Mr. Gabriel Ojeda Fritz-Pak Corporation Phone: (214) Eastover Circle Fax: (214)

Similar documents
Mr. Jody Wall Carolina Stalite P.O. Box 186 Phone: (704)

Final Report of ASTM C Standard Specification for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete

Center for By-Products Utilization

CEMENT AND CONCRETE REFERENCE LABORATORY PROFICIENCY SAMPLE PROGRAM

CEMENT AND CONCRETE REFERENCE LABORATORY PROFICIENCY SAMPLE PROGRAM

CEMENT AND CONCRETE REFERENCE LABORATORY PROFICIENCY SAMPLE PROGRAM

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE CLASS C FLY ASH CONCRETE SYSTEMS

Characterization of TX Active Cement

Utilization of micro silica as partial replacement of OPC & SRC in concrete

Effects of Cement Type and Fly Ash on the Sulfate Attack Using ASTM C 1012

ENGINEERING MATERIALS Assignment #8: Concrete Mix Design

SUPER WHITE. tile. White cement with high performance!

Fly Ash, Slag, Silica Fume, and Natural Pozzolans

CHAPTER 3 PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS

Fundamentals of Concrete

NRMCA is working on. Experimental Case Study Demonstrates Advantages of Performance Specifications

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. TMMB Printing

Mechanical Properties and Durability of Concrete made with HVFA Blended Cement Produced in a Cement Plant

METHOD OF TEST FOR CEMENT CONTENT FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

Comparison of Length Changes, Flexural Strengths and Compressive Strengths. Between Concrete Made with Rounded Gravel

Chapter VI Mix Design of Concrete

Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete

Influence of Silica Fume, Fly Ash, Super Pozz and High Slag Cement on Water Permeability and Strength of Concrete

Soil Subgrade Resilient Modulus Characteristics With Geopolymer Additive In Peat

FAILURE MODE AND STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-GRADED COARSE AGGREGATE CONCRETE BEAMS

Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete 1

FROST RESISTANCE OF MODERN AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE MIXTURES ROBERT V. FELICE. Bachelor of Science in CIVIL ENGINEERING. Oklahoma State University

OPTIMIZED 3/4" GRADATION LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE REPORT

The Application of X-Ray Fluorescence to Assess Proportions of Fresh Concrete

EFFECTS OF DEICERS ON CONCRETE DETERIORATION

METHOD OF TEST FOR EVALUATION OF SUPERPLASTICIZING ADMIXTURES FOR CONCRETE

FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE WITH CEMENT DISPERSING AGENT FOR RETEMPERING

PCC Pavement Mixture Selection

A DETAILED PROCEDURE OF MIX DESIGN FOR FLY ASH BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE

Influence of Utilization of High-Volumes of Class F Fly Ash on the Abrasion Resistance of Concrete

Study of Sorptivity of Self-Compacting Concrete with Different Chemical Admixtures

Concrete Technology 2/5. Aalto University School of Engineering Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Building Materials Technology

TENSILE STRENGTH OF FLY ASH BASED GEOPOLYMER MORTAR

Brown Coal Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete

CONCRETE MIX DESIGN WORKSHOP FOR NORMAL CONCRETE MIXTURES 3/21/2017 1

INFLUENCE OF EXCESSIVE BLEEDING ON FROST SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CONCRETE INCORPORATING FERRONICKEL SLAG AS AGGREGATES

Influence of Silica Fume, Fly Ash, Super Pozz, and High Slag Cement on Water Permeability and Strength of Concrete

CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

NTPEP Evaluation of Epoxy and Resin Based Adhesive Bonding Systems.

Effect of Micro Silica on the properties of hardened concrete

SECTION 904 AGGREGATES

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 145 (2016 ) 66 73

Pumice Pozz vs. Fly Ash

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 7, July ISSN

Production of High Performance Concrete

Comparison of Properties of Fresh and Hardened Concrete Containing Finely Ground Glass Powder, Fly Ash, or Silica Fume

Strength properties of Fly ash and GGBS based Geo-polymer Concrete

IMPROVEMENT OF CONCRETE DURABILITY BY COMPLEX MINERAL SUPER-FINE POWDER

Course Concrete Technology Course Code Theory Term Work POE Total Max. Marks Contact Hours/ week

Japanese Standardization of recycling materials to concrete

SULFATE AND CHLORIDE RESISTANCE PROPERTIES OF PORTLAND CEMENT BLENDS

Center for By-Products Utilization

The Illinois Tollway s Use of Composite Concrete Pavements with Greener Concrete for Improved Sustainability

Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp , July 2006

A-4 TEST DATA FOR MATERIALS v) Cement used : OPC 43 grade confirming to IS 8112 w) Specific gravity of cement : 3.15 x) Specific gravity of

STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF GEOPOLYMER MORTAR CONTAINING BINARY AND TERNARY BLENDS OF BENTONITE

PROPERTIES OF GREEN CONCRETE CONTAINING QUARRY ROCK DUST AND MARBLE SLUDGE POWDER AS FINE AGGREGATE

AIR PERMEABILITY OF SUPERPLASTICIZED CONCRETE WITH 0.5 CLINKER FACTOR

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, NIT Warangal, India 2. Senior year undergraduate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, NIT Warangal, India 3

Experimental Case Study Demonstrating Advantages of Performance Specifications

Index Terms- Copper Slag (CS), Silica Fume (SF), Physical Properties, Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength.

Size and Dosage of Micro Silica Fume Behaviour for Partial replacement of Cement in Concrete

The procedures that are currently being used for classification of fly ash are

A Short Study to Test the Compliance of Various Pakistani Ordinary Portland Cements with ASTM Composition Standards

The Study on The Effect of Clay Content in Fine Aggregate and its Impact on The Compressive Strength of Concrete

EVALUATION REPORT OF HESS PUMICE

A Comparative Study of the Methods of Concrete Mix Design Using Crushed and Uncrushed Coarse Aggregates

Performance of Jordanian Masonry Cement for Construction Purposes

HANDS-ON TRAINING: MATERIALS AND MIX DESIGN

International Journal on Emerging Technologies 6(1): (2015) ISSN No. (Print) : ISSN No. (Online) :

STRENGTH EVALUATION OF MORTAR BY INCLUSION OF STONE DUST AS A CEMENT AND SAND REPLACING MATERIAL M. T. Raihan 1* & I. B. Muhit 2

Utilization of Coal Slurry Waste as an Alternative Raw Material in Portland Cement Clinker Production

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

LIST OF DAC (17025) ACCREDITED TESTS CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING. Determination of sulphate content of soil and ground water testing

LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATES AS AN INTERNAL CURING AGENT FOR LOW-CRACKING HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETE

COMPREHENSIVE MIX DESIGN: GAINING CONTROL OVER YOUR CONCRETE

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS MADE WITH COAL COMBUSTION BY-PRODUCTS. Lihua Wei*, Tarun R. Naik**, and Dean M. Golden***

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - CONCRETE

GDOT RP Investigation of Recycled Tire Chips for Use in GDOT Concrete Used to Construct Barrier Walls and Other Applications Phase I

Laboratory Test Results on Concrete Mixtures Containing Water-Reducing, Set-Retarding Admixtures

Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Concrete Containing Silica Fume from a Local Source in Pakistan

STRENGTH AND THERMAL STABILITY OF FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER MORTAR

A STUDIES ON BEHAVIOUR OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE

MiniFIBERS ADMIXUS TM Admixtures for Cement Containing Applications. July 2016

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. Endorsed by and Affiliated with. TMMB Printing

FIELD EVALUATION OF 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL FROM ALBERT S. NADEAU/JOHNSON, VERMONT FOR USE IN STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. REPORT 83-7 October 1983

Use of Brick Masonry from Construction and Demolition Waste as Aggregates in Concrete

Proppant and. Gravel Pack Sands. Brady, Texas Operation. Millwood, Ohio Operation. Glass Rock, Ohio Operation. Colorado Springs, Colorado Operation

EFFECTS OF ACIDITY PRESENT IN WATER ON STRENGTH AND SETTING PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE

Effects of Materials and Mixing Procedures on Air Void Characteristics of Fresh Concrete

Tolerances- Section

TYPE S MORTAR W/COLOR

EFFECT OF TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF CHEMICAL ADMIXTURE ON PROPERTIES OF PRODUCED CONCRETE

Variation of Feed Chemical Composition and Its Effect on Clinker Formation Simulation Process

Transcription:

September 11, 2012 Mr. Gabriel Ojeda Fritz-Pak Corporation Phone: (214) 221-9494 4821 Eastover Circle Fax: (214) 341-3182 Mesquite, TX 75149 Email: gabrielojeda@fritzpak.com Subject: Final Report for SLICK-PAK, Compliance Verification Type S Admixture AASHTO M194 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete Dear Mr. Ojeda: Testing, Engineering and Consulting Services, Inc. (TEC Services) is an AASHTO R18 and International Accreditation Services (IAS) (TL-458) accredited laboratory in compliance with ANS/ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and is an Army Corps of Engineering approved laboratory. TEC Services is pleased to present this report of our compliance verification testing of SLICK-PAK, an ASTM C 494-10 Type S (Specific Performance) admixture. All sample preparation and testing was performed in accordance with applicable sections of AASHTO M194-06, ASTM C 494 and documents referenced therein. Material and procedures outlined in AASHTO M194 were used. Based on our results, SLICK-PAK complies with the requirements in AASHTO M194 and Table 1 of ASTM C 494. These test results pertain only to the sample tested. The compliance verification was performed in TEC Service s laboratory in Lawrenceville, Georgia. Concrete batching was carried out on three different days in September, 2011. One control mixture and one test mixture containing SLICK-PAK, both meeting the requirements of AASHTO M194 and ASTM C 494 for fresh concrete properties, were produced each day. A 1- gallon sample of SLICK-PAK was manufactured and supplied to TEC Service by FRITZ-PAK Corporation. The air-entraining agent used in this testing was a commercially available vinsol resin admixture, meeting the requirements of AASHTO M154-06. Testing of the concrete s plastic properties, time of setting, compressive strengths, flexural strengths, length change, and freeze thaw resistance were performed by TEC Services. Determination of the admixture s specific gravity, solids content, and ph were performed by TEC Services. Determination of the admixture s chloride content was performed by Wyoming Analytical Laboratories and the IR analysis was performed by Applied Technical Services. Mixture proportions and results of our testing are given in Tables 1 to 3. Information and test data on fine and coarse aggregates are listed in Tables 4 to 6. Table 7 contains information supplied by the producers of the SLICK-PAK. Product information and test data on the Type I cement is included in Table 8. Test results for each of the six batches prepared for this report are included in Tables 9 through 12.

Table 1: Admixture performance and AASHTO M194 requirements for a Type S admixture SLICK-PAK Specification Requirements Water content (percent of control) 97 NA Time of setting, deviation of control Initial (hr:min) -0:08-1:00 to +1:30 Final (hr:min) -0:11-1:00 to +1:30 Compressive strength (percent of control) 3 days 105 90 (min) 7 days 104 90 (min) 28 days 104 90 (min) 56 days 104 90 (min) 90 days 103 NA 6 months 105 90 (min) 1 year 106 90 (min) Flexural strength (percent of control) 3 days 96 90 (min) 7 days 101 90 (min) 28 days 104 90 (min) 56 days 103 90 (min) Length change (increase over control) -0.005 0.010 (max) Relative durability factor 100 80 (min) Table 2: Mixture proportions, fresh concrete properties, and AASHTO M194 requirements for a Type S admixture Average of Three Separate Tests Control Mixture SLICK-PAK Specification Requirements Cement factor (lb/yd 3 ) 516 517 517 ± 5 Water (lb/yd 3 ) 286 279 Water-cement ratio 0.555 0.539 Coarse aggregate 1846 1851 Fine aggregate 1153 1178 Fine aggregate-total aggregate ratio 0.38 0.39 Slick-Pak (g/cwt) 0.00 0.20 Vinsol Resin (oz/cwt) 0.58 0.82 Slump (in.) 3.25 3.50 3 ½ ± ½ Air content (%) 5.8 5.7 5-7 (± 0.5 of control) Density (lb/ft 3 ) 140.8 141.7 Time of setting Initial (hr:min) 3:53 3:45 dev. of control (hr:min) -0:08-1:00 to +1:30 Final (hr:min) 5:24 5:13 dev. of control (hr:min) -0:11-1:00 to +1:30 Page 2 of 8

Table 3: Properties of hardened concrete Control Mixture SLICK-PAK Compressive strength (psi) 3 days 2390 2510 7 days 3160 3290 28 days 4340 4520 56 days 4630 4830 90 days 4760 4920 6 months 4910 5180 1 year 4920 5230 Flexural strength (psi) 3 days 465 445 7 days 525 530 28 days 585 610 56 days 645 665 Length change (%) -0.017-0.012 Durability factor (%) 86 86 Table 4: Properties of fine and coarse aggregates Fine aggregate Coarse aggregate Manufacturer Martin Marietta, Shorter Vulcan, Lithonia Aggregate type Natural sand Crushed Granite Specific gravity SSD 2.60 2.61 Absorption (%) 0.45 0.77 Table 5: Gradation of fine aggregate and ASTM C494 requirements Percent passing Sieve Fine aggregate Specifications Requirements No. 4 (4.75 mm) 100 100 No. 16 (2.36 mm) 75 65 to 75 No. 50 (300 µm) 15 12 to 20 No. 100 (150 µm) 2 2 to 5 Table 6: Gradation of coarse aggregate and ASTM C494 requirements Percent passing Sieve Coarse aggregate Specifications Requirements 1.5 in. (37.5 mm) 100 100 1.0 in. (25.4 mm) 99 95 to 100 0.5 in. (12.5 mm) 37 25 to 60 No. 4 (4.75 mm) 2 0 to 10 No. 8 (2.36 mm) 1 0 to 5 Page 3 of 8

Table 7: Admixture information as supplied by the manufacturers Type S, Specific Performance Admixture Brand name SLICK-PAK Manufacturer FRITZ-PAK Corporation Lot ID 083011 -SlickPak Sample Size 5 lbs Oven Dried Residue (%) 89.21 ph (1% material in distilled water) 10.98 Chloride Content (%) 0.033 *Chloride content analysis performed by Wyoming Analytical Laboratories, Inc. **IR Scan performed by Applied Technical Services is attached to this report Table 8: Cement information and test data Brand name Manufacturer ASTM C 150 Type I/II cement Portland Type I/II Lafarge Cement Chemical analyses by mass (%) Silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) 19.4 Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) 0.27 Aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) 4.9 Phosphorus pentoxide (P 2 O 5 ) 0.05 Iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3 ) 3.2 Manganic oxide (Mn 2 O 3 ) 0.07 Calcium oxide (CaO) 62.0 Strontium oxide (SrO) 0.03 Magnesium oxide (MgO) 3.8 Barium oxide (BaO) 0.04 Sodium oxide (Na 2 O) 0.12 Loss on ignition (950ºC) 2.56 Potassium oxide (K 2 O) 0.47 Insoluble residue 0.10 Sulfur trioxide (SO 3 ) 3.07 Alkalies as Na 2 O 0.43 Calculated potential compounds as per ASTM C 150-05 (%) Tricalcium silicate (C 3 S) 59 Tricalcium aluminate (C 3 A) 7 Dicalcium silicate (C 2 S) 11 Tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C 4 AF) 10 Physical Testing and Results Fineness Specific Surface (Blaine) 398 m 2 /Kg Air Content (%) 8.0 Setting Times (Vicat) Initial Final 110 minutes 135 minutes Autoclave Expansion (%) 0.07 Compressive 3 Day Strength (psi) 3580 Compressive 7 Day Strength (psi) 4270 Page 4 of 8

Table 9: Mixture proportions, fresh concrete properties, and time of set for three control batches Control 1 Control 2 Control 3 Average Cement factor (lb/yd 3 ) 514 517 517 516 Water (lb/yd 3 ) 285 287 287 286 Water-cement ratio 0.555 0.555 0.555 0.555 Coarse aggregate (lb/yd 3 ) 1841 1849 1849 1846 Fine aggregate (lb/yd 3 ) 1150 1155 1155 1153 Fine aggregate-total aggregate ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 SLICK-PAK (g/cwt) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vinsol Resin (oz/cwt) 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 Slump (in.) 3.00 3.75 3.25 3.25 Air content (%) 5.9 5.7 5.9 5.8 Density (lb/ft 3 ) 140.4 141.0 141.0 140.8 Time of setting Initial (hr:min) 3:51 3:52 3:56 3:53 Final (hr:min) 5:24 5:19 5:29 5:24 Table 10: Properties of hardened concrete from three control test batches Control 1 Control 2 Control 3 Average Compressive strength (psi) 3 days 2160 2480 2520 2390 7 days 2680 3320 3490 3160 28 days 4180 4450 4380 4340 56 days 4420 4840 4640 4630 90 days 4560 4930 4780 4760 6 months 4710 5140 4890 4910 1 year 4520 5380 4860 4920 Flexural strength (psi) 3 days 475 430 485 465 7 days 550 500 530 525 28 days 540 585 635 585 56 days 595 640 700 645 Length change (%) -0.021-0.016-0.013-0.017 Durability Factor (%) 87 87 84 86 Approximate Total Cycles Completed Fundamental Transverse Frequency, khz Relative Dynamic Modulus, percent Control 1 Control 2 Control 3 Control 1 Control 2 Control 3 Average 0 cycles 2.070 2.090 2.129 NA NA NA NA 35 cycles 1.934 1.973 1.953 87 89 84 87 75 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 117 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 152 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 185 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 235 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 273 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 301 cycles 1.934 1.953 1.953 87 87 84 86 Page 5 of 8

Table 11: Mixture proportions, fresh concrete properties, and time of set for three test batches containing SLICK-PAK Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average Cement factor (lb/yd 3 ) 516 519 517 517 Water (lb/yd 3 ) 278 280 279 279 Water-cement ratio 0.539 0.539 0.539 0.539 Coarse aggregate (lb/yd 3 ) 1848 1855 1850 1851 Fine aggregate (lb/yd 3 ) 1175 1180 1177 1178 Fine aggregate-total aggregate ratio 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 SLICK-PAK (g/cwt) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Vinsol Resin (oz/cwt) 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.82 Slump (in.) 3.75 3.50 3.00 3.50 Air content (%) 6.0 5.6 5.5 5.7 Density (lb/ft 3 ) 141.4 142.0 141.6 141.7 Time of setting Initial (hr:min) 3:38 3:54 3:43 3:45 Final (hr:min) 5:02 5:15 5:22 5:13 Table 12: Properties of hardened concrete from three batches containing SLICK-PAK Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average Compressive strength (psi) 3 days 2380 2440 2710 2510 7 days 3160 3050 3670 3290 28 days 4350 4380 4820 4520 56 days 4660 4620 5200 4830 90 days 4580 4750 5420 4920 6 months 5070 5110 5360 5180 1 year 4950 5000 5750 5230 Flexural strength (psi) 3 days 425 415 490 445 7 days 555 520 520 530 28 days 600 620 615 610 56 days 625 645 730 665 Length change (%) -0.018-0.018-0.001-0.012 Durability Factor (%) 87 87 84 86 Approximate Total Cycles Completed Fundamental Transverse Frequency, khz Relative Dynamic Modulus, percent Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Page 6 of 8 Average 0 cycles 2.07 2.07 2.168 NA NA NA NA 35 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 75 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 117 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 152 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 185 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 235 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 273 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86 301 cycles 1.934 1.934 1.992 87 87 84 86

We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, Testing, Engineering & Consulting Services, Inc. Anne Miller Project Manager Shawn P. McCormick Laboratory Principal Attachment: IR Scan of Slick-Pak Page 7 of 8

The IR Scan was performed by Applied Technical Services, Inc. on September 28, 2011. The sample was dried at 105 C for 17 hours per ASTM C494-10. The dried sample was then analyzed using a diamond anvil cell. Page 8 of 8