Autoclave Meltout of Cast Explosives

Similar documents
Safe Disposal of Secondary Waste

STORAGE OF LIMITED QUANTITIES OF EXPLOSIVES AT REDUCED Q-D

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Munitions Items Disposition Action System (MIDAS) Program

Characterizing PCB contamination in Painted Concrete and Substrates: The Painted History at Army Industrial Sites

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection (JECP) Family of Systems (FoS)

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

Navy s Approach to Green and Sustainable Remediation

Sustainable Management of Available Resources and Technology (SMART) Cleanup

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

Department of Defense Green Procurement Program and Biobased Products

RECYCLING PROPELLANTS AND EXPLOSIVES INTO THE COMMERCIAL EXPLOSIVE INDUSTRY

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Hybrid Vapor Compression Ejector Cycle: Presentation to IAPG Mechanical Working Group

Reintroducing High Workload Needle Free Jet Injectors to the US Military Medical Community

FEASIBILITY OF USING NON PROPAGATION WALLS IN AN EXISTING OPERATING FACILITY. And

Counters for Monitoring

Testing Cadmium-free Coatings

Report No. D August 1, Internal Controls Over U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works, Disbursement Processes

DoD Environmental Information Technology Management (EITM) Program

Aeronautical Systems Center

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

Vehicle Thermal Management Simulation at TARDEC

DOD Methodology for the Valuation of Excess, Obsolete, and Unserviceable Inventory and Operating Materials and Supplies

Update on ESTCP Project ER-0918: Field Sampling and Sample Processing for Metals on DoD Ranges. Jay L. Clausen US Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC CRREL

Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Management at Fort Stewart

EFFECT OF MATERIAL PHASE CHANGE ON PENETRATION AND SHOCK WAVES

Novel Corrosion Control Coating Utilizing Carbon Nanotechnology

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Rockville, MD 20852

Enhance Facility Energy Management at Naval Expeditionary Base Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti. 12 May 2011

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BLAST DESIGN FOR THE EXPLOSIVES DEVELOPMENT FACILITY ABSTRACT

Predicting Disposal Costs for United States Air Force Aircraft (Presentation)

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Protective Design. Force Protection Standards and Historic Preservation Policy. DoD Conservation Conference

Implementing Open Architecture. Dr. Tom Huynh Naval Postgraduate School

Evaluation of Dipsol IZ-C17 LHE Zinc-Nickel Plating

Stormwater Asset Inventory and Condition Assessments to Support Asset Management Session 12710

Stakeholder Needs and Expectations

Systems Engineering, Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence, the Semantic Web and Operations Research

Progress on LHE Zinc-Nickel and Other Cadmium Alternatives

SAIC Analysis of Data Acquired at Camp Butner, NC. Dean Keiswetter

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Yttria Nanoparticle Reinforced Commercially Pure (CP) Titanium

Deciding in a Complex Environment : Human Performance Modeling of Dislocated Organizations

VARTM PROCESS VARIABILITY STUDY

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DISPOSAL SITE IN NORTHEASTERN HARDEMAN COUNTY,

Considerations for Characterization of PAHs at Skeet Ranges and the Possible Future of PAH Risk Assessment

USACE Environmental Support to the Army and the Nation

Sustainable Contingency Bases Reducing the Logistical and Environmental Footprint

Grinding & Superfinishing. Methods & Specifications

Lithium Potassium Manganese Mixed Metal Oxide Material for Rechargeable Electrochemical Cells

Parametric Study of Heating in a Ferrite Core Using SolidWorks Simulation Tools

Transparent Ceramic Yb 3+ :Lu2O3 Materials

Views on Mini UAVs & Mini UAV Competition

AND Ti-Si-(Al) EUTECTIC ALLOYS Introduction. temperatur-dependent

Avoiding Terminations, Single Offer Competition, and Costly Changes with Fixed Price Contracts

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Process for Evaluating Logistics. Readiness Levels (LRLs(

Title: Human Factors Reach Comfort Determination Using Fuzzy Logic.

INTERACTION MATRIX FOR PLANNING UNDERGROUND AMMUNITION STORAGE FACILITIES

CASE HISTORY OF BREAKWATER/JElTY REPAIR: CHEMICAL GROUT SEALING OF PALM BEACH HARBOR SOUTH JEllY, FLORIDA

Final Report for AOARD

Magnesium-Rich Coatings

Army Systems Engineering Career Development Model

Sediment and Terrestrial Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Nano Aluminum Oxide. Click to edit Master subtitle style

60mm M225 FATIGUE TEST AND BURST TEST

Atmospheric Plasma Depainting. Peter Yancey Atmospheric Plasma Solutions, Inc.

Choosing the Right Measures -

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Title: Nano shape memory alloy composite development and applications

ENHANCED PROPELLANT AND ALTERNATIVE CARTRIDGE CASE DESIGNS

Emerging Technologies Addressing Alternatives to Open Burn and Open Detonation

Solar Thermal Radiant Heating at Pohakuloa Training Area

Laser Stripping of Aerospace Materials with Closed-Loop, Color-Recognition Control

AFRL-RX-TY-TP

Development of an integrated ISFET ph sensor for high pressure applications in the deep-sea

Incremental Sampling Methodology Status Report on ITRC Guidance

Use of Residual Compression in Design to Improve Damage Tolerance in Ti-6Al-4V Aero Engine Blade Dovetails

Ultraviolet Curable Powder Coatings With Robotic Curing for Aerospace Applications

Software And Systems Engineering Risk Management

Improving Strategic Decision and Senior-level Teamwork in U.S. National Security Organizations

Overview of USD-AT&L Memo on Cr 6+ and Other Regulatory Issues

3 Workshop Thermochemical processes in plasma aerodynamics

ERDC/GSL TN-14-2 August 2014 Review of Instrumentation and Monitoring for USACE Levees

Integrated Systems Engineering and Test & Evaluation. Paul Waters AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA. 16 August 2011

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

THE TARDEC ADVANCED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CAPABILITY (ASEC)

DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL

Static and dynamic testing of bridges and highways using long-gage fiber Bragg grating based strain sensors

A WORKING MAN S ANALYSIS OF INCIDENTS AND ACCIDENTS WITH EXPLOSIVES AT THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY,

Hazards Produced by Explosions Inside Earth-Covered Igloos

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Transcription:

Autoclave Meltout of Cast Explosives Barry C. McCall Tooele Army Depot Ammunition Equipment Directorate Ammunition Equipment Division SIOTE-AEA Tooele, Utah 84074 Presented at 27 th Department of Defense Explosive Safety Seminar Sahara Hotel and Casino Las Vegas, Nevada 20-22 Aug 1996

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE AUG 1996 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Autoclave Meltout of Cast Explosives 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Tooele Army Depot,Ammunition Equipment Directorate,SIOTE-AEA,Tooele,UT,84074 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

INTRODUCTION Current methods for the disposal of munitions containing cast explosives (TNT, Comp B, and Tritonal) includes Open Burn/Open Detonation (OB/OD), steam out, wash out and contour drilling. Environmental concerns associated with above methods include air and ground contamination and waste stream treatment. Volume, concentration and toxicity variables have a direct correlation to the economics of disposal. Autoclave meltout is a demilitarization method that reduces the volume of the waste stream, employs basic industrial technology, and produces a product suitable for reuse. This method is currently in use at Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant (HWAAP), Nevada and Crane Army Ammo Activity (CAAA), Indiana. The Ammunition Equipment Directorate (AED), Tooele Army Depot, Utah is in the process of developing a standard autoclave system. Candidate munitions and explosives are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Candidate Munitions for Autoclave Meltout Item Explosive Explosive Weight (lbs) 90mm Projectiles TNT, Comp B 2.15 105mm Projectiles Comp B 5.08 120mm Projectiles TNT, Comp B 5.26/8.0 155mm Projectiles TNT 15.5 175mm Projectiles TNT, Comp B 30.0/31.0 8 inch Projectiles TNT 36.0 750 lb GP Bomb Tritonal 386 BACKGROUND Previously, the Ammo Peculiar Equipment (APE) 1300 Washout Plant was the only APE designed for large scale recovery of cast explosives. This system uses hot water to erode explosives through the nose or base plugs of projectiles from 75MM to 2000 pound bombs. The process involves loading the items onto a rack, open end down, then onto a washout tank with the openings positioned over jet nozzles. These nozzles direct 180 F water at 100 psi into the cavity, eroding the explosive and allowing it to drop into the washout tank. Through various tanks, kettles, and pelletizing equipment a usable product was recovered. This process creates large amounts of pink water requiring treatment prior to discharge Pink water is any water contaminated with TNT and is classified as a hazardous waste. Only one APE 1300 Washout Plant is currently operational. Another method employed at various locations is a steam lance inserted through the nose of the item to also melt and erode the explosive. Through unique fixturing, the condensate/explosive mixture is collected and processed through separation/melt kettles and the explosive is cast into bricks or flaked. This method also produces large quantities of pink water requiring treatment prior to 1

discharge. Ravenna Army Ammo Plant pursued autoclave meltout of projectiles and bombs since the 1960 s. This equipment has been reinstalled at CAAA and went operational July 1994. It should be noted that fabrication and installation drawings and operational manuals were practically nonexistent for these excess autoclaves. Eleven thousand 175MM projectiles were processed. The autoclaves are being set up to process 750 pound, general purpose bombs at this time. HWAAP installed autoclave meltout and refining equipment in the late 1970 s. This system incorporated larger, improved autoclaves, molten explosive collection piping, vacuum treatment melt kettles, flaker belts, and improved material handling equipment in an integrated system. During the 1976/1977 period, AED investigated various methods of heating of munitions to meltout cast explosives. Autoclave heating of explosives in sawed projectiles and induction and microwave heating were all investigated. Induction and microwave heating were abandoned during testing phases as a result of hot spot detonation of the munition. Sawing projectiles in half and then heating to remove a slug of explosive proved safe, but the sawing process was deemed as unwarranted for small munitions. With the emphasis on environmental considerations, Industrial Operations Command assigned Ammunition Equipment Directorate (AED) in 1993 the task to develop and field a standard autoclave system. This system has been designated the APE 1401 Autoclave Meltout System. Emphasis was placed on performance, reliability, maintainability and environmental sensitivity to meet the growing workload for demilitarization and anticipation of greater restrictions on OB/OD. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED APE 1401 AUTOCLAVE MELTOUT SYSTEM AED visited both operating autoclave facilities to collect performance data, process flow, fabrication methods and recommended improvement data. AED has also visited the proposed first installation site, McAlester Army Ammo Plant, Oklahoma, to discuss proposed workload and inspect available facilities and equipment. Pilot model production and testing was conducted February-June 1995. The basic autoclave is shown in Figure 1. Emphasis was placed on fabrication economy and catalog available components. Basic design calls for seamless pipe shells, ASME code heads, kits and adapters for various munitions, cooling spray nozzles, and manual and automated controls and timers. Bolted components versus welded components were incorporated to allow adaption flexibility. The autoclaves will be operated at a maximum 15 psig steam pressure. The munitions will be cooked in a melt/drain, vertical position. Molten explosives will be collected and transferred to melt kettles for final processing. The preferred process flow is shown in Figure 2. The final form of the explosive, whether flake, pellet, or cast block, will be determined by the operating facility. Performance of autoclaves on munitions up to 8 inch projectiles has been established at the other locations. Typical projectile configuration is shown in Figure 3. 2

Various methods of autoclave meltout of the 750 pound bomb were tested. Initial tests were to cut the base off the bomb at the wax/tritonal interface. The nose piece was removed and the bomb loaded into the autoclave base first with a nozzle inserted into the tail fuze well liner. Live steam was introduced through the arming conduit to be exhausted from the nose liner and circulated around the bomb case. As the explosive melts, it will drain from the base into the collection manifold. o Process time at 15 psig, 240 F was 140 minutes. Base melt configuration is shown in Figure 4. An alternative method tested was internal cutting and partial removal of the nose fuze well. An APE Kit was designed and fabricated using a commercially available internal recessing tool and a steam heated fuze well wrench. This method was required for those installations without a bomb saw. Incidentally, an APE bomb saw is currently being procured and installed at Blue Grass Army Depot. After fuze well removal, the bomb was loaded into the autoclave, nose first, with the nozzle inserted int the nose fuze well. Live steam was introduced through the arming conduit and the explosive o melted out. Process time at 15 psig, 240 F was 180 minutes. Nose melt configuration is shown in Figure 5. Pink water generation was approximately 1 gallons (25 pounds) per hour per autoclave. Production pink water will be treated by carbon filters prior to discharge to plant industrial waste water treatment. Additional testing efforts pursued were various configurations of molten tritonal collection/ seperation systems. A trough system was sellected to allow the tar from the bombs to be picked out o at the completion of each bomb melt. A 5 slope provided enough flow velocity to prevent the aluminum powder component of the tritonal from sedimenting in the trough. Three steam trace lines provided sufficient heat to keep the tritonal molten. The tar would collect in the bottom of the trough and was not substantially melted and eroded by the explosive flow. After collection of the tritonal in the melt kettle, the aluminum powder settled quickly, allowing the TNT to be decanted off the top for separate processing. Anticipated production rates are shown in Table 2. Anticipated cost for autoclave demilitarization is $500-$650 per short ton. Expected pink water generation is approximately 67 pounds per short ton of munition (not net explosive weight). OB/OD costs are approximately $500 per short ton. 3

Table 2. Production Rates for Various Items Item Production Rate 90mm Projectiles 8 per 15 min 105mm Projectiles 12 per 20 min 120mm Projectiles 8 per 30 min 155mm Projectiles 6 per 50 min 175mm Projectiles 3 per 60 min 8 inch Projectiles 3 per 75 min 750 lb GP Bomb, Base Cut 1 per 155 min 750 lb GP Bomb, Nose Fuze 1 per 195 min Well Cut and Removed Production rate is per autoclave and includes process time plus a load/unload cycle. The first APE 1401 Autoclave meltout system is being install at McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, at this time. Operation is anticipated in August 1996. Target workload is 105mm, M1, HE projectiles. CONCLUSIONS Autoclave meltout of cast explosives has been demonstrated as an environmentally sensitive alternative for demil. The development of the APE 1401 and associated test reports, technical data package, operational manuals and personnel experienced with the system will provide DoD facilities a standard system for their operations. 4

Figure 1. APE 1401 Autoclave. 5

Casting Trays/ Flaker Belt Melt Kettles Jacketed Manifolds Autoclaves Figure 2. Typical Process Flow. 6

Steam In Condensate Out Molten Explosives Figure 3. Typical Projectile Meltout Configuration. 7

Steam In Condensate Out Molten Explosives Figure 4. Base Meltout Configuration for 750 Pound, GP Bomb. 8

Steam In Condensate Out Molten Explosives Figure 5. Nose Meltout Configuration for 750 Pound, GP Bomb. 9