Case No IV/M Jefferson Smurfitt / Saint Gobain. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/09/1994

Similar documents
Case No IV/M HAVAS ADVERTISING / MEDIA PLANNING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/06/1999

Case No IV/M ICI / TIOXIDE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No IV/M DAIMLER - BENZ / CHRYSLER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/07/1998

Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M VIVENDI / US FILTERS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1999

Case No IV/M DHL / DEUTSCHE POST. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/06/1998

Case No IV/M ALCATEL / AEG KABEL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No COMP/M OTTO VERSAND / SABRE / TRAVELOCITY JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / RAAB KARCHER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M DOW / ENICHEM POLYURETHANE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/04/2001

Case No COMP/M WPP / CORDIANT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2003

Case No COMP/M ALCOA / BRITISH ALUMINIUM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/10/2000

Case No IV/M ALCOA / INESPAL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/1997

Case No COMP/M BUNGE / CEREOL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/09/2002

Case No IV/M RECTICEL / GREINER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/03/1997

Case No COMP/M SHELL / BEB. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003

Case No COMP/M BOEING / AVIALL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/08/2006

Case No COMP/M TNT FORWARDING HOLDING / WILSON LOGISTICS. REGULATION (EEC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M ALCAN / FLEXPACK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/02/2003

Case No COMP/M LVMH / PRADA / FENDI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/05/2000

Case No COMP/M NTN / SNR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2007

Case No COMP/M PAI / CHR. HANSEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/2005

Case No COMP/M EDP / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No IV/M BAIN / HOECHST - DADE BEHRING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 002/09/1997

Case No COMP/M AVNET/ BELL MICRO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/07/2010

&DVH 1R,90 '(876&+( 3267 $6* 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/07/1999

Case No COMP/M CVC / BOCCHI / DE WEIDE BLIK. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/05/2006

Case No COMP/M CVC / DSI. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/09/2007

Case No COMP/M BOEING / LOCKHEED MARTIN / UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS / CINVEN / AHLSELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/01/2006

Case No COMP/M MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT

Case No COMP/M AMCOR / SCHMALBACH- LUBECA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/06/2002

Case No COMP/M UNIVERSAL STUDIO NETWORKS / DE FACTO 829 (NTL) / STUDIO CHANNEL LIMITED. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M S&B / HALLIBURTON / CEBO JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2007

Case No M MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV

Case No COMP/M PAI PARTNERS/ INDUSTRIAL PARTS HOLDING

Case No COMP/M ASTRIUM HOLDING/ VIZADA GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/11/2011

Case No COMP/JV.54 - SMITH & NEPHEW / BEIERSDORF / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/01/2001

Case No IV/M AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS / MONSANTO. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/09/1998

Case No COMP/M PRINCES / PREMIER FOODS CANNED GROCERY OPERATIONS

Case No COMP/M G SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III/ BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY/ H J HEINZ COMPANY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32011M6357

Case No COMP/M ORACLE / BEA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/2008

Comp-CCD/35/11 Amazon.com, Inc/The Book Depositary International Ltd

ANNEX XIV COMPETITION

Case No COMP/M SMITHFIELD / OAKTREE / SARA LEE FOODS EUROPE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Our solutions your success

EU MERGER CONTROL. UNIMORE, Seminario di Diritto della Concorrenza Modena, 11 April Mona Caroline Chammas OECD - Competition Division

Case M SYSCO / BRAKES

Mondi Group Capital Markets Day 2017

Case M DEERE & COMPANY / WIRTGEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/08/2017

Case No COMP/M * WALLENIUS LINES AB / WILHELMSEN ASA / HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M PEPSICO/ THE PEPSICO BOTTLING GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32012M6468

Metallic products Types of inspection documents

Case No COMP/M WATERLAND/ ALYCHLO/ OMEGA PHARMA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/12/2011

Case No COMP/M HEWLETT-PACKARD/ 3COM. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/02/2010

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32014M7023

Case No COMP/M.4276 AHOLD / KONMAR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 4 (4) Date: 02/08/2006

Case No COMP/M OSRAM / SITECO LIGHTING. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/06/2011

Case No COMP/M SIEMENS / BAYER DIAGNOSTICS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 31/10/2006

The smarter choice PAPERS FOR STRONG AND ATTRACTIVE CARRIER BAGS. Xpression

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8248

Case No COMP/M HONEYWELL/ INTERMEC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2013

Case No COMP/M SECOP/ ACC AUSTRIA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/12/2013

Case No COMP/M VODAFONE/ CABLE & WIRELESS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/07/2012

Taking Advantage of Change in North American Paper Based Packaging Markets

Contents Foreword Scope Normative references Terms and definitions Dimensions and tolerances Designation Technical

Case No COMP/M WPP / GREY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/01/2005

Simplified procedure: EU Practice

Sectoral Profile - Industry

CHEMICALS IN MATERIAL CYCLES

EU General Data Protection Regulation, a new era in data protection

Case No COMP/M CANON/ OCE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/2009

FINAL DRAFT FprEN

Growth Engine. Mats Nordlander, EVP, Renewable Packaging

Future Opportunities in Paper Based Packaging

Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority

Case M HONEYWELL / ELSTER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Art 6(2) Date: 21/12/2015

Council of the European Union Brussels, 8 December 2017 (OR. en)

Case No COMP/M SUN CAPITAL/ REXAM PERSONAL AND HOME CARE PACKAGING BUSINESS

The Implications of a Changing Raw Material Outlook and its Effects on Containerboard Production, Products and Manufacturing in the Future

BillerudKorsnäs Decor

This document is a preview generated by EVS

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

UTILITIES: HOW THE EU DIRECTIVE IS IMPLEMENTED AND HOW IT WORKS IN EU MEMBER STATES

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

The Fourth Community Innovation Survey (CIS IV)

ACCC Review of Proposed Timber Transaction

COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE../ /EU. of XXX

IMPORT HEALTH STANDARD FOR MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION AND SWITZERLAND

The European soil information system and its extension to the Mediterranean Basin

2. Facebook is a US American company. Why does the Bundeskartellamt have competence to investigate in this case?

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Resistance welding Procedures for determining the weldability lobe for resistance spot, projection and seam welding

Transcription:

EN Case No IV/M.499 - Jefferson Smurfitt / Saint Gobain Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/09/1994 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 394M0499 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.09.1994 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION Registered with advice of delivery To the notifying party Dear Sirs, Subject : Case No IV/M.499 - Jefferson Smurfit/St. Gobain Notification of 16.08.1994 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/89 1. On 16 August 1994 Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (JSG) notified to the Commission its intended acquisition of the paper and packaging interests of Compagnie de St Gobain Group (St Gobain). 2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of application of Council Regulation No 4064/89 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. Rue de la Loi 200 - B-1049 Brussels - Belgium Telephone: exchange (+32-2)299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877 - Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels

- 2 - I. THE PARTIES 3. JSG, incorporated in Ireland, is an integrated manufacturer and converter of paper and paperboard whose main operations are located in Europe, the United States of America and Latin America. During the course of the examination of this case the Commission was informed of the proposed acquisition by JSG of a 27.5 per cent non-controlling interest in an Austrian competitor, Nettingsdorfer Beteiligungs-AG (Nettingsdorfer). 4. The principal activity of St Gobain, whose ultimate holding company is incorporated in France, is the manufacture of glass. It conducts its paper and packaging interests through a division of the group (the Division) consisting of seven companies which are controlled by La Cellulose du Pin SA and Cristaleria Espanola SA and which operate in France, Italy and Spain. II. THE OPERATION 5. JSG will acquire from La Cellulose du Pin and from Cristaleria Espanola their shares in the companies in the Division. III. CONCENTRATION OF COMMUNITY DIMENSION 6. The notified operation constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)b of the Regulation. 7. The undertakings concerned have a combined aggregate worldwide turnover in excess of 5000 million ECU. Both JSG and the Division have a Community-wide turnover in excess of 250 million ECU, but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate Community-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension. IV. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE COMMON MARKET a) Relevant product markets 8. JSG and the Division are both active in several product markets involving the supply of paper and packaging - corrugated case materials, corrugated cases, coated paper, sack kraft and paper sacks. Corrugated case materials 9. Corrugated case materials (CCM) are the paper products used to create corrugated board - sheets of paper linerboard enclosing a layer of fluted undulating paper - which is itself converted into corrugated cases. 10. CCM is produced from either virgin or waste fibre. A high degree of cross-substitutability exists between virgin fibre- and waste fibre-based material due to a high degree of crosssubstitutability of both supply and demand. Important factors in demand crosssubstitutability are cost and performance characteristics such as compression strength and porosity. Purchasers usually specify objective characteristics rather than relying on a specific manufacturing process; prices for both types of fibre therefore tend to follow similar patterns. However, as the operation will not result in the creation or strengthening of a

- 3 - dominant position it can be left open whether virgin and waste fibre-based CCM belong to the same product market. Corrugated cases 11. Corrugated cases, the packaging materials constructed out of sheets of corrugated board, compete with other types of packaging, in particular wood and plastic packaging. However, as even on the narrow definition of a market for corrugated cases the operation does not create or strengthen a dominant position, the precise market definition can be left open. Coated paper 12. Coated papers are superior grades of printing and writing paper which are coated on one or both sides to produce a glossy surface. They are used in advertising, magazine publishing, book publishing and photocopying and for business forms. In its decision Torras/Sarrio (IV/M.166, 24 February 1992) the Commission recognised the existence of four separate markets within the fine paper market (which is itself distinct from the markets for selfadhesive paper and self-copying paper) - uncoated wood-containing paper, uncoated woodfree paper, coated wood-containing paper, and coated wood-free paper. JSG and the Division each supply only coated wood-free paper. Sack kraft 13. Sack kraft is strong brown paper made from virgin pulp and used for the production of paper sacks. It has lower grammage per square metre than CCM and is produced on different machines. It is therefore not substitutable for CCM either on the demand side or on the supply side. It accordingly forms a distinct market from CCM. Paper sacks 14. Paper sacks, made from sack kraft, are used for packaging a wide range of products. Among the most important such products in Europe are cement, gypsum and other construction materials. b) Geographical reference markets Corrugated case materials and sack kraft 15. CCM and sack kraft have high density and are thus easily transportable. According to the parties the markets are global. About 70 per cent of virgin fibre-based and 40 per cent of waste fibre-based CCM consumed in the EU is imported from outside; about 30 per cent of all CCM used in the EU is produced in another member state. Almost 50 per cent of the sack craft used in the EU is imported from the EFTA. The reference markets can thus be considered to be at least the EEA area. Corrugated cases and paper sacks 16. Corrugated cases and paper sacks have low density and thus incur relatively high transport costs which limit delivery ranges to a radius of between 200 and 300 kilometres. The parties stressed that as major customers seek supplies of corrugated cases from a single supplier with local operations the market is increasingly at least Europe-wide. However, as even on the

- 4 - narrower market definition, the operation will not create or strengthen a dominant position, the precise market definition can be left open. Coated papers 17. Because of high density and thus easy transportability printing and writing paper are supplied on a world-wide market. But the quality of paper produced in Europe is generally higher than that produced elsewhere, so that imports into Europe are not significant. The reference market is thus the EEA area. c) Competitive assessment Corrugated case materials 18. The combined shares of JSG and the Division of the EU market for CCM are less than 12 per cent and of the EEA market 11 per cent. If virgin fibre-based and waste fibre-based materials are considered as separate markets these proportions are roughly similar. Nettiingsdorfer has less than a 2 per cent share of the EU market and of the EEA market for CCM; even, if therefore the market shares of JSG, the Division and Nettingsdorfer were to be aggregated, the total would not exceed 14 per cent in the European Union and 13 per cent in the European Economic Area. Corrugated cases 19. The parties' share of the EU and the EEA markets for corrugated cases will be about 10 per cent. If the local areas are considered, the parties' activities will overlap only in Italy and (to a lesser extent) France; in both these areas they will face a number of established competitors. In Italy the leading suppliers are Italcarta (part of SCA, Sweden) [ ], Guisti [ ] and International Paper (USA) [ ] (1). In France the leading suppliers are Otor [ ], International Paper (USA), Rossmann [ ] and Groupe Giepac [ ] (1). The overall market share of JSG following the operation will amount to [less than 10%] in Italy and [less than 25%] in France. Nettingsdorfer's activities overlap with those of JSG only in Italy; however, even if the market shares of JSG, the Division and Nettingsdorfer in Italy were to be aggregated, the total would not exceed 15 per cent. Furthermore the market is characterised by low cost of entry; thus it could be easily entered by any of the European competitors of JSG. Coated papers 20. The combined shares of the parties of the EU market for coated wood-free papers is about 3 per cent. Sack kraft 21. The combined shares of the parties of the EU market for sack kraft will not exceed 6 per cent. (1) (2) Deleted business secrets - their total market share is about 30%. Deleted business secrets - they have a total market share of about 35%.

- 5 - Paper sacks 22. JSG produces paper sacks only in Ireland; they export only a small amount - to Northern Ireland. The Division supplies paper sacks only in France and Spain. On the basis of the narrower market definition there is accordingly no overlap between their geographic markets. If however the market was considered to be Europe-wide the aggregated market shares of the parties would amount to 12 per cent. 23. The proposed concentration will not therefore create or strengthen a dominant position as a result of which effective competition will be significantly impeded in the common market or in a substantial part of it. V. ANCILLARY RESTRAINTS 24. The parties have asked that certain restrictions be considered as ancillary to the concentration. 25. By section 6.8 of the Share Purchase Agreement companies in the St Gobain group agree to maintain existing levels of the purchase of goods from the Division provided that prices and conditions are competitive. This restriction lasts for five years and is intended to reduce disruption to the activities of the Division following the acquisition. In its absence the concentration could be implemented only with considerably less prospect of success. 26. By section 10 of the Share Purchase Agreement companies in the St Gobain group accept restrictions on competing with businesses carried on by the Division, specifically by providing advice to competitors, soliciting customers or soliciting employees. These restrictions last for five years and are intended to ensure the transfer of the goodwill of the Division to JSG. 27. These restrictions are directly related to and necessary for the successful implementation of the concentration and can thus be treated as ancillary to it. VI. CONCLUSION 28. For the foregoing reasons, the proposed concentration does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. * * * For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No. 4064/89. For the Commission