NUCLEAR PLANT WITH VK-300 BOILING WATER REACTORS FOR POWER AND DISTRICT HEATING GRIDS

Similar documents
Nuclear Desalination Complex with VK-300 Boiling-Type Reactor Facility

Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development

BN-1200 Reactor Power Unit Design Development

Module 05 WWER/ VVER (Russian designed Pressurized Water Reactors)

Joint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015

Practical Application of the RUTA Safe Pool-type Nuclear Reactor to Demonstrate the Advantages of Atomic Energy Use

Safety Provisions for the KLT-40S Reactor Plant

The design features of the HTR-10

CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

OperatiOn and safety report Of MOchOvce and BOhunice v2 nuclear power plants

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor. Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events

RELAP5/MOD3.2 INVESTIGATION OF A VVER-440 STEAM GENERATOR HEADER COVER LIFTING

NUCLEAR POWER NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN 2012

Concepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant

Design, Safety Technology and Operability Features of Advanced VVERs

DESIGN AND SAFETY PRINCIPLES LEONTI CHALOYAN DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER ON MODERNIZATION

Status of the FRM-II Project at Garching. Hans-Jürgen Didier, Gunter Wierheim Siemens AG, Power Generation (KWU), D Erlangen

Significant Events in Rostechnadzor Activity Regarding WWER-type NPPs Operation within the Period from September 2015 up to July 2016

NSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS)

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) Vienna University of Technology /Austria Atominstitute Stadionallee 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria

FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI BWR REACTOR SPRAY AND FEED WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR EARLY FAILURE Dean Wilkie

NON-ELECTRICITY APPLICATION OF NUCLEAR ENERGY: SOME GENERAL ISSUES AND PROSPECTS

Status report 85 - VVER-1500 (V-448) (VVER-1500 (V-448))

In April 1986, unit 4 of the Chernobyl nuclear

AP1000 European 19. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Design Control Document

Safety design approach for JSFR toward the realization of GEN-IV SFR

RESULTS OF THE GRADUAL UPGRADING AT BOHUNICE WWER - 440/230 NPP

The "Réacteur Jules Horowitz" : The preliminary design

Secondary Systems: Steam System

NuScale Power Modular and Scalable Reactor. NuScale. Integral Pressurized Water Reactor. Light Water. Light Water.

CAREM Prototype Construction and Licensing Status

CANDU Safety #6 - Heat Removal Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing

NPP Simulators Workshop for Education - Passive PWR NPP & Simulator Overview

Implementation of Lessons Learned from Fukushima Accident in CANDU Technology

Isolation Condenser; water evaporation in the tank and steam into the air. Atmosphere (in Severe Accident Management, both P/S and M/S)

AP1000 European 15. Accident Analysis Design Control Document

Passive Cooldown Performance of Integral Pressurized Water Reactor

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT

HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES

The Westinghouse AP1000 : Passive, Proven Technology to Meet European Energy Demands

Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency

PLUTONIUM UTILIZATION IN REACTOR FUEL

Regulatory Actions and Follow up Measures against Fukushima Accident in Korea

LEAD-COOLED FAST-NEUTRON REACTOR BREST. Yu.G. Dragunov, V.V. Lemekhov, A.V. Moiseyev, V.S. Smirnov (NIKIET, Moscow, Russia)

The Westinghouse Advanced Passive Pressurized Water Reactor, AP1000 TM. Roger Schène Director,Engineering Services

ACR-1000: ENHANCED RESPONSE TO SEVERE ACCIDENTS

German contribution on the safety assessment of research reactors

The ESBWR an advanced Passive LWR

Reactor Technology: Materials, Fuel and Safety. Dr. Tony Williams

COLD NEUTRON SOURCE AT CMRR

Experiments Carried-out, in Progress and Planned at the HTR-10 Reactor

Safety Design Requirements and design concepts for SFR

NUCLEAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND REACTORS Vol. I - Pressurized Water Reactors - J. Pongpuak

Journal of American Science 2014;10(2) Burn-up credit in criticality safety of PWR spent fuel.

INL/EXT Key Design Requirements for the High Temperature Gascooled Reactor Nuclear Heat Supply System

SMR/1848-T03. Course on Natural Circulation Phenomena and Modelling in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors June 2007

NUCLEAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND REACTORS - Vol. II - Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors - Tim McKeen

PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

NUCLEAR POWER DEVELOPMENT IN MARKET CONDITIONS WITH USE OF MULTI-PURPOSE MODULAR FAST REACTORS SVBR-75/100

Nuclear Power A Journey of Continuous Improvement

Status Report IMSR-400

Nuclear Reactor Types. An Environment & Energy FactFile provided by the IEE. Nuclear Reactor Types

Application for Permission to Extend the Operating Period and Application for Approval of Construction Plans of Unit 3 at Mihama Nuclear Power Station

APR1400 Safe, Reliable Technology

CAREM: AN INNOVATIVE-INTEGRATED PWR

OKBM AFRIKANTOV SMALL MODULAR REACTORS ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR SAFETY PROVISION

STRUCTURAL RADIATION SAFETY AT A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Main Steam & T/G Systems, Safety

Innovative Process for Comprehensive Treatment of Liquid Radioactive Waste

The 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations

Status report Chinese Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor (CSR1000)

Nuclear Fusion / Nuclear Fission

Shutdown and Cooldown of SEE-THRU Nuclear Power Plant for Student Performance. MP-SEE-THRU-02 Rev. 004

Preparedness at PFBR Kalpakkam to meet the challenges due to Natural events Prabhat Kumar, Project Director, PFBR, Director construction BHAVINI

ANTARES Application for Cogeneration. Oil Recovery from Bitumen and Upgrading

DESIGN, SAFETY FEATURES & PROGRESS OF HTR-PM. Yujie DONG INET, Tsinghua University, China January 24, 2018

Post-Fukushima Assessment of the AP1000 Plant

Fast and High Temperature Reactors for Improved Thermal Efficiency and Radioactive Waste Management

INTEGRAL EFFECT NON-LOCA TEST RESULTS FOR THE INTEGRAL TYPE REACTOR SMPART-P USING THE VISTA FACILITY

Basics. R/P depends on how it is used. High estimate is about 150 years, low estimate is about 40 years. More on this later

Safety Challenges for New Nuclear Power Plants

EPR: Steam Generator Tube Rupture analysis in Finland and in France

This description was taken from the Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments 2016 Edition booklet.

SEVERE ACCIDENT FEATURES OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLANT DESIGNS FOR NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FINLAND

Decommissioning in Germany: Greifswald NPPs. Bernd Rehs Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)

Provision of containment integrity at Russian VVER NPPs under BDBA conditions

Balance of Plant Requirements and Concepts for Tokamak Reactors

Dry storage systems and aging management

RESEARCH REACTOR FRJ-1 (MERLIN) THE CORE STRUCTURES OF THE REACTOR BLOCK ARE DISMANTLED

Stress tests specifications Proposal by the WENRA Task Force 21 April 2011

THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

Green Cross Russia Nuclear and Radiation Safety Programme. V. M. Kuznetsov Contemporary state of safety at Russian nuclear installations

The EnBW Strategyfor Decommissioningand DismantlingofNuclearPower Plants»

STATUS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED REACTOR DESIGNS

QUALIFICATIONS NEEDED TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND MANUFACTURE NUCLEAR SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT. Cosmos M. Voutsinos, P.Eng.

SAFETY GUIDES. Deterministic Safety Assessment РР - 5/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY

Nuclear Power Volume II - Nuclear Power Plants

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Transcription:

7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering Tokyo, Japan, April 19-23, 1999 ICONE-7335 NUCLEAR PLANT WITH VK-300 BOILING WATER REACTORS FOR POWER AND DISTRICT HEATING GRIDS Yu.N. Kuznetsov*, F.D. Lisitsa, A.A.Romenkov, Yu.I. Tokarev Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering 101000 P.O. Box 788, RDIPE, Moscow, Russia Phone: 7-95-264-4774, Fax: 7-95-975-2019 E-mail: kuz@demo.nikiet.msk.su Specific requirements to nuclear power units for medium-size power and district heating grids are under consideration. Among the main requirements are the following: matching of units output with the grid stability, enchanced NPP reliability and safety, competitiveness of power generated. Design and main characteristics of two-units NPP with VK-300 reactors of SBWR-tipe being developed by RDIPE are described. NPP and rector safety problems including ones for underground NPP are consideration. Key words Water boiling reactor, District heating, Primary containment, Emergency cooldown, Underground plant location 1 POTENTIAL FOR MEDIUM SIZE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT The analysis of electric power and heat consumption in the Russian Far East and Siberia shows that these regions (especially those with small power systems) need the medium capacity power sources for heat and electric power generation that are capable of rivaling the organic fuel plants. Technical and economic estimates show that the required number of plants in the foreseeable future may be approximately as follows: 10 units of 100 MW electric power, 10 units of 300 MW and 2 units of 400 MW. There is information that nuclear plant (NP) of such power are in demand in Byelorussia. Medium power nuclear plant units should meet specific requirements. Their power governed by the demand should not exceed the limit ensuring stability of the power system at a sudden shutdown of the unit. Power limitation for autonomous power systems is unlikely to permit the use of units with the power of over 250-350 MW in their mix. Larger capital investments due to power reduction should be compensated by simplified reactor and plant designs, less equipment and higher reliability, as well as smaller maintenance and repair costs with assurance of highest safety requirements. A major contributor to a higher efficiency of medium power nuclear plants is their dualpurpose application both for electric power and heat generation. At the same time, this circumstance demands that nuclear plants should be located closer to the consumer which 1

imposes stringent requirements to radiation safety assurance for population during normal operation and in emergencies. 2 CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE FOP KRASNOYARSK APPLICATION To a certain extent a prototype of a medium capacity district heating station is a nuclear cogeneration plant (NCGP) with VK-300 boiling water reactors that is being developed for Krasnoyarsk GKhK (Mine and Chemical Integral Works). The main peculiarities of this project are as follows: 1. The possibility of using the existing underground premises of the integrated works that will save construction costs and produce rather favorable conditions for protection of population of the nearby city of Zheleznogorsk against potential radioactive releases during accidents. 2. The use of the existing infrastructure of the integrated works ensuring operation of the decommissioned NCGP (that is in operation now) that considerably reduces the cost of building a new plant. The plant equipment is located in two parallel tunnels (Figs. 1, 2) (each reactor unit is located in its own tunnel) isolated from each other. Emergency cooldown tanks are located in the immediate vicinity of the reactor. The reactor department accommodates the cooling tanks and vaults for storage of reactor internals during refueling and preventive inspection of the reactor. Besides, the reactor units are located in leak-tight rooms designed for the pressure of 0.5 MPa. The plant rooms are connected with the day surface via an entrance gate with locks and water and air pipelines and electric cables are sealed. The rooms have a recirculation ventilation system. Hence, the plant rooms are permanently connected with the atmosphere only via small diameter tubes (50 mm) intended for rarefaction in controlled access rooms. Such an arrangement provides for practically full localization of radioactive releases that may appear in the rooms in case of accident. All basic plant equipment including turbine generators, boiler rooms, control rooms, electric equipment and chemical process equipment, are also located in the underground rooms. Refueling (Fig.3) is done by "dry" method through pulling the spent FA into a shield container that is carried to the cooling tank by a vehicle. Reactor internals are carried to the tanks and storage facilities in the same way. It is proposed that the plant should use an extraction turbine set. The design of the VK-300 boiling water reactor (Fig.4) is based on the technical decisions tested during operation of a VK-50 reactor that has been in service in Dimitrovgrad for more than three decades. First of all, they are in-vessel natural circulation circuit, coolant water chemistry, fuel composition and fuel element materials. The reactor project provides for the higher design margins of linear fuel rating and fuel temperature. The principal novelties to the project are in-vessel coolant separation and the primary containment that confines coolant leakage during primary circuit depressurization. Unlike most of BWRs, the control and safety system absorber drives are located on the reactor cover. It allows reducing the reactor vessel height approximately by the drive stroke through reducing a clearance between the vessel bottom and the core. Besides, it allows not 2

providing a special room for withdrawal and repair of the drives under the reactor which requires fewer amounts of mine workings.it is suggested that already manufactured and upgraded as low as possible WWER-1000 reactor vessels (new) should be used. The maximum value of the fast neutron fluence (E > 0.55 MeV) that is accumulated on the vessel during 60 years of operation, does not exceed 3.8 10 19 1/cm 2. Main plant data Number of reactor units 2 Thermal power, MW 750 2 Heat generation capacity, Gcal/h 400 2 Electric power, MW under district heating mode 150 2 under condensation mode 250 2 Steam parameters at the reactor outlet pressure, MPa 6.86 temperature C 285 moisture content % 0.1 Reactor steam output, t/h 1370 Number of hours of using installed power per year 7000 Number of hours of using nominal power for heat generation per year 5600 Uranium load, t 32.2 2 Fuel enrichment, % 4 Fuel burnup, MW day/kg 42.4 Gross efficiency in district heating mode 0.206 in condensation mode 0.333 3 SAFETY SYSTEMS Underground plant location allows excluding the consideration of the stability of safety systems to failures during a whole range of accidents caused by external events. They are aircraft fall onto the nuclear plant, hurricanes, transport accident, explosions of commercial installations and facilities. Since fire may also be a source of safety system common-cause failures, the equipment of the systems' channels is located in different rooms. The safety system equipment is designed for operation during an ultimate design-basis earthquake. The project includes organizational and technical measures to avoid unauthorized access to the safety system rooms. The stability of safety systems to personnel errors is ensured by prohibition of operator interference with the accident management within 30 minutes after the accident starts (the interference is excluded by technical means). After this time expires, remote control or manual backup for actuation of safety system channels is permitted in the case of failures in their automatic actuation circuits or failure to actuate. 3

To avoid flooding of the process rooms, they will have a special sewage system with water gravity discharge. The main electrical components and devices are located such that no process service lines are run and no tanks with liquid media are present near them to flooding of the main electrical rooms. Hence, the sequence of physical barriers along the path of radioactive substances and ionizing radiation spreading for this plant may be presented as follows: Fuel pellet Fuel cladding Reactor vessel, primary circuit pipelines, gas mixture burning facility, residual heat removal pipelines and equipment Primary containment (PC), emergency cooldown tanks (ECTs) Reactor department's leak-tight rooms Underground plant rooms The designs and schematic arrangements of the emergency cooldown systems (Fig.5) provides for passive cooldown of the core without time limitation and without operator involvement during such accidents as loss of in-house power and primary circuit pipeline rupture. In emergencies, the isolation valves shut off the steam line and the feedwater pipeline on the primary containment boundary confining the radioactive coolant inside the primary contaiment (PC) and the coolant goes to the emergency cooldown tank: if a pipeline is ruptured inside the PC, the coolant goes by gravity to beneath the water layer in the tank, condenses there and goes back to the reactor via a release valve; if a primary circuit pipeline is ruptured outside the PC or if in-house power is lost, the coolant goes to the PC heat exchanger via the release valve and goes back to the reactor after it condensed. 4

Heat is further discharged from the emergensy cooldown tanks (ECT) via an additional water circuit between a water-to-water heat exchanger located in the ECT and a water-to-air heat exchanger located in the air channel. Hence, the radioactive coolant is confined in the PC-ECT system all emergency situations, except primary circuit pipeline rupture outside the PC. In the latter case, not more than 1.2 t of coolant with the radioactivity of 66 MBq by radioactive inert gases and 10.3 GBq by iodines enters the leak-tight reactor (or turbine) department due to fast actuation of the isolation valves. The simplicity of the reactor design and passive nature of safety systems actuation will allow ensuring a very low probability of a core damage during accidents (less than 2.10-7 of events per reactor-year). Calculations show that due to the use of the existing underground premises and the existing infrastructure of the integrated works, the plant construction time will be reduced by 3-4 years and the capital investments will be cut by 30-40 % as compared to the construction of a similar land-based plant. 4 CONCLUSION In accordance with the International scale of nuclear events, not more than a level 4 accident (an accident within the plant boundaries) is possible at the underground NCGP under design. 5

TURBINE ROOM REACTOR ROOM Reactor Core barrel Reactor cover Upcomer tubes Steam turbines Emergency tanks Fuel assembly Reactor Separator Sluice-gate camera Fig.1 Turbine and reactor room NPP. 6

TURBINE ROOM REACTOR ROOM Electricity equipment, centrol room Steam turbine Reactor Fuel assembly Warter purification system Primary conteinment vessel Core barrel Upcomer tubes Reactor cover Separator Fig.2 Turbine and reactor room NPP (longitudinal section). 7

Reactor room Charge fuel equipment Fuel container Rotation plate for taking aim at fuel assembly Fuel assembly storage room Reactor Separator, core barrel and upcomer tubes s Fuel assembly Reactor cover New fuels Spent fuels Fig.3 Fuel reloading schedule. 8

Fig.4 Reactor VK-300. 1 - CPS drive; 2 - Reactor cover; 3 - Separators; 4 - Reactor vessel; 5 - Upcomer tubes; 6 - Core barrel; 7 - Fuel assembly; 8 - Iron-water shield; 9 - Core supportplate. 9

Condenser Air Heat exchangers Primary containment vessel Emergency tank Barboter Steam Feedwater Release valves Armoured concrete Rock Cut-off valves Reactor Fig.5 Primary containment vessel and emergency cooling systems of the reactor. 10