The Nuclear Crisis in Japan

Similar documents
Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Improvements Needed in Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments: Lessons Learned from Fukushima

Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development

Assessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant

Chapter 3 Accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: Sequences, Fission Products Released, Lessons Learned

Summary. LOCA incidents: Gas and liquid metal cooled reactors. List of LOCA incidents: 3-4

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

AP1000 European 19. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Design Control Document

Frequently Asked Questions: Japanese Nuclear Energy Situation

FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI BWR REACTOR SPRAY AND FEED WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR EARLY FAILURE Dean Wilkie

The 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) Vienna University of Technology /Austria Atominstitute Stadionallee 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria

PDHonline Course E438 (3 PDH) Nuclear Accidents. Charles A. Patterson, P.E. PDH Online PDH Center

OVER VIEW OF ACCIDENT OF FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPSs AND FUTURE PLANNING TOWARD D&D

Implementation of Lessons Learned from Fukushima Accident in CANDU Technology

Response to Nuclear Emergency Situation - Viewpoints of Crisis Management -

1. What happened at Fukushima Daiichi five years ago on 11 March 2011?

NUCLEAR ENERGY. Prepared by Engr. JP Timola Reference: Nuclear Energy by Dr. Lana Aref

Contents of summary. 1. Introduction

Chapter 7 Lessons Learned from the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl Accidents and from the Phebus FP Research Programme

Major Influential Issues on the Accident Progressions of Fukushima Daiichi NPP

Development of technologies for the processing and disposal of radioactive waste

Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Safety design approach for JSFR toward the realization of GEN-IV SFR

Post-Fukushima Assessment of the AP1000 Plant

Corium debris configurations in course of accident

XII. Lessons Learned From the Accident Thus Far

Study on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs

Reactor Technology: Materials, Fuel and Safety. Dr. Tony Williams

Major events leading to the accident on April 26, 1986

Isolation Condenser; water evaporation in the tank and steam into the air. Atmosphere (in Severe Accident Management, both P/S and M/S)

Stress tests specifications Proposal by the WENRA Task Force 21 April 2011

NUCLEAR POWER NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN 2012

severe accident progression in the BWR lower plenum and the modes of vessel failure

Ensuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety

Enhancement of Nuclear Safety

IV. Occurrence and Development of the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations

The Accident at Fukushima: What Happened?

Acceptance Criteria in DBA

The Fukushima Nuclear Accident: Insights on the Safety Aspects

THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

Are We Safer Now? The Future of Nuclear Power in the Northwest 3.5 Years After Fukushima

Nuclear Accidents. William M. Murphy. Professor of Geological and Environmental Sciences California State University, Chico

Nuclear accident in Fukushima-I nuclear power plant: Critical Analysis

Safety Provisions for the KLT-40S Reactor Plant

Safety Design Requirements and design concepts for SFR

Chapter VI. VI.Situation regarding efforts to address lessons learned (28 items)

HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES

OperatiOn and safety report Of MOchOvce and BOhunice v2 nuclear power plants

H.R relies on the NRC for all safety issues. However, the NRC provides limited safety evaluations.

Regulatory Actions and Follow up Measures against Fukushima Accident in Korea

The international program Phebus FP (fission

Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response in Japan following Fukushima Accident

Side Event of IAEA General Conference. Severe Accident Analyses of Fukushima-Daiich Units 1 to 3. Harutaka Hoshi and Masashi Hirano

Nuclear Fusion / Nuclear Fission

Dry storage systems and aging management

Verification of the MELCOR Code Against SCDAP/RELAP5 for Severe Accident Analysis

BWR Safety Improvement as a Lesson Learned from Fukushima Accident

Joint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015

SUMMARY OF SE NNEGC ENERGOATOM PERFORMANCE IN POST-FUKUSHIMA PERIOD

SEVERE ACCIDENT FEATURES OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLANT DESIGNS FOR NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FINLAND

Spent Fuel and Spent Fuel Storage Facilities at Fukushima Daiichi

Tsunami Countermeasures at Hamaoka Nuclear Power Station

Reactor Technology --- Materials, Fuel and Safety

DESIGN AND SAFETY PRINCIPLES LEONTI CHALOYAN DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER ON MODERNIZATION

Safety Enhancement of Nuclear Power Plant Post Fukushima. Kumiaki Moriya

Journal of American Science 2014;10(2) Burn-up credit in criticality safety of PWR spent fuel.

Introduction to Level 2 PSA

Lessons Learned from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident and Consequent Safety Improvements

Lessons learned from the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Design of Traditional and Advanced CANDU Plants. Artur J. Faya Systems Engineering Division November 2003

Present Status of Kyoto University Research Reactor, KUR

AP1000 European 15. Accident Analysis Design Control Document

RESEARCH REACTOR FRJ-1 (MERLIN) THE CORE STRUCTURES OF THE REACTOR BLOCK ARE DISMANTLED

Controlled management of a severe accident

Fundamental Research Program for Removal of Fuel Debris

NUCLEAR FUEL AND REACTOR

GERMAN APPROACH TO ESTIMATE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING A SABOTAGE ATTACK AGAINST NUCLEAR INTERIM STORAGES

BACKGROUNDER Office of Public Affairs Phone:

The ESBWR an advanced Passive LWR

Preparedness at PFBR Kalpakkam to meet the challenges due to Natural events Prabhat Kumar, Project Director, PFBR, Director construction BHAVINI

OELG Event Categories

What exactly is Nuclear energy?

4. Current Status (1) Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

Accident Management under Extreme Events

Safety Challenges for New Nuclear Power Plants

Evaluation of AP1000 Containment Hydrogen Control Strategies for Post- Fukushima Lessons Learned

Post-Fukushima Actions in Korea

Understanding the effects of reflooding in a reactor core beyond LOCA conditions

CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Activities of Toshiba for Fukushima restoration

Power Generation. Ronaldo Jenkins Electrical Engineering Branch Chief Office of New Reactors (NRO)

Main Steam & T/G Systems, Safety

ACR-1000: ENHANCED RESPONSE TO SEVERE ACCIDENTS

MEXT Nuclear Energy R&D

India s HWR Activities S.G.Ghadge Executive Director (Reactor Safety & Analysis) Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited

RADIOACTIVE WASTE TREATMENT FROM MO-99 P RODUCTION FACILITY IN THE NETHERLANDS

HOW TO FACE CONCERNS OF RADIATION EFFECTS

Transcription:

The Nuclear Crisis in Japan March 21, 2011 Daniel Okimoto Alan Hanson Kate Marvel

The Fukushima Daiichi Incident 1. Plant Design 2. Accident Progression 3. Radiological releases 4. Spent fuel pools

" Fukushima Daiichi (Plant I) 1. Plant Design Unit I - GE Mark I BWR (439 MW), Operating since 1971 Unit II-IV - GE Mark I BWR (760 MW), Operating since 1974

" Building structure Concrete Building Steel-framed Service Floor 1. Plant Design " Containment Pear-shaped Dry-Well Torus-shaped Wet-Well en.wikipedia.org/wiki/browns_ferry_nuclear_power_plant nucleartourist.com

1. Plant Design " Service Floor

" Lifting the Containment closure head 1. Plant Design

1. Plant Design " Reactor Service Floor (Steel Construction) Spend Fuel Pool " Concrete Reactor Building (secondary Containment) Fresh Steam line " Reactor Core Main Feedwater " Reactor Pressure Vessel " Containment (Dry well) " Containment (Wet Well) / Condensation Chamber

" 11.3.2011 14:46 - Earthquake Magnitude 9 Power grid in northern Japan fails Reactors itself are mainly undamaged " SCRAM Power generation due to Fission of Uranium stops Heat generation due to radioactive Decay of Fission Products After Scram ~6% After 1 Day ~1% After 5 Days ~0.5%

" Containment Isolation Closing of all non-safety related Penetrations of the containment Cuts off Machine hall If containment isolation succeeds, a large early release of fission products is highly unlikely " Diesel generators start Emergency Core cooling systems are supplied " Plant is in a stable save state

" 11.3. 15:41 Tsunami hits the plant Plant Design for Tsunami height of up to 6.5m Actual Tsunami height >7m Flooding of Diesel Generators and/or Essential service water building cooling the generators " Station Blackout Common cause failure of the power supply Only Batteries are still available Failure of all but one Emergency core cooling systems

" Reactor Core Isolation Pump still available Steam from the Reactor drives a Turbine Steam gets condensed in the Wet-Well Turbine drives a Pump Water from the Wet-Well gets pumped in Reactor Necessary: Battery power Temperature in the wet-well must be below 100 C " As there is no heat removal from the building, the Core isolation pump cant work infinitely

" Reactor Isolation pump stops 11.3. 16:36 in Unit 1 (Batteries empty) 14.3. 13:25 in Unit 2 (Pump failure) 13.3. 2:44 in Unit 3 (Batteries empty) " Decay Heat produces still steam in Reactor pressure Vessel Pressure rising " Opening the steam relieve valves Discharge Steam into the Wet-Well " Descending of the Liquid Level in the Reactor pressure vessel

" Reactor Isolation pump stops 11.3. 16:36 in Unit 1 (Batteries empty) 14.3. 13:25 in Unit 2 (Pump failure) 13.3. 2:44 in Unit 3 (Batteries empty) " Decay Heat produces still steam in Reactor pressure Vessel Pressure rising " Opening the steam relieve valves Discharge Steam into the Wet-Well " Descending of the Liquid Level in the Reactor pressure vessel

" Reactor Isolation pump stops 11.3. 16:36 in Unit 1 (Batteries empty) 14.3. 13:25 in Unit 2 (Pump failure) 13.3. 2:44 in Unit 3 (Batteries empty) " Decay Heat produces still steam in Reactor pressure Vessel Pressure rising " Opening the steam relieve valves Discharge Steam into the Wet-Well " Descending of the Liquid Level in the Reactor pressure vessel

" Reactor Isolation pump stops 11.3. 16:36 in Unit 1 (Batteries empty) 14.3. 13:25 in Unit 2 (Pump failure) 13.3. 2:44 in Unit 3 (Batteries empty) " Decay Heat produces still steam in Reactor pressure Vessel Pressure rising " Opening the steam relieve valves Discharge Steam into the Wet-Well " Descending of the Liquid Level in the Reactor pressure vessel

" Reactor Isolation pump stops 11.3. 16:36 in Unit 1 (Batteries empty) 14.3. 13:25 in Unit 2 (Pump failure) 13.3. 2:44 in Unit 3 (Batteries empty) " Decay Heat produces still steam in Reactor pressure Vessel Pressure rising " Opening the steam relieve valves Discharge Steam into the Wet-Well " Descending of the Liquid Level in the Reactor pressure vessel

" Measured, and here referenced Liquid level is the collapsed level. The actual liquid level lies higher due to the steam bubbles in the liquid " ~50% of the core exposed Cladding temperatures rise, but still no significant core damage " ~2/3 of the core exposed Cladding temperature exceeds ~900 C Balooning / Breaking of the cladding Release of fission products form the fuel rod gaps

" ~3/4 of the core exposed Cladding exceeds ~1200 C Zirconium in the cladding starts to burn under Steam atmosphere Zr + 2H 2 0 ->ZrO 2 + 2H 2 Exothermal reaction further heats the core Generation of hydrogen Unit 1: 300-600kg Unit 2/3: 300-1000kg Hydrogen gets pushed via the wet-well, the wet-well vacuum breakers into the dry-well

" at ~1800 C [Unit 1,2,3] Melting of the Cladding Melting of the steel structures " at ~2500 C [Block 1,2] Breaking of the fuel rods debris bed inside the core " at ~2700 C [Block 1] Melting of Uranium-Zirconium eutectics " Restoration of the water supply stops accident in all 3 Units Unit 1: 12.3. 20:20 (27h w.o. water) Unit 2: 14.3. 20:33 (7h w.o. water) Unit 3: 13.3. 9:38 (7h w.o. water)

" Release of fission products during melt down Xenon, Cesium, Iodine, Uranium/Plutonium remain in core Fission products condensate to airborne Aerosols " Discharge through valves into water of the condensation chamber Pool scrubbing binds a fraction of Aerosols in the water " Xenon and remaining aerosols enter the Dry-Well Deposition of aerosols on surfaces further decontaminates air

" Containment Last barrier between Fission Products and Environment Wall thickness ~3cm Design Pressure 4-5bar " Actual pressure up to 8 bars Normal inert gas filling (Nitrogen) Hydrogen from core oxidation Boiling condensation chamber (like a pressure cooker) " Depressurization of the containment Unit 1: 12.3. 4:00 Unit 2: 13.3 00:00 Unit 3: 13.3. 8.41

" Positive und negative Aspects of depressurizing the containment Removes Energy from the Reactor building (only way left) Reducing the pressure to ~4 bar Release of small amounts of Aerosols (Iodine, Cesium ~0.1%) Release of all noble gases Release of Hydrogen " Gas is released into the reactor service floor Hydrogen is flammable

" Unit 1 und 3 Hydrogen burn inside the reactor service floor Destruction of the steel-frame roof Reinforced concrete reactor building seems undamaged Spectacular but minor safety relevant

" Unit 2 Hydrogen burn inside the reactor building Probably damage to the condensation chamber (highly contaminated water) Uncontrolled release of gas from the containment Release of fission products Temporal evacuation of the plant High local dose rates on the plant site due to wreckage hinder further recovery work " No clear information's why Unit 2 behaved differently

" Current status of the Reactors Core Damage in Unit 1,2, 3 Building damage due to various burns Unit 1-4 Reactor pressure vessels flooded in all Units with mobile pumps At least containment in Unit 1 flooded " Further cooling of the Reactors by releasing steam to the atmosphere " Only small further releases of fission products can be expected

3. Radiological releases " Directly on the plant site Before Explosion in Unit Block 2 Below 2mSv / h Mainly due to released radioactive noble gases Measuring posts on west side. Maybe too small values measured due to wind After Explosion in Unit 2 (Damage of the Containment) Temporal peak values 12mSv / h (Origin not entirely clear) Local peak values on site up to 400mSv /h (wreckage / fragments?) Currently stable dose on site at 5mSv /h Inside the buildings a lot more Limiting time of exposure of the workers necessary

3. Radiological releases

3. Radiological releases " Outside the Plant site As reactor building mostly intact => reduced release of Aerosols (not Chernobyl-like) Fission product release in steam => fast Aerosol grows, large fraction falls down in the proximity of the plant Main contribution to the radioactive dose outside plant are the radioactive noble gases Carried / distributed by the wind, decreasing dose with time No Fall-out of the noble gases, so no local high contamination of soil " ~20km around the plant Evacuations were adequate Measured dose up to 0.3mSv/h for short times Maybe destruction of crops / dairy products this year Probably no permanent evacuation of land necessary

3. Radiological releases GRS.de " ~50km around the plant Control of Crop / Dairy products Usage of Iodine pills (Caution, pills can interfere with heart medicine)

" Spend fuel stored in Pool on Reactor service floor Due to maintenance in Unit 4 entire core stored in Fuel pool Dry-out of the pools Unit 4: in 10 days Unit 1-3,5,6 in few weeks Leakage of the pools due to Earthquake? 4. Spend fuel pools " Consequences Core melt on fresh air Nearly no retention of fission products Large release

" Spend fuel stored in Pool on Reactor service floor Due to maintenance in Unit 4 entire core stored in Fuel pool Dry-out of the pools Unit 4: in 10 days Unit 1-3,5,6 in few weeks Leakage of the pools due to Earthquake? 4. Spend fuel pools " Consequences Core melt on fresh air Nearly no retention of fission products Large release

" Spend fuel stored in Pool on Reactor service floor Due to maintenance in Unit 4 entire core stored in Fuel pool Dry-out of the pools Unit 4: in 10 days Unit 1-3,5,6 in few weeks Leakage of the pools due to Earthquake? 4. Spend fuel pools " Consequences Core melt on fresh air Nearly no retention of fission products Large release " It is currently unclear if release from fuel pool already happened