Montana Statewide Survey Interview Schedule

Similar documents
CAP Western States Survey Interview Schedule

Bureau of Land Management 2005 System-wide Visitor Survey

Bureau of Land Management 2014 National Report

Millennials in the West

Where Funds are Spent

KEY FINDINGS JANUARY 2012 THE 2012 SURVEY OF THE ATTITUDES OF VOTERS IN SIX WESTERN STATES

October 28 November 1, 2017 IOWA ELECTION ISSUES SURVEY A-WT N=500 MARGIN OF SAMPLING ERROR ±4.4% (95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL)

Public Attitudes About New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Indiana

COMMISSIONED BY Detroit Free Press, WXYZ TV 7, WLNS TV 6, WOOD TV8 & WJRT (ABC) TV 12

Rio Grande NF Forest Plan Revision Awareness Meeting October 14, 2014 Alamosa, CO 5:00 pm - 7:00 pm Meeting Summary

Van Buren County Recreation Plan Meeting Page Growing Greener in Southwest Michigan Overview and Significant Findings

Suffolk University/USA TODAY INITIAL POSTING October 2017

WBUR Poll Massachusetts 2016 General Election Survey of 502 Likely Voters Field Dates October 13-16, 2016

Farmland Values Project Survey Summary Statistics for Buncombe County

Katahdin Forest Management 2014 SFI Summary Audit Report

The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project

The Fish River Chain of Lakes Concept Plan

climate change in the ohioan mind CLIMATE

A. For starters, would you say that the best description of the community where you live is:

MICHIGAN PUBLIC POLICY SURVEY (MPPS) LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL TRACKING SURVEY

Opinion Poll. Ohio Small Business Owners Support Government Investments in Clean Energy and Enforcement of EPA Rules. June 7, 2012

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR OUTFITTING, GUIDING, AND PARKS ACTIVITY BUSINESS LICENCES PARKS CANADA YUKON FIELD UNIT

The Northeastern Area s Objectives and Beliefs Responses Regarding Forests and Grasslands: 2004 Survey Results

FRACKING AND CLEAN WATER: A SURVEY OF PENNSYLVANIA RESIDENTS. A Survey Conducted for the Civil Society Institute

PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the Environment

I. Survey Methodology

I. Strategic Planning

Maintaining Forest Health and Water Quality in the Lake Tahoe Region

2016 Annual Volunteer Report

Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District

Suffolk University Nevada Likely Voters August 2016

Visitor Capacity Analysis and Outfitter-Guide Allocation

THE WYOMING FRAMEWORK WATER PLAN

Sponsorship Information and Opportunities Packet

Opinion Poll. Colorado Small Business Owners Support Government Investments in Clean Energy and EPA Clean Air Standards.

Colorado Survey on State Water Policy

What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues Pennsylvania

Massachusetts Support for Cape Wind, State Clean Energy Leadership

U.S. Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring Survey Results National Summary Report. Data collected FY 2012 through FY 2016

RIVER ACCESS STRATEGY GUIDING PRINCIPLES & STRATEGIES

PUBLIC OPINION AND THE ENVIRONMENT: THE NINE TYPES OF AMERICANS

Hiawatha: Your Great Lakes National Forest

BC Public Attitudes Toward Toward Agriculture and Food Detailed Topline Report

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

4 CONSERVED LANDS, PUBLIC LANDS, AND OTHER RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

OUTREACH NOTICE ABOUT THE JOB

SURVEY OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES ABOUT WATER ISSUES IN COLORADO

helps balance supply and demand for recreation with other resources, and enables us to provide what people want.

FINAL NEW JERSEY SEPTEMBER

Travel Management; Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use. SUMMARY: The Forest Service proposes to amend regulations regarding travel


New Maryland Poll: Strong Voter Concern about Pesticides

Transfer of Federal Lands

politics & global warming, october 2017

Blue Mountains ELK NUTRITION AND HABITAT MODELS

General Recreation $3.00 $9.01 Specialized Recreation $12.20 $35.65

Rocky Mountain Bighorn Society P. O. Box 8320 Denver, Colorado

Forest Classification And. Forest Road and Trail Designations For the. Mississippi Headwaters State Forest. Classification Review

Area Code: INTRO SECTION>

Hello my name is Joy Loughry and I am with the groundwater technical unit of the Minnesota department of natural resources. Today I am going to talk

Biodiversity Debate. To evaluate the biological, aesthetic, ethical, social and economic arguments with regard to maintaining biodiversity.

WELCOME. The 7,456-acre Cason Callaway Woodland Estate is being offered for purchase for the first time ever by the Callaway family.

HEADQUARTERS WEST LTD. PHOENIX - TUCSON - SONOITA - COTTONWOOD - ST. JOHNS

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF MINING, LAND AND WATER LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION AS

Monongahela National Forest Outreach Notice

Sierra Club National Survey on Coal, Climate and Carbon Pollution Key Findings

Drake University Agricultural Law Center

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS EXCLUSIVE FOREST AND CONSERVATION DISTRICT (EFC)

M P ANAGEMENT LAN. for Churn Creek. Ministry of Environmen Lands and Parks BC Parks Division

Environmental Policies in the United States

Achyut Kafle1and Stephen K. Swallow2

OUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST HOW TO APPLY: RECREATION POSITIONS BEING HIRED:

Paying for News: Why People Subscribe and What It Says About the Future of Journalism

The Social and Economic Importance of Canada s Privately Owned Forest Lands

Page 1 of 13 Canadians unclear on definition of GMOs, but want mandatory GMO labeling anyway

Hat Creek Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat. LCP Volume II Supporting Analysis for Recommendations

Salmon-Challis National Forest Borah Peak Recommended Wilderness Area USFS Region 4 - Idaho

politics & global warming, may 2017

Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES LESSON PLAN LIBRARY

Americans and Energy Policy: The Myth of the Partisan Divide. A Survey for the Civil Society Institute April 25, 2012

1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7) A 2. ADJACENT LANDS & EASEMENTS 3. FAMILY AGRICULTURAL LEGACY

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Camp Lick Project. Recreation Report. Prepared by: Teresa L. Dixon Recreation Program Manager. for:

Nez Perce - Clearwater NFs Job and Income Contributions for 2014 At A Glance

Alabama 2002 Agricultural, Environmental and Rural Life Issues

General Description WOLF CREEK PASS LINKAGE LANDSCAPE ZOOLOGICAL AREA. Proposed Designated Area Rio Grande National Forest Divide Ranger District

Town of Tolland, Connecticut Conservation Commission Knofla Conservation Area Management Plan 148 and 119 Bakos Road

Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August - September 2017

RIVER BRIDGE MOUNTAIN ACREAGE

Genetically Modified Organisms Survey Results For Aggregated Northland Area

OUTREACH NOTICE The Coconino National Forest, Flagstaff Ranger District will soon be filling the following temporary seasonal positions:

Land Between The Lakes NRA Job and Income Contributions for 2014 At A Glance

Forest Resource Values

Sustainable Forests, Sustainable Communities

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 277 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

2012 Election and Promotional Products Interaction

Reaching the Vermont Travel Market Through Television Advertising:

What Citizens Want from E-Government Current Practice Research

Outdoor Recreation Destinations as Model Regions for Adaption to Climate Change and Protecting Biodiversity

Transcription:

Montana Statewide Survey Interview Schedule Project #18246 April 12-17, 2018 Margin of Error = +4.38% N=500 Registered Voters Public Opinion Strategies/ FM3 In this Interview Schedule: An asterisk (*) in a response category means that less than 0.5% of respondents chose that response category and a dash (-) represents no response. An carrot (^) denotes rounding. Due to rounding, some figures may be higher or lower by less than onehalf of one percent. 6/14: Trend data from a telephone survey of 500 Registered Voters conducted June 17-19, 2014. 5/16: Trend data from a telephone survey of 500 Registered Voters conducted May 7, 9-11, 2016.

1. Compared to other issues like the economy, health care and education, how important are issues involving clean water, clean air, open spaces and public lands for you in deciding whether to support an elected public official? Are they (READ; DO NOT ROTATE) 6/14 5/16 4/18 48% 41% 48% Very important, they are a primary factor in deciding whether to support an elected public official 38% 48% 39% Somewhat important; they are one of several issues you consider 9% 7% 9% Not too important; they are not a significant factor considering in deciding whether to support an elected public official 4% 4% 4% Not at all important for you in deciding whether to support an elected official 1% * * UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 86% 88%^ 87% TOTAL IMPORTANT 13% 11% 13% TOTAL NOT IMPORTANT 2. Over the past year, how many times do you think you have visited national public lands such as national parks, national forests, national monuments, national wildlife refuges, or other national public lands? (ROTATE PUNCHES 1-5 TOP TO BOTTOM, BOTTOM TO TOP) 14% Once or twice 14% 3-5 times 16% 6-10 times 14% 10-20 times 32% More than 20 times 11% NEVER (DO NOT READ) * UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 89%^ TOTAL VISITED (ASK IF Q2:1-5)(ASKED OF N=444 RESPONDENTS) 3. And in the last year have you visited national public lands - (ROTATE PUNCHES 1-2) 39% In Montana 1% Somewhere else 57% Or both? 3% DON'T RECALL/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) Page 2

(ASK IF D6:1, 3)(ASKED OF N=262 RESPONDENTS) 4. And in the last five years have you (ROTATE PUNCHES 1-2) 12% Hunted on privately owned land 17% Hunted on public lands OR 63% Hunted on BOTH private and public lands? 8% NOT HUNTED IN LAST FIVE YEARS (DO NOT READ) * UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) (ASK IF D6:2, 3)(ASKED OF N=275 RESPONDENTS) 5. And in the last five years have you (ROTATE PUNCHES 1-2) 3% Fished on privately owned land 43% Fished on public lands OR 50% Fished on BOTH private and public lands? 4% NOT FISHED IN LAST FIVE YEARS (DO NOT READ) * UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 6. When you think about the presence of national public lands, such as national forests, national monuments, or wildlife refuges in Montana -do you think that having such lands (ROTATE PUNCHES 1 AND 2) 82% Helps our economy 3% Hurts our economy 12% Has little impact on our economy 3% UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) Page 3

7. Thinking just about National Parks for a moment - How important would you say the presence of National Parks here in Montana is to our state? 83% Very important 16% Somewhat important 1% Not very important 1% Not at all important -- UNSURE (DO NOT READ) 98%^ TOTAL IMPORTANT 2% TOTAL NOT IMPORTANT 8. As you may know, National Parks in Montana, like some others around the country, have seen record numbers of visitors in the last few years. One proposal would feature less visited public lands in the state's tourism promotion efforts, to inform voters about other places around the state, like Red Rocks Lake National Wildlife Refuge or the Terry Badlands Wilderness Study Area. Does that sound like something you would support or oppose? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 27% STRONGLY SUPPORT 45% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 8% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 5% STRONGLY OPPOSE 14% DON'T KNOW (DO NOT READ) 1% REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 72% TOTAL SUPPORT 13% TOTAL OPPOSE Page 4

Taking a step back and thinking about all publicly owned lands -- Generally speaking, do you believe enhancing and protecting public lands, such as local, state and national parks, national forests, and wilderness has a positive impact, a negative impact, or no real impact on each of the following: (RANDOMIZE) RANKED BY % 2018 POSITIVE IMPACT POS. NO NEG DK/REF IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT (DNR) 12. Maintaining what is best about Montana (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 81% 8% 6% 5% 5/16 83% 13% 2% 1% 4/18 90% 6% 2% 2% 18. Opportunities for children to explore and learn about nature (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 85% 11% 2% 2% 5/16 92% 6% * 1% 4/18 89% 8% 2% 1% 17. The overall quality of life in Montana (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 80% 11% 6% 3% 5/16 83% 13% 3% 1% 4/18 87% 9% 3% 1% 13. Opportunities for hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 80% 11% 6% 3% 5/16 80% 8% 10% 2% 4/18 87% 6% 3% 4% 9. Tourism (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 84% 9% 4% 4% 5/16 86% 7% 6% 1% 4/18 86% 5% 4% 5% 10. Wildlife (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 81% 10% 5% 4% 5/16 87% 9% 3% 1% 4/18 85% 8% 3% 4% Continued Page 5

POS. NO NEG DK/REF IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT (DNR) 11. Protecting clean water (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 81% 13% 2% 4% 5/16 85% 10% 4% 2% 4/18 85% 8% 2% 5% 15. Protecting our culture and heritage (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 74% 18% 4% 3% 5/16 83% 14% 2% 1% 4/18 81% 12% 6% 1% 14. Protecting clean air (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 71% 16% 6% 7% 5/16 74% 22% 3% 1% 4/18 76% 16% 5% 3% 16. Jobs and the economy (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 6/14 62% 17% 14% 6% 5/16 77% 16% 6% 1% 4/18 75% 12% 9% 4% Page 6

Thinking about one national proposal that may be considered by Congress - 19. Would you support or oppose ensuring that a small portion of federal offshore drilling fees already being paid by oil and gas companies is dedicated to the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which was created by Congress to be used for conserving natural areas, wildlife, and clean water and providing access to outdoor recreation throughout the country? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 6/14 4/18 40% 47% STRONGLY SUPPORT 31% 29% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 8% 6% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 12% 7% STRONGLY OPPOSE 8% 11% DON'T KNOW (DO NOT READ) * * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 71% 76% TOTAL SUPPORT 21% 13% TOTAL OPPOSE Page 7

Just over fifty years ago Congress passed the Wilderness Act, which protected the Bob Marshall or the Beartooths here in Montana. These areas were designated by Congress as wilderness in order to keep that land conserved in its natural state. Wilderness lands can be used for hiking, camping, livestock grazing, horseback riding, wildlife watching, hunting and fishing. However, mining, oil and gas development, logging, and the use of motorized or off-road vehicles, and mountain biking are not allowed on wilderness lands. 20. Would you support or oppose dedicating additional, existing public lands as wilderness areas here in Montana? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 6/14 4/18 33% 38% Support/strongly 18% 19% Support/somewhat 8% 6% UNDECIDED 10% 13% Oppose/somewhat 30% 22% Oppose/strongly 1% 2% Don't know (DO NOT READ) - * Refused (DO NOT READ) 51% 57% TOTAL SUPPORT 40% 35% TOTAL OPPOSE Page 8

(ASK IF Q20:3-6)(ASKED OF N=215 RESPONDENTS) 21. Just three percent of Montana lands are currently dedicated as wilderness areas. Knowing this, would you support or oppose dedicating additional, existing public lands as wilderness areas here in Montana? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 6/14 4/18 3% 8% Support/strongly 9% 11% Support/somewhat 8% 6% UNDECIDED 19% 22% Oppose/somewhat 58% 49% Oppose/strongly 3% 3% Don't know (DO NOT READ) -- -- Refused (DO NOT READ) 12% 20%^ TOTAL SUPPORT 77% 71% TOTAL OPPOSE 22. Here in Montana some areas of existing public lands are protected as Wilderness Study Areas, such as the Big Snowy Mountains and the Terry Badlands. These public lands are accessible to hunters, anglers, hikers, and others on foot and horse, and allow grazing and motorized vehicle use in some areas, but not mining or logging. There are proposals in Congress that would eliminate protections for 29 wilderness study areas in Montana. That would potentially expand motorized recreation, oil and gas drilling, or industrial development in nearly 700 thousand acres. Which would you prefer Congress do - (ROTATE TOP TO BOTTOM, BOTTOM TO TOP PUNCHES 1-3) 11% Eliminate protections in all 29 Wilderness Study areas 24% Add new protections in some areas, and eliminate protections in others 57% Keep all 29 wilderness study areas as they are now 8% UNSURE (DO NOT READ) * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 81% TOTAL ADD NEW/KEEP ALL Page 9

23. And in legislation related to the level of protections on existing public lands, how important is it to you that a wide range of stakeholders and local communities have the opportunity to provide their input before decisions are made? (ROTATE TOP TO BOTTOM, BOTTOM TO TOP PUNCHES 1-4) (IF IMPORTANT/NOT IMPORTANT, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 77% Very Important 19% Somewhat important 2% Not very important 1% Not at all important * UNSURE (DO NOT READ) * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 97%^ TOTAL IMPORTANT 3% TOTAL NOT IMPORTANT Thinking more specifically about some proposals that would affect public lands here in Montana - for each one, please tell me whether it sounds like something you would support or oppose. 24. The Blackfoot Clearwater Stewardship Project in western Montana would ensure access to hunting and fishing sites, increasing protections for approximately eighty thousand acres of existing public lands by adding them to the Bob Marshall, Scapegoat and Mission Mountains wilderness areas; open a high quality area for snowmobiling, and maintain timber harvesting. Do you support or oppose this project? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 5/16 4/18 35% 36% Strongly Support 39% 37% Somewhat Support 7% 8% Somewhat Oppose 11% 8% Strongly Oppose 6% 11% UNSURE (DO NOT READ) 1% * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 74% 73% TOTAL SUPPORT 18% 16% TOTAL OPPOSE Page 10

25. Thinking specifically about the Badger Two Medicine area of the Lewis and Clark National Forest, which connects Glacier National Park and the Bob Marshall Wilderness. The Trump Administration has proposed making this area a National Monument, largely due to the presence of sites that are sacred to the Blackfeet Tribe. These areas are accessible to hunters, anglers, hikers, and others on foot and horseback. Does this sound like something you would support or oppose for this area? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 40% Strongly Support 36% Somewhat Support 5% Somewhat Oppose 11% Strongly Oppose 8% UNSURE (DO NOT READ) * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 76% TOTAL SUPPORT 16% TOTAL OPPOSE National Monuments can vary in different aspects. I'm going to read you a number of potential aspects of a National Monument in the Badger-Two Medicine area. For each one, please tell me how important you think it is that the National Monument include that particular element - is it extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important? (RANDOMIZE) RANKED BY % EXTREMELY/VERY IMPORTANT EXTR/ TOTAL VERY EXTR VERY SMWT NOT DK REF IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT (DNR) (DNR) 29. Continue to allow recreational opportunities for those who come to hike, camp, fish, hunt, and recreate here (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 97%^ 75%^ 27% 47% 22% 2% 1% 26. Conserve wildlife habitat, for species such as elk, native trout and mountain goats (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 94%^ 73% 31% 42% 21% 5% * 1% 30. Provide opportunities for community input in how the land is managed and conserved (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 96% 69% 22% 47% 27% 3% 1% * Continued Page 11

EXTR/ TOTAL VERY EXTR VERY SMWT NOT DK REF IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT (DNR) (DNR) 31. Protect archaeological and cultural sites considered sacred by the Blackfeet Tribe (ASKED OF SAMPLE B, ASKED OF N=247 RESPONDENTS) 92%^ 69% 32% 37% 22% 7% * 1% 28. Create jobs in nearby communities (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 92% 58% 21% 37% 34% 8% * -- 27. Provide a role for the Blackfeet tribe in managing these lands, which does not exist today (ASKED OF SAMPLE A, ASKED OF N=253 RESPONDENTS) 77% 49% 20% 29% 28% 19% 3% 1% 32. And do you support or oppose the President continuing to have the ability to protect existing public lands as national monuments? (IF SUPPORT/OPPOSE, ASK:) And would that be STRONGLY (support/oppose) or just SOMEWHAT (support/oppose)? 41% Strongly Support 37% Somewhat Support 6% Somewhat Oppose 10% Strongly Oppose 4% UNSURE (DO NOT READ) 1% REFUSED (DO NOT READ) 78% TOTAL SUPPORT 17%^ TOTAL OPPOSE D1. To ensure we have a representative sample of voters in your state, please tell me in what year you were born. 19% 18-34 24% 35-44 15% 45-54 22% 55-64 20% 65 AND ABOVE * REFUSED Page 12

Thinking about you for a moment - D3. Do you consider yourself to be a conservationist? 6/14 5/16 4/18 67% 75% 74% YES 27% 21% 21% NO 5% 4% 5% DK/REF (DO NOT READ) D4. Which of the following types of outdoor recreation do you participate in regularly? (ACCEPT MULTIPLE RESPONSES) **PERCENTAGES ADD UP TO GREATER THAN 100% BECAUSE MULTIPLE RESPONSES WERE ALLOWED** 67% Hiking or trail running 66% Camping 49% Bird watching and viewing wildlife 48% Kayaking, canoeing or boating 39% Snow shoeing, skiing or boarding 35% Riding an off-road vehicle or snowmobile 27% Mountain biking 3% OTHER (SPECIFY ) (DO NOT READ) 6% NONE OF THESE (DO NOT READ) * UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) And for statistical purposes only... D5. How would you describe the area where you currently live? 24% A city 9% A suburban area 27% A small town 39% A rural area 1% DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE (DO NOT READ) * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) Page 13

D6. Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? 9% HUNTER ONLY 12% ANGLER ONLY 43% BOTH 36% NO/NEITHER -- UNSURE/REFUSED (DO NOT READ) D7. And, in politics today, do you consider yourself to be...(rotate) a Republican, a Democrat, An Independent, or something else? 30% REPUBLICAN 26% DEMOCRAT 43% INDEPENDENT/ SOMETHING ELSE 1% REFUSED (DO NOT READ) D8. Generally speaking, do you consider yourself to be on most issues? (ROTATE TOP TO BOTTOM, BOTTOM TO TOP) conservative, moderate...or... liberal 43% CONSERVATIVE 33% MODERATE 19% LIBERAL 5% DON'T KNOW (DO NOT READ) * REFUSED (DO NOT READ) D9. Gender (BY OBSERVATION) 50% MALE 50% FEMALE Page 14