SPE Abstract. in oil and gas. designs. Introduction On an eight-year. review of the. EPA s Clean. Air Act, includes the first.

Similar documents
Complying with NSPS Regulations Governing Air Emissions from Natural Gas Well Sites

EPA's Proposed Air Pollution Standards for the Oil and Natural Gas Sector Preliminary Analysis September 2011

A PENNSYLVANIA FRAMEWORK OF ACTIONS FOR METHANE REDUCTIONS FROM THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR

Hydraulic Fracture Pollution Capture: Oil & Gas Production Air Regulations

Oil and Gas Regulations and TCEQ Lessons Learned

Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program: Supplementary Technical Information for ONE Future Commitment Option

Natural Gas Development, Including Hydraulic Fracturing ( Fracking ) and Horizontal Drilling

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 2012 Data Summary

BLM Forum on Venting and Flaring of Gas Produced from Onshore Federal Lands. Statement of Tomás Carbonell

DRAFT Procedures for Quantifying Fugitive VOC Emission Sources at Petroleum Facilities

Minor Source Permitting Guidance for Facilities Subject To Federal Standards

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Compressor Station Whites Creek Pike Page 1

Environmental Breakout: Regional Perspectives on Environmental Challenges to Controversial Development Projects

Technical Support Document

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Issues for the Oil and Gas Sector ERM 2015 Webinar Series

CDPHE s Regulation of Oil and Gas Development. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Kent Kuster CDPHE Oil and Gas Liaison

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division RENEWABLE OPERATING PERMIT STAFF REPORT

Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Life Cycle and Implications for Power Generation: Update on Emission Studies

NSPS OOOOa Fugitive Emissions Requirements

An Overview of Air Quality Issues in Natural Gas Systems

EMISSIONS REGULATIONS AND REDUCTIONS TECHNOLOGY IN WESTERN CANADA S OIL & GAS SECTOR

EPA Did Not Use Allegedly Flawed Studies to Estimate Methane Emissions or Set New Source Performance Standards for Oil and Natural Gas Production

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program

Natural Gas Extraction. Key Environmental Issues in US EPA Region 2 May 29, 2014

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DOCUMENTS For DCP Midstream, LP Hamilton Township, Michigan

40 CFR 98 Subpart W Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Title V. Model General Permit Template SERIES 1 FLARES. Template # SJV-FL-1-1

Smoking Guns. Environmental Integrity Project SMOKING FLARES AND UNCOUNTED EMISSIONS FROM REFINERIES AND CHEMICAL PLANTS IN PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS

Methane and Other Air Pollution Issues in Natural Gas Systems

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Results from DCU Depressurization Vent Testing. Presented by: Chris Weber, Senior Chemist, URS Corporation

Santa Barbara County APCD

EPA Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule. Onshore Petroleum & Natural Gas Production

DFW SIP Development Update and Oil & Gas Inventory Follow-Up

SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION OCTOBER Version 1.0. Prepared by:

Oil and Gas Drilling Linked to Air Pollution. Fracking Provides Many Opportunities For The Release Of Air Pollutants.

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Volatile Organic Compound Storage Tanks (greater than or equal to 2,000 gallons)

DEVELOPMENT OF 2010 OIL AND GAS EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS FOR THE DENVER-JULESBURG BASIN

e-cfr Data is current as of October 16, 2017

How to Develop a Methane Emissions Feasibility and Measurement Study

Notice of Construction Application Supporting Information Report Tacoma Liquefied Natural Gas Facility Tacoma, Washington

Staff will monitor Bills as the move through the legislative process

BEFORE THE COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION

Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the Canadian Oil and Natural Gas Industries

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality

NRRI Colloquium July 11, 2015 Answering Questions about Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Sector

April 25, 2006 Villahermosa, Mexico. Compressors: Agenda

MEMORANDUM November 22, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager

SHELL ONSHORE OPERATING PRINCIPLES

Answers to our Viewers Questions

Projections of Future Oil & Gas Emissions. EPA/States Oil and Gas Emissions Summit November 5, 2014 Rich Mason

MEMORANDUM February 19, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager Air Quality Division

Focus on Hydraulic Fracturing

Best Practices Learned from Greenhouse Gas Reporting

MEMORANDUM January 6, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager

TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT STATEMENT OF BASIS

MEMORANDUM December 9, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager, Air Quality Division

DRAFT. MEMORANDUM March 19, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager,

Opportunities for Methane Emissions Reductions in Natural Gas Production

Methane Research: The 16 Study Series AN UNPRECEDENTED LOOK AT METHANE FROM THE NATURAL GAS SYSTEM

Environmental Testing of an Advanced Flare Tip for a Low-Profile Flare Burning Ethylene

Update of Saskatchewan Upstream Oil & Gas Industry Regulations

A.6 Boilers. A.6.1 New and Existing Boilers located within AQCR 131

Natural Resources Canada Office of Energy Efficiency 580 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E4

Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations NSPS 60, Subpart WWW Checklist for Conditions and Requirements Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLF)

Regulation I Rule 104 Prohibitions

RELEASE POINT TYPE Enter or select one of the following stack/emission point release orientation: downward

2011 Oil and Gas Emission Inventory Enhancement Project for CenSARA States

Reducing Methane Emissions from Production Wells: Reduced Emission Completions in Gas Wells; Smart Automation of Gas Well Plunger Lifts

Air Quality Impacts of Well Stimulation and Recommendations for the SB 4 DEIR

OIL&GAS METHANE PARTNERSHIP SECOND-YEAR REPORT

Incident Reporting Requirements

August 2, Bent Creek Boulevard Suite 101 Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania

Air Quality Regulation Update Proposed MSW Landfill NSPS/EG Changes (& Other Relevant Musings)

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Best Performance Standard (BPS) x.x.xx

Managing the Risks of Shale Gas Identifying a Pathway toward Responsible Development

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DOCUMENTS For Holland Board of Public Works Holland, Michigan

Description [in natural gas volume] Emissions estimated from size of breach / pressure / duration calculation

Satisfying the Corrective Action Requirements of the Refinery Sector Rule

The Pipelines Regulations, 2000

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY

Planning for Attainment: Ozone Advance

Downsizing a Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit

NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY COOPERATION OPPORTUNITIES BETWEEN CHINA AND USA

Natural Gas Processing

Flares in refineries and chemical plants. Industry Standards and US emissions regulations AFRC Houston, Tx, September 19-20, 2011

Natural Gas Gathering Lines. John Williams Director Service Monitoring and Enforcement Department

Exploring the variability between methods for characterizing flash gas emissions from oil storage tanks

The Shale Gas Industry: Risks to Human Health and the Environment

SOT Executive Summary: The Role of Toxicological Page 2 of 5 Science in Meeting the Challenges and Opportunities of Hydraulic Fracturing

Two for One Special: Targeting Pollutants that Both Cause Local Air Pollution Problems and Contribute to Climate Change

Methane and CO 2 emissions from the natural gas supply chain: an evidence assessment

OIL AND GAS SUPPLEMENT

APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST LAND PROTECTION DIVISION HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNICALLY ADMIN.

MURPHY OIL AND CLIMATE CHANGE Upstream Worldwide Exploration/Production Assets 2016 Emission Data MURPHY OIL CORPORATION 1

CHAPTER 6: AIR EMISSIONS

MEMORANDUM May 2, Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits & Engineering Group Manager

Emissions from the Production, Storage, and Transport of Crude Oil and Gasoline

Transcription:

SPE 157803 Best Practices for Using Flares to Meet Proposed EPA Emissions Regulations for Hydraulically Fractured Natural Gas or Oil Wells Scott D. Reed, Zeeco, Inc. Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8-10 October 2012. This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright. Abstract The new 2012 EPA Oil and Natural Gas Air pollution standards, enacted April 17, 2012, are designed to reduce harmful emissions of VOCs from hydraulically fractured wells. VOCs in the presence of sunlight promote the formation of smog (grade-level ozone) near areas where oil and gas production occurs. The four-targeted areas of VOC reduction in oil and gas production will affect some 25,000 wells per year as well as storage tanks and other processing equipment. Flare systems are proposed as one of the preferred control devices to meet these new regulations. Complicating the hydraulic fracturing production picture further, the industry expects new EPA flare regulations to be proposed shortly. These regulations are currently under review with public comment underway via the TCEQ and EPA Flare Stakeholder Task Force. This paper will address specifics of both new regulations and provide guidance for cost-efficient and effective flare system designs. Introduction On April 17, 2012, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released final environmental regulations to reduce air pollution from the oil and gas industries. The final ruling, the result of an eight-year review of the EPA s Clean Air Act, includes the first federal air standards for oil and natural gas production. After final comments were received, a New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for VOC and SO 2 reduction at the well site, and a National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for oil and gas production facilities were developed. The final ruling provides well owners and operators increased compliance flexibility while enhancing transparency and accountability. The new regulations will also help well operators avoid unnecessary spending of state and private resources and maintain comparable environmental benefits. One of the key components of the new ruling is reducing the potent greenhouse gases that result from natural gas production. Forty percent of all greenhouse gas emissions occur from oil and gas production and processing; gas production and processing is one of the single largest methane sources. 1 Reducing the VOC emissions from production equipment and welll sites will help reduce ground-level than 11,000 new hydraulically fractured gas wells each year. 1 VOCs in the presence of sunlight promote the formation of smog (ground level ozone) ), a known irritant with potential health and environmental impacts near oil and gas ozone. This final ruling is expected to yield a nearly 95% reduction in methane and VOCs emitted from more production sites. Crude oil and gas production as well as natural gas onshore processing are targeted segments for VOC and SO 2 reduction. Other emissions, including benzene and other known potential air toxins, are also defined. 40 CFR Part 63 subpart HH directly impacts the oil and gas production industry. Subpart HHH of regulation 40 CFR Part 63 specifically affects the natural gas transmission and storage market segment. In previous rulings, Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) activities were exempted from meeting performance standards during these specific periods of operation. In the new regulations, SSM is not exempt and is required to meet the noted performance standards. This is a departure from previous regulations and should be a consideration in the design of control devices.

2 SPE 157803 The new ruling incorporates five source categories of oil and gas production: NATCS Code 211111- Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction 211112- Natural Gas Liquid Extraction 221210- Natural Gas Distribution 486110- Pipeline Distribution of Crude Oil 486210- Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas Figure 1. The Natural Gas Production Process Diagram adapted from the American Gas Association and the EPA Natural Gas STAR Program EPA Regulations Affecting Upstream Operations Standards for Natural Gas Well Operations Affecting newly fractured or refractured natural gas wells after August 23, 2011, the NSPS require reduced VOC emissions by 95% during completion flowback activities. The rule requires hydraulically fractured gas wells use Reduced Emission Completion (REC), otherwisee known as green completion, to reduce VOC emissions during the flowback period. Green completion is not required until January 1, 2015. For applications where REC is not a technically feasible option (Exploration, Delineation, LP wells), a Completion Combustion Device (CCD) may be one of the preferred options. In orderr for a CCD to be applicable, CCDs must have reliable ignition sources over the duration of the flowback period (typically 3-10 days) and must meet 95% VOC reduction. For those operators with multiple drilling sites in a condensed geographical area, the use of a portable CCD might be an option to consider. Open or enclosed portable well production flares can increase flexibility to address multiple well sites without any foundation requirement and allow for management of multiple well sites. Standards for Storage Tanks The NSPS initially defined a storage tank as a vessel or series of vessels having VOC emissions equal to or greater than 10 tons per year. The final ruling limits storage tanks to a VOC emissionss level of six tons per year. This is a significant change from the initial drafting of the ruling. Storage tanks have one year or until April 17, 2013, to install necessary controls. Storage tank operators may have an additional 30 days to measure VOC to determine if controls are required on new tanks and an additional 30 days to set and install necessary controls in place. A 95% VOC reduction efficiency is required. If a flare is utilized to achievee the 95% VOC reduction, and the flare is designed per SS 60.18b, there is no requirement for rigorous performance testing either in the field or at the flare provider s facility, and only compliance testing per Method 222 from 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A-7 is required. The flare will requiree a standing pilot and heat sensing monitoring with a recording devicee to indicate continuous ignition of the pilot flame. Per NESHAP review, large and small dehydration units at major sources require a 95% reduction in benzene emissions. New units must comply on startup and already existing applications are required to comply within three years, or April 17, 2015. Flare systems specifically designed for glycol dehydration vents are available and can easily achieve the 95% VOC reduction mandated.

SPE 157803 3 Figure 2. Wellpad Process Flow Diagram Natural Gas Gathering and Boosting Stations The final ruling limits storage tanks in natural gas gathering and boosting stations to a VOC emissions level of six tons per year. This is a significant change from the initial drafting of the ruling. Storage tanks have one year or until April 17, 2013, to install necessary controls. Storage tank operators may have an additional 30 days to measure VOC to determine if controls are required on new tanks and an additional 30 days to set and install necessary controls in place. A 95% reduction in VOC is required. A properly designedd flare system will easily achieve and meet the 95% reduction required when using the flare as a CCD. NSPS as well as NESHAP require the control of centrifugal and reciprocating compressors, rod packing replacement and pneumatic controller vents. Under the new regulations, the compressors are required to meet emission reductions, necessary replacements, initial performance testing, and recorded annual reports. Beyond the new NSPS and NESHAP requirements, further pending regulations are likely to impact flares for these facilities. The EPA has continued research the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) initiated regardingg highly reactive VOC reduction in flare systems. The Flare Task Force section of the TCEQ websitee gives additional details on this effort (http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/stationary-rules/stakeholder/flare_stakeholder.html). Thesee forthcoming regulations will likely require additional controls for the assist media being utilized for smokeless operation, typically steam or low pressuree air blowers. It is also likely to be required that the steam or air to be in a particular ratio to the amount of hydrocarbon being flared, so that the flare can not be operated in a over steam or over air condition, to the point of quenching the flame and producing excessive VOC emissions. While those regulations have not been published as of the date of this manuscipt, the affected facility operators need to remain aware of both the already published new and the likely upcoming regulations and consider potential flare designs that would meet requirements for forthcoming new facilities. To address glycol dehydration vent VOC reduction, flare systems are specifically designed for thesee applications and are able to achieve the 95% VOC reduction mandated. Gas Processing Facility The final ruling limits storage tanks at Gas Processing facilities to a VOC emissionss level of six tons per year. This is a significant change from the initial drafting of the ruling. Storage tanks have one year or until April 17, 2013, to install necessary controls. Storage tank operators may have an additional 30 days to measure VOC to determine if controls are required on new tanks and an additional 30 days to set and install necessary controls in place. A 95% reduction in VOCs is required. A properly designedd flare system for gas processing facilities can easily achieve these requirements. NSPS as well as NESHAP require the control of centrifugal and reciprocating compressors, rod packing replacement and pneumatic controller vents. Under the new regulations, the compressors are required to meet emission reductions, necessary replacements, initial performance testing, and recorded annual reports. Beyond the new NSPS and NESHAP requirements, further pending regulations are likely to impact flares for these facilities. The EPA has continued research the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) initiated regardingg highly reactive VOC reduction in flare systems. The Flare Task Force section of the TCEQ websitee gives additional details on this effort

4 SPE 157803 (http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/stationary-rules/stakeholder/flare_stakeholder.html). These forthcoming regulations will likely require additional controls for the assist media being utilized for smokeless operation, typically steam or low pressure air blowers. It is also likely to be required that the steam or air be in a particular ratio to the amount of hydrocarbon being flared, so that the flare can not be operated in a over steam or over air condition, to the point of quenching the flame and producing excessive VOC emissions. While those regulations have not been published yet, the affected facility operators need to remain aware of both the already published new and the likely upcoming regulations and consider potential flare designs that would meet requirements for forthcoming new facilities. Gas processing facilities have important NESHAP regulations to note regarding leak detection and repair. For sweetening units over five long tons per day (ltpd) of SO2, the units are required to meet the reduction of 99.9%. For large and small dehydration units located at major sources, a required 95% reduction in benzene emissions must be met upon startup on newer small units, and existing small dehydration units must comply within 3 years or April 17, 2015. To address glycol dehydration vent VOC reduction, flare systems are specifically designed for these applications and are able to achieve the 95% VOC reduction mandated. Gas Compressor Stations For gas compressor stations, the final ruling limits storage tanks to a VOC emissions level of six tons per year. This is a significant change from the initial drafting of the ruling. Storage tanks have one year or until April 17, 2013, to install necessary controls. Storage tank operators may have an additional 30 days to measure VOC to determine if controls are required on new tanks and an additional 30 days to set and install necessary controls in place. A 95% reduction in VOC is now required by NSPS. This emissions reduction can be easily achieved through the use of a properly designed flare system. Per NESHAP review, large and small dehydration units at major sources require a 95% reduction in benzene emissions. New units must comply with the new regulations upon startup and already existing applications are required to comply within 3 years, or April 17, 2015. Beyond the new NSPS and NESHAP requirements, there is further pending regulations that are likelyto impact flares for these facilities. The EPA has continued research the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) initiated regarding highly reactive VOC reduction in flare systems. The Flare Task Force section of the TCEQ website gives additional details on this effort (http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/stationary-rules/stakeholder/flare_stakeholder.html). These forthcoming regulations will likely require additional controls for the assist media being utilized for smokeless operation, typically steam or low pressure air blowers. It is also likely required that the steam or air to be ratioed to the amount of hydrocarbons being flared, so that the flare can not be operated in a over steam or over air conditions, to the point of quenching the flame and producing excessive VOC emissions While these regulations have not been published as of the date of this manuscipt, the affected facility operators need to remain aware of new and upcoming regulations and consider potential flare designs that may impact forthcoming facilities. To address glycol dehydration vent VOC reduction, flare systems are specifically designed for these applications and are able to achieve the 95% VOC reduction mandated. Using Flare Applications in Accordance with EPA Regulations In order to utilize a production flare application as a CCD for completion flowback, the flare must have a reliable ignition source over the duration of the flowback period (typically 3-10 days) and be able to meet the required 95% VOC reduction. For those operators with multiple drilling sites in a condensed geographical area, the use of a portable CCD might be an option to consider. Open or enclosed portable well production flares can increase flexibility to address multiple well sites without any foundation requirement and allow for management of multiple well sites in a field to manage flowback schedules. Production flares are able to operate in difficult environments and are typically located in unmanned locations. Combustion companies such as Zeeco, Inc., understand the regualtory landscape and resulting design features to incorporate into current designs for custom applications. Storage vessel vents do not require performance testing if it is designed and operated per 60.18b with compliance demonstration using Method 22 from 40 CFR Part 60, appendix A-7, to determine visible emissions. The flare will require a standing pilot, and heat sensing monitoring with a recording device that indicates the continuous ignition of the pilot flame. To address glycol dehydration vent VOC reduction, flare systems are specifically designed for these applications and are able to achieve the 95% VOC reduction mandated.

SPE 157803 5 The proposed regulations are designed to reduce harmful emissions of VOCs from hydraulically fractured wells. VOCs in the presence of sunlight promote the formation of smog (grade-level ozone) near areas where oil and gas production occurs. The four targeted areas of VOC reduction in oil and gas production will affect some 25,000 wells per year as well as storage tanks and other processing equipment. Flare systems are proposed as one of the preferred control devices to meet these new regulations. With the increasing exploration of shale formations around the globe, it is important to make the right decision when choosing a combustion device. As of this writing, the aforementioned regulations are the final regulations and should be considered when designing a combustion device to meet the necessary production needs. References 1 Overview of Final Amendments to Air Regulations for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry Fact Sheet. 2012. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). <http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas>.