Draft Safety Guide: Radiological Environmental Impact Analysis for Facilities and Activities. Gerhard Proehl

Similar documents
Application of the system of radiological protection of the environment in the IAEA Safety Standards a position paper

Environmental Radiological Monitoring for Nuclear Power Reactors (Nuclear Facility)

NATURE OF WASTE, DISPOSAL PRACTICES, RADIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THE ASSESSMENT OF RADIATION EXPOSURE

INSTITUTE OF RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF REACTOR SAFETY

Radiation Protection of the Public and Protection of the Environment

IAEA Perspective on Management of NORM Waste

Entwicklungen im Strahlenschutz

1. Introduction. 2. Background of the revision process. 1 RASSC, WASSC and NUSSC

Modelling NORM in the environment

International Experience and Challenges to Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites

Peer Review of the RPII s Environmental Monitoring Programme Foundation Document. F. Exposure from Natural Sources in Ireland

Radiation Contamination after the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident and the Effective Dose Received by the Population of Croatia

Dose and Risk Calculations for Decontamination of a Hot Cell

Radiation monitoring of contaminated foodstuffs in Poland after the Chernobyl accident

Sb Shane Brightwell. HullRAC Science Summit FEBRUARY 4, Radiological Risks from NORM/TENORM Associated with Shale Gas Development

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Regulatory Code

FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM APPLICATION OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

RADIATION PROTECTION

ASSESSMENT OF RADIATION DOSES TO THE PUBLIC IN THE VICINITY OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

FAO/IAEA NARO Technical Workshop Remediation of Radioactive Contamination in Agriculture

SUMMARY OF THE MAIN OUTCOMES OF MEETINGS WITH THE JAPANESE RESEARCH COMMUNITY

IAEA Safety Standards. for protecting people and the environment. Copy

Saxon State Agency of Environment, Agriculture and Geology (LfULG) Issues of the department 53 Radiation protection

Environmental Regulator's RWA Syllabus mapped to PHE's RPTS courses. RPTS coverage EA. No

Overview about NERIS-TP and PREPARE

Exel(5n. Nuclear Plant Effluent and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs

Environmental Impact Assessment Programme Summary. Extension of the Olkiluoto nuclear power plant by a fourth unit

Development of Remediation Targets for Contaminated Land

NOTIFICATION ABOUT CONSTRUCTION OF ONE NEW LATEST GENERATION NUCLEAR UNIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Yes.

Assessment of Doses around Nuclear Installations: For What? C. Ringeard J. Brenot D. Laurier A. Morin

RSLS Summary of Activities and 3 Year Work Plan

The GRS Emergency Centre during the Fukushima NPS Accident: Communicating Radiological Information to the Public

IAEA Safety Standards

ICRP Meeting. October 21-27, 2013 Abu Dhabi, UAE. Kathryn Higley Vice-Chair, ICRP Committee 5

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Identification of the sources of pollution and assessing the impacts on the environment due to proposed project if any;

WM 00 Conference, February 27 - March 2, 2000, Tucson, AZ

Transboundary aspects of EP&R in Greece Christos Housiadas Chairman, Greek Atomic Energy Commission (EEAE)

New Swedish Regulations for Clearance of Materials, Rooms, Buildings and Land Efraimsson, Henrik Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, SWEDEN

ICRP 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS

European Radiation Protection Legislation and Initiatives

RADIATION LEVEL IN CHINA AND PROTECTION STANDARDS

OELG Event Categories

Practical implementation of anticipated radon dosimetry changes in the mining industry

Safety principles of radioactive waste management activities and supportive IAEA documents

Report on Defense-Related Legacy Uranium Mines in the United States

Safety Goals for Nuclear Installations a Status Overview

The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Applying the proposed Strategic Siting Assessment Criteria: a study of the potential environmental and sustainability effects Appendices

How will Belgium implement the European directive with regard to NORM? S. Pepin (Federal Agency for Nuclear Control, Belgium)

Recovery Handbooks: their application and future development. Anne Nisbet, Stacey Wyke-Sanders, Sam Watson & Raquel Duarte-Davidson

IAEA-TECDOC-560 QUALITATIVE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTES

MOIRA-PLUS: a decision support system for the management of complex fresh water ecosystems contaminated by radionuclides and heavy metals

CALCULATION OF THE DISPERSION OF RADIOACTIVE RELEASES FROM A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

OBJECTIVE 24: POST-EMERGENCY SAMPLING OBJECTIVE

ICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection

6.3.2 Exposure Assessment

Yucca Mountain. High-level Nuclear Waste Repository

Air Sampling in Nuclear Facilities DAY 2

Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management. 15 July - 3 August, Lecture Notes. I. Mele IAEA, Vienna, Austria

REGULATORY CONTROL OF NORM: MALAYSIA TENG IYU LIN POLICY, CODE AND STANDARD DIVISION

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING IN SLOVAK REPUBLIC

NORM Waste Treatment System for oil and Gas Industry

GERMAN APPROACH TO ESTIMATE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING A SABOTAGE ATTACK AGAINST NUCLEAR INTERIM STORAGES

News this quarter. Environment, Safety&Health Quarterly Performance Report. Reporting period: 1 October to 30 December 2015

A PROSPECTIVE RADIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A PHOSPHATE INDUSTRY PROJECT. Rócio Glória dos Reis Dejanira da Costa Lauria

2007 ANS Topical Meeting on Decommissioning, Decontamination and Reutilization September 2007, Chattanooga, TN, United States of America

o u ;9D2 A DEMONSRATION OF DOSEMODELING.'i ":... AT YUCCAMOUNTAIN r.,.. : t; November _,:== = = _ _i_=o::

Rajvir Singh; Scientific Officer H BSCS, BARC ;

Linde FUSRAP Site Tonawanda, New York

Regulatory Requirements for Site Approval Permit of Nuclear Power Plants

Natural radioactivity in mineral and spa waters: the current regulatory approach in Italy

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. The Decommissioning Process. Lesson Objectives. Decommissioning. Decontamination. Decommissioning Objective

JRODOS : Real-time online decision support system for nuclear emergency management

Appraisal of Sustainability: Radioactive and Hazardous Waste. EN-6: Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation

REGULATORY CONTROL AND REMEDIATION OF URANIUM LEGACY SITES IN BULGARIA

Uranium mining legal and regulatory framework

PROPOSED TERM OF REFERENCE

Guidance on the Use of Deterministic and Probabilistic Criteria in Decision-making for Class I Nuclear Facilities

Interim Guidance on the Regulation of In-situ Disposals of Radioactive Waste and Residual Radioactive Contamination on Nuclear Authorised Premises

Kathryn Higley, PhD, CHP Professor, Assistant Department Head. Oregon State University

Guidance for NORM industrial activities on how to comply with the radioactive substances exemption regime

Norm survey in Argentina

Radiation Protection Adviser (RPA) Register

PNNL Darlington Nuclear Power Plant Project Review of Ontario Power Generation s Assessment of Cooling Towers for Condenser Cooling

Application of the Concepts of Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance

Berlin, Germany A. BAYER, E. WIRTH, R. HAUBELT, K. KONIG. Bundesamt fur Strahlenschutz, Miinchen, Germany 1. RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION [1]

Radioecology in 2014 Current research directions and trends for the future. Union Internationale de Radioécologie International Union of Radioecology

THE PROBLEM OF PHOSPHOGYPSUM WASTES IN THE TINTO RIVER MARSHES HUELVA, SPAIN July 16th, 2008, Brussels

COUNTRY REPORT: MONGOLIA

RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

HOW TO FACE CONCERNS OF RADIATION EFFECTS

RADIOACTIVITY MONITORING IN FOOD AND FEED CURRENT STATUS IN THE EU COUNTRIES

ENVIRONET Network on Environmental Management and Remediation. Terms of Reference

Reliability Of Atmospheric Dispersion Models Used In Assessing The Impact Of Radioactive Discharges On Food Safety

Probabilistic Versus Deterministic Analysis for Demonstration of Compliance with the Dose Criteria in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E

NATIONAL NUCLEAR REGULATOR

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 468

Transcription:

Draft Safety Guide: Radiological Environmental Impact Analysis for Facilities and Activities Gerhard Proehl Waste and Environmental Safety Section International Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites Vienna, 23 October 2013 International Atomic Energy Agency

The System of Radiation Protection in the Safety Standards

Safety Standards Global Reference Point Safety for protecting people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation. Safety Fundamentals Safety Requirements Safety Guides 3

The Safety Fundamentals Basic objectives Concepts Principles for protection and safety 10/22/2015 4

The new Basic Safety Standards Integration of Recommendations in ICRP 103 (2007) Approval by the Board of Governors (Sept. 2011) Replaces BSS (1996) http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/p1531interim_web.pdf

Protection against radiation risks Basic requirements on radiation protection and safety Reflects a broad international consensus Co-sponsored by FAO, ILO, OECD/NEA, PAHO, WHO Establish basic requirements for General public Workers Patients Basis for legislation in many countries

Key issues for remediation in the BSS Guidance on site to be remediated Post-accident situations Past inappropriate practices and insufficient regulation Nuclear legacies (Nuclear test sites, inappropriate waste disposal, experimental sites Defines responsibilities Government Regulatory body Planning/implementing institutions Recommends radiological criteria Reference level for the representative person: 1-20 msv/a Requires the application of radiation protection criteria Justification, optimization, limitation Requests Involvement of interested parties Establishment of a strategy for management of radioactive waste 7

Three exposure situations for Public exposure Exposure situations Planned Emergency Existing Operation of facilities Accidents, Malicious acts Post-accident Residues from past, uncontrolled practices Dose limit: 1 msv/a Reference level: 20-100 msv Reference level: 1-20 msv/a

Draft Safety Guide: Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment for Facilities and Activities

Objectives Application in planned exposure situations Prospective nature Assess impacts on the public and on the environment. Consideration of potential exposures (potential consequences of accidents) Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment Safety Assessment in the authorization process for facilities and activities identified in the BSS Environmental Impacts Assessment related to the evaluation of proposals prior to major decisions being taken

Environmental Impact Assessment Espoo Convention Environmental impact assessment means a national procedure for evaluating the likely impact of a proposed activity on the environment Impact Any effect caused by an activity on the environment including Human health and safety, Flora, fauna, soil, air, water, climate, Landscape and historical monuments or other physical structures Interaction among these factors; Effects on cultural heritage or socio-economic conditions

Components Radiological impacts Exposures to humans Exposures to flora and fauna Non-radiological impacts Chemical pollutants Heavy metals, organics Dust Heat Noise Hydrology Impacts on cultural heritage

MAIN FACTORS AFFECTING TYPE OF ASSESSMENT Factor Inventory Source term Level of expected dose Location of facility Safety characteristics of the activity or facility Interested parties involvement Element Form (chemical/physical make up) Radionuclides Quantity (both activity and mass/volume) Potential for release source term varies between normal operation and potential exposure assessments Previous similar facility or previous assessments Presence of receptor Characteristics of environment around the facility Exposure pathways Number of safety barriers and engineering features present in the design Degree of interest

Remediation process Monitoring (Radiological Characterization) Land use Living habits No Assessment of exposures Decision for remediation Criteria Technologies Dose to workers Acceptance Costs Yes Remediation Exit Criteria Yes ok? No

Safety Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment

Components of an Assessment

Environmental transport processes Atmospheric dispersion Deposition of radioactivity to the ground Dispersion of radionuclides Surface water Ground water Exposure assessment Transfer of radioactivity to plants and animals in the food chain External exposure Inhalation

Comprehensive exposure analysis Internal exposure Inhalation of radioactivity in a plume Ingestion of crops, animal food products (milk, meat) Ingestion of drinking water Ingestion of aquatic food Fish, crustaceans, molluscs External exposure From radioactivity in a plume From radionuclide deposited on the ground or in building materials From radionuclides in water and sediments e.g. from swimming, staying on cont. sediments

Site characterization Monitoring Air Water Terrestrial and aquatic food Building material Weather/climatic conditions Hydrological conditions Rivers Lakes Population Population density and distribution Land use

Limitation of exposures to the public and the environment International Atomic Energy Agency

Limitation of public exposure dose criteria in the BSS Existing exposures Residual radioactive material from past activities, NORM, legacies Late phase of an emergency Reference level: 1-20 msv/a Planned exposures E.g. Licensing of a new nuclear installation Dose limit: 1 msv/a Emergency exposures Accident, malicious acts Reference level: 20-100 msv

Reference levels Reference levels are given in terms of dose They are not limits, but doses that should not be exceeded Dose to be assessed for a representative person. a more highly exposed individual in the population

Consideration of exposures to flora and fauna ICRP Definition of a set of Reference and Animals and Plants Definitions of a set of bands of dose rates for these that indicate no or minor effects to flora and fauna Recommended in DS 427 for planned exposure situations

Reference Animals and Plants (ICRP)

ICRP: Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRL) D O S E R A T E mgy/d 1 mgy/d = 42 µgy/h= 0.36 y/a

Radiological impact to flora and fauna in existing exposure situation Exposures to flora and fauna can hardly be controlled Remediation measures may have drastic effects on populations, e.g: soil removal Optimization Exposure to flora and fauna one factor for optimization of protective actions for people Consideration should be given to reduce exposures Technical feasibility Cost and benefits are such that further efforts are warranted. May imply reduction of exposures to people as well DCRL levels to be used as the criteria for mitigating environmental exposures.

Components of an Assessment

Conclusions DS 427 provides guidance Implementing radiological environmental impact assessment as recommended in the BSS Applies in particular for planned exposure situations Some elements can be applied for existing exposure situations Comprehensive pathway analysis Site characterization Assessment of exposures Control of exposures in existing exposure situations Public: Reference levels in the range of 1-20 msv/a Flora and fauna: Exposures cannot be controlled

Thank you