

DITCH NO. 29 + JUDICIAL DITCH NO. 367 Martin County, Minnesota This drainage system was drastically undersized for today s standards and production practices. ISG s improved design replaced the existing tile to achieve a higher drainage coefficient and improve the downstream effects of the system. The improvement consisted of larger tile and increased depth in the system. A new storage pond was connected to an existing wetland basin that enhanced the project and also provided storage, water quality treatment and wildlife habitat. By storing water, the drainage coefficient increased while the outlet capacity of the system decreased protecting farmland and lakes downstream. COUNTY DITCH NO. 78 Blue Earth County, Minnesota At over 2,000 acres, the Branch 1 watershed was not draining properly despite having soils that are considered prime farmland. Existing tile was deteriorated and capacity was not adequate. Improvements included main branch tile as well as lateral tile improvements. Included with the project was to deepen 3,100 feet of the Branch 1 open ditch to add depth and storage capacity. One to two-foot berms provide additional storage and raised elevation to keep the ditch from overtopping up to the 100-year rain event. Two strategically added culverts helped reduce downstream peak flows and maximized storage capacity. www.is-grp.com

ARCHITECTURE Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Planning ENGINEERING Civil Electrical Mechanical Municipal Steam + Power Structural Transportation Water/Wastewater 3D Scanning ENVIRONMENTAL Assessments Geographic Information Systems Permitting Planning + Feasibility Testing PLANNING Community Municipal Resources Proud Supporter Of: www.is-grp.com